Keele Finch Plus Downsview Airport Operational Needs Assessment Executive Summary

Similar documents
Keele Finch Plus Downsview Airport Operational Needs Assessment.

Transit-supportive development and city-building

Eglinton West LRT Update

Director, Community Planning, North York District

5 TOWN OF MARKHAM OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 144 MILLIKEN MAIN STREET SECONDARY PLAN

Finch Avenue West and Sheppard Avenue East Corridors - Planning Study Approach. Planning and Growth Management Committee

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE HURONTARIO-MAIN CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN

Relief Line Project Assessment

DOWNSVIEW AREA SECONDARY PLAN

Director, Community Planning, North York District

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

Hurontario/Main Street Corridor Master Plan Mississauga and Brampton Building a new and integrated vision for the corridor

1050 Sheppard Avenue West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report

Coordinated Transit Planning in Toronto SmartTrack GO RER Scarborough Relief Line Waterfront Transit

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Municipal Network in Place and Moving Forward May 9, 2014 Chris Murray, City Manager City of Hamilton

YONGE STEELES CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN. Young + Wright / IBI Group Architects Dillon Consulting Ltd. GHK International (Canada) Ltd.

The Corporation of the Town of Milton

Northeast Corner of Steeles Avenue West and Jane Street, City of Vaughan

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

WHY INVEST THE EGLINTON CONDOS

Port Credit Local Advisory Panel October 20 th Meeting

APPENDIX 6 TRANSIT NETWORK ANALYSIS

~!VAUGHAN NOV Z November 21, Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1

City of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan

Keele Finch Plus: September 28, 2017 Open House & Public Workshop

Acting Director, Transportation Services Division. p:\2010\cluster B\TRA\EtobicokeYork\eycc tp

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016

Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report

Phase 2 Public input: engagement

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER A By-law to adopt Amendment Number 1 to the Official Plan of the Vaughan Planning Area.

CITY OF VAUGHAN D R A F T YONGE STREET STUDY. June 2008 YOUNG + WRIGHT /IBI GROUP ARCHITECTS DILLON CONSULTING LTD.

STATION AND STOP NAMES Eglinton Line. September 2015

1.0 PLANNING MARKHAM S FUTURE CONTENTS

Mobility Hub Guidelines: Tools for Achieving Successful Station Areas

2 STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING AND INFORMATION REPORT FOR PUBLIC MEETING ON AMENDMENT NO. 62 TO THE YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN

CONTENTS 2.0 A FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH 2.1 MANAGING SUSTAINABLE GROWTH THE VISION TO GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2.3 MARKHAM STRUCTURE

Stanley Greene District Downsview (80 Carl Hall Road) Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications Request for Direction Report

Local Growth Planning in North Central Green Line Communities

Transit Terminal Design Surveillance Access Control - Territoriality. Ian Trites Supervisor Facilities and Architectural Design

New Official Plan Quest November 2013

Relief Line Project Assessment

Employment and Commercial Review Analysis of Policy Directions

HEMSON IV EMPLOYMENT LAND CONVERSION

Assessing City of Toronto and Metrolinx Rapid Transit Priorities

Globemaster Corridor Specific Plan. Community Workshop

Integration of Trees into Roads Policy - the road to success -

3 MARKHAM NORTH-SOUTH LINK CORRIDOR PUBLIC TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UPDATE

1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (WORKING SESSION) AUGUST 27, 2002 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TORONTO DRAFT OFFICIAL PLAN. Recommendation

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

Laird in Focus Community Information Session

PUBLIC MEETING April, 20161

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

This application has been applied for with support of an Outline Plan to provide the technical details for the site s development.

Commercial, Retail and Tourism Executive Summary December 2018

Trafalgar Road Corridor Planning Study Open House

7 HIGHWAY 7 CORRIDOR AND VAUGHAN N-S LINK ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT

12 AMENDMENT NO. 149, TOWN OF MARKHAM HIGHWAY 404 NORTH SECONDARY PLAN

Report No. 4 of the Planning and Economic Development Committee Regional Council Meeting of April 21, 2011

3. Endorse the LRT vision in transforming Surrey into Connected-Complete-Livable communities, and more specifically, the official vision statement:

2.0 A FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH CONTENTS

1.3 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION THEME 1: PUTTING TRANSIT AT THE CENTRE OF COMMUNITIES. Fully integrate transit with community planning

SUBJECT: GO Station Mobility Hubs Preferred Concepts: Aldershot GO, Burlington GO and Appleby GO. Planning and Development Committee - Public Meeting

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 24, 2017

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

Building the transportation network we need for the future

Strachan Ave. Overpass Community Design Update. October 26, 2010 Stephen Lipkus Executive Director Georgetown South Project GO Transit

South of Eastern Strategic Direction Status Update

This report presents the draft Don Mills Crossing Secondary Plan for public consultation.

Director, Community Planning, North York District

2370 Finch Avenue West - Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application Request for Interim Directions Report

SUBJECT: Proposed Downtown Mobility Hub Precinct Plan and Proposed Official Plan Policies

1 INTRODUCTION Purpose Project Background PROJECT CONTEXT Background The Capital City Downtown Plan...

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

Eglinton Connects Planning Study Phase 1 (Part 2) Implementation Report

Official Plan Review

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

Rail Deck Park - City-initiated Official Plan Amendment Final Report

393, 395, 397, 399, 401 and 403 Spring Garden Avenue Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Committee of the Whole Report

OP Council Resolution June 16, Planning and Development Services

2450 Victoria Park Avenue Official Plan Amendment Application Preliminary Report

City-Initiated Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments, Yonge-Eglinton Centre Focused Review Final Report

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

From: Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District. Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

PART 1. Background to the Study. Avenue Study. The Danforth

Official Plan Amendment for Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) Extension Final Report

2.0 A FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH CONTENTS

Emery Village Road 2A Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study

Sustainable Growth. Sustainable Growth

Subject: Transit Planning in Toronto: roles, priorities and our decision making framework

1 Introduction. Chapter. In this chapter:

WITNESS STATEMENT Of. Ronald Blake. On behalf of the Intervenor The Corporation of the City of Markham

Niagara GO Hub and Transit Stations Study

Amendment C146 Melton Planning Scheme Expert Evidence Statement Traffic & Transport Beattys Road, Plumpton

Transcription:

City of Toronto Keele Finch Plus Downsview Airport Operational Needs Assessment Executive Summary It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. 1

1 Executive Summary 1.1 Background The TTC is currently constructing a subway station at the Keele Street and Finch Avenue West intersection, and Metrolinx is investing in the Finch West Light Rail Transit line (LRT). Both of these lines will result in improvements to public transit service to and from the Keele and Finch area. The subway and LRT lines will significantly improve mobility and transportation options while also bringing a number of city building opportunities. In provincial planning policy documents, the Finch Avenue West corridor is identified as an "intensification corridor", and the area around Keele and Finch is identified as a "major transit station area" and a "Mobility Hub". This means that it should be planned to achieve "increased residential and employment densities that support and ensure the viability of existing and planned transit service levels", among other things. Building heights in the area are limited by the flight path of the Downsview Airport, with greater heights permissible with greater distance from the airport. Current municipal zoning includes Schedule D of North York Zoning By-Law 7625 "Airport Hazard Map" which is used to help determine height limits in the Keele and Finch area. Site specific applications have been approved for heights that (in at least one case) are more than twice what the height limit set out in Schedule D identify as a maximum height. Examples such as this suggest a disconnect between the zoning height permissions and the flight path/surface requirements for Downsview Airport operations and the need for a full review of the relationship between aerodrome and land use regulatory frameworks within the study area was identified. 2

1.2 Obstacle Limitation Surfaces The objective of this study is to identify opportunities for potential increases in zoning height permissions that are compatible with Downsview Airport operations. The primary mechanism for protecting airspace is to develop comprehensive mapping of aeronautical surfaces aligned with the runways and surrounding the aerodrome, known as obstacle limitation surfaces (OLS), and ensure that these surfaces are not penetrated by new obstacles. The Obstacle Limitation Surfaces are permanent and should form the basis for municipal zoning by-law controls. Obstacle Limitation Surfaces are defined federally by Transport Canada in TP312 Aerodrome Standards and Recommended Practices. These standards are periodically updated. TP312 is currently in its 5 th edition, which superseded the 4 th edition on September 15 th, 2015. 1.3 Governing Standard TP312 4 th Edition OLS definition varies between the 4 th and 5 th edition and the implication on potential building heights were assessed for both. The Obstacle Limitation Surfaces defined by TP312 4 th Edition should form the basis for municipal zoning by-law controls for the following reasons: Downsview Airport was certified under TP312 4 th edition as such this will be the governing standard until such time as changes to airport facilities trigger the need to adhere to the latest standards. The Obstacle Limitation Surface requirements within TP312 4 th Edition result in clearances which are less than TP312 5 th Edition and as such represent the more restrictive standard. 3

The TP312 4 th Edition obstacle limitation surfaces are comprised of 3 surfaces, shown in Figure 1: Outer Surface; a horizontal plane at 800ft above sea level Approach Surface; an inclined plane with a 1:50 slope Transitional Surface; an inclined plane with a 1:7 slope Figure 1 Obstacle Limitation Surface TP312 4 th Edition 4

Buildings and other obstacles must not penetrate any of these surfaces. Where surfaces overlap the lower surface will govern the maximum building heights. Figure 2 TP312 4 th Edition Elevated Perspective of composite OLS surfaces. It is important to note that the obstacle limitation surfaces are applicable to all objects including installations commonly found on roof tops (such as air handling equipment, satellite dishes, antenna and obstacle lights) as well as temporary installations including construction cranes. 1.4 Comparison to Current Zoning Permissible building heights in the Keele and Finch area permitted under TP312 4 th Edition were compared against the current municipal zoning per Schedule D of North York Zoning By-Law 7625 "Airport Hazard Map". In general permissible building heights under TP312 4 th Edition are greater than the current municipal zoning. In the Keele Finch Plus Study area permissible building heights with respect to airport operations only (i.e. the OLS) are between 1.3 to 4.1 times greater depending on location. 1.5 Indicative Building Heights TP312 4 th Edition defines permissible heights relative to an elevation above sea level. The height of obstacles is ultimately governed by their maximum elevation above sea level, however in order to visualize the potential development heights in and around the study area an analysis of indicative building heights was assessed by city block. 5

The indicative building heights in Figure 3 reflect the minimum distance between current topography provided by the City of Toronto and the obstacle limitation surface in each area. In areas of lower topography greater building heights may be achievable, where building heights in excess of those noted below are proposed detailed assessment based on permissible height above sea level will be required. Figure 3 Diagram Indicative Buildable Heights (in meters), By Block 6

As this study focused more specifically on the development area around the intersection of Keele and Finch, the following visualization was prepared to illustrate maximum potential building heights, using 1315 Finch Avenue W as an example. Figure 4 Keele Finch Plus Area Key Plan - 1315 Finch Avenue West ELEVATION m (ASL) Outer Surface 243.8 Top of Building 218.9 Ground Elevation 197.9 Top of Building to OLS (Delta) 24.9 Figure 5 Keele & Finch Study Area Visualization Maximum Buildable Height 1315 Finch Avenue West (southeast corner of Keele & Finch) 7

1.6 Conclusions The Obstacle Limitation Surfaces defined by TP312 4 th Edition should form the basis for municipal zoning by-law controls. The majority of Keele Finch Plus area falls beneath the horizontal plane of the Outer Surface, with an Above Sea Level (ASL) height restriction of 243.8 m / 800 ft. The block in the southeast quadrant of the intersection falls beneath the sloped Approach and Transitional Surfaces, and therefore has a slightly more restrictive buildable heights ranging from 759 800 ft ASL. Permissible building heights under TP312 4 th Edition in the Keele Finch Plus Study area are significantly greater than the current municipal zoning, supporting the objective to increase residential and employment densities, subject to other municipal planning considerations. 8