Industrial Radiography (IR) General overview. R. Berden

Similar documents
Use of control and analytical X-ray apparatus

Document Preparation Profile (DPP)

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA ATOMIC ENERGY ACT, 2008 SCHEDULE 1 FORM 2A

The system can be easily relocated by a standard container truck., and re-commissioned by trained engineers typically within a 72-hour period

WG Entire Truck & Cargo X-Ray Scanning Portal

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORISATION - PART 1

WG Container & Cargo X-Ray Scanning Portal

Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4732 X-Ray Revision

Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4732 X-Ray Revision

EVALUATION OF THE RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY OF 192 IR APPARATUS FOR INDUSTRIAL GAMMA RADIOGRAPHY ABSTRACT

AEC RADIATION SAFETY GUIDE SAFE USE OF INDUSTRIAl RADIOGRAPHY DEVICES (X-RAY AND GAMMA)

Radiation Emitting Devices Research X-ray Safety Program

A new fully digital system for RT inspection of metal tube to tube sheet joints of heat exchangers

ISO 3999 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Radiation protection Apparatus for industrial gamma radiography Specifications for performance, design and tests

25 TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Radiation Safety Requirements for Analytical and Other Industrial Radiation Machines

An Overview of Security of Radioactive Sources on Industrial Radiography and a Case of Responding to Security Incident involving Radioactive sources

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SAFETY AT A TID RADIATION TEST LABORATORY

Co-60 irradiator for therapy level calibrations at SSDLs

Design, Testing and Performance of Exposure Devices RD/GD-352

FIRE PROTECTION ISSUES IN THE HOT CELLS OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Atomic Energy Licensing Board

Integration of safety and security for effective control and protection of radioactive sources

Development of Security System for IGRED

Guidance Document Design, Testing and Performance of Exposure Devices RD/GD-352

HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM 406 IONIZING/NONIONIZING RADIATION PROTECTION

REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES REPORT BY: MS VERA UUSHONA TITLE: INSPECTION OF CONVENTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY FACILITIES

REGISTRY OF RADIOACTIVE SEALED SOURCES AND DEVICES SAFETY EVALUATION OF DEVICE (Amends In Its Entirety)

NDT In Canada Presentation Radiation Safety June 2014

Radiation Safety and Equipment Considerations. Bonnie Meilner Regional Sales Manager LAURUS Systems Inc.

University of Maryland Baltimore. Radiation Safety Procedure

Small Controlled Area Radiography Fundamentals and Technology Advancements. J. R. Lapinskas, PhD and R. L. Kelly

Recommended Work Area Controls

Monitoring of Radiation Exposure Adjacent to a Linear Accelerator Treatment Bunker with a Highlight Window

Personal Radiation Alarm Dosimeter LK Operating Instruction Manual. Contents

Electronic Personal Dosemeter

Analytical X-Ray Safety Program

Module 7 - Irradiators

University of Pennsylvania. Environmental Health and Radiation Safety (EHRS) X-ray Diffraction User Guide

Case Study. Custom Solutions for High Arc Flash Incident Energy and. Interlocked Electrical Enclosures. Overview: iriss.com

RC4000 Radiation Detection System

TOWARD ENSURING SAFETY AND SECURITY IN RADIOGRAPHY WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR WORKERS AND PUBLICS

Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO)

An Approach to First Responder Radiological Preparedness Tom O Connell and Paul Ares

X-Ray Protection Program

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket No ; NRC ] Exemption Requests for Special Nuclear Material License SNM-362,

AEC RADIATION SAFETY GUIDE SAFE USE OF INDUSTRIAl DEVICES CONTAINING RADIOACTIVE SOURCES

Appendix C X-Ray Diffraction User s Guide and Approval Form

Real-Time Remote Monitoring System Utilizing New Electronic Personal Dosimeter

California State University Bakersfield Radiation Safety Program Revised November 2017

User s Manual. Electronic Personal Dosimeter (For Gamma(X)-ray) NRF30. Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. TN514629i 1/31

Carnegie Mellon University Radiation Safety Committee

Effect of Different Types of Fabricated Anti-scatter Grids in Reducing Backscattered Radiation

Maximize safety and productivity. Thermo Scientific Nuclear Power Radiation Detection and Monitoring Solutions

Corporate Standard Radiation Safety HB#

The RSO will submit a copy of the revised manual to the RSC for approval when the revised manual has substantial changes.

Systems of inspecting the existing building and the procedures of auditing engineering plans. M. Mostafa

Passive Infrared Perimeter Monitoring Alarm System

The French experience on nuclear detection architectures and related reachback Laurent OLMEDO

Harvard University X-ray Safety Manual

ALPHA Radiation Safety Manual

X-ray Inspection System

Radiation Safety for AREAL Phase 1

LASER SAFETY. Class 2 and 2a - low power, low risk Class 2 and 2a lasers have low power and emit visible light. They will cause harm if viewed

Installation and Operation of Model CS X-ray Cabinet. 11 Emery Avenue Randolph, NJ Tel.:

Chemical/Radiological Threat Detection. Innovation with Integrity. Combined NC Detection: Bruker RAID-XP Series CBRNE

NGUYEN NU HOAI VI Vietnam Agency for Radiation and Nulcear Safety

OHIO UNIVERSITY RADIATION SAFETY REVIEW

Initial Version Revision No. 0 Next Review Date: Preparation: Safety Mgr Authority: President Issuing Dept: Safety Page: Page 1 of 6

Moving to the Cloud: The Potential of Hosted Central Station Services

International Requirements for the Control of Radon

The Regulatory Perspective on Radiation Protection in Canadian Uranium Mines

The Problems Related to Orphan Radioactive Sources in Scrap Metal (Georgian Experience)

Battery-operated, hand-held alarm and measuring instruments for radiation protection

Arrangements for detection, interdiction and response to criminal or unauthorized acts involving nuclear and other radioactive materials

Chemical Threat Detection. Innovation with Integrity. Integrated CWA/TIC detection and identification: Bruker RAID-S2plus CBRNE

REGULATORY GUIDE 4.4 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES RADIATION SAFETY LICENSING BRANCH (RSLB) P.O. Box Austin, Texas

Radiation Safety Manual

Stony Brook University Hospital Environmental Health & Safety Policy & Procedure Manual. EH&S 6-8 Original : 1/00 Revision Date: 3/16/15 Pages 6

RADIOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES, STRATEGY, AND RESPONSE: THE MASSACHUSETTS APPROACH

Public Comment No. 3-NFPA [ Global Input ] Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment. Submitter Information Verification

XRAY SHARK XBD50/XBD51 X-Ray Inspection System for Glass-in-Glass Detection

Regulatory Challenges While Harnessing Societal Benefits of Radiation Sources in India

Laser Use at Subaru Telescope (NAOJ) Laser Safety Policy

Quality Assurance of Radiation Protection Monitoring Instruments in India

DMC 2000 Personal Electronic Dosimeter

Electromagnetic Compatibility of Alarm Systems

Identify the following features and specifications for the ESP1

COMMENTS ON THE GHS. Graphical symbols, safety identification, signs, shapes, symbols and colours, comprehensibility

Safety Security Interface (SSI) at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India

Circuit Breakers JANUARY The electronic pdf version of this document found through is the officially binding version

Fire prevention and protection

Safety and Security in industrial applications of radioactive sources. Two principles, one only commitment. Walter Adrian Truppa

Electron detectors. The most used signals in a scanning electron microscope in standard conditions are the electrons and in particular the SE.

EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (EOI) FOR. Fire Fighting System (FFS)

RADIATION SAFETY OF SEALED SOURCES AND EQUIPMENT CONTAINING THEM

Services. Monitoring. t f e. w.

Transitioning to Alternatives and Challenges in Japan

SIMPLY MORE SECURITY MOSRO

Improving the Security of Radioactive Sources in Industrial Radiography in South East Asia

PROFILE. industrial services rental trading

Transcription:

Industrial Radiography (IR) General overview R. Berden

IR IN BELGIUM

What is industrial radiography (IR) Industrial radiography (IR) is a type of non-destructive testing (NDT) of welds using radiation from a radioactive source or an X-ray machine. Other NDT methods include visual, ultrasonic (TOFD), penetrant, acoustic emission, More radiation-related accidents occur in this industry than in any other.

Different possibilities in IR Use of: different radiation methods: X-ray equipment (panoramic, directional) Radioactive sources ( 192 Ir, 75 Se) in different installation types: fully shielded enclosure (failsafe) bunker fixed enclosure free on site

Different possibilities in IR Choice depending on: Available infrastructure in NDT company and/or client company; Equipment / materials to be checked; Demands client Applicable standards

Advantages and drawback X-ray equipment + No Power = no radiation Easy (electrical) connexion with safety equipment (interlocks, ambient dose meters, warning lamps) in a bunker (or on site) Better contrast Higher dose rates (several Gy s/min) Need of external power supply of hundreds of kv s Unsuitable for working on field especially with items of small dimensions or irregular shape The penetration ability of X-Ray s is limited to a few mm of steel due to low energy of emitted photons (up to 300KVp which means a mean energy about 120-140 KeV (0.12-0.14 MeV) Radioactive sources + Thicker wall thickness Easy deployment in installations Risk of blocked source (radiation exposure when safety equipment is not properly used, intervention team) Permanent risk of radiation (additional attention for transport and storage) (Mechanical) connexion between source container and safety equipment only possible with automatic wind-out (expensive, not always available)

Advantages and drawback Failsafe bunker + Optimal protection of operators and public Expensive Additional manipulations of equipment Difficult to achieve with source containers (only ambient dose meters) Not yet a clear legislation for implementation Fixed enclosure / site + A fixed enclosure reduces dose for operators in normal condition and for the public Protection of operators (and public for site work)

Radioactive sources Isotope Half-life Typical Thickness Range steel (m m) Typical activities TBq (Ci) Used In Belgium Iridium 192 74 days 10-50 1,5 (40) X Cobalt 60 5.26 years 25-200 3,7 (100) X Ytterbium 169 32 days < 10 Thulium 170 128 days < 10 Selenium 75 119 days 5-20 3 (80) X Caesium 137 30 years 20-80

Radioactive sources Classification at least C 43515 (ISO 2919)

ISO 3999 Category II Class P exposure containers Exposure Device Outlet Port Source Guide Tubes Remote Control Crank

Old source containers Techops 660 Others: GammaMat S301, Teletron SU GammaMat TI (F)(F)

New source containers GammaMat TSI3 GammaMat SE

New source containers QSA SENTINEL 880 OSERIX DUAL 120

Portable X-ray equipment High voltage range (kv) 100 300 Tube Current range (ma) 0,5 5 Beam Angle (º) 40 Inherent filtration (mm Be) 1 Settings 200kV/5mA: 300 msv/sec at 30 cm empirical data using radprocalculator http://www.radprocalculator.com/xray.aspx Balteau Baltospot CERAM35

Main NDT-companies operating in Belgium Company Operators Source containers AIB VINCOTTE INTERNATIONAL 80 30 SGS 30 20 Apragaz 15 12 Bytest 5 5 WMI 2 2 MISTRAS 8 3

Other NDT-companies operating in Belgium COPPENRATH D. SCMITT ZERSTÖRUNGFREIE MATERIALPRÜFUNG GMBH MATERIAAL METINGEN TESTGROEP Quality Inspection Services STORK Technical Services

Regulations Belgian Regulation (Royal Decree) is very general and is not written specifically for industrial radiography. 1 st renewal of licenses in December 2010 based on SSG-11: Radiation Safety in Industrial Radiography 2 nd renewal in April 2013 to implement the use of a radiation meter and active measurement.

License Conditions (1) Justification At least 2 operators (except for fixed installation in a shielded irradiation vault). Management system for safety Missions & responsibilities of all persons (including customers) Operational electronic dosimetry Accident prevention and safety culture (risk analysis, site audits, ) Notification to FANC of events significant for safety and/or radiation protection

License Conditions (2) Radiation protection training of personnel Approval by FANC Radiography equipment (ISO 3999) Site activities annual dose limit (300 µsv/an), dose rate limit (10µSv/h -> 40 µsv/h) Intervention team Temporary storage of the source on site Radiation meter and active measurement

Regulatory developments Mandatory use of failsafe bunkers Clients: shared responsibility Certification of operators by the FANC

Difficulty for legal framework Theory Reality

INCIDENTS

Incident Magotteaux April 2015 Magotteaux : metal casting company Use of a 60 Co (3,7 TBq) source for quality control of pieces New type of container SENTRY 330 (QSA Global) which replaces the previous GammaMat TK 100 container

Incident Magotteaux Fixed installation (in irradiation vault, approved by inspection organisation) Automated manipulation of the source

Incident Magotteaux 10 april 2015: significant event 10h30: source blocked outside the container 15h22: Notification AFCN No exposure of operators. Several attempts to retrieve the source under supervision of inspection organisation and with the help of manufacturer Decoupling of automated system and manual system (remote handling) Not successful

Incident Magotteaux 13 april2015: Visualisation by means of endoscopic camera to find the exact location of the source. Additional attempts to remotely retrieve the source were not successful Further interventions not allowed by inspection organisation and FANC

Incident Magotteaux Need to establish a unique protocol to retrieve the source Intervention team : licensee and inspection organisation, QSA Global, Military, Civil Protection, FANC Use of military grade robot, used for mine clearing purposes Cold test on real size mock-up of irradiation vault

Mock-up of inner part of irradiation vault

Robot moving the container that will house the source - Container needed to be modified

Cold testing of robot manipulations

Positioning of the cable by the robot

Source entered in container safely interlocked success of the operation

Cold testing Image of on-board camera

Dose cartography with shielded doors open: 5 µsv/h

Preparation of retrieval

Intervention Removal of command cable of source holder: source intact and safely retrieved and stored in Techops 680

Human error: ejection hoses not properly connected (Images from irradiation vault)

Put back into service on 18 may 2015 after extensive testing (including cold tests). Reparation of cable and micro balls

Incidents 2014-2015 October 2014: Exposure of members of public (airport handlers) during radiography (bad coordination of work programme) October 2014: Failure of source retraction 192 Ir (TSI3) November 2014: Exposure of 4 members of public (bad coordination of work programme) January 2015: Operators declare difficulties in source retraction of DUAL 60 source container March 2015: Wrong manipulation during source transfer of 192 Ir source from DUAL 60 to UKI4 container, leading to exposure of a worker and a FANC inspector (INES 1) March 2015: Legal dose limit exceeded during radiography (65 msv registered on dosimeter, INES 2)

SITE INSPECTIONS

Difficult sector Low-skilled operators (secondary school) Clients of NDT company IR = essential quality assurance in work flow Pressure by client on operators: execute work in between, at night or after hours Last minute changes Responsibility: link FPS ELS No clear legislation for bunkers: postpone investments

Difficult sector Competition between companies (foreign companies) Habituation to radiation risk (Multiple) subcontractors Interference with other radioactive measurements Work at heights (heavy containers) Irregular working times Language