Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 11. Pukemutu

Similar documents
Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 76. Mossburn

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 8. Sobig

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 23. Waikiwi

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

The entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks.

PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Soil Horizons cont. Oa- highly decomposed Oi-undecomposed

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

Mature basalt volcanic soils

Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008

1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop

THE TENNESSEE VEGETABLE GARDEN

IOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

27/01/2017. This event is being run by SAC Consulting. What is Soil?

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LAND NEAR SHIRE HILL FARM SAFFRON WALDEN ESSEX

SUMMARY. alcholnie.doc\ih\jk

Agricultural Land Classification and Statement of Physical Characteristics Higbfield Farm Whitley Bridge North Yorkshire October 1996

Land Capability Classifications

Pits 1 & 3 Questions. 7. Subsurface: Texture (5 pts) A. Coarse B. Moderately course C. Medium D. Fine E. Very Fine

AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND NEAR MINDALE HOUSE PRESTATYN. Report 762/1

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX

SOIL CHARACTERIZATION USING DIAGNOSTIC PROPERTIES

Soil Properties in the Rai/Pelorus Catchment. MDC Technical Report No:

Report on the soil evaluation at Harakeke 2015 Ltd Properties, Tasman District, Nelson

CORNFORTH EAST QUARRY COUNTY DURHAM

MAFF Ministry of Ifinil Agriculture Rsheries and Food

Soil Requirements of. Healthy Urban Trees

Soils and the Environment. A Summary of RI Envirothon Study Materials Compiled by Sally Paul

2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity. Laboratory #4

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

SOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA

Restoration of Degraded Soils

Soil Properties in the Koromiko Area

The issue of Protection of class I and class II soils in the One Plan

Soil Physical Properties

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND OFF HOLT ROAD, ROSSETT. Report 1067/1

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

Soil Geography Notes JC-Learn. JC-Learn. Geography Notes Soil. 1 P a g e

3.44b. Soil Classification AK & BR

The Nature of Soil Soil Conservation Sustainable Ag.

If you are not able to turn in your notebook see me or Dan ASAP

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key

Terminology & Soil Science. Andy Spetch

5 RESULTS FOR THE REJECT EMPLACEMENT AREA

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)

1 Describe the concept of soil texture and its importance. 2 Determine the texture of a soil sample.

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

CAVIL HEAD OCCS ACKLINGTON NOVEMBER 1997

Eco new farmers. Module 2 Soil and Nutrient Cycling. Section 1 Soils and soil fertility

THE SCORE CARD. Observed Soil Properties. Interpretive Soil Properties

Introduction to Environmental Science. Soil Characteristics. Chapter 11 Soil

Soil resources in upper Basho Valley.

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LAND AT BOLE INGS, WESTBURTON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE (SK805875)

Swan Coastal Plain - Reading

SUBSURFACE DRIP DISPERSAL OF EFFLUENT for LARGE SYSTEMS. Presented by: David Morgan and Rodney Ruskin

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION


EDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the

Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Kenya Soil Survey P.O. Box Tel: /

Learning Objectives Part 1. Chapter 4 Soil Physical Properties. Soil Physical Properties. Color. Physical properties part 1

P/2014/00830 Received 27/06/2014 SOIL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND AT ROLLESTON PARK FARM TUTBURY, STAFFORDSHIRE.

HEALTHY SOILS LANDHOLDER SERIES PROPERTY PLANNING GUIDE CHARACTERISTICS OF A HEALTHY SOIL LANDHOLDER SERIES - PROPERTY PLANNING GUIDE HEALTHY SOILS

Effects of the Bupa retirement complex on the soil resources at 25 & 35 Ulyatt Road, Napier

Soil Management: the basis of sustainable agriculture

Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture

THE FOREST NURSERY AND ITS SOILS

Using Land Capability Classifications

Drainage & wet soil management. Dr Bill Cotching

Unearthing problem soils in the Lachlan Valley

Historic soils of NSW

This definition is from the Soil Science Glossary (Soil Science Society of America).

Assessing and Amending Your Garden Soil Craig Cogger, Soil Scientist Emeritus Washington State University Puyallup

Waipu clay - YU Waipu peaty sand - YUay

Loam: About 40% sand, 40% silt, 20% clay. Mixture of pore sizes to balance water retention and aeration. Considered the best soil for growing crops.

Level 1 Agricultural and Horticultural Science, 2011

3. What are the five master horizons? Give distinguishing features of each. 5. List three means by which plant roots come into contact with nutrients.

Site Selection. The #1 Most Important Step in Planting Anything Soils a major component. Physical Characteristics. Chemical Composition

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 3: Understanding Soil Color

Soil 1/18/2012. Soils, Nutrients and Fertilizers Part I. Soil Profile

SOIL RESOURCES REPORT HALVERGATE MARSHES, NORFOLK 1. BACKGROUND

Soil is the Key (Chapter 3)

2014 Envirothon Georgia Soil Study Guide

Sam Houston Ranger District West/Central WUI Fuels Reduction Project Soil and Water Resources

Girtridge Monitor Farm Meeting

Transcription:

This Technical Data Sheet describes the typical average properties of the specified soil. It is essentially a summary of information obtained from one or more profiles of this soil that were examined and described during the Topoclimate survey or previous surveys. It has been prepared in good faith by trained staff within time and budgetary limits. However, no responsibility or liability can be taken for the accuracy of the information and interpretations. Advise should be sought from soil and landuse experts before making landuse decisions on individual farms and paddocks. The characteristics of the soil at a specific location may differ in some details from those described here. No warranties are expressed or implied unless stated. Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 11 Soil name: Pukemutu Overview Pukemutu soils occupy about 47,600 hectares on high terraces south of the Taringatura and Hokonui hills, extending across the Southland Plain. They also occur intermittently north of the Hokonui Hills on dissected terraces and fans from Mandeville to Mossburn. They are formed in deep loess derived from tuffaceous greywacke. They have heavy silt loam, grading with depth to silty clay, textures and are poorly drained, with a dense fragipan between 60 and 90cm depth which restricts water drainage. They respond well to mole and tile drainage and are used for intensive sheep, dairy and deer production, with some cropping. Regular summer rainfall occurs, though inland soils may be seasonally dry. Soil classification Argillic-fragic Perch-gley Pallic; stoneless; silty over NZ Soil Classification (NZSC): clayey Previous NZ Genetic Classification: Yellow-grey earth Classification explanation The NZSC of the Pukemutu soil is consistent with the previous classification. Pukemutu soils are poorly drained, due to perching of water on a dense fragipan. The subsoil above the fragipan also typically has high density, which limits root growth. Pukemutu soils have silty textures in the upper horizons, but the lower subsoil is typically more clayey due to the accumulation of clay in or above the fragipan. The soils typically have P-retention of <30% throughout the profile, and are stone free. Soil phases and variants Identified units in the Pukemutu soils are: Pukemutu undulating deep (PgU1): occurs on slopes of 0 7º Pukemutu undulating deep, floodplain variant (PgU1vf): occurs on stable floodplains on slopes of 0 7º Pukemutu undulating moderately deep (PgU2): has gravel between 45 and 90cm depth and occurs on slopes of 0 7º Pukemutu undulating moderately deep, floodplain variant (PgU2vf): occurs on stable floodplains with gravel between 45 and 90cm depth and has slopes of 0 7º Pukemutu rolling deep (PgR1): occurs on slopes of 7 15º Pukemutu hilly deep (PgH1): occurs on slopes of >25º The soil properties described in this Technical Data Sheet are based on the most common phase, Pukemutu undulating deep (PgU1). Values for other phases and variants can be taken as being similar. Where they differ significantly they are recorded with a separate versatility rating, e.g., Pukemutu hilly deep (PgH1). 1/5 Last updated 21/11/2002

Associated soils Some soils that commonly occur in association with Pukemutu soils are: Braxton: moderately deep to deep Gley soil on terraces with heavy silt loam to clayey textures; has no perch-gley properties or fragipan within 90cm depth Makarewa: Gley soil with clayey textures on the floodplain Woodlands: imperfectly drained Brown soil without a fragipan Tisbury: Gley soil on terraces of the Southland Plain; has silty textures throughout and is strongly leached, with moderate to high P-retention; has no perch-gley properties or fragipan within 90cm depth. Similar soils Some soils that have similar properties to Pukemutu soils are: Aparima: imperfectly drained equivalent of the Pukemutu soil Mossburn: similar profile form to Pukemutu, but has siltier textures throughout the profile; formed in mixed loess and colluvium on fans flanking the Taringatura Hills; commonly has stones scattered through the profile Waikoikoi: has silty textures throughout the profile; fragipan has prismatic structure and occurs at a shallower depth (45 60cm) Hokonui: has clayey textures, and formed in mixed loess and alluvium on fans from the Hokonui Hills; has perch-gley properties but not fragipan Typical profile features The following is a generic or composite profile description representing the most common combination of characteristics for this soil type. The actual profiles for which descriptions and data are are listed at the end of this Technical Data Sheet. Pukemutu profile Ap Ap/Bg Bg Btx(g) Horizon Depth (cm) Description Ap 0 22 Greyish yellow-brown silt loam; weak soil strength; moderately developed medium polyhedral structure; abundant roots Ap/Bg 22 40 Greyish yellow silt loam; common orange mottles; abundant worm casts; weak soil strength; moderately developed medium blocky structure; abundant roots Bg 40 61 Light grey silt loam; common reddish brown mottles; few worm casts; slightly firm soil strength; moderately developed medium to coarse blocky structure; many roots Btx(g) 61 90 Bright brown silty clay; common light grey veins and mottles; firm soil strength; moderately developed extremely coarse blocky breaking to coarse to medium blocky structure; few roots in veins 2/5

Key profile features Pukemutu soils have a 15 25cm deep topsoil that has moderately developed structure. Subsoil structure is moderate to weak in the upper subsoil, abruptly changing in the lower subsoil to the moderately developed extremely coarse prismatic structure of the fragipan. The fragipan is distinctive from the fragipans of other soils by the bright brown colour, and having a densely packed blocky or platy sub-structure. Greyish colours are dominant in the upper subsoil, indicating the poor drainage caused by water perching on the fragipan. Typical physical properties Note: values in Italics are estimates Horizon Depth (cm) Bulk density Permeability Texture Gravel content Ap 0 22 Moderate High Moderate Silt loam Gravel free Ap/Bg 22 40 Moderate High Moderate Silt loam Gravel free Bg 40 61 Moderate High Slow Silt loam Gravel free Btx(g) 61 90 High Slow Silty clay Gravel free Profile drainage: Poorly drained Plant readily water: Moderately high to high Potential rooting depth: Rooting restriction: Moderately deep Fragipan Key physical properties Pukemutu soils have a moderately deep potential rooting depth that is severely restricted by the fragipan at 60 90 cm depth. The depth of the fragipan means the Pukemutu soils typically have moderately high to high plant water. The soils are poorly drained, with very slow permeability in the subsoil and limited aeration during sustained wet periods. Textures are typically heavy silt loams, increasing to silty clay in the lower subsoil. Topsoil clay content is typically 25 30%, and stone free. The moderately deep variants have gravel between 45 and 90cm depth. Typical chemical properties Depth Horizon ph P retention CEC BS Ca Mg K Na (cm) Ap 0 22 Moderate Low Low Moderate Moderate Very low Very low Low Ap/Bg 22 40 Moderate Low Low Low Low Very low Very low Low Bg 40 61 Moderate Low Low High Low Moderate Low Low Btx(g) 61 90 Moderate Low Low High Low High Very low Low Key chemical properties Organic matter values range from 4 to 6%; P-retention values under 30%; ph values above 5.5 but tend to decline down the profile. Cation exchange values are low, with base saturation increasing in the subsoil, which also has higher magnesium values than the topsoil. Values for calcium, potassium and sodium are low. Phosphorus reserves are low and sulphur levels increase in the subsoil. Good responses to lime and phosphate occur. Micro-nutrient levels are generally adequate, although boron responses in brassicas and molybdenum responses in legumes can occur. 3/5

Vulnerability to environmental degradation Note: the vulnerability ratings given in the table below are generalised and should not be taken as absolutes for this soil type in all situations. The actual risk depends on the environmental and management conditions prevailing at a particular place and time. Specialist advice should be sought before making management decisions that may have environmental impacts. Where vulnerability ratings of Moderate to Very severe are indicated, advice may be sought from Environment Southland or a farm management consultant. Vulnerability factor Rating Vulnerability compared to other Southland soils Structural compaction Severe These soils have a severe vulnerability to structural degradation by long-term cultivation, or compaction by heavy stocking and vehicles. This rating reflects the poor drainage, low clay and P-retention in the topsoil that results in low structural stability. Nutrient leaching Slight These soils have a slight vulnerability of leaching to ground water. The vulnerability is strongly influenced by the moderately high waterholding capacity and the slow permeability of the subsoil. Lateral water flow in installed mole and tile drains would increase losses. Topsoil erodibility by water Moderate Due to the low clay content, the topsoil erodibility of these soils is moderate. Erodibility is highly dependent on management, especially when there is no vegetation cover. Organic matter loss Slight Vulnerability to long-term decline in soil organic matter levels is partly dependent on soil properties, and highly dependent on management practices (e.g., crop residue management and cultivation practices) Waterlogging Severe These soils have severe vulnerability to waterlogging during wet periods. This rating reflects the poor drainage and slow permeability. General landuse versatility ratings for Pukemutu soils Note: The versatility ratings in the table below are indicative of the major limitations for semi-intensive to intensive landuse. These ratings differ from those used in the past in that sustainability factors are incorporated in the classification. Refer to the Topoclimate district soil map or property soil map to determine which of the soil symbols listed below are applicable, then check the versatility ratings for that symbol in the appropriate table. PgU1 (Pukemutu undulating deep) PgU1vf (Pukemutu undulating deep flood plain variant) PgU2 (Pukemutu undulating moderately deep) PgU2vf (Pukemutu undulating moderately deep flood plain variant) Versatility evaluation for soil PgU1, PgU1vf, PgU2, PgU2vf Non-arable horticulture Arable Intensive pasture Risk of short-term Forestry Inadequate aeration during wet periods; vulnerability to sustained waterlogging. PgR1 (Pukemutu rolling deep) Versatility evaluation for soil PgR1 Non-arable horticulture Arable Rolling slopes; risk of short-term Intensive pasture Risk of short-term Forestry Inadequate aeration during wet periods; vulnerability to sustained waterlogging. 4/5

PgH1 (Pukemutu hilly deep) Versatility evaluation for soil PgH1 Non-arable horticulture Unsuitable Hilly slopes Arable Unsuitable Hilly slopes Intensive pasture Hilly slopes; risk of short-term waterlogging after heavy rain. Forestry Inadequate aeration during wet periods. Management practices that may improve soil versatility Careful management after heavy rain and wet periods will reduce the impact of short-term waterlogging. Intensive stocking, cultivation and heavy vehicular traffic should be minimised during these periods. Installation and maintenance of sub-surface mole and tile drains will reduce the risk of shortterm waterlogging. If compaction occurs, aeration at the correct depth and moisture condition can be of benefit. Soil profiles for Pukemutu soils Soil symbol Profile ID Topoclimate map sheet Profile description Physical data Chemical data Profile photo PgU1 YT5 9 PgU1 YT2 9 PgU1 YT9 9 PgU1 YT14 9 PgU1 CT1 6 PgU1 CT2 6 PgU1 CT8 6 PgU1 CT21 6 PgU1 1T3 8 PGu1 IT4 8 PgU1 XT13 13 PgU1 XT14 13 PgR1 GMT1 27 PgU1 168/75/39 9 PgU1 M2407 1 PgU1 SB5948 9 PgU1 SB7691 6 PgU1 IT14 8 Published by Crops for Southland with financial support from Environment Southland. Copyright 2002, Crops for Southland This Technical Data Sheet may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Crops for Southland and Environment Southland would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this Technical Data Sheet as a source. No use of this Technical Data Sheet may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from Crops for Southland. Crops for Southland PO Box 1306, Invercargill. New Zealand www.cropssouthland.co.nz 5/5