San Francisco General Plan Preservation Element: Objectives 7-9. Historic Preservation Commission August 20, 2014

Similar documents
Historic Preservation Element

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

Phase II: School Safety Report_ _08:56

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION HP. A. Purpose HP B. Assessment and Conclusions...

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Fredericksburg Historic Resources Survey

C h a p t e r 3 E V A L U A T I O N A N D D E S I G N A T I O N. Background

Urban Design and Preservation Element

FINAL WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Cumberland County Preservation Opportunities Watch List 2018 Nominations

Steering Committee Meeting

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

Mary Bradford, Director of Parks Mike Riley, Deputy Director of Parks John E. Hench, Ph.D., Chief, Park Planning & Stewardship Division

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

HERITAGE ACTION PLAN. Towards a renewed Heritage Conservation Program. What is the Heritage Action Plan? Key areas of work. A Collaborative Approach

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES POLICIES

Heritage Assessment and Considerations. Tamara Anson-Cartwright Pourya Nazemi City of Toronto Urban Land Institute, November 24, 2017

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

The John Bartram Association Action Plan to advance the 10 year Strategic Plan

7-1. Chapter 7: Historic Preservation. 7.0 Accomplishments since Introduction. New Castle County 2012 Comprehensive Plan

Draft Historic Preservation Vision, Goals, and Policies

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Historic Preservation Commission Motion No Certificate of Appropriateness

Planning for Historic/Cultural Resources Coastal Resiliency in Connecticut. Presented to CAFM s 3 rd Annual Conference

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

Downtown Streetscape Manual & Built Form Standards

CONSERVATION PLAN BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF INTEGRITY

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

A COMMUNITY VISION. For the County of Brant

Heritage Property 70 Liberty Street (Central Prison Chapel)

WELLINGTON STREET WEST COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN

HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

Slot Home Task Force Meeting #5 Phase 2 June 8, 2017

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

CHAPTER 4.1 COMMUNITY HERITAGE AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

MASTER PLANNING: THE CRITICAL ROLE OF ELECTED LEADERS AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Michigan Conference

CALGARY: City of Animals Edited by Jim Ellis

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Saratoga Quarry Park Master Plan

Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0171

Workshop on the Management of Historic Urban Landscapes of the XXth century, December 2007 Chandigarh, India

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

CHAPTER 8 JOPLIN S STORIES: INTERPRETATION AND ENGAGEMENT

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Phase II: School Safety Report_ _15:42

Town of Westport. Design Guidelines Development Committee Public Informational Presentation

3 Urban Design and the State Highway Network

Planning for Historic/Cultural Resources Coastal Resiliency in Connecticut. Presented to ASFPM 41 st Annual Conference, Kansas City, MO

Open House Schedule min to Visit Stations, Ask Questions and Contribute Your Thoughts min Presentation

Executive Summary Planning Code and Zoning Map Amendments HEARING DATE: JUNE 18, 2015

Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report HEARING DATE: MARCH 20, 2019

PRIORITIES COMMITTEE MEETING

PARK AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

Trail Heritage Facility Feasibility Study Proposal

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

Introduction and Overview

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Endorse the Alameda Point Conceptual Planning Guide

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

CITY OF GENEVA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 22 S. FIRST STREET GENEVA, ILLINOIS 60134

MEMORIAL DRIVE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLAN

HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOURCE GUIDE CHAPTER TEN: HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOURCE LIST HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOURCE GUIDE

Subject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

CENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

County Board Meeting October 20, Request to Advertise Draft Area Plan

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

August 1, 2018 beginning at 12:30 p.m. in Room 400 of City Hall

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

MAYORS MEETING POLICYMAKERS DIALOGUE Creative city making and the New Urban Agenda CONCEPT NOTE

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Enclosures Appendix 1: Draft Golders Green Station Planning Brief. Summary

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services. Natural Heritage Action Plan (NHAP) Project Initiation

AT A GLANCE... Our People, Culture & Place. A plan to sustain Ballarat s heritage (final draft)

PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

City of Mahtomedi Park System Plan Public Hearing Draft: September 13, 2006

Project Team. 2M Associates. City of Saratoga. HT Harvey Biology. PlaceWorks. NV5 Infrastructure. Tom Origer Associates History/Archeology

Fredericksburg Historic Resources Survey

Rhode Island Shoreline Change Special Area Management Plan

The Manager of Urban Design and Cultural Heritage recommends:

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

ABOUT HISTORIC DISTRICTS

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

RIDGES TO RIVERS OPEN SPACE NETWORI< OF THE MID-COLUMBIA DRAFT ACTION PLAN

Salisbury Cathedral An Exceptional Place. Revised Master Plan 2016: An Outline

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Monitoring for Ecological Integrity and State of the Parks Reporting

CHAPTER 9. Community Character

Request for Proposals: Architectural/Design Guidelines

Transcription:

San Francisco General Plan Preservation Element: Objectives 7-9 Historic Preservation Commission August 20, 2014

Preservation Element Definition An element of the General Plan that establishes a long-range vision for the protection of historic resources and that sets forth a series of goals, objectives, and policies to accomplish that vision over time.

Project Summary Overview Update the draft Preservation Element. Improve usability. Clarify existing policies. Identify missing policies. Perform public outreach. Prepare final draft for environmental review. Propose for adoption.

Project Goals Overview Create a succinct, inspiring, and effective policy document. Reflect the City s progress over the past 7 years and current best practices. Clearly differentiate between Objectives, Policies, and Implementation Measures.

Preservation Element Objectives Overview 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Maintain Inventory Protect & Preserve Preserve Archeological Resources Manage Change in the Built Environment Integrate Preservation in Land Use Decisions Provide Incentives & Guidance Foster Public Awareness & Appreciation Promote Preservation as Sustainable Prepare for Disasters

OBJECTIVE 7 Foster public awareness and appreciation of San Francisco s historic resources and the benefits of historic preservation. Promote more participatory ways of fostering awareness and appreciation. Balance the needs of the City s visitors and the City s citizens. Refer to Preservation Element Policy 1.8, 2.11, and Objective 6.

OBJECTIVE 7: Related Policies 1.8 Develop and maintain an official City Register of identified historic resources and associated documentation, which shall be made readily available and accessible to property owners, government agencies, and the general public. 2.11 Collect, archive, maintain, and protect documents and artifacts that are important to the historical understanding of San Francisco s built environment. 6.0 Promote historic preservation through incentive and guidance.

OBJECTIVE 7: Policies 7.1 Promote awareness of San Francisco s historic resources. Replace historic with historic and cultural and expand to include walking tours, paper and webbased publications, events, and exhibits. 7.2 Encourage public participation in the historic resources planning process. Encourage participation in the identification of resources, long-range planning, hearings, landmark designations, and historic context statements.

OBJECTIVE 7: Policies 7.3 Encourage activities that foster awareness and appreciation of historic events and resources. Include cultural events and resources, and expand to include the promotion of social heritage resources, including festivals and traditional practices.

OBJECTIVE 7: New Policies 7.? Engage communities in the stewardship of their historic and cultural resources. 7.? Utilize City-sponsored or City-funded projects as opportunities to interpret related historic and cultural resources. 7.? Support the educational efforts of public and private institutions dedicated to the collection of documents and artifacts that are important to the historical understanding of San Francisco s history and culture.

OBJECTIVE 8 Promote historic preservation as a key strategy in adhering to the principals of sustainability for the built environment. Staff does not recommend any significant changes to the objective statement. Staff suggests adding several policies to broaden the objective s reach. The policies currently focuses on the sustainable quality of historic preservation and misses an opportunity to promote sustainable practices within the field of historic preservation.

OBJECTIVE 8: Policies 8.1 Promote preservation, rehabilitation, and adaptive reuse of historic resources as a sustainable practice consistent with the goals and objectives of the Sustainability Plan for the City and County of San Francisco. Consider a salvage program as an implementation measure to reduces construction waste and encourages the reuse of architectural materials.

OBJECTIVE 8: New Policies 8.? Encourage the study of energy use for projects throughout the City as a means of better understanding the environmental benefits of preservation, rehabilitation, and adaptive reuse projects. 8.? Encourage the use of sustainable materials, systems, and infrastructure for alterations to historic resources and within historic districts.

OBJECTIVE 9 Prepare historic resources for disasters and develop emergency preparedness and response plans that consider these resources. Overlaps with Community Safety Element policies: 1.16 Preserve, consistent with life safety considerations, the architectural character of buildings and structures important to the unique visual image of San Francisco, and increase the likelihood that architecturally and historically valuable structures will survive future earthquakes. 3.11 Ensure historic resources are protected in the aftermath of a disaster.

OBJECTIVE 9: Policies 9.1 In preparing for disasters, preventative measures are encouraged to protect the architectural character of San Francisco s significant structures and to improve life safety for citizens. These measures increase the likelihood that architecturally and historically important structures will survive future disasters. **SUGGESTED RE-WORDING** Encourage preventative measures to improve life safety and ensure the architectural character of the City s historic and cultural resources will survive future disasters.

OBJECTIVE 9: Policies 9.2 Ensure that historic resources are protected in the aftermath of a disaster. No suggested changes.

OBJECTIVE 9: New Policies 9.? Integrate preservation policies into recovery plans resulting from future disasters. 9.? Monitor and prepare for climate change related risks to historic and cultural resources, including sea level rise.

Staff Requests Conclusion Respond to staff suggestions for each Objective and Policy. Contribute further suggestions for structural or conceptual changes. Make recommendations for future staff presentations. Implementation Measures? Background Section?

Next Steps Conclusion September 10 Open House Fall 14 Public Outreach & Revision Winter 14/ 15 Draft Text Review Spring 15 CEQA Review

QUESTIONS? www.sfplanning.org