ZERO ZONE USER GUIDE TO THE 2017 EPA RETAIL FOOD REFRIGERATION REGULATIONS

Similar documents
Gary Parker Refrigerants Product Manager

Understanding Applications for Alternative Refrigerants

The Current Path of Refrigerants

PREPARE FOR CHANGE LOW GWP ALTERNATIVES. November 17

Gary Parker Refrigerants Product Manager

Refrigerant and Energy Regulations Update

The lowest energy consumption when using R290 LBP fixed speed compressors in a plug in ice cream conservator

Lower GWP Refrigerants Compared to R404A for Economizer Style Compressors

Refrigerant & Energy Regulations Update

Understanding Applications for Alternative Refrigerants

BRA FACT FINDER Number 19

Chillers for High Ambient Conditions: What Technologies and Fluids?

Evaluation of HCFC Alternative Refrigerants

Refrigerants Management & Retrofits. Mike Saunders & Randy Tebbe Emerson Climate Technologies

Modelling of an Integrated Supermarket Refrigeration and Heating System Using Natural Refrigerants

PRICE CHOPPER SARATOGA, NY. First cascade supermarket system in North America Installed and Started March of 2008

The Changing State of Refrigerants. Gary Parker Refrigerants Product Manager

DOE and EPA Impacts to Commercial Refrigeration

Study of R161 Refrigerant for Residential Airconditioning

CO 2 transcritical FTE System Full Transcritical Efficiency

System Considerations for Refrigerant Blends with Temperature Glide

Low Global Warming Refrigerants For Commercial Refrigeration Systems

Alternatives in the AC & Chiller Sectors. Sukumar Devotta and Lambert Kuijpers OORG Refrigeration

TEST REPORT #14. System Drop-In Test of Refrigerant Blend ARM-42a in an Air-Cooled Screw Chiller

Volume 3, Issue 4 (2015) ISSN International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation

The R-404A Challenge. Commercial Opteon Refrigerant Solutions - The New Industry Standard

Recommendations to retrofit positive existing installations running with HFCs (R404A & R507) RETROFIT POSITIVE & MEDIUM REFRIGERATING SYSTEMS

REFRIGERANT CHANGEOVER

Stay in business: STOP installing R-404A / R-507A! R-404A R-507A

Oct. Newly Developed Refrigerants for Refrigeration, meeting Global Warming Regulations. Hitomi ARIMOTO / Product R&D Department, Chemicals Division

TEST REPORT #4. Travis Crawford Dutch Uselton. Lennox Industries Inc Metrocrest Drive Carrollton, TX 75006

International Journal of Research in Engineering and Innovation Vol-1, Issue-5 (2017), 68-72

Refrigeration Cycle And Compressor Performance For Various Low GWP Refrigerants

How to Meet 2017/2020 Energy Regulations

Overview of New Refrigerants and Expected Market Trends

Sanhua accepts the challenge of new low-gwp refrigerants

Low GWP Refrigerants for Air Conditioning Applications

Effectively Managing the Transition to Lower GWP Refrigerants

Role of Nano-technology for improving of thermal performances of vapour compression refrigeration system (VCRS): An Overview

INDUSTRIAL REFRIGERATION. Position on refrigerant selection

Study of R-161 refrigerant as an Alternate Refrigerant to various other refrigerants

The analysis proceeded by adopting the ASHRAE guideline for conventional HVAC chiller applications. This guideline is summarized in Table II.

A2L Refrigerants. Objectives 14/09/2017

Performance Comparison of Hydronic Secondary Loop Heat Pump and Conventional Air-Source Heat Pump ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

Performance of R-22, R-407C and R-410A at Constant Cooling Capacity in a 10

Tube-in-tube heat exchanger Type HE

Making Sense of the Latest Rulemaking on Acceptable Refrigerants. E360 Webinar

Update on Next Generation Low GWP Refrigerants for Chillers Products. Steve Kujak Director, Next Generation Refrigerant Research

Chapter 2. Alternatives to HCFCs and their Characteristics

The Industry s Most Complete Refrigeration Source

Behavior of R410A Low GWP Alternative Refrigerants DR-55, DR-5A, and R32 in the Components of a 4-RT RTU

ENERSAVE Hydrocarbon Scroll Water Cooled Chiller

A Comparison Between Refrigerants Used In Air Conditioning

Embraco Position Paper: Light Commercial Refrigeration

Dehumidification: Energy Efficiency Comparisons

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF VAPOUR COMPRESSION REFRIGERATION SYSTEM USING REFRIGERANT R152A, R404A AND R600A

Reference Document RD-0007-E GUIDELINES FOR THE UTILIZATION OF R-404A R-452A. Page 1 of Tecumseh Products Company LLC. All rights reserved.

Tube-in-tube heat exchanger Type HE

R-404A Alternative with Low Compressor Discharge Temperature

Copeland Scroll ( HP) ZB*KA and ZF*KA for Refrigeration

Natural Refrigerants.

Low GWP Refrigerants for Air Conditioning and Chiller Applications

Low Charge ADX Ammonia. Presented by: Bruce Nelson, President, Colmac Coil Manufacturing Rick Watters, Vice President, AMS Mechanical Systems

Publication # RD-0003-E Rev 1, 10/17 SERVICE GUIDELINES HCFC R22 TO HFC REFRIGERANT BLENDS

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

REPLACING HARMFUL CFC 12 BY ECO-FRIENDLY REFRIGERANT IN MILK CHILLER

Check valve Types NRV and NRVH

Hot gas bypass regulator, type CPCE Liquid gas mixer, type LG (accessory)

Product Offering for 2017

R718 TURBO CHILLERS AND VACUUM ICE GENERATION TWO APPLICATIONS OF A NEW GENERATION OF HIGH SPEED, HIGH CAPACITY R718 CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSORS

investment in R&D, the commitment to - name.

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF VAPOUR COMPRESSION REFRIGERATION SYSTEM USING REFRIGERANT R152A, R404A AND R600A

DuPont Refrigerants. John McCormack Business Manager DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts. R22 market and the ISCEON retrofit options

Alternatives to HCFC/HFC refrigerants for high ambient temperatures

Transitioning to Alternatives and Challenges in Japan

Sustainable Refrigerant Solutions for HVAC-R. Laurent Abbas, Wissam Rached, Brett Van Horn

HEAT PUMPS WITH HYDROCARBONS AS REFRIGERANTS FOR SMALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

A RECENT REVIEW OF REFRIGERANT R-1234YF AND R-1234ZE (E)

Comparative assessment for drop in replacement of R134a in domestic refrigerator.

Technical Bulletin (TB )

TEST REPORT #34. Compressor Calorimeter Test of Refrigerant DR-7 in a R-404A Scroll Compressor

Low GWP alternative refrigerants to R404A

From the Field to the Supermarket

Flammability and the Low GWP Refrigerant Challenge

*Corresponding author;

TEST REPORT #65. Compressor Calorimeter Test of Refrigerant L-41-2 (R-447A) in a R-410A Scroll Compressor

Natural refrigerant trends in EU, Japan & North America

Volume 2, Issue 4 (2014) ISSN International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation

TEST REPORT #32. System Soft-Optimized Test of Refrigerant D2Y60 in Air Source Heat Pump

Actions to Control Emission of HFCs in Japan

Campbell Soup Company Extends Use of CO2 Systems Into Their Operations

REFRIGERATION CYCLE Principles of Mechanical Refrigeration Level 2: Cycle Analysis

PRESSURE-ENTHALPY CHARTS AND THEIR USE By: Dr. Ralph C. Downing E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. Freon Products Division

Guidance for Stationary Refrigeration & Air-Conditioning

EVALUATION OF REFRIGERANT R290 AS A REPLACEMENT TO R22

(Refer Slide Time: 00:00:40 min)

Be sustainable while protecting your business

Assessment of Alternatives to Refrigerant R134a in Automotive Air Conditioning System

DTI Kenneth Bank Madsen Global Application Expert Food Retail

Public Services Building 155 N First Avenue Hillsboro, OR March 2012

Transcription:

ZERO ZONE USER GUIDE TO THE 2017 EPA RETAIL FOOD REFRIGERATION REGULATIONS Per the EPA: Retail food refrigeration, or commercial refrigeration, includes equipment designed to store and display chilled or frozen goods for commercial sale. This end-use includes the following categories of equipment: stand-alone equipment, remote condensing units, and. Zero Zone acknowledges that the 2017 EPA requirements can be difficult to understand and apply to store design needs. In an effort to sort through all the possibilities, we offer this document which will help you narrow down the available options. A methodical approach is. Four critical steps of the process include: 1. Determine if the system is a system (rack) or remote condensing unit. 2. Identify the date it will become operational. 3. Determine if it s a new or a retrofit system. 4. Apply EPA rules to the system design. Since 1961, Zero Zone has been a leading manufacturer of high quality, energy-efficient refrigerated display cases and commercial and industrial refrigeration. All of our display merchandisers are remote cases designed to be connected to individual condensing units, rack, or top-mount, field-installed condensing unit kits (Hybrid Display Cases). The display case installation should conform to local codes including necessary permits for remote installations. This document is designed for and related food retailers to help determine the best EPA approved to use to suite the retailer s specific goals, based on comparisons of energy efficiency, GWP, costs. etc. Step 1: Determine if the system is a system (rack) or remote condensing unit. EPA retail food refrigeration rulemaking focuses on the type of system being installed and not the fixtures themselves. EPA has divided the rule into two categories: (rack) and remote condensing unit. EPA defines as having multiple compressors without an attached condenser. EPA defines a remote condensing unit as two or less compressors attached to a condenser. According to the EPA: The EPA draws a distinction between and remote condensing units based on the number of compressors in the remote condensing system. Supermarket generally have more than two compressors arranged in a rack whereas remote condensing units typically have only one or two compressors linked to a single condenser. EPA SNAP Regulations Rule 20 Page 42901 It s easy to apply this rule to the small condensing units provided by various manufacturers and traditional rack. If the compressor is not connected (linked) to a condenser at the factory and not shipped as a single unit, it is a system (rack), regardless of the number of compressors. If there are one or two compressors, and it is connected (linked) to a condenser at the factory and shipped as a single unit, it is a condensing unit. If it has three or more compressors, it is a system (rack), regardless of being attached (linked) or not being attached (linked) to a condenser. 1

Step 2: Identify the date it will become operational. The date that the system is operational is the date used to determine which rules apply. For example, if a system (rack) is shipped from a manufacturer on September 1, 2016 and the system is ready for operation: The EPA will consider a system to be new for purposes of these SNAP determinations as of the date upon which the circuit is complete, the system can function, the system holds a full charge, and the system is ready for use for its intended purposes. (Page 42903) If the operational date is after January 1, 2017 the system must meet the new EPA guidelines, e.g., no R404a or R507a. If the system was operational before January 1, 2017, but was turned off and then restarted in 2017, the 2016 rules would apply. The manufacturing date of the equipment does not determine which is allowable. Step 3: Determine if it s a new or a retrofit system. Expansions to the refrigeration system capacity on existing changes them to new. Systems made operational in 2016, but expanded in 2017 or beyond, will also be considered new. On the other hand, if a remodel or expansion changes the intended purpose of the original equipment, for instance by adding additional cases, compressors, and that were not supported by the original compressor system, EPA would consider the expanded system a new system. In that situation, a would not be allowed to use a that was listed as unacceptable as of the date that new system was expanded or remodeled, even if the system had been using that before the expansion or remodel. (Page 42903) The EPA considers a retrofit a change in, not a change in equipment. The EPA uses the term retrofit to indicate the use of a in an appliance (such as a system) that was designed for and originally operated using a different and does not use the term to apply to upgrades to existing equipment where the is not changed. (Page 42903) Step 4: Applying EPA rules to the system design. Specific phase-out dates are as follows: REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING - UNACCEPTABLE REFRIGERANTS RETAIL FOOD REFRIGERATION UNACCEPTABLE REFRIGERANTS FURTHER INFORMATION Supermarket Systems - RETROFIT Remote Condensing Units - RETROFIT Supermarket Systems - NEW Remote Condensing Units - NEW R-404a, R-407b, R-421b, R-422a, R-422c, R-422d, R-428a, R-434a, R-507a Unacceptable As Of: July 20, 2016. R-404a, R-407b, R-421b, R-422a, R-422c, R-422d, R-428a, R-434a, R-507a Unacceptable As Of: July 20, 2016. HFC-227ea, R-404a, R-407b, R-421b, R-422a, R-422c, R-422d, R-428a, R-434a, R-507a Unacceptable As Of: January 1, 2017. HFC-227ea, R-404a, R-407b, R-421b, R-422a, R-422c, R-422d, R-428a, R-434a, R-507a Unacceptable As Of: January 1, 2018. These s have GWPs ranging from 2,729 to 3,985. Other substitutes will be available for this end-use with lower overall risk to human health and the environment by the status change date. Final rule page 42955 2

A single is not the best fit for all applications. The tables below provide comparisons of the different s. However as a general rule, Zero Zone recommends R448a /R449a or R407a for central rack or distributed refrigeration. This is based on GWP levels and system efficiency. Discharge temperatures will be higher than with R404a and compressors may require additional cooling. Users may want to evaluate the costs of the s. We ll work with customers to make the best selection for their. For small retail format stores, we are working with manufacturers of small condensing units and evaluating choices for these units (that we purchase and resell). MEDIUM TEMPERATURE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS Refrigerant Notes GWP Mass Flow Rate [lb/s] Volumetric Capacity [btu/ft 3] Power [kw] Cooling Heating EER [btu/w] Estimated Compressor Refrigerant Displacement Efficiency % Displacement Cost % of R134a of R134a [ft 3 /min] Comparison % of R134a R448a R449a R407a R450a R407c R407f R410a R513a 1273 2.74703 65.836 65.25 2.695 3.695 9.196 151.79 59 95 252 1397 2.79825 68.6 65.72 2.676 3.676 9.13 153.35 60 94 303 1923 2.82132 64.742 65.28 2.694 3.694 9.191 154.35 60 95 146 547 2.99684 33.592 62.18 2.828 3.828 9.649 297.49 116 99 189 1624 2.57384 62.629 63.97 2.749 3.749 9.38 159.56 62 97 146 1674 2.52425 69.446 64.59 2.723 3.723 9.29 143.9 56 96 164 1924 2.54075 92.172 66.93 2.627 3.627 8.964 108.42 42 92 106 631 3.2935 41.5 63.97 2.75 3.75 9.38 253.61 99 97 329 R134a being phased out 1300 2.80613 38.924 61.78 2.846 3.846 9.712 256.74 100 100 100 R404a being phased out 3943 3.7872 62.199 70.35 2.5 3.5 8.529 160.67 63 88 146 R507a being phased out 3985 3.93546 63.051 71.12 2.473 3.473 8.437 158.49 62 87 146 AMMONIA R1234yf R1234ze toxic-mildly flammable 0 0.36488 71.512 58.75 2.993 3.993 10.212 139.74 54 105 42 0 3.72113 36.406 65.78 2.673 3.673 9.121 274.49 107 94 2253 1 3.11036 28.521 62.25 2.825 3.825 9.639 350.38 136 99 633 PROPANE flammable 3 1.49045 54.56 62.87 2.797 3.797 9.544 183.16 71 98 633 NOTES: Cooling Capacity [btu/hr] = 600,000 Condenser Subcooling = 0 F Evaporator Superheat = 10 F Volumetric Efficiency = 95% Compressor Superheat = 10 F Isentropic Efficiency = 70% 3

LOW TEMPERATURE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS Refrigerant Notes GWP Mass Flow Rate [lb/s] Volumetric Capacity [btu/ft 3] Power [kw] Cooling Heating EER [btu/w] Estimated Compressor Refrigerant Displacement Efficiency % Displacement Cost % of R134a of R134a [ft 3 /min] Comparison % of R134a R448a R449a R407a R450a R407c R407f R410a R513a 1273 0.58163 27.014 21.69 1.622 2.622 5.533 73.99 55 95 252 1397 0.5935 28.1 21.86 1.607 2.608 5.49 75.04 56 94 303 1923 0.59784 26.143 21.75 1.617 2.617 5.518 76.45 57 95 146 547 0.6557 12.542 20.94 1.679 2.679 5.73 159.36 118 99 189 1624 0.54322 25.175 21.23 1.657 2.657 5.652 79.39 59 97 146 1674 0.52937 28.466 21.38 1.645 2.645 5.613 70.21 52 97 164 1924 0.52334 40.328 21.98 1.6 2.6 5.46 49.56 37 94 106 631 0.72537 16.1 21.66 1.624 2.623 5.54 131.13 97 95 328 R134a being phased out 1300 0.60466 14.8 20.64 1.704 2.704 5.814 135.04 100 100 100 R404a being phased out 3943 0.82327 25.878 23.91 1.471 2.471 5.019 77.23 57 86 146 R507a being phased out 3985 0.85744 26.334 24.21 1.452 2.452 4.956 75.9 56 85 146 AMMONIA R1234yf R1234ze toxic-mildly flammable 0 0.07418 28.314 19.48 1.806 2.806 6.161 70.59 52 106 0.42 0 0.83397 14.14 22.61 1.556 2.556 5.308 141.35 105 91 2253 1 0.68833 10.446 21.09 1.667 2.667 5.689 191.33 142 98 633 PROPANE flammable 3 0.32093 24.137 20.90 1.683 2.683 5.743 82.81 61 99 633 NOTES: Cooling Capacity [btu/hr] = 120,000 Condenser Subcooling = 0 F Evaporator Superheat = 10 F Volumetric Efficiency = 95% Compressor Superheat = 10 F Isentropic Efficiency = 70% 4

For more information about this White Paper, contact: Bruce Hierlmeier, PE Director of Regulatory Compliance and Refrigeration Technology Zero Zone, Inc. 800-247-4496 THE RESPONSIVE COMPANY ZERO ZONE, INC. ZERO-ZONE.COM CASE DIVISION 800-247-4496 SYSTEMS DIVISION 800-708-3735 2016 Zero Zone, Inc. APR 2016 WP-04-A