Community Character and Design Guidelines Questionnaire

Similar documents
Chapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

lot flankage Y street 16m 6m landscape strip for large site 3m landscape strip for small medium site

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines

Concrete Flat Tile Roofs Large Exposed Overhangs Oversized Bracing Predominately Gable Roofs With Non-Plaster Gable End Treatments.

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO ALL OR SOME DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH RESIDENTIAL USES

3.4 Business & Light Industrial Parks and Buildings

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS CITY OF LANGLEY

Division VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards

Division 9 Southwood Ranch (CR 484/475/475A Corridor-Gateway Development Overlay) Purpose and Intent Applicability.

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

Landscape and Streetscape Design 2.5

SOUTHEAST ANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY STANDARDS DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance amending Title 22 Planning and Zoning of the Los Angeles County

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

GUIDELINES REPLACEMENT HOUSING GUIDELINES LOCATION INTRODUCTION URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Design Guidelines and Development Standards for Southwood Ranch. Prepared February, 2016 by

Streetscape Patterns. Design Guidelines, Ridgewood Village Center Historic District, Ridgewood, N.J. page 20

Standards (R-3) Figure B-11: R-3 Residential Standards Exhibit

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

CHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

The Highway Overlay District applies to an area within the City of Papillion's zoning jurisdiction described as:

Chapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES

This chapter contains the design standards and guidelines for development and improvement of office and industrial buildings and

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

BUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 5 MULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL

S I T E P L A N A N D A R C H I T E C T U R A L R E V I E W A P P L I C A T O I N

6 STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO ALL

COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION

IV. Architectural Design Guidelines

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

YARMOUTH ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS

City of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

LITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

Design Review Commission Report

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

YOLO COUNTY DESIGN GUIDELINES

Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions:

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

13. New Construction. Context & Character

elk grove design guidelines Table Contents

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Residential Development

CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

ARTICLE XIII USE PROVISIONS. Section Mall of Georgia Overlay District Requirements:

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION

RESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

SECTION 24 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LARGE COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS INTRODUCTION & PROCEDURE 24-2

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

North Logan City Commercial Design Guidelines

The broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.

EXHIBIT A. Chapter 2.7 SPECIAL PLANNED DISTRICTS. Article XVIII 15th Street School Master Planned Development

1. General Purpose. 3. Uses

Town Center Design Guidelines

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

Building & Site Design Standards Application

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

Zoning OBJECTIVE: in the zoning. is to make. projects for. the Planning and. are attached ITTALS: Department

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009

CHAPTER 11: LANDSCAPE DESIGN

Design Guidelines Checklist

ARTICLE 27 CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICTS

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

Architectural Review Board Report

PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BLOCK C OF THE MT. DIABLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted by Design Review Commission February 4, 2004

East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

ORDINANCE NO. 14,767

Transcription:

Community Character and Design Guidelines Questionnaire This questionnaire was created in an effort to ensure applicants utilization of the City Council adopted Santa Clarita Community Character and Design Guidelines. The applicant is required to fill out this form completely. If sections are left blank, the associated application file may not be accepted for processing or may be deemed incomplete with suspended processing. A copy of the Santa Clarita Community Character and Design Guidelines is available online at https://www.santa-clarita.com/city-hall/departments/community-development/planning/communitycharacter-and-design-guidelines. General Project Description: A. Project Title: B. Project Type: Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Commercial Mixed-Use Industrial C. Is the project located in a Specific Plan area or a Planned Development Overlay? Yes / No If yes, please list: D. Project Location (street address or description): E. Assessor s Parcel Number(s): F. Brief Project Description: G. Have you provided a legend that includes a summary of project statistics including zoning, type of use, the square footage of each use, overall square footage, lot square footage or acreage, building height, setbacks, floor area ratio, area and percentage of landscaping, area and percentage of open space, parking statistic summaries, etc.? Yes / No H. Contact Information: 1. Applicant:

Page 2 of 7 2. Architect: 3. Engineer: 4. Consultant: Architectural Character: A. Have you reviewed Chapter 3 of the Santa Clarita Community Character and Design Guidelines? Yes / No B. Identify which community the project is located within and which architectural style is reflected in the proposed project design. Check the appropriate boxes in the table below: Community Canyon Country Newhall Saugus Valencia Architectural Style Proposed Rustic Californian Contemporary Western Mission Revival Victorian Ranch Agrarian Contemporary C. Is the architectural style proposed consistent with a style described in the design guidelines and the table above? Site Design: A. Has the building and parking placement minimized the visual impact of the parking? B. Has the effort been made to preserve natural resources (land forms, native habitat, views, distinctive features, etc.)?

Page 3 of 7 C. Are the trash/recycling enclosures located to minimize visibility from public rights-of-way and out of the primary view corridors? D. Have loading and service areas been provided and have they been located at the rear or side of buildings and appropriately screened? E. Has the project been designed to minimize grading impacts? F. Has the project been designed to promote on-site surface water quality and water run-off retention? G. Has pervious paving been used to allow for water retention and percolation on-site? H. Has decorative paving been used to accentuate project entries, plazas, and pedestrian circulation? I. Have plaza/public open spaces been purposefully designed to have clear, recognizable shapes that reflect careful planning rather than the result of left-over areas between structures? J. Describe plaza/ public open spaces, i.e. location, what types of amenities are proposed, connections provided to other project elements, etc.

Page 4 of 7 Circulation/Parking: A. Do landscape strips and planters separate all buildings from sidewalks, parking or paved areas, and other structures? B. Is the parking field well landscaped and screened from public view? C. For large projects, has the number of parking spaces been divided into smaller parking fields rather than one large field? Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections, Trails and Pathways: A. Are pedestrian connections provided to connect to adjacent sites or neighboring uses? B. Is there a pedestrian path connecting to the street edge and adjacent public paths or right-of-way? C. Are the pedestrian/bicycle connections located in the most convenient and logical places within the site? D. Do the plans include a path of travel indicator from rights-of-way to buildings and from building to building? E. Have pedestrian/bicycle connections or trails been provided to access useable open space?

Page 5 of 7 F. Have connections been provided to existing bicycle/multi-use trails or paths? Landscaping, Walls and Fences: A. Have you provided a landscape plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect? Yes / No B. Does the proposed landscape plan utilize drought-tolerant and native species of plants? C. List the plants that are proposed that are not compatible with Sunset Western Garden Book s climate zone 18 and describe where the plants are used D. Has landscaping been used to screen parking fields and utilitarian aspects of the project? E. Do the plans identify the type and location of all oak trees over 2 in diameter and specify any trees that are to be removed? F. Do the plans identify the location of all proposed existing fencing? G. Have site walls and fences been designed with architectural treatments on both sides and does the design complement the building architecture with the use of similar colors and materials? H. Have you provided a fence/wall detail?

Page 6 of 7 Building Design and Massing: A. Have elevations for all sides of the building(s) been provided? B. Does the project incorporate 360 degree architectural articulation (i.e. have the building surfaces been articulated with recessed or projecting elements, canopies, trellises, arcades, colonnades, etc.) appropriate to the architectural style and are there variations in the roof and wall planes on all four sides)? C. Does the overall building design include variation in the wall plane and height as well as well as in the roof plane and elements? D. Is the building unique to the project site and community so as not to appear to be designed as though it is part of a commercial chain? E. Are the building(s) entries easily identifiable? F. Do building materials wrap around the building and terminate at inside corners? G. Do the building forms relate to the desired architectural style? H. Do the window type and treatment reflect the selected architectural style?

Page 7 of 7 I. Do plans indicate all locations of freestanding signs? J. Does the building signage relate to the building architectural style? Utilitarian Aspects: A. Do plans indicate method of screening ground and roof mounted equipment, fences, trash enclosures, etc.? B. Have the trash enclosures been designed to complement the building architecture with similar materials and details? C. Do the plans indicate the type, locations, height and method of shielding of exterior lighting? Has a lighting detail been included? D. Does the parking area contain facilities for electric vehicle charging or other alternative fueling options? This questionnaire, as well as additional information regarding entitlement applications, can be found on the City of Santa Clarita website at www.santa-clarita.com. If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, you can contact the Planning Division at (661) 255-4330, e-mail the Department of Community Development at www.santaclarita.com/cityhall/cd, or visit the Planning Division at City Hall, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Last updated 08/12/2013 S:\CD\PLANNING FORMS\Counter\Checklists\New Checklists\CommunityCharacterandDesignGuidelinesQuestionnaire.doc