Replanting Walnut without Soil Fumigation: Is this Possible?

Similar documents
Nematicides delivered: 1/via resistant rootstocks 2/foliar-applied systemics. Michael McKenry, UC Riverside / Kearney

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES FOR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT 2008

BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF PHYTOPHTHORA CROWN AND ROOT ROT OF WALNUT. Greg Browne, Leigh Schmidt, Terry Prichard, and Wes Hackett

CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES FOR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT

New Orchard Development: Site Evaluation through Planting. David Doll Farm Advisor UCCE Merced County

Bacterial Canker Susceptibility of Peach:Almond Hybrid Rootstocks for California Stonefruit Orchards

CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES FOR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT 2010

BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF PHYTOPHTHORA CROWN AND ROOT ROT OF WALNUT

WALNUTRESEARCHRESULTSFOR1986 STUDYOF WALNUTREPLANTPROBLEMANDEFFICACIOUS METHODSOF CONTROL

Cling Peach ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO BACTERIAL CANKER AND ORCHARD REPLANT CONDITIONS.

EVALUATION OF CHANDLER CLONE WALNUT TREES ON VARIOUS ROOTSTOCKS INCLUDING ITS OWN ROOTS

Walnut Hedgerow Trial on Marginal Soils. Bill Krueger, John Edstrom and Wilbur Reil

CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES FOR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT 2011

Integration of Tree Spacing, Rootstock Selection & Pruning for Efficient Almond Production

A REPORT TO THE CALIFORNIA TREE FRUIT AGREEMENT

PROPAGATION AND RETESTING OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES PUTATIVELY RESISTANT TO PESTS AND DISEASES

PROPAGATION AND RETESTING OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES PUTATIVELY RESISTANT TO PESTS AND DISEASES

University of California Cooperative Extension Butte County. Walnut Notes

Pistachio rootstocks. Elizabeth J. Fichtner Farm Advisor: nuts, prunes, olives UCCE Tulare and Kings Counties

Rootstock Options for the southern Sac Valley. Kat Pope Orchard Advisor, Sac-Solano-Yolo Feb 3 rd, 2016

A COMPARISON STUDY OF MICRO-PROPAGATED CLONAL WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GROWTH FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS OF MICROBIAL AND HUMECTANT SOIL AMENDMENTS

Walnut Notes Volume 37 May 19, 2008

Virginia Tech VIRGINIA POLYTEHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY

Fast Facts about Ethephon Use on Walnuts Robert Beede, Kings County Farm Advisor

Training Young Walnut Trees

HORTSCIENCE 50(8):

July-August 2007 Volume 13 / NO. 7. Walnut Rootstock Clones. page 4. PACIFIC NUT PRODUCER / July-August 2007

CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES FOR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT 2012

What to Consider: Almond Rootstocks. December 6, 2016

INTRODUCTION OF GRAFTING AS A NEW IPM TOOL IN ARIZONA MELON PRODUCTION

ALTERNATIVES FOR METHYL BROMIDE FUMIGATION OF TOBACCO SEED BEDS, PEPPER AND TOMATO SEEDLINGS

Pear Rootstocks. How many trees would I plant? ± 3,000 per ha. What I believe growers need to be doing to be successful in the Year 2012.

HOW DO YOU THIN A ROOT ROT REPLANT BLOCK?

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION GLENN COUNTY P.O. Box 697 (821 E. South St.), Orland, CA (530) FAX (530)

FRUIT AND NUT NOTES SACRAMENTO VALLEY REGIONAL WALNUT NEWSLETTER

FRUIT AND NUT NOTES SACRAMENTO VALLEY REGIONAL WALNUT NEWSLETTER

University of California Cooperative Extension. August 2008 Issue 3: Fall 2008

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this

FACT SHEET MARCH 2018 Perennia 2018

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

Citrus and Avocado Nematodes Spread by nursery stock, by contaminated implements, and by water from irrigation canals that may drain infested land

Response of Cucurbit Rootstocks for Grafted Melon to Root-knot

Population Increase of Pratylenchus hexincisus on Corn as Related to Soil Temperature and Type 1

Establishing new trees possible impacts of rootstock propagation method on young tree growth Ute Albrecht

Corn Nematode Sampling Guidelines from United Soils

ANNUAL REPORT TO NC DWARF APPLE ROOTSTOCK TRIAL SUMMARY FOR THE 2010 SEASON

Development of nematode/rootstock profiles for 40 rootstocks with the potential to be an alternative to Nemaguard

Influence of Fungicides and Biological Controls on Potato Diseases and Yukon Gold Yield and Quality

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

walnuts on system and

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF AMELANCHIER SP. AND QUINCE ELINE AS ROOTSTOCKS ON 1- TO 2-YEAR-OLD EUROPEAN PEAR TREES

Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Walnut (Juglans regia) Grafted on Northern California Black (Juglans hindsii) or Paradox Rootstock

Nutrient Management of Irrigated Alfalfa and Timothy

Unit E: Urban Forestry. Lesson 4: Pruning Trees in Urban Settings

Sacramento Valley Walnut News

Harmonizing Grapevine Nursery Stock Certification Programs in the Pacific Northwest

Light Management in Pecan Orchard in Semi-Arid Regions. Jim Walworth, University of Arizona & Richard Heerema, New Mexico State University

DISEASE AND PEST RESISTANT TRANSGENIC ROOTSTOCKS: ANALYSIS, VALIDATION, DEREGULATION AND STACKING OF RNAi-MEDIATED RESISTANCE TRAITS

Dr. Danielle Hirkala BC Tree Fruits Cooperative

Arnold Schumann, Kevin Hostler, Laura Waldo, Wije Bandaranayake (UF/IFAS, CREC) 2015 Fluid Forum February 17, 2015 Scottsdale, AZ

Imperial County Agricultural Briefs

Madera County Volume 39, December 2002

SACRAMENTO VALLEY PRUNE & WALNUT NEWS

Managing Nematodes in Vineyards

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

Shank and Drip applied Soil Fumigants as Potential Alternative to Methyl Bromide in California-grown Cut Flowers

Sacramento Valley Walnut News Summer, 2018

Determining the Host-Plant Resistance Mechanisms for Banded Sunflower Moth

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Tolerance of almond rootstocks to root-knot nematodes Peter Clingeleffer, Norma Morales & Brady Smith (deceased March 2013)

Influence of Fungicides and Biological Products on Potato Diseases and Yukon Gold Yield and Quality

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service Washington, D.C

ETIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF CROWN AND ROOT ROTS OF WALNUT

Screening and Evaluation of New Rootstocks with Resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi

COMMON ERRORS IN ORCHARD SET UP. Room December

Walnut Newsletter. Early Walnut Tree Training: How to Handle Different Nursery Products. In this issue:

Vegetable Grafting a Pest Management Perspective

Evaluation of Grafted and Non-Grafted Hybrid and Heirloom Tomatoes in a High Tunnel

SUGAR BEET NEMATODE

Effect of Orchard Management Practices on Peach Tree Growth, Yield, and Soil Ecology

Managing Soil Borne Diseases

Pinto Peanut. A legume for use in pastures, soil improvement and conservation, and as cover crop in fruit crops

The Sun-Blotch Disease of Avocado

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

Information Note Choosing a Cover Crop. Crimson Clover

Growing Fruit: Grafting Fruit Trees in the Home Orchard

Preplant Considerations for New Vineyards

Soil management impacts on orchard soil health and tree productivity

Grafting Fruit Trees. Loyd Collett 4/5/2011 1

East Malling Rootstock Club. Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

Grafting Morphology and Physiology Text Pages:

The current status of Pistachio Bushy Top Syndrome in California. Florent Trouillas, KARE UD Davis Plant Pathology

B.2. SPECIALIZED USES To change plant size and vigor. To repair damaged parts of established plant. To change plant form. Virus indexing.

Seed & Soil-borne Diseases - What s New? 2012 Agronomy Update Crop Establishment

Project Leader: Gary S. Bender* 1

WALNUT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2005

Training and Pruning Almond Trees

Pruning and Training Fruit Trees

Transcription:

Replanting Walnut without Soil Fumigation: Is this Possible? Michael McKenry, UC Riverside Woodland, CA Feb 23, 2010

Wait 2 years, rip to five feet, walnuts after walnuts in clay loam soil, replant with seeds Various fumigants Non fumigated

Wait 2 years, rip four feet deep, walnuts to walnuts in sandy loam soil, replant 1 yr olds Non fumigated fumigated

Both sites were impacted by one or more components of the walnut replant problem 1/ The rejection component (old soil ecosystem) 2/ Soil pest and disease component (commonly root lesion nematode) 3/ Soil physical and chemical factors (plow pans & chemical residues usually resolved with ripping) 4/ Small amounts of macro and micro nutrients t at the time of planting.

The rejection component appears as poor growth, unevenly distributed across the field but only for the first 1 to 1 ½ yrs after replanting. But, if root lesion nematode is also present, the new trees may never grow well.

Nematodes are a major soil pest of walnuts Root-knot Root-lesion

Soil fumigation MB, tarped to deep-dried soil can kill all old roots to 6 feet deep + 99.99% of nematodes within. Telone II at 33.7 gpa can kill all old roots to 4.5 feet and 99.99% if soil is less than 12% soil moisture content. t Telone C35 at 49gpa can accomplish what Telone II does but also provide: 1) a visible plant growth response + 2) protection from the rejection component of the replant problem.

More on fumigants later: If soil fumigants are not available or soil is not adequately prepared or can t be dried out: What then??? This is our research question! The answer will be to know more about the The answer will be to know more about the biology of the problem and the plant.

First-year root structure of Serr vs. NCB Serr NCB

NCB fleshy roots range from 3cm to 15cm in length

Serr root tips range from 1cm to 5cm

English stocks have multiple tips more often than NCB Serr NCB

Fleshy root tip, fibrous root covered with sloughed tissues and further back the fibrous portion of the root Slo Sloughed tissues on fibrous root

Relative host status of four walnut rootstocks 220 days after exposure to 22,400 P. vulnus and 110 M. incognita race 3 + eggs 1,200,000 1,000,000 Nematodes per root system 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 a b b Chandler Vina Paradox NCB b

Preferred feeding sites for root knot and root lesion nematode in the first 220 days after inoculation 900 800 700 Chandler Vina Paradox NCB a t s / gram of root Nematode 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 b b a ab bc ns n.s. c >7mm roots Fibrous roots Fleshy roots b

3500 plants screened

Several mechanisms of potential ti nematode relief were found High vigor in the presence of nematode feeding and reproduction in Paradox VX211 Pre-infection resistance in Paradox NX and UZ seedlings

What is the potential of pre- infection resistance noted in NX and UZ seedlings of paradox?

Relative tree sizes in 2005, four years after various fumigations Broadcast Strip MB MS T/V

One Way Analysis Trunk diameter in cm - Nov. 2007 P=0.05 Sixth-leaf differences, 2007 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 16.3 15.4 15.1 15 14.1 13 a ab bc bc cd d MB,400 T/V str MS 332lb MB,400 T/V str MS 332lb NX DN Two Way Analysis Mean MB,400 16 15.7 15.7 a T/V str 14.7 MS 15.5 14 15 Trunk diameter in cm - Nov. 2007 P=.05 "Looking at the soil treatment " 14.7 b 14.5 14 14 b 13.5 13 MB,400 T/V str MS Trunk diameter in cm - Nov. 2007 P=0.05 " Looking at the rootstock " 16 MEAN NX15.5 15.6 DN 14 15 15.6 a 14.5 14 14 b 13.5 13 NX DN

NX vs DN Paradox seedlings in fall 2006 NX DN

Incidence of P. vulnus 6 years after various soil treatments at Rio Oso Soil Volume of Mean Mean counts/250 Treatment soil counts/250cc soil cc soil when fumigated/ac when replanted replanted to DN to NX Paradox Paradox 400lb/ac MB 99.99% 2 a 123 ab (tarp) broadcast control in 24M lbs soil 500lb/ac rate 99.99% 301 bc 145 abc Telone stripped + 110lb MS control in 9M lbs soil 325 lb/ac MS broadcast in 6 water 99.90% control in 16 M lbs soil 432 c 332 c Sample each foot to 5 feet deep Samples from top 2 feet at canopy edge

Trunk circumference (inches) at Rio Oso in fall 2008 Fumigant NX rootstock DN rootstock MB @400lb/ac 22.6 21.6 ns broadcast Telone II 50gpa strip applied Vapam drench to 4, 4, broadcast 21.8 a 19.6 b 21.3 a 18.2 b Read values across, DMRT at P=0.05

2009 yield (lb of hulled nuts/tree) of Chandler on NX vs DN seedlings 80 70 a a a 60 50 a 9% diff. a 37% diff. 40 30 b NX paradox DN paradox 20 10 0 MB broadcast Strip Telone Vapam broadcast P = 0.05 Each treatment analyzed separately

What about Paradox VX211? Is the vigor due to nematode tolerance or extreme hybrid vigor?

Clones of VX211 compared to AX1 Paradox in first-leaf f 1. Each plot is 1/100 th acre 2. Plots contain either 0, 1, 20, or 500P. vulnus/250 cc soil

Third-year (October) growth of VX211 vs AX1 VX211 500 Pv AX1 VX211 no nemas

Roots of third-leaf VX211 without nematodes

Root systems of VX211 and AX1, in 500 P. vulnus/250 cc soil

Root-lesion in AX1 Paradox, within the first inch of root tip

Root-lesion in AX1 Paradox at 1 to 4 inches back from the root tip.

Root-lesion in AX1 Paradox at 4 to 12 inches back from the root tip.

Very few root-lesion found in VX211 root cortex. This photo is at 3 to 9 cm back from the root tip

Root-lesion Nematode in roots of two Paradox walnut clones VX211-Few nematodes in cortex at 0 to >9 cm from root tip AX1-nematode in cortex throughout new roots including samples >9 cm back from the root tip

Actual nematodes extracted from within root sections and from soil Rootstock 0 to 3cm 3.1 to 9 >9cm per 250 cm cm 3 soil VX211 5.9 a 7.9 a 4.0 a 881. AX1 272. b 345. b 104. b 541. P=0.05 ns.

Fifth-leaf Chandler on VX211 and AX1 rootstocks VX211 AX1

Fifth-leaf VX211 and AX1 trunk circumference (inches) Nematode Pi VX211 AX1 0 22.4 15.8-30% 1/250cc soil 19.5 13.7 20/250cc 17.6 11.5 500/250cc 20.1 13.3-30% -35% -34%

Root lesion/250 cc soil at 5 th -leaf, Nov. 2008 2000 a 1500 1000 b b b b b AX1 VX211 500 c 0 c Pi=0 Pi=1 Pi=20 Pi=500

VX211 vs AX1 nut yields in kg/tree 14 12 10 a ab ab 8 bc bc VX211 6 c AX1 4 c c 2 0 Pi=0 Pi=1 Pi=20 Pi=500

One-year lath house evaluation of P. vulnus host status /gram of root tips on several Paradox clones clones R1 R2 R3 R4 mea n Vlach 7871 7286 5813 5352 6580 a PX1 1673 2431 1800 1870 1944 b AX1 1037 1691 1132 1846 1426 bc VX211 1212 1306 1300 1409 1307 bc UZ229 959 633 621 707 730 c DMRT P = 0.05

Field Examinations, year 1 PX1 Vlach AX1 UZ RX1 VX211 P. vulnus No P. vulnus

Second-leaf growth of 9 walnut clones with or without P. vulnus P.v no Pv P.v. P.v. P no Pv P.v.

First-year tree height of 9 walnut clones with and without P. vulnus Rootstock Height w/o Pv Height w/pv RX032 136 cm 132 cm ns RX1 119 95 * VX211 117 128 ns AZ025 110 80 ns AX1 92 86 ns Vlach 84 56 * WIP 3 80 37 * PX1 75 86 ns UZ229 62 82 ns DMRT P=.05

Is there resistance in elite selections of Juglans?

One of the elite Juglans spp. provided us with nematode resistance in 5 of 11 plants!!! Juglans cathayensis Chinese walnut, a type of butternut t

Two-year evaluation of 8 Juglans sources from National Germplasm Repository Juglans spp. seeds trees mean root-lesion/g root mean root-knot/g root % resistant 1st yr 2nd yr 1st yr 2nd yr RL RKN J. mandschurica 37 13 6.9 272.4 0.2 0.39 0% 92% J. ailantifolia 47 26 33.8 422.44 0.13 4.7 0% 15% J. cathayensis 47 11 0.25 49.3 0 0.57 55% 18% J. hindsii, Rawlins 47 25 6.8 257 24.6 63.5 4% 44% J. regia, Hartley 47 6 21.7 118 1.3 17% 33% J. microcarpa 47 8 0.06 76.8 2.4 11 12% 12% J. major 47 14 0.95 59.4 0.24 0.24 14% 64% J. californica 47 11 0.19 75.6 9.4 89.8 18% 27%

First-year Chandler/J. cathayensis seedling in foreground J. cathayensis Chandler/J.c.

Six of 15 grafted limbs of Chandler/J.cathayensis survived 1 yr

There are swollen graft unions

In Summary NX and UZ Seedlings offer protection from nematode entry unless too many are present. Our studies encourage more study of UZ229. VX211 clone offers vigor and some tolerance to nematodes because fewer feeding sites are available but fumigate! But: to plant without fumigation we will need: Garlon > wait one year> then replant on different parentage having nematode resistance such as J. cathayensis #21