Weed Management in Sugar Beets: 2008 Research Results. Prepared for the. Ontario Sugar Beet Growers Association

Similar documents
EFFECTS OF TANK MIXES OF ROUNDUP WITH FUNGICIDES AND INSECTICIDES ON ROUNDUP READY SOYBEANS

University of Florida

CERCOSPORA BETICOLA INSENSITIVITY IN MICHIGAN AND MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY S RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Foliar fungicide timing and interaction with soybean maturities: Effect on soybean disease suppression and yield

County: Columbia. See factors. N/A Starter : N/A N/A N/A Post plant : See factors 6 /15/17 N/A. Insecticide:

2000 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA

Soybean plant health: Foliar fungicide and insecticide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I.

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Rhapsody (Bacillus subtilis) for Control of Botrytis cinerea on Lily (Lilium Star Gazer and Show Winner )

2007 Herculex Corn Rootworm Soil Insecticide / Seed Treatment Efficacy Experiment. 1. Data Summary

APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE OF QUADRIS FOR CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT. Jason R. Brantner and Carol E. Windels

Control of Rhizoctonia from Planting to Harvest

EFFECT OF IN-FURROW FUNGICIDE APPLICATION METHOD ON CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA AND SUGARBEET STAND ESTABLISHMENT. Jason R. Brantner and Jeffrey D.

2006 CORN ROOTWORM EFFICACY TRIAL YIELDGARD ROOTWORM COMPARISON TO SOIL INSECTICIDES AND SEED TREATMENTS 1. Final Report

Effect of Max-In Technology on Roundup Power Max Performance on Sugarbeet and Weeds at Mitchell, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season.

Influence of Fungicides and Biological Controls on Potato Diseases and Yukon Gold Yield and Quality

2001 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA

Evaluation of Fiesta and liquid corn gluten meal for pre-emergent control of turfgrass weeds greenhouse and bare soil trial.

TOLERANCE OF NATIVE WILDFLOWER SEEDLINGS TO PREEMERGENCE AND POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES

1. Any antagonistic or synergistic effects of the unlabelled tank mixes; and 2. The use of the Bayer product.

Imperial County Agricultural Briefs

EFFECT OF HEADLINE (PYRACLOSTROBIN) AS A YIELD ENHANCER FOR SUGARBEETS IN MICHIGAN

DAKOTA. EPA Reg. No This supplemental label expires January 19, 2020 and must not be used or distributed after this date.

Diversified Crops Report 17

(F) (%) (mph) (inches) May Calm 8:30 AM 2 true leaves

Potatoes (2007) Potatoes Comparisons of Nitrogen Sources and Foliars (2008) Potatoes Nitrogen Types (2008) Potato Seed Piece Direct Fertilizer

7. Cabbage / AARS / Lepidoptera Foliar Trial

YWTG Grower Meetings 2011

Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato

Update on Root Rot Research: Aphanomyces and Rhizoctonia

Weeds in Ornamental Plantings:

When and What Herbicides to Apply for Layby Weed Control in Sugarbeets during the 2008 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

WEED CONTROL IN PEPPERMINT AND SPEARMINT. Charles E. Stanger and Joey Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon, 1995

Grower Summary. FV 372a

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

University of GA Coop Ext Service Postemergence Broadleaf Weed Control with Penoxsulam in Bermudagrass.

Identifying and Managing Sunflower Diseases. Sam Markell, PhD Extension Plant Pathologist North Dakota State University

The Impact of Post Application Irrigation on Dollar Spot, Brown Patch and Algae Control with Renown Fungicide, 2008

High Tunnel Pepper Variety Trial, 2011

Cool Season Vegetables and Strawberry Response to Phosphates Research and Observations over the last Ten Years

Weed Control in Green Peas. Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon

White Rot Fungicide Evaluations in Fresno County & Nitrogen Balance Progress Report

CALIFORNIA LEAFY GREENS RESEARCH PROGRAM. April 1, 2012 March 31, 2013 EVALUATION OF AN AUTOMATED LETTUCE THINNER

Final Report for Slosson Foundation. Trap Cropping for Management of Root-knot Nematode in Home Gardens

Evaluation of Foliar Insecticide Approaches for Aphid Management in Head Lettuce

Critical Weed Control Requirements in High Density Apple Orchards

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Cycocel (Chlormequat Chloride) for Growth Control of Sweet Potato Vine (Ipomoea batatas Tricolor )

POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

Basics of Pesticide Resistance. Sam Markell, Ph.D. Extension Plant Pathologist

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center -1- Vegetable Report 2. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center Vegetable Report 2 January 2000

Effect of Alternative Control Products on the Reduction of Dandelion in Turf J.B. Ross and M.A. Anderson

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT ON SUGARBEET FOLLOWING CORN

95.4 ab 95.7 a 11.5 c 50 b 100 a 9.5 c 95 a 99.8 a 95.4 de. 0 c 97.8 a 68.4 ab 0 c 33.3 bc 33.3 bc 0 b 91.6 a 93.9 e

The (COSHH) Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations may apply to the use of this product at work. IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Corn Rootworm Control in Field Corn with planting time treatments. Soil Insecticide Test # 3, 2005

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Mogeton 25 WP (Quinoclamine) on Winter Creeper (Euonymus fortunei Green and Gold )

California Pepper Commission Final Report, Title: Preemergence Weed Control Trials in Peppers

Is your spraying equipment well adjusted? Orchard Spray Equipment: Set Up and Calibration by Greg O'Sullivan

Variety Evaluation and Weed Management Trials in San Joaquin County

Volume XIX, Number 3 29 March Weed Control: It s All about the Timing

Radish IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

Response of Burley Tobacco to Sucker Control Chemicals Gary Palmer and Bob Pearce

Rootstock and Interstem Effects on Pome Fruit Trees

Steven R. James and Gary L. Reed

DRY BEAN RESEARCH WEED CONTROL VARIETY TRIALS 2008 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

9:30 a.m. New Products for Disease Control in Carrots Mary Hausbeck, Plant Pathology Dept., MSU

Pennsylvania Fresh-market Sweet Corn IPM. by Shelby Fleischer, Lee Young & David Biddinger 11/9/07

Vine Nutrition. A g e n d a 4/10/2017. Soil How to sample Sample submission sheet Lab analysis & results Interpretation

10 month project. Andrew Jukes Andy Richardson Paul Miller. Matt Rawson. 31 March 2012

Spring Barley Seed Treatment Trial, Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2005

Effect of Five Planting Dates on Yield of Six Sweet Onions

North American Bramble Growers Research Foundation. Grit Weeding to Efficiently Control Weed Populations in Primocane-Fruiting Raspberries

INSECTICIDE ROTATIONS FOR CONTROL OF THRIPS IN ONIONS, 2011

Contains 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, each at %, as preservatives

Organically Managed Lands Program. Durango, CO. Chip Osborne Osborne Organics. Prepared by:

Sorghum Disease Update. Doug Jardine Extension Plant Pathologist

Tree water use and irrigation

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

Oregon Winter Workshop 2018 The Washington Report

Using Liquid Sources of Potassium Fertilizer in Highbush Blueberry. David Bryla USDA-ARS Horticultural Crops Research Unit Corvallis, OR

CORN - CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE SYSTEM - 3% ORGANIC MATTER OR MORE - MEDIUM

2016 Dormant Stem Brush Control Trial

4.05L ZIDUATM. SC Herbicide

Products. Ridomil Gold 480SL Fungicide. About this Product. Uses. Technical Information. Tank Mixes. Label and MSDS. Application Information

PERMIT TO ALLOW MINOR USE OF AN AGVET CHEMICAL PRODUCT

In the field. Greenhouse/High Tunnel. Tomato Diseases. Fungicides

Stoneville Cotton Seed Louisiana Variety Information

Evaluation of Peanut Varieties in Mississippi

Seed & Soil-borne Diseases - What s New? 2012 Agronomy Update Crop Establishment

Soil management impacts on orchard soil health and tree productivity

SF 012 (GSK195) John Atwood ADAS Horticulture Boxworth Cambridge CB3 8NN. Tel: Fax:

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

(F) CORN: Zea mays L. 'Pioneer 32T85, Pioneer 32T84 HERCULEX BT TRANSGENIC HYBRIDS AND FORCE 3G INSECTICIDE AT

Pepper IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

Weed control in beets.

EVALUATION OF NATURAL SELECTIVE POST-EMERGENT HERBICIDE PRODUCTS ON GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF WEEDS AND TURFGRASS.

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

EVALUATION OF SMARTSTAX TRAITED AND REFUGE CORN HYBRIDS IN COMBINATION WITH SOIL INSECTICIDES AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN

2007 Plant Management Network. Accepted for publication 23 October Published 2 February 2007.

Transcription:

Weed Management in Sugar Beets: 2008 Research Results Prepared for the Ontario Sugar Beet Growers Association Darren Robinson University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, February 5, 2009

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The registration of glyphosate tolerant sugar beets provides growers with an effective weed control option that is much simpler to use than conventional herbicides that rely on split or micro rate applications. However, there are still questions regarding the potential utility of the RR system, specifically on tank mixing glyphosate (Weathermax) with fungicides to reduce the number of passes over a field. The first objective of this research was to determine whether Weathermax can be safely applied in a tank mix with Quadris, Headline, Eminent and Proline and still obtain acceptable weed control. Since herbicides and fungicides may be applied at different pressures, water volumes and spray pressures than one another, we conducted three studies to examine each of these factors, when Weathermax was applied alone, or with each of the four fungicides mentioned above. The two take home messages of this research are: Quadris, Headline, Eminent and Proline did not antagonize Weathermax (667 ml/ac applied just prior to row closure), nor did they cause injury when tank mixed with Weathermax with either nozzle type (air induction or hollow cone), water volume (10 or 20 gallon/acre) or spray pressure (30 or 80 PSI). Nozzle type, water volume and spray pressure did not reduce weed control when the various fungicides were tank mixed with Weathermax. One concern that RR sugar beet growers face is control of volunteer RR corn. To meet this objective, research was conducted to determine whether Weathermax can be safely tank mixed with Assure II and still obtain acceptable control. Volunteer RR corn seed was spread over the entire trial area, planted to sugar beet, and Assure II alone, Weathermax alone, and the tank mix of Assure II + Weathermax was applied once the corn reached the 3 4 leaf stage. The two take home messages of this research are: The tank mix of Assure II + Weathermax did not injure RR sugar beet (as seen in both injury ratings and in yield). The tank mix of Assure II + Weathermax effectively controlled volunteer RR corn. 2

Table of Contents TRIAL NAME PAGE # EFFECT OF NOZZLE TYPE ON EFFICACY OF WEATHERMAX FUNGICIDE TANK MIXES 4 EFFECT OF SPRAY PRESSURE ON EFFICACY OF WEATHERMAX FUNGICIDE TANK MIXES 6 EFFECT OF WATER VOLUME ON EFFICACY OF WEATHERMAX FUNGICIDE TANK MIXES 8 CONTROL OF VOLUNTEER RR CORN IN RR SUGAR BEETS 10 3

TRIAL 1: EFFECT OF NOZZLE TYPE ON EFFICACY OF WEATHERMAX FUNGICIDE TANK MIXES Objective: Compare AI to Hollow Cone nozzles for weed control and tolerance of sugar beet to applications of Weathermax with Quadris, Headline, Eminent and Proline. Materials & Methods: Variety: Crystal RR827 Planting date: April 30 Planting rate: 59355 seeds/ha Depth: 1 Row spacing: 30 Plant spacing: 4.2 Design: Randomized Complete Block Design Plot width: 6 Plot length: 30 Reps: 4 Soil Description: Sand: 49% OM: 5.9% Silt:34% ph: 7.2 Clay: 17% CEC 20 Application Information: A APPLICATION DATE JUL 4 TIME OF DAY 1:00 PM TIMING POST AIR TEMP (c) 27 RH (%) 29 WIND SPEED (KPH) 3 CLOUD COVER (%) 10 CROP STAGE PRIOR TO ROW CLOSURE Spray Equipment: Application Method: CO2 Backpack Pressure: 80 PSI Nozzle Type: AI OR HOLLOW CONE Nozzle Spacing: 20 Spray Volume: 20 GAL/AC Boom Width: 60 4

Table 1.1. Effect of nozzle type, Weathermax (667 ml/ac) and fungicide on sugar beet visual injury 14 days after application and sugar beet yield. NOZZLE TYPE HERBICIDE FUNGICIDE VISUAL INJURY % WEED TOTAL YIELD % CONTROL T/AC 1. AI NONE NONE 0A 0A 13.2A 2. AI WEATHERMAX NONE 0A 97B 31.8B 3. AI WEATHERMAX QUADRIS 0A 98B 31.7B 4. AI WEATHERMAX HEADLINE 0A 96B 31.6B 5. AI WEATHERMAX EMINENT 0A 97B 34.0B 6. AI WEATHERMAX PROLINE 0A 96B 35.8B 7. HOLLOW CONE NONE NONE 0A 0A 13.2A 8. HOLLOW CONE WEATHERMAX NONE 0A 97B 32.0B 9. HOLLOW CONE WEATHERMAX QUADRIS 0A 98B 32.0B 10. HOLLOW CONE WEATHERMAX HEADLINE 0A 97B 32.3B 11. HOLLOW CONE WEATHERMAX EMINENT 0A 96B 35.1B 12. HOLLOW CONE WEATHERMAX PROLINE 0A 98B 32.9B LSD (P <0.05) 0 12 3.9 Conclusions: The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of nozzle type on weed control and tolerance of sugar beet to Weathermax (667 ml/ac) applied alone or in tank mix with Quadris, Headline, Eminent and Proline immediately prior to row closure in sugar beets. There was no visual injury in sugar beet, and the addition of a fungicide to Weathermax did not reduce weed control or yield in either the AI or Hollow Cone nozzle treatments. 5

TRIAL 2: EFFECT OF SPRAY PRESSURE ON EFFICACY OF WEATHERMAX FUNGICIDE TANK MIXES Objective: Compare weed control and tolerance of sugar beet to applications of Weathermax with Quadris, Headline, Eminent and Proline, applied at 30 or 80 PSI pressure. Materials & Methods: Variety: Crystal RR827 Planting date: April 30 Planting rate: 59355 seeds/ha Depth: 1 Row spacing: 30 Plant spacing: 4.2 Design: Randomized Complete Block Design Plot width: 6 Plot length: 30 Reps: 4 Soil Description: Sand: 49% OM: 5.9% Silt:34% ph: 7.2 Clay: 17% CEC 20 Application Information: A APPLICATION DATE JUL 4 TIME OF DAY 1:00 PM TIMING POST AIR TEMP (c) 27 RH (%) 29 WIND SPEED (KPH) 3 CLOUD COVER (%) 10 CROP STAGE PRIOR TO ROW CLOSURE Spray Equipment: Application Method: CO2 Backpack Pressure: 30 or 80 PSI Nozzle Type: AI Nozzle Spacing: 20 Spray Volume: 20 GAL/AC Boom Width: 60 6

Table 2.1. Effect of spray pressure, Weathermax (667 ml/ac) and fungicide on sugar beet visual injury 14 days after application and sugar beet yield. SPRAY PRESSURE HERBICIDE FUNGICIDE VISUAL INJURY % WEED TOTAL YIELD PSI % CONTROL T/AC 1. 30 NONE NONE 0A 0A 12.2A 2. 30 WEATHERMAX NONE 0A 98B 28.8B 3. 30 WEATHERMAX QUADRIS 0A 96B 29.6B 4. 30 WEATHERMAX HEADLINE 0A 96B 27.7B 5. 30 WEATHERMAX EMINENT 0A 98B 29.1B 6. 30 WEATHERMAX PROLINE 0A 97B 28.5B 7. 80 NONE NONE 0A 0A 13.5A 8. 80 WEATHERMAX NONE 0A 96B 29.9B 9. 80 WEATHERMAX QUADRIS 0A 99B 29.0B 10. 80 WEATHERMAX HEADLINE 0A 96B 31.2B 11. 80 WEATHERMAX EMINENT 0A 97B 30.9B 12. 80 WEATHERMAX PROLINE 0A 98B 29.2B LSD (P <0.05) 0 13 4.1 Conclusions: The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of spray pressure on weed control and tolerance of sugar beet to Weathermax (667 ml/ac) applied alone or in tank mix with Quadris, Headline, Eminent and Proline immediately prior to row closure in sugar beets. There was no visual injury in sugar beet, and the addition of a fungicide to Weathermax did not reduce weed control or yield in either the 30 or 80 PSI spray pressure treatments. 7

TRIAL 3: EFFECT OF WATER VOLUME ON EFFICACY OF WEATHERMAX FUNGICIDE TANK MIXES Objective: Compare weed control and tolerance of sugar beet to applications of Weathermax with Quadris, Headline, Eminent and Proline, applied at 10 or 20 gal/ac water volume. Materials & Methods: Variety: Crystal RR827 Planting date: April 30 Planting rate: 59355 seeds/ha Depth: 1 Row spacing: 30 Plant spacing: 4.2 Design: Randomized Complete Block Design Plot width: 6 Plot length: 30 Reps: 4 Soil Description: Sand: 49% OM: 5.9% Silt:34% ph: 7.2 Clay: 17% CEC 20 Application Information: A APPLICATION DATE JUL 4 TIME OF DAY 1:00 PM TIMING POST AIR TEMP (c) 27 RH (%) 29 WIND SPEED (KPH) 3 CLOUD COVER (%) 10 CROP STAGE PRIOR TO ROW CLOSURE Spray Equipment: Application Method: CO2 Backpack Pressure: 80 PSI Nozzle Type: AI Nozzle Spacing: 20 Spray Volume: 10 or 20 GAL/AC Boom Width: 60 8

Table 3.1. Effect of water volume, Weathermax (667 ml/ac) and fungicide on sugar beet visual injury 14 days after application and sugar beet yield. WATER VOLUME HERBICIDE FUNGICIDE VISUAL INJURY % WEED TOTAL YIELD GA/AC % CONTROL T/AC 1. 10 NONE NONE 0A 0A 10.7A 2. 10 WEATHERMAX NONE 0A 97B 31.6B 3. 10 WEATHERMAX QUADRIS 0A 98B 30.4B 4. 10 WEATHERMAX HEADLINE 0A 96B 28.9B 5. 10 WEATHERMAX EMINENT 0A 97B 30.6B 6. 10 WEATHERMAX PROLINE 0A 96B 27.4B 7. 20 NONE NONE 0A 0A 12.5A 8. 20 WEATHERMAX NONE 0A 97B 31.8B 9. 20 WEATHERMAX QUADRIS 0A 98B 32.6B 10. 20 WEATHERMAX HEADLINE 0A 97B 33.6B 11. 20 WEATHERMAX EMINENT 0A 96B 30.2B 12. 20 WEATHERMAX PROLINE 0A 98B 31.2B LSD (P <0.05) 0 11 4.6 Conclusions: The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of water volume on weed control and tolerance of sugar beet to Weathermax (667 ml/ac) applied alone or in tank mix with Quadris, Headline, Eminent and Proline immediately prior to row closure in sugar beets. There was no visual injury in sugar beet, and the addition of a fungicide to Weathermax did not reduce weed control or yield in either the 10 or 20 gallon/acre water volume treatments. 9

TRIAL 4: CONTROL OF VOLUNTEER RR CORN IN RR SUGAR BEETS Objective: Determine whether volunteer RR corn control and tolerance of sugar beet are reduced by tank mixing Assure II with Weathermax. Materials & Methods: Variety: Crystal RR827 Planting date: April 30 Planting rate: 59355 seeds/ha Depth: 1 Row spacing: 30 Plant spacing: 4.2 Design: Randomized Complete Block Design Plot width: 6 Plot length: 30 Reps: 4 Soil Description: Sand: 49% OM: 5.9% Silt:34% ph: 7.2 Clay: 17% CEC 20 Application Information: A APPLICATION DATE JUN 24 TIME OF DAY 10:00 AM TIMING POST AIR TEMP (c) 27 RH (%) 29 WIND SPEED (KPH) 3 CLOUD COVER (%) 10 CROP STAGE 8 LEAF Spray Equipment: Application Method: CO2 Backpack Pressure: 80 PSI Nozzle Type: AI Nozzle Spacing: 20 Spray Volume: 20 GAL/AC Boom Width: 60 10

Table 4.1. Effect of tank mixing Assure II with Weathermax on sugar beet visual injury, volunteer RRcorn control and sugar beet yield. HERBICIDE TREATMENT VISUAL INJURY % WEED TOTAL YIELD % CONTROL T/AC 1. UNTREATED 0A 0B 12.6B 2. WEATHERMAX (667 ML/AC) 0A 0B 18.6AB 3. ASSURE II (100 ML/AC) + SUREMIX (0.5% V/V) 0A 93A 23.9A 4. WEATHERMAX (667 ML/AC) + ASSURE II (100 ML/AC) + 0A 95A 26.4A SUREMIX (0.5% V/V) 5. WEATHERMAX (1334 ML/AC) + ASSURE II (200 ML/AC) + 0A 95A 26.8A SUREMIX (1.0% V/V) LSD (P <0.05) 0 3 7.4 Conclusions: The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of tank mixing Assure II with Weathermax to control volunteer RR corn in RR sugar beet on weed control and tolerance of sugar beet. Tank mixing Assure II with Weathermax did not injure sugar beets. Volunteer RR corn control and sugar beet yield were not reduced by tank mixing Weathermax with Assure II. 11