ii

Similar documents
Northeast Florida Estuary Restoration Initiative: A District Perspective. Ron Brockmeyer, SJRWMD And a cast of thousands!!

Green or Grey Solutions? Why not both? Lessons from the Mid-Atlantic on Hybrid Living Shorelines

PURPOSE: The purpose is to provide commercial facilities in the Vancouver and Clark County vicinity.

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

Dauphin Island s East End Beach and Barrier Island Restoration Project. April 16, :00 PM Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Shelby Hall

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017

Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014

January 18, JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah District/State of Georgia

Coastal Habitat Conservation in a Changing Climate: Strategies and Tools in the Southern California Region

Sierra Club Comments on ACOE Public Notice NAE Re: Proposed Town Neck Beach Project at Sandwich, Massachusetts

The Napa River Flood Protection Project

Restoring Water Ecosystems in NYC Parks

Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017

Floating Wetlands Pilot Project:

Natural Resources Research Summaries for National Park Service Units within the Southeast Coast Network

Blue/Green Infrastructure Study Accomack County, VA

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 LOS ANGELES GREEN VISION PLAN. File No.: Project Manager: Marc Beyeler

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

Monitoring and Maintenance Permit Process

Chapter 3: Natural Environment. Proposed Waikato District Plan Stage 1. (Notified version)

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

Kevin M. Rampe, President -- Lower Manhattan Development Corporation

Wetlands: Mitigating And Regulating Development Impacts. By David Salvesen

Coastal Planning in Texas. Tony Williams Senior Director of Planning Coastal Resources Division Texas General Land Office

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

Ecosystem Restoration Business Line Budgeting A Systems Approach

ARLINGTON COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE INVENTORY AND NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

Sustainable TamAlmonte 215 Julia Avenue Mill Valley, CA 94941

Protecting Farmland. The Future of Agriculture in Prince George s County

Large Landscape Restoration and the National Park System

Chapter 14. Shorelines

Introduction. Integrating Ecological Restoration of Estuarine Shorelines with Urban Community Revitalization Efforts. Ed Morgereth Biohabitats, Inc.

Sustainable Natural Environment Wetlands

Map Development 5/15/2012. New Virginia Modeling Tools

Pontchartrain Coastal Lines of Defense Program Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 1

Pike River Restoration Adaptive Design: Restoring Structure and Function in an Urban Floodplain - from cabbages to cordgrass

Hunts Point Landing, Bronx, New York

Turkey Creek Streamway Corridor

MEMORANDUM. September 10, 2018

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE. 26 June United States Army Corps of Engineers State of Louisiana

5 TH ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE COONAMESSETT RIVER RESTORATION PROJECT. Elizabeth H. Gladfelter, Ph.D. Conservation Commission Town of Falmouth

Green Infrastructure. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation

Arkansas River Corridor

Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016

Environmental Consulting & Restoration, LLC Specializing in Wetland and Coastal Resource Area Delineation & Permitting

Jack Creek Park Capital Improvement Project

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Prado Basin Project Updates

Lawrencetown Beach & Rainbow Haven Beach

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

Why Are We Here? Mrs. Farrow protected this land. CCPRC Acquires Property. Funding Appropriated. Structure Stabilization

Appendix A. Planning Processes. Introduction

The Trust for Public Land. in Minnesota

APPENDIX F: EXTERNAL APPROVALS

Mission Statement. Friends of the Bonita Nature Place Goal

Beneficial Use at Deer Island A Decade of Design and Implementation. Mississippi Water Resources Conference Jackson, Mississippi April 3, 2012

URBANE Final Stakeholder Workshop Enhancing Biodiversity in Urban Natural and Artificial Coastal Environments Steve Hawkins Richard Thompson Welcome!

Green Infrastructure Project Guidance

Connecticut River Watershed Initiative

River Bend Area Plan Map Amendment ARPP Analysis Camp Fire Day Camp November 20, 2014

Public Information Meeting

Empowering Local Action for Coastal Resilience in Massachusetts. Bruce K. Carlisle MA Office of Coastal Zone Management

[FWS R8 R 2015 N087; FXRS282108E8PD0 156 F ] South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards National Wildlife

Bristol Marsh Heritage Conservancy

Preparing New Hampshire for Projected Storm Surge, Sea-Level Rise, and Extreme Precipitation

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Project Summary. Rationale

Clallam County Shoreline Master Program Update. Salt Creek and Tongue Point, 2006

Steering Committee 3. September 17, :30-7:30pm. Welcome.

SUBJECT: Pershing Park/World War I Memorial Design

INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION MEETING

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE Fisheries Division nd Avenue SE. Auburn, Washington

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

Conservation by Design: Promoting Resilient Coastal Wetlands & Communities. GreatLakesLCC.org

Introducing Green Infrastructure for Coastal Resilience

Karen A. Duhring Marine Advisory Scientist Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William & Mary


A Master Plan for High Park s Hillside Garden and other Ornamental Gardens: Recommendations from the High Park Natural Environment Committee

PACE ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION CLINIC, INC.

CAO Update Status Work continues on products: Draft ordinance BAS report CAO process summary (2002 to present) Comprehensive e Plan policy review Some

Ottawa County Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. February, 2006

1/21/2014. Definitions vary widely Legal vs. functional Not always obvious. Wetlands are legally protected by Clean Water Act (1972)

From: Sent: To: Cc: Harmon, Dan; Erik Dickson RE: South Avenue Bridge Project, Missoula County // Request for comment

PUBLIC NOTICE. us Anny Corps CENAE-R-A FILE NO. NAE

138 ATTACHMENT 17. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WlLMlNGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Parks Master Plan Implementation: Phase I Waterfront Use and Design REPORT #: September 7, 2016 File #

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

PUBLIC HEARING. DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement. Matthews Memorial Baptist Church Washington, DC October 18, National Capital Region

EXHIBIT A CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Master Plan for Preservation and Scenic Conservation (1995)

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1472

NJ Department of Environmental Protection

PARK PLANNING & STEWARDSHIP DIVISION

TO: Port of Orcas FROM: Tina Whitman, Science Director SUBJECT: Master Plan Update DATE: September 7, 2018

OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS A. JIM CONWAY 2016-WTRA B. KENNETH CALISE 2016-WTRA C. SAGIE DORON 2016-WTRA-00060

VP for Public Service and Outreach Mark Risse Chuck Hopkinson David Bryant Mona Behl integrated

Transcription:

PURPOSE Freshwater tidal marshes were once extensive along the Coastal Plain rivers of the mid- Atlantic region of the United States. After thousands of years of relatively low-impact use by Native Americans and several centuries of intense development by European Americans, freshwater tidal marshes have been reduced to scattered remnants that are now incapable of providing the extent of ecosystem services characteristic of widespread, healthy marsh ecosystems (Odum et al. 1984). Nonetheless, even remnant marshes provide numerous goods and services that benefit human society, including resident and migratory wildlife habitat, refuge for endangered species, spawning and nursery grounds for anadromous fish, attenuation of tidal energy, shoreline stabilization, flood control, water quality enhancement, carbon storage, aesthetic enjoyment, and recreational activities (Odum et al. 1984). Consequently, maintenance and enhancement of remaining tidal marsh is imperative both socially and ecologically. Dyke Marsh is an important, large tract of freshwater tidal marsh along the Potomac River in the Washington, D.C. area and has existed for at least 5,000 years (Myrick and Leopold 1963). Located just south of the city of Alexandria, VA, Dyke Marsh is viewed as a national treasure because of its proximity to the nation s capital and a large urban/suburban population, its history, and its current potential for provision of ecological services, recreational values, and educational opportunities. In addition, its location along a major travel corridor (George Washington Memorial Parkway) to one of the most popular tourist destinations in the D.C. area (Mount Vernon) provides Dyke Marsh Preserve (DMP) with opportunities to enhance the economic productivity and environmental education in the region. Smoot Sand and Gravel Corporation (SSGC) dredged approximately 270 acres of marshland along the outer fringes of Dyke Marsh from 1940 1972. The 1959 agreement with SSGC gave the United States government legislative mandate (Public Law 86-41) for management of the marsh so that fish and wildlife development and preservation as wetland wildlife habitat shall be paramount, and federal control over the entire 485 acres of DMP formally occurred in 1976 (see 1959 mandate pgs. ii-iii). To fulfill the 1959 mandate, a 1974 mandate called for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to assist the National Park Service in designing multiple plans and assessments for restoration (e.g., National Park Service 1977), but none have been implemented (see 1974 mandate pgs. iv-vi). Thus the ecological value and potential of DMP continues to be impeded by its degraded state. Our team of researchers at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science s Appalachian Laboratory has compiled existing data and collected additional information to facilitate establishing feasibility of restoring dredged portions of Dyke Marsh while maintaining the integrity and health of the existing marsh. The final and most crucial step of our feasibility study is to convene all parties that would either be affected by or would be involved in the restoration. Our goal is to establish consensus among all interested parties on the feasibility of restoration and recommendations for restoration. Odum, W. E., T. J. Smith III, J. K. Hoover, C. C. McIvor. 1984. The ecology of tidal freshwater marshes of the United States East Coast: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report FWS/OBS- 83/17. i

ii

iii

iv

v

vi

GOALS OF WORKSHOP 1) Assemble representatives of the scientific, regulatory and management agencies, and interested public that would need to provide input to a restoration project; 2) Have all parties review and comment on data (both quality and extent of information) pertinent to restoration of emergent marsh at DMP; 3) Ask all participants to comment on the feasibility of restoration from the perspective of their respective agencies or groups; 4) Receive recommendations from agencies and special-interest groups on whether restoration is feasible, and, if so, to what extent restoration should be attempted; 5) Establish consensus among all interested parties on whether to move forward with a recommendation to restore DMP. vii

8:00 am Registration and breakfast STRUCTURE OF WORKSHOP 8:30 am Introduction to workshop Welcome The process of establishing feasibility at Dyke Marsh Workshop groundrules Audrey Calhoun Katia Engelhardt Kathy Joyce 9:00 am Historical perspective Dick Hammerschlag 9:20 am Mandate of NPS for action on Dyke Marsh Dan Sealy 9:30 am Perspectives of agencies and special interest groups Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (Andrew Zadnik) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Sherry Krest & John Gill) Friends of Dyke Marsh (Ed Eder & Jeb Byrne) 10:15 am Break 10:30 am More perspectives Army Corps of Engineers (Claire O Neill, Robert Blama, Steve Pugh) 11:00 am Elements of restoration Summary of case studies Elements of successful restoration General scenarios of restoration Kristy Hopfensperger Katia Engelhardt Katia Engelhardt 12:00 pm Lunch (provided) 1:00 pm Summary of perspectives Katia Engelhardt 1:30 pm Discussion: Need for restoration Kathy Joyce 2:30 pm Discussion: Negative consequences for existing marsh Kathy Joyce 3:15 pm Break 3:30 pm Discussion: Essential information and resources Kathy Joyce 4:15 pm Discussion: Establishing concrete scenarios Kathy Joyce 5:00 pm Moving forward Audrey Calhoun 5:30 pm End of workshop viii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Friends of Dyke Marsh: Larry Cartwright, Ed, Eder, David Johnston Georgetown University: Edward Barrows, Daniel Kjar National Aquarium: David Nemerson National Park Service George Washington Memorial Parkway: Ann Brazinski, Joe Gilmer, Melissa Kangas, Jean Olson, Brent Steury National Park Service Center for Urban Ecology: Bill Lellis, Diane Pavek, Dan Sealy, Jim Sherald National Park Service Manassas Battlefield: Bryan Gorsira National Park Service Capitol Parks East: Stephen Syphax National Park Service Cape Cod National Seashore: John Portnoy, Charles Roman, Stephen Smith Northern Virginia Community College: Walter Bulmer University of Maryland College Park: Andy Baldwin U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Cecilia Donovan, Mark Mendelsohn U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Mike Mangold USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center: Richard Hammerschlag VA Dept. of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage: Allen Belden ix