: New Design in Heritage Contexts Background Established in 2005, a special Award is given in addition to the conservation award categories. The Contexts (previously known as the Jury Commendation for Innovation), recognizes newly built structures that The Award encourages submissions of completed new architecture design projects that enrich the existing heritage setting. 2016 : About the Throughout Asia the Pacific, cultural heritage sites are under threat. As heritage buildings properties are largely in private ownership, the role of private individuals institutions in protecting these vulnerable sites is paramount. Recognizing this, UNESCO seeks to encourage private sector involvement public-private collaboration in conserving the region s cultural heritage for the benefit of current future generations. The UNESCO Asia-Pacific for Cultural Heritage Conservation recognize excellent achievement in successfully conserving or restoring heritage buildings properties in the region by the private sector or by public-private initiatives. The Award winners span a wide range of conservation projects from private residences to palace complexes. Over the years, the projects illustrate the increasing momentum level of conservation in Asia the Pacific. The set technical social benchmarks for cultural heritage conservation in the region. Award-winning projects serve as catalysts a source of inspiration for private individuals institutions in conserving cultural heritage throughout the region. UNESCO s Mission The United Nations Educational, Scientific Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is at the vanguard of international efforts to safeguard cultural heritage. UNESCO recognizes that cultural heritage in its rich diversity has intrinsic value for sustainable development, social cohesion peace. As a source of identity, innovation creativity, it constitutes our collective cultural memory the foundation upon which communities can construct their future. In Asia the Pacific, UNESCO promotes the stewardship of cultural heritage in all its manifestations, including built heritage. UNESCO works closely with governments civil society in protecting the region s cultural heritage through activities at all levels. Deadline Award for New Design in Heritage Contexts. 1.1 In addition to the announced, the Jury will, through its special Award for New, recognize newly built structures that 2.1 The Award for New Design in Heritage Contexts will be given at the discretion of the Jury. 2.2 The Contexts will consist of a bronze plaque for a selected number of entries. 3.1 Projects should have been undertaken within the framework of a larger conservation project or should be located within or adjacent to a historic area whose essential elements are more than 3.2 Building annexes, new extensions, new buildings, new public spaces new structures such as bridges are all eligible for consideration. 3.3 To be considered for the Award for New, the work must have been completed within the preceding 10 years at the time of submission. The project must also have at least one year. Contact Us Since 2000, UNESCO has received 598 entries from 24 countries. A total of 186 projects have received for exemplary conservation efforts, while 10 projects have received the Award for TH/CLT/15/01 UNESCO is the only United Nations agency with a mate in cultural heritage. Submission deadline for the 2016 UNESCO Asia-Pacific for Cultural Heritage Conservation is 31 March 2016. In 2005, UNESCO launched the Jury Commendation for Innovation, now known as the Contexts. This award recognizes newly built structures that demonstrate outsting design well-integrated into historic contexts. : Tel: (66 2) 391-0577 ext. 509 Fax: (66 2) 391-0866 Email: culture.bgk@unesco.org wwww.unescobkk.org/culture/ heritage/ : Sanfang Qixiang, Fuzhou,
: New Design in Heritage Contexts Background Established in 2005, a special Award is given in addition to the conservation award categories. The Contexts (previously known as the Jury Commendation for Innovation), recognizes newly built structures that The Award encourages submissions of completed new architecture design projects that enrich the existing heritage setting. 2016 : About the Throughout Asia the Pacific, cultural heritage sites are under threat. As heritage buildings properties are largely in private ownership, the role of private individuals institutions in protecting these vulnerable sites is paramount. Recognizing this, UNESCO seeks to encourage private sector involvement public-private collaboration in conserving the region s cultural heritage for the benefit of current future generations. The UNESCO Asia-Pacific for Cultural Heritage Conservation recognize excellent achievement in successfully conserving or restoring heritage buildings properties in the region by the private sector or by public-private initiatives. The Award winners span a wide range of conservation projects from private residences to palace complexes. Over the years, the projects illustrate the increasing momentum level of conservation in Asia the Pacific. The set technical social benchmarks for cultural heritage conservation in the region. Award-winning projects serve as catalysts a source of inspiration for private individuals institutions in conserving cultural heritage throughout the region. UNESCO s Mission The United Nations Educational, Scientific Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is at the vanguard of international efforts to safeguard cultural heritage. UNESCO recognizes that cultural heritage in its rich diversity has intrinsic value for sustainable development, social cohesion peace. As a source of identity, innovation creativity, it constitutes our collective cultural memory the foundation upon which communities can construct their future. In Asia the Pacific, UNESCO promotes the stewardship of cultural heritage in all its manifestations, including built heritage. UNESCO works closely with governments civil society in protecting the region s cultural heritage through activities at all levels. Deadline Award for New Design in Heritage Contexts. 1.1 In addition to the announced, the Jury will, through its special Award for New, recognize newly built structures that 2.1 The Award for New Design in Heritage Contexts will be given at the discretion of the Jury. 2.2 The Contexts will consist of a bronze plaque for a selected number of entries. 3.1 Projects should have been undertaken within the framework of a larger conservation project or should be located within or adjacent to a historic area whose essential elements are more than 3.2 Building annexes, new extensions, new buildings, new public spaces new structures such as bridges are all eligible for consideration. 3.3 To be considered for the Award for New, the work must have been completed within the preceding 10 years at the time of submission. The project must also have at least one year. Contact Us Since 2000, UNESCO has received 598 entries from 24 countries. A total of 186 projects have received for exemplary conservation efforts, while 10 projects have received the Award for TH/CLT/15/01 UNESCO is the only United Nations agency with a mate in cultural heritage. Submission deadline for the 2016 UNESCO Asia-Pacific for Cultural Heritage Conservation is 31 March 2016. In 2005, UNESCO launched the Jury Commendation for Innovation, now known as the Contexts. This award recognizes newly built structures that demonstrate outsting design well-integrated into historic contexts. : Tel: (66 2) 391-0577 ext. 509 Fax: (66 2) 391-0866 Email: culture.bgk@unesco.org wwww.unescobkk.org/culture/ heritage/ : Sanfang Qixiang, Fuzhou,
natural context; please visit the website: quality control of materials building techniques (either cancer support assistance groups embracing articulating the multilayered history of the site. the final product extend the local community s cultural reverse the gradual abonment of this against historic facades historic all materials particulars of the architectural practice design of Mumbai s major Neo-Gothic lmarks well-loved public institutions. Parvati Nan Ganapati Temple, The restoration of Parvati Nan prominence vitality to a local religious of Yim Tin Tsai Isl in a rural area of form of industrial heritage contributes to exping the envelope communicate all materials 6.4 The wording of plaques the details given or throughout the 7.2 Heritage project description (using on the website PDF format, drawings a heritage inn museum sparked an in Chantaboon catalyzed a larger : Parvati Nan Ganapati, forms): The transformation of the aboned Mei Ho House into a youth hostel Social Policy Impact h. the overall complexity, sensitivity i. the on-going socio-economic environmental viability relevance of the project, provision for its future use maintenance; architecture the historic kingdom s most significant lmark. forms): d. the understing of the technical e. the use quality control of appro priate building, artisan the character inherent spatial promoted widespread recognition of Seven Alleys district. institutional buildings; religious properties; urban rural settlements/historic towns cultural lscapes, parks adherence to elaborate ritual protocols PDF format, drawings which demonstrates outsting 3.1 To be considered for the, lscapes, the essential historic for the full period of the Understing the Place social, historical architectural 6.4 The wording of plaques certificates 2.2 T he shall consist of a number 2.6 The will be made out in the 4.1 The recipients will have the final product contribute to the surrounding environment the local community s cultural historical continuum; conservation practice policy locally, 2.1 T he, which are established 2.5 The format number of the the discretion of UNESCO the Jury. owned undertaken wholly by : achievement of the private sector places properties of heritage New a. outsting design concept that cultural social c. the compatibility : Glass steel viewing walkway
natural context; please visit the website: quality control of materials building techniques (either cancer support assistance groups embracing articulating the multilayered history of the site. the final product extend the local community s cultural reverse the gradual abonment of this against historic facades historic all materials particulars of the architectural practice design of Mumbai s major Neo-Gothic lmarks well-loved public institutions. Parvati Nan Ganapati Temple, The restoration of Parvati Nan prominence vitality to a local religious of Yim Tin Tsai Isl in a rural area of form of industrial heritage contributes to exping the envelope communicate all materials 6.4 The wording of plaques the details given or throughout the 7.2 Heritage project description (using on the website PDF format, drawings a heritage inn museum sparked an in Chantaboon catalyzed a larger : Parvati Nan Ganapati, forms): The transformation of the aboned Mei Ho House into a youth hostel Social Policy Impact h. the overall complexity, sensitivity i. the on-going socio-economic environmental viability relevance of the project, provision for its future use maintenance; architecture the historic kingdom s most significant lmark. forms): d. the understing of the technical e. the use quality control of appro priate building, artisan the character inherent spatial promoted widespread recognition of Seven Alleys district. institutional buildings; religious properties; urban rural settlements/historic towns cultural lscapes, parks adherence to elaborate ritual protocols PDF format, drawings which demonstrates outsting 3.1 To be considered for the, lscapes, the essential historic for the full period of the Understing the Place social, historical architectural 6.4 The wording of plaques certificates 2.2 T he shall consist of a number 2.6 The will be made out in the 4.1 The recipients will have the final product contribute to the surrounding environment the local community s cultural historical continuum; conservation practice policy locally, 2.1 T he, which are established 2.5 The format number of the the discretion of UNESCO the Jury. owned undertaken wholly by : achievement of the private sector places properties of heritage New a. outsting design concept that cultural social c. the compatibility : Glass steel viewing walkway
natural context; please visit the website: quality control of materials building techniques (either cancer support assistance groups embracing articulating the multilayered history of the site. the final product extend the local community s cultural reverse the gradual abonment of this against historic facades historic all materials particulars of the architectural practice design of Mumbai s major Neo-Gothic lmarks well-loved public institutions. Parvati Nan Ganapati Temple, The restoration of Parvati Nan prominence vitality to a local religious of Yim Tin Tsai Isl in a rural area of form of industrial heritage contributes to exping the envelope communicate all materials 6.4 The wording of plaques the details given or throughout the 7.2 Heritage project description (using on the website PDF format, drawings a heritage inn museum sparked an in Chantaboon catalyzed a larger : Parvati Nan Ganapati, forms): The transformation of the aboned Mei Ho House into a youth hostel Social Policy Impact h. the overall complexity, sensitivity i. the on-going socio-economic environmental viability relevance of the project, provision for its future use maintenance; architecture the historic kingdom s most significant lmark. forms): d. the understing of the technical e. the use quality control of appro priate building, artisan the character inherent spatial promoted widespread recognition of Seven Alleys district. institutional buildings; religious properties; urban rural settlements/historic towns cultural lscapes, parks adherence to elaborate ritual protocols PDF format, drawings which demonstrates outsting 3.1 To be considered for the, lscapes, the essential historic for the full period of the Understing the Place social, historical architectural 6.4 The wording of plaques certificates 2.2 T he shall consist of a number 2.6 The will be made out in the 4.1 The recipients will have the final product contribute to the surrounding environment the local community s cultural historical continuum; conservation practice policy locally, 2.1 T he, which are established 2.5 The format number of the the discretion of UNESCO the Jury. owned undertaken wholly by : achievement of the private sector places properties of heritage New a. outsting design concept that cultural social c. the compatibility : Glass steel viewing walkway
: Parvati Nan Ganapati, reverse the gradual abonment of this for the full period of the please visit the website: architectural practice design all materials particulars of the cancer support assistance groups embracing articulating the multilayered history of the site. the final product extend the local community s cultural of Mumbai s major Neo-Gothic lmarks well-loved public institutions. Parvati Nan Ganapati Temple, The restoration of Parvati Nan prominence vitality to a local religious quality control of materials building techniques (either Social Policy Impact h. the overall complexity, sensitivity i. the on-going socio-economic environmental viability relevance of the project, provision for its future use maintenance; or throughout the 7.2 Heritage project description (using on the website PDF format, drawings a heritage inn museum sparked an in Chantaboon catalyzed a larger institutional buildings; religious properties; urban rural settlements/historic towns cultural lscapes, parks forms): natural context; which demonstrates outsting d. the understing of the technical e. the use quality control of appro priate building, artisan the character inherent spatial The transformation of the aboned Mei Ho House into a youth hostel promoted widespread recognition of Seven Alleys district. a. outsting design concept that cultural social c. the compatibility of Yim Tin Tsai Isl in a rural area of form of industrial heritage contributes to exping the envelope architecture the historic kingdom s most significant lmark. New adherence to elaborate ritual protocols 6.4 The wording of plaques certificates 2.2 The shall consist of a number Understing the Place social, historical architectural 4.1 The recipients will have the final product contribute to the surrounding environment the local community s cultural historical continuum; conservation practice policy locally, against historic facades historic 3.1 To be considered for the, lscapes, the essential historic 2.6 The will be made out in the 2.5 The format number of the the discretion of UNESCO the Jury. : 2.1 The, which are established achievement of the private sector places properties of heritage owned undertaken wholly by Glass steel viewing walkway : communicate all materials 6.4 The wording of plaques the details given forms): PDF format, drawings
New Design in Heritage Contexts Background Established in 2005, a special Award is given in addition to the conservation award categories. The Contexts (previously known as the Jury Commendation for Innovation), recognizes newly built structures that The Award encourages submissions of completed new architecture design projects that enrich the existing heritage setting. Award for New Design in Heritage Contexts. 1.1 In addition to the announced, the Jury will, through its special Award for New, recognize newly built structures that 2.1 The Award for New Design in Heritage Contexts will be given at the discretion of the Jury. 2.2 The Contexts will consist of a bronze plaque for a selected number of entries. 3.1 Projects should have been undertaken within the framework of a larger conservation project or should be located within or adjacent to a historic area whose essential elements are more than 3.2 Building annexes, new extensions, new buildings, new public spaces new structures such as bridges are all eligible for consideration. 3.3 To be considered for the Award for New, the work must have been completed within the preceding 10 years at the time of submission. The project must also have at least one year. : TH/CLT/15/01 2016 Since 2000, UNESCO has received 598 entries from 24 countries. A total of 186 projects have received for exemplary conservation efforts, while 10 projects have received the Award for In 2005, UNESCO launched the Jury Commendation for Innovation, now known as the Contexts. This award recognizes newly built structures that demonstrate outsting design well-integrated into historic contexts. The UNESCO Asia-Pacific for Cultural Heritage Conservation recognize excellent achievement in successfully conserving or restoring heritage buildings properties in the region by the private sector or by public-private initiatives. Recognizing this, UNESCO seeks to encourage private sector involvement public-private collaboration in conserving the region s cultural heritage for the benefit of current future generations. Throughout Asia the Pacific, cultural heritage sites are under threat. As heritage buildings properties are largely in private ownership, the role of private individuals institutions in protecting these vulnerable sites is paramount. About the : Sanfang Qixiang, Fuzhou, The United Nations Educational, Scientific Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is at the vanguard of international efforts to safeguard cultural heritage. UNESCO s Mission The set technical social benchmarks for cultural heritage conservation in the region. Award-winning projects serve as catalysts a source of inspiration for private individuals institutions in conserving cultural heritage throughout the region. The Award winners span a wide range of conservation projects from private residences to palace complexes. Over the years, the projects illustrate the increasing momentum level of conservation in Asia the Pacific. : wwww.unescobkk.org/culture/ heritage/ Tel: (66 2) 391-0577 ext. 509 Fax: (66 2) 391-0866 Email: culture.bgk@unesco.org Contact Us Submission deadline for the 2016 UNESCO Asia-Pacific for Cultural Heritage Conservation is 31 March 2016. Deadline In Asia the Pacific, UNESCO promotes the stewardship of cultural heritage in all its manifestations, including built heritage. UNESCO works closely with governments civil society in protecting the region s cultural heritage through activities at all levels. UNESCO recognizes that cultural heritage in its rich diversity has intrinsic value for sustainable development, social cohesion peace. As a source of identity, innovation creativity, it constitutes our collective cultural memory the foundation upon which communities can construct their future. UNESCO is the only United Nations agency with a mate in cultural heritage. :