REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING STUDY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

Similar documents
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS THEATER DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING STUDY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO. Proposals due February 6, 2018

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

ANC 2A Presentation. November 9, 2006

implementation r expression in landscape

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

Winston-Salem State University Campus Master Plan 2016 Update

Phase 1 : Understanding the Campus Context. Phase 2 : APPROACHES - Alternates & Preferred Plan

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development

CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

Planning Study. University of California, San Diego. Prepared by: Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP The Office of James Burnett Fehr and Peers

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:

DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES PEER REVIEW OF BAKER PARK. Request for Qualifications (RFQ)

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Request for Proposal

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

UAA School of Engineering Parking Garage Master Plan Amendment. 1. Purpose

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

Vision & Land Use. Discussion. Historic Preservation Plan. Foggy Bottom Campus Plan:

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

2019 Hillcrest Campus LRDP EIR Scoping Meeting

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

Independence Boulevard Area Plan Planning Committee Public Comment May 18, 2010

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

CAL POLY MASTER PLAN UPDATE, March 2015

MAIN STREET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Development Solicitation Request for Qualifications. The Historic Hollering Place Development

Request for Proposals: Architectural/Design Guidelines

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MOUNT VERNON CAMPUS

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

Wadsworth Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

Planning Commission Staff Report March 15, 2007

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

11.0 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

ARLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN CHAIR GUIDE

CENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

Sustainability and the Campus Long Range Master Plan

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

Call for Artists Gateway Island Ashland Oregon Requests for Qualifications (RFQ)

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Future Proposed Development

Request for Proposals For the purchase and redevelopment of Cityowned property in the Historic Downtown. 109 South Boyd Street

A Campus Within Context

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

Chapter Master Planned Communities (MPC) District

Figure 1- Site Plan Concept

University of Saskatchewan CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. Senate Meeting Preliminary Presentation. April 21, 2018 DIALOG ECS DA WATT

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Economic Development Committee Overview May 25, 2010

TOWN OF BRUDERHEIM Report to the capital region board

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Urban Design Review Panel Terms of Reference

Beachside Redevelopment Committee

III. Design Principles

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

11 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Design Guidelines

QUINCE ORCHARD/FIRSTFIELD CORRIDOR CITY OF GAITHERSBURG MTAP 2017

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Sewanee Village + Request for Builder/Developer Proposals

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Transcription:

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING STUDY FOR THE Proposals due THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2015 Issue Date Wednesday, October 28, 2015

I. INTRODUCTION This Study will provide a development plan and associated design guidelines for the redevelopment of the Thurgood Marshall College on UC San Diego s West Campus (see Exhibit 1). In addition to achieving development objectives as defined in the 2004 Long Range Development Plan ( LRDP see http://physicalplanning.ucsd.edu/plans/lrdp.html), this Study will expand on the 1989 UCSD Master Plan Study ( Master Plan see http://physicalplanning.ucsd.edu/plans/masterplan.html), a comprehensive urban planning analysis which identified key physical planning principles that are guiding the evolution of UC San Diego s built environment. The Master Plan recommends that future planning for the campus include more detailed urban design studies to guide development. It states that "the campus should develop plans for each neighborhood to address patterns of building and development, buildable sites, program capacity for suggested sites, open space, building massing, and phasing strategy." Over the past 20+ years, neighborhood planning studies have been developed for the majority of the campus (see here: http://physicalplanning.ucsd.edu/plans/nplans.html). However, Thurgood Marshall College is one of the few areas of campus without such a study. In addition, the Study would inform an upcoming update to the campus 2004 Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) and associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR). II. BACKGROUND As defined in the Master Plan, neighborhoods are smaller clusters of common academic or other functions that are intended to create a more human scale environment within the larger campus setting. The Thurgood Marshall College Neighborhood Planning Study Area ( Study Area ) comprises approximately 61 acres (Exhibit 2). It is bordered by North Torrey Pines Road on the west, Muir Lane (and Mandeville Center) on the south, Hopkins Drive on the east, and Pangea Drive and Voigt Drive to the north (Exhibit 1). The Thurgood Marshall College Neighborhood consists of student housing, several academic buildings formal and informal open spaces including eucalyptus groves and significant pedestrian and bicycle circulation features. Thurgood Marshall College was primarily developed in the 70s and early 80s. Current programs require that a more urban, dense, mixed-use neighborhood be developed that would help meet future housing and academic goals to create a better sense of community and better meet the University s strategic vision as a student-centered, research-focused, service-oriented, public university. Along with the redevelopment of the existing facilities within Thurgood Marshall College, the study includes the large surface parking lots, and open spaces between Muir and Thurgood Marshall Colleges. Recent studies have identified the large surface lots as ideal mixed use development areas that could accommodate much needed undergraduate housing as well as large academic programs. Retail and parking would also be need included to support these future programs. A careful study of circulation to and from the Study Area will be required to resolve vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian movement through this space. Major non-vehicular movement to and through this space will be required to address current and future traffic. These goals will need to be reconciled in consideration of service and loading access to existing and planned programs. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 1

III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION UC San Diego will be selecting an urban planning, landscape architecture or architecture firm to prepare a Neighborhood Planning Study for the Thurgood Marshall College Neighborhood. IV. SCOPE OF SERVICES OBJECTIVES Define and analyze potential development/ redevelopment parcels to determine the development capacity of the neighborhood. Define the amount, location and desired adjacencies of future housing, recreation, permanent open space, retail/commercial, and structured and surface parking areas to meet future programmatic needs. Guidelines for future building heights and setbacks should be developed to allow the neighborhood to meet programmatic goals while ensuring that the proposed massing is appropriate for the neighborhood given its context along the campus edge. Define the neighborhoods open space network of greens, plazas, courtyards and interconnecting pathways. Identify key characteristics and design features to enable the neighborhood to develop as a vibrant community for residents and visitors. Identify pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation routes within the study area that will connect buildings within the neighborhoods, provide routes to other adjoining campus neighborhoods, and strengthen connections to the off-campus community. Identify service and fire access to all existing and proposed buildings. Develop a conceptual phasing plan for the Study Area to guide the implementation of future redevelopment. The concept should adopt an urban design approach that promotes sustainability and creates a unique neighborhood identity with a distinct sense of place. SCOPE OF WORK REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 2

The Thurgood Marshall College Neighborhood Planning Study ( Study ) will consist of the following tasks: A. Assess existing conditions of the Study Area and identify features that may pose opportunities or constraints to design and development. Features to evaluate should include, but not be limited to, the area topography, view corridors, vegetation, circulation patterns, shuttle stop locations, parking locations and capacity, utility corridors, environmental and sustainability considerations, and the character of the existing or planned development within and adjacent to the Study Area (including off-campus areas). Evaluate existing land uses and buildings with respect to density and access. B. Prepare a comprehensive development plan, after consideration of alternative concept options, along with associated design guidelines and criteria. The Study should address the following elements: 1) Land Use Concepts - Establish land uses based on appropriate adjacencies for housing, amenities and other supporting program elements. 2) Development Potential - Identify and define capacity of infrastructure, building sites and open spaces. The plan should accommodate the forecasted programmatic need identified by the University. 3) Development Guidelines - Prepare development guidelines including, where necessary, parcel boundaries, building orientation (with respect to pedestrian and service access, views, daylighting, open spaces, and other buildings and activity areas); location, size and function of entries; service areas; utilities and infrastructure. 4) Open Space Framework Develop a network of open spaces of adequate scale and design to provide relief from the built environment while providing human-scaled places for socialization, contemplation, and circulation. These include quads, plazas, courtyards, recreational spaces, and transitional spaces. 5) Development Phasing - Establish a phased develop and delivery plan to allow for future development to meet identified programmatic need in a systematic way paying specific attention to the displacement of existing units/tenants and delivery of new units so as to minimize impacts to the community and the fiscal stability of the housing program. Phasing options should consider the advantages and disadvantages of necessary displacements (open space, parking, housing, roadways, etc.). Consider financial matters germane to auxiliary housing and parking operations to ensure feasibility of implementation. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 3

6) Circulation - Determine the circulation and access routes for pedestrians (conformance with The Americans with Disabilities Act), bicyclists, and vehicles (public, service, transit, and emergency). The circulation framework should encourage alternative transportation, walking and biking. 7) Parking - Identify locations, initial design and capacity of parking facilities (surface and structured) necessary to accommodate future program needs. Locate parking to minimize impacts to adjacent housing/community (massing, visual impact, noise and glare). 8) Neighborhood Identity - Develop an urban design approach that would create a distinct neighborhood identity and sense of community for the Mesa Housing Neighborhood. Architecture and landscape architecture guidelines should be developed to reinforce this identity. 9) Architecture - Prepare design guidelines to address: a) building height and mass, b) exterior building materials and colors (the exterior color palette to be developed in coordination with the campus color consultant), c) character of fenestration, especially at the pedestrian level, and d) treatment of accessory structures. 10) Landscape Guidelines - Develop a landscape concept for the Study area with associated design guidelines regarding the plant materials palette, hardscape, and site furniture (i.e. seating, bicycle racks, locations of outdoor lighting fixtures, signage, etc.) for various types of open spaces The landscape framework should provide a cohesive plant palette for the neighborhood with high attention being given to maximizing low water use planting, use of recycled water and drought resistant design. Coordinate with all applicable, approved UC San Diego planning studies including the landscape, lighting, bicycle and signage studies. 11) Utility Corridors - Incorporate requirements for the relocation or expansion of existing utility systems, and new utility corridors as identified by the UC San Diego offices of Facilities Design and Construction and/or Facilities Management. 12) Sustainability Provide feasible approaches that promote sustainable site, building orientation, materials, alternative energy opportunities and building and circulation designs consistent with University of California policy. Identify all potential opportunities for achieving a minimum of LEED Gold ratings on all new buildings. C. Prepare a report describing the plan concepts and design guidelines with text, tables, images and illustrations in sufficient detail to provide clear guidance to future consultants involved in the development of individual projects within the neighborhood. SCHEDULE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 4

Consultant s work will be directed by the UC San Diego's Physical and Community Planning staff. Throughout the course of the Study, the consultant will work closely with a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) consisting of campus staff and stakeholders. In addition to regular interaction with the Physical and Community Planning staff and the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), the Campus/Community Planning Committee (C/CPC), the Open Space Committee (OSC) and the Design Review Board (DRB) will formally review the Study, at appropriate intervals. As required, meetings with the campus color/material consultant, Fire Marshal, campus engineers, and, as needed, others will be coordinated to occur during regularly scheduled staff and/or PAC meetings. Meetings with Senior Administrators and Leadership may also be required. Following review and comment by these campus groups, design concepts and guidelines will be revised as necessary. The consultant should expect 2 presentation meetings with C/CPC, 2 meetings with DRB, 8 meetings with the PAC, in addition to meetings with Planning Staff and others as necessary. Whenever possible, meetings with different groups will be scheduled on the same day. The C/CPC will be responsible for final endorsement of the Development Plan; the DRB will be responsible for final endorsement of design guidelines and color and materials palette associated with the Development Plan. The University, under separate contract, will contract for services with Celia Conover the campus color consultant and be responsible for coordinating development, review and approval of a color and materials palette for the Study. The tentative Study schedule anticipates that the project will begin in December 14th 2015 and conclude with receipt of the consultant s final submittal NO LATER THAN April 11th 2016. The consultant's final submittal will include: AutoCAD (or other native electronic format) files of development plan graphics/maps. Report originals (electronic PDF and native format (e.g. InDesign or Illustrator), 25 paper and 25 CD copies of the final report. The paper report may include folded maps of the neighborhood planning study. V. CONSULTANTS The University is selecting a firm that specializes in urban design, physical planning, landscape architecture and/or architecture. Although timing and funding of a future project is unknown, implementation of the Study may include Design-Build project delivery. Please be aware that the selected firm will not be eligible to compete in subsequent Design/Build selection process that seeks to implement the plan. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 5

VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND SELECTION CRITERIA The University of California, San Diego, requests the following submittal material for use in the selection of a planning or architectural firm to perform the Scope of Services described in Section IV. A. Demonstrated experience and excellence in master planning and urban design for universities; including familiarity with campus housing development. B. Demonstrated relevant qualifications of the Principals and Project Team Members, including a clear definition of the primary responsibility of each. C. Outline of the basic work plan to accomplish the work. D. Ability to provide Professional Liability Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 Each Occurrence and $2,000,000 per Project Aggregate. VII. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING All Short-listed firms will be required to sign a Statement of Understanding. By signing the document it is acknowledged that a draft copy of the standard Professional Services Agreement (PSA) has been read, and with reservation of rights, the terms and conditions are generally agreed upon. Additionally, notwithstanding this is a qualification based selection process, it is understood that fees for basic services are expected to fall within a limited and commercially reasonable range for work. VIII. PROCEDURES FOR SUBMISSION Consulting firms wishing to be considered should submit electronic materials, under a coversheet, indicating their past experience preparing urban planning studies including references, using University Statement of Qualifications form (Attachment B). (Attachment A is not a part of this RFQ.) One electronic copy on CD or flash drive, in pdf format, should be submitted, with any graphic images, spreadsheets or pages larger than 8.5 x 11 submitted in landscape view. No paper copies requested. Proposals are due no later than 4:00 P.M. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2015. Forward material by mail, messenger and/or overnight express to: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 6 University of California, San Diego Robert Clossin Physical & Community Planning 10280 No. Torrey Pines Rd., Suite 355 La Jolla, CA 92093-0074 Hours of business: Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Technical questions or questions regarding the scope of the project should be directed to Project Manager Raeanon Hartigan at

rhartigan@ucsd.edu. UC San Diego requests that interested firms refrain from contacting any other party regarding this project. UC San Diego encourages the participation of Small, Disadvantaged, Minority-owned, Women-owned and Service/Disabled Veteran-owned Business Enterprises (S/D/M/W/DVBE s) and is committed to promote a diverse pool of firms for our building programs. Every effort will be made to ensure that all persons have equal access to contracts and other business opportunities with the University within the limits imposed by law or University policy. Each candidate firm may be required to show evidence of its equal employment opportunity policy. The University of California is an Equal Opportunity Employer minorities and women are encouraged to apply for consideration. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 7