RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE ALMOND GROVE PHASE II PROJECT

Similar documents
City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

Building Great Neighbourhoods LAURIER HEIGHTS

Cottage Grove Road Reconstruction. City of Madison Engineering

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. TO: Parking and Public Improvements Commission

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

4/8/2015 Item #10D Page 1

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

PLANNING COMMISSION Work Session Meeting Agenda

Update on the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (CA MWELO)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF STREET SERVICES REPORT NO.1 Page 1 of 5. Date: October 7,2016 CD# 14

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR VEGETATIVE MANAGEMENT

PennDOT Public Meeting. S.R. 3044, Section A01 Castle Shannon Boulevard Roadway Improvement Project

II PREVIOUS REPORTS PERTINENT TO THIS MATTER II

Town of Yucca Valley Capital Improvement Projects Report July 24, 2014

TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan directs that master plans be developed for each proposed urban village (FLU-18), and

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

MALLETTS BAY INITIATIVE

Public Works Project Delivery Report

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Project will Replace: Utilities Curb Pavement Lighting. City of Madison

People who are members of historically disenfranchised racial, ethnic, cultural, and other identity groups are encouraged to apply.

REPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

I. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this policy the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Review Process

Agenda Item # 1. Meeting Date September 21, Prepared By. Approved By

2018 Woodhill Road Improvements Public Informational Meeting. September 28, :00 pm

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works Karen Ginsberg, Director of Community and Cultural Services

REPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento

CARVER COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS LANDSCAPE POLICY. Adopted by the Carver County Board of Commissioners March 3, 2015

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

City of Sebastopol Tree Board Staff Report

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

GUIDELINES FOR PERMEABLE SIDEWALK-LANDSCAPING PERMIT

The full agenda including staff reports and supporting materials are available at City Hall.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE TO DESIGNATE A LANDMARK DISTRICT OVERLAY FOR THE CRAWFORDS VISTA LANDMARK DISTRICT

PARKS MEMORIALS AND DONATIONS POLICY

SOUTH UNIVERSITY Street Design Alternatives in Progress

PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

PARKLET PROPOSAL PACKAGE & PROCESS

Fall 2017 Construction Update

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS

ANNUAL PARKWAY TREE DONATION PROGRAM. Dear Kenilworth Resident:

Construction and Landscaping on Public Property

Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements

Juniper Networks CO-8

Report to City Council

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

COUNCIL POLICY. 1. Removals. a) Dead or Hazardous Trees

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

The planning and zoning board held workshops on January 11, 2016, January 18, 2016 and January 25, 2016 to discuss the issue.

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

Rezoning Petition Post-Hearing Staff Analysis February 5, 2019

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CHRIS ANARADIAN, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR, BRETT BURNINGHAM, PRINCIPAL PLANNER

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

Coffey Neighborhood Park Master Plan/Design/Rebuild Workshop. August 4, :00pm 4:00pm

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

(APN: );

Agenda Report DESIGNATION OF 1855 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (FORMER DRAPER'S BUILDING) AS A LANDMARK

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DC Clean Rivers Project - Green Infrastructure Program. ACEC What s New at DC Water?

DESIGN & GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE December 13, 2016

CHAPTER BEAUTIFICATION AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT

COUNTY OF EL DORADO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SPECIAL USE PERMIT

Listening Sessions: Guiding Principles and Unified Development Code New Castle County, Delaware

1173 W. University Dr. Request to construct a new Alumni Center.

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 17, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5I

REQUEST FOR BIDS LANDSCAPING SERVICES HAYMARKET, VIRGINIA

Building Great Neighbourhoods. Strathcona

RANCHO PALOS VERDES MICHAEL THRONE, PE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS~ CAROLYNN PETRU, ACTING CITY MANAGE~

For the purposes of this chapter, the words and terms used herein are defined as follows:

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

TOWN OF JUPITER. Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council Andrew D. Lukasik, Town Manager

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

RPD GEORGE CHRISTOPHER PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY MEETING 1 SEPTEMBER 24, Duncan St

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019

LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLAN PREPARATION GUIDELINES

Welcome to the. Open House

Town Council Agenda Packet

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

Urban Planning and Land Use

Transcription:

TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: 12/20/2016 ITEM NO: 12 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL LAUREL PREVETTI, TOWN MANAGER RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE ALMOND GROVE PHASE II PROJECT RECOMMENDATION: Receive an update on the Almond Grove Phase II Project. BACKGROUND: The Almond Grove Street Rehabilitation project is intended to renew the streets and rehabilitate curb, gutter, and sidewalks consistent with Council direction in the Almond Grove and Broadway historic districts. The Council has discussed the project over the course of ten meetings, beginning in 2012. On April 19, 2016, the Town Council authorized the Town Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Wilsey Ham for the design of the remaining eight Almond Grove streets. The design was to follow guidelines provided by Council during the October 20, 2015 Council meeting. During the October meeting, Council approved the plans and specifications for bidding Broadway and Bachman and provided the following design direction for all of the Almond Grove Streets: Keep the existing curb line in the same location. Include Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements where needed for compliance with ADA while saving as much sidewalk as possible. Handle trees per the Town s tree ordinance, with an emphasis on trying to save trees. Institute a five-year no-cut rule on the streets after reconstructed including a specified replacement practice if streets are cut. PREPARED BY: MATT MORLEY Director of Parks and Public Works Reviewed by: Town Manager, Town Attorney, and Finance Director 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 408-354-6832 www.losgatosca.gov

PAGE 2 OF 6 BACKGROUND (cont d): Council approved the Basis of Design Report from Wilsey Ham on August 26, 2016, which provided an overview of the Phase II design. Included in the report was the recommendation for a design section that placed the concrete pavement on top of a cement treated soil. After further review of existing utilities following this meeting, Wilsey Ham has proposed a structural section with thicker concrete on top of existing subgrade. The Council Agenda Report of August 26 th also included information on asphalt areas within the Phase II project limits and methods of project bidding. During the meeting, the Council directed staff to convert all asphalt areas within the Phase II limits to concrete and to bid all eight Almond Grove streets at one time. DISCUSSION: Public Outreach PPW staff has provided extensive public outreach during the design phase of the Almond Grove Phase II project, providing residents with opportunities to gain information on the project through a variety of means. PPW staff added an additional three resident meetings specifically to discuss tree replacements in order to provide the community with a full and complete understanding of the proposed tree replacements, an opportunity to discuss the plan, and the ability to work directly with residents on concerns. The outreach to the community on the Almond Grove Phase II project has included the following to date: Establishment of an Almond Grove Phase II Website providing the community with the latest information and project updates. Website Notify Me option to provide immediate text/e-mail update information. Notification of meetings through letters, door hangers, Notify Me list, website and Nextdoor. Three resident meetings to discuss street tree replacements. Three resident meetings to discuss project design details. Meeting presentations and exhibits provided on the project website. Individual resident meetings, phone calls and e-mail exchanges. Staff will continue this high level of public outreach as the project continues to progress. Trees An in-depth survey of street trees to remain and trees to be replaced was completed by the design consultant Wilsey Ham s landscape architect and arborist team, Callandar and Associates. Callandar s comprehensive Tree Report is included as Attachment 1 of this report

PAGE 3 OF 6 DISCUSSION (cont d): and was based on the Town s street tree provisions within Chapter 26 of the Town Code. The Tree Report was also reviewed and concurred with by the Town Arborist and PPW staff. The report shows a total of 309 street trees on the project with a total of 78 street tree replacements proposed, 28 of these have diameters greater than 12 inches with the remaining trees significantly smaller in many cases. Additionally, staff is proposing to add 121 new street trees to the Almond Grove Phase II area in locations that did not previously have street trees. This will increase the number of street trees in the area by 40%. Prior to conducting public meetings, street trees recommended for replacement were tied with orange flagging tape. This step was taken to draw the attention of residents to the trees under consideration early in the process, much like story poles do for developments. Residents were notified of the meeting through letters (which included a tree replacement map), door hangers, the Almond Grove Phase II website, Nextdoor, and through the Town s Almond Grove Notify Me list. A number of residents contacted PPW staff prior to the meetings to have their questions answered. A total of 12 residents attended the meetings that were held from 6 to 8 p.m. on November 2nd, 8th and 10th. A presentation was provided to those in attendance and both PPW staff and the Wilsey Ham s arborists were available for questions following the presentation. A few of the residents in attendance requested adding trees or retaining specific trees slated for replacement. Many expressed support for the decision to replace trees noted in the report and the reasons provided by Callandar and Associates for the replacement need. Callander has modified their report to retain specific trees requested by residents and Wilsey Ham will review any required design changes needed for this retention. Callandar noted that some of the trees that residents have requested to remain are in planter strips less than 18 inches and the trees could be severely impacted by the construction over their root system and required root pruning and ultimately may not survive. Tree replacements, as noted in the report, meet the Standard of Review and Required Findings set forth in Chapter 26 Trees and Shrubs of the Town Municipal Code. These replacements include trees that are deteriorating or diseased, crowded, damaging public infrastructure, and/or are identified in the Town Code as nuisance trees. The majority of tree replacements are in small planter strip areas measuring 18 inches or less. This is because many tree species cannot thrive in small planter strips due to low soil volume or survive construction impacts directly over key root structures caused by being in a small planter strip. The goal of the Almond Grove Phase II project is to provide a vibrant tree canopy for the community following the construction and placement of the trees. This is achieved through the selective replacement process and the significant increase in the number of trees in the

PAGE 4 OF 6 DISCUSSION (cont d): neighborhood. This includes adding planter strips and trees in areas that currently do not have planter strips, if space is available and following discussions with the adjacent property owner. Callander and Associates has recommended a number of location appropriate street trees for the replacement trees and new trees. Trees that are currently being considered, varying on the width of the planter strip, are Maidenhair, Eastern Redbud, Crape Myrtle, London Plane and Chinese Pistache. This plan deliberately balances retention of mature trees with the long term health of street trees. Curb Ramps In addition to the tree meetings, three separate design meetings were held with residents on December 5 th, 8 th and 12 th. Residents were notified of the meetings in the same manner as the tree meetings described above. The meeting discussion included various project design elements and project implementation. The meeting presentation was provided by the project design team Wilsey Ham and supported by PPW staff. A total of 40 residents attended the meetings. Residents expressed support for the project public outreach following the meetings and thanked staff for providing residents an opportunity to review the design proposals in front of their residences and provide input. A discussion of the project curb ramps was included in the meeting presentation. Currently, Caltrans standards allow for the placement of seven different types of curb ramps. These ramps can be divided into two categories; ramps with curbs and ramps with flares (or no curbs). The ramps with flares require additional room (Town right of way) free from obstructions (i.e. trees, utility poles, drainage inlets) to be installed. Where there is room, Wilsey Ham has been instructed to design ramps with flares. Where there is not room, the Town is still required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to install curb ramps. In these cases, the designer s only choice is to install ramps with curbs. Regarding curb ramp location, where there is room for only one curb ramp on a corner, as is the case on the majority of corners in the Almond Grove, the curb ramp is placed at the center of the curb radius. The United States Access Board, which develops guidelines for ADA, recommends placement of the ramp at the center of the curb radius for safety reasons. This is to provide the best visibility from both directions (east-west, north-south) for those with disabilities who are crossing at intersections.

PAGE 5 OF 6 DISCUSSION (cont d): Utility Upgrades Utility upgrade discussions and coordination meetings were held with all affected utility companies in the project area. Based on these conversations, several companies will be replacing older utility lines on a number of streets within the Phase II project limits. San Jose Water Company is scheduling an extensive replacement project on all but three of the project streets. West Valley Sanitation District will be completing a main replacement on the west end of Bean and PG&E has indicated they will be replacing a gas main on Massol between Bachman and Nicholson. All of the utility replacement work is expected to be completed by the end of 2017 or beginning of 2018. Streets that will not be impacted by utility replacement work are Tait, Bayview and Glen Ridge as the utilities on these streets were previously upgraded by the respective utility companies. Project Phasing Pursuant to Council direction, all eight of the Almond Grove Phase II streets will be put out to bid at the same time. In order for the Town to obtain the best pricing from contractors for the work, the contractors will be asked to determine the street reconstruction schedule within specific Town stipulated parameters. The parameters will include the following: The Town must approve the proposed schedule. The Contractor will complete reconstruction of all streets in three years. The Contractor will first complete work on streets where no utility replacement work is proposed (Tait, Bayview, Glen Ridge). The Contractor will complete a minimum of 2.5 and a maximum of 3 streets per year. The Contractor may not work on streets that are utilized for the Cat s Hill Bike Race until after race completion. Construction must be complete by October, prior to the rainy season. Anticipated Schedule The following schedule is anticipated for the Almond Grove Phase II project: Design Completion January 2017 Council Approval of Plans, Specifications, and Engineering and Authorize TM Award to Low Bidder February 2017 Award of Bid April 2017 Construction Start (First Year) May 2017 Construction End (First Year) December 2017

PAGE 6 OF 6 CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Council receive the update on the Almond Grove Phase II Project. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This is not a project defined under CEQA, and no further action is required. Attachments: 1. Arborist s Report 2. Tree Removal and Replacement Maps 3. Public Comment