Guided Angler Fish Program 2017Annual Report Prepared by Kurt Iverson October 27, 2017

Similar documents
Brine Generation Study

Under Section 608 of the CAA, EPA has established regulations (40 CFR Part 82, Subpart F) that:

Asparagus Response to Water and Nitrogen

Saying Mahalo to Solar Savings: A Billing Analysis of Solar Water Heaters in Hawaii

Preservation of Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfronts

All Types - Automatic, semi-automatic and manual. All Types - Horizontal (front loaders) and Vertical Plane (top loader)

WHEREAS, the Water Financial Plan was presented to the public for comment and was adopted by the

PINNIPED PREDATION IN THE BONNEVILLE DAM TAILRACE,

2017 Remodeling Impact Report

Multi-Family Recycling Discussion Paper

These are non-living factors that influence the performance of a crop. Ex. Climate, weather, soil type, soil fertility, etc.

Effects of Fall Fertilization on Frost Hardiness of Azaleas

TENANT TRAINING HURRICANE SEASON 2017

Presentation to Investors. November FamilyMart, Where You Are Always One of the Family

The Revised Method of Test for Residential Water Heating and Its Impact on Incentive Programs

Toronto District School Board Church Street Junior Public School

RenewableEnergy. A Guide to Prepare for a Grain Dryer Energy Audit. Introduction. Fueling and Feeding America Through Renewable Resources

STRUCTURE FIRES IN EDUCATIONAL PROPERTIES

Boiler MACT Deadline Is Here, Are You In Compliance? Sponsored by

Battery Performance Alert: A TOOL FOR IMPROVED PATIENT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVICES UNDER BATTERY ADVISORY

EDC ADDENDUM to the INTERIM REPORT

Dealing with the Loss of Waterfront Land in South Florida: The Monroe County Marine Management Strategic Plan

A Stewardship Plan for Refrigeration Units. Submitted to the Ministry of the Environment by the Canadian Beverage Association November

Technological developments in aquaculture, fishing technology and processing

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. Best Performance Standard (BPS) x.x.xx

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

Subj: Shipboard Refrigerant Leak Repair and Record Keeping

Workshop F Managing Ozone Depleting Substances Compliance, New Rule Changes and How that Impacts Your Compliance Program

Homeowner Rewards Program

Minnesota Multifamily Rental Characterization Study

4. Applicability: 4.1. Functional Entities: 4.2. Facilities: 5. Effective Date: See Implementation Plan

Cool Roofs in Northern Climates

I Annex 14.1 GSPP Protocol for sampling of seed lots for seed-health testing

Library of Birmingham integrated with The REP

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

Irrigating Lawns When Water Supply is Reduced Howard Neibling, Extension Water Management Engineer, University of Idaho

Mecklenburg County Residential Trash and Recycling

G.D. 13 MEMORANDUM. Board of Regents. Governance Report on Fire and Environmental Safety. Date: November 4, Recommended Actions:

Broomfield Garbage & Recycling Survey. Draft Report of Results

Preserving Recreational & Commercial Working Waterfronts. Jennifer Z. Carver, AICP August 2007

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket No ; NRC ] Exemption Requests for Special Nuclear Material License SNM-362,

Acknowledgement: Ralph Prahl, Prahl & Associates, contributed critical review and analysis

MORRO BAY COMMERCIAL FISHERIES 2017 ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT December Prepared by Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

Sugarbeets Enjoy Warm Winter

Low-Temperature Drying of The 1992 Indiana Corn Crop. Dirk E. Maier, Agricultural Engineering, and Richard L. Stroshine, Agricultural Engineering

4. Applicability: 4.1. Functional Entities: 4.2. Facilities: 5. Effective Date: See Implementation Plan

Understanding Water Use by Plants in a Cloche System - Gardening

Comox Valley Water Conservation Bylaw

REGION OF DURHAM EFFICIENT COMMUNITY FINAL REPORT. MAY 2008 Veritec Consulting Inc. Mississauga, Ontario

Waste Audit Cohen Loading Dock. 7 March 2013 Prepared for University of Pennsylvania, School of Arts and Sciences

Landscaping Securities August 28, 2014

PERFORMANCE GOALS 5 RESPONSIBILITIES 6 M=manufacturer. Y Recommended based on recycling rate

Shelter submission to the DCLG review of the Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm (England) Regulations 2015

5.8 PUBLIC SERVICES FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY SERVICES

Grain and Soybean Drying on Georgia Farms

FINAL REPORT ON THE 4 TH JOINT CROSS-BORDER EMC MARKET SURVEILLANCE CAMPAIGN (2011) LED LIGHTING PRODUCTS

Primocane-fruiting Blackberry Cane Management

AS/NZS :2009. Performance of household electrical appliances Refrigerating appliances AS/NZS :2009

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. Best Performance Standard (BPS) x.x.xx

Effect of Five Planting Dates on Yield of Six Sweet Onions

DRAFT TIMETABLE FOR STOUR MUSSEL TRIAL

Update on the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (CA MWELO)

Soli with three Bonsai Lords! Marco, Peter and Akiyama

Jennifer Vazquez Local Foods Planner & Farm Manager Laura Kleiman Local Foods Coordinator

From: Sent: To: Cc: Harmon, Dan; Erik Dickson RE: South Avenue Bridge Project, Missoula County // Request for comment

The following table summarizes information from various sources on corn development.

A. Product data. Unless otherwise indicated, submit the following for each type of product provided under work of this Section:

Introduction to Material and Energy Balance

Standard PRC-005-3(X) Protection System and Automatic Reclosing Maintenance

Star Fire District staridaho.org/government/firedept.php

The State of Electronics Recycling

Mechanical System Redesign. Dedicated Outdoor Air System. Design Criteria

Sacramento County Regional Parks American River Parkway Group Activity & Special Event Procedures

Division F Of G Of The 1987 Standard Industrial Classification Manual

U.S. STRUCTURE FIRES IN OFFICE PROPERTIES

Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident: Blowout and Fire August 9, 2005

Zone C Residential Recycling and Garbage Collection Calendar

Measurement of Attic Temperatures and Cooling Energy Use in Vented and Sealed Attics in Las Vegas, Nevada

Extended Producer Responsibility A global perspective. Andrew Sweatman

Subject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

Community Development and Recreation Committee

a high level of operational reliability), and the designer (in performing probabilistic-based

Battery Performance Alert

2017 Residential Wi-Fi Thermostat DR Evaluation

DOUGLAS L. BARRY FIRE CHIEF

Crop Management Details Start from Parameters settings Emergence Planting Seed brand: Settings Parameter settings Hybrid-specific Generic

Interim report January-September October 20, 2014 Magnus Agervald and Pernilla Walfridsson

Eelgrass Distribution in the Great Bay Estuary and Piscataqua River for 2013

Vegetarian Newsletter

fertilization: environmental impact

Food Information to Consumers (FIC)

XI B R.AR.Y OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS G30.7. HGb. ho.354-3g3. cop. 2. TCR1CUITURE

FIRE SAFETY POLICY LEEDS METHODIST MISSION. Oxford Place Centre

2015 PET Recycling Rate Report

INCIDENCE OF XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS PV CAROTAE ON CARROT SEED IRRIGATED BY DRIP OR SPRINKLER IN CENTRAL OREGON, 2004

Jeremy Barker Plotkin Simple Gifts Farm

METRO GROUP achieves sales target and confirms EBIT guidance

E-Waste Frequently Asked Questions August 1, 2017

Star Fire District staridaho.org/government/firedept.php

Transcription:

Alaska Region Sustainable Fisheries Guided Angler Fish Program 2017Annual Report Prepared by Kurt Iverson October 27, 2017 In 2014, NMFS implemented the Guided Angler Fish (GAF) Program as part of the Catch Sharing Plan for International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) Regulatory s 2C (Southeast Alaska) and 3A (South Central Alaska). The GAF Program authorizes limited annual transfers of commercial halibut individual fishing quota (IFQ) as GAF to qualified charter halibut permit holders for harvest by charter vessel anglers in 2C and 3A. Using GAF, qualified charter halibut permit holders may offer charter vessel anglers the opportunity to retain halibut of any size up to the limit for unguided anglers when the charter management measure in place limits charter vessel anglers to more restrictive size or harvest limits. For 2017, charter vessel anglers in 2C were limited to one halibut per day that was less than or equal to 44 inches or greater than or equal to 80 inches in total length. In 3A, charter vessel anglers were allowed to keep two halibut per day. If two fish were kept, one had to be no more than 28 inches total length. Additionally, charter anglers in 3A had a 4-fish annual limit. Charter vessels in 3A were limited to one trip per day, and no charter fishing for halibut was allowed in 3A on Wednesdays for the entire season, and on three consecutive Tuesdays from mid-july to August 1. Using GAF, charter vessel anglers in 2C and 3A could harvest up to two halibut of any size per day, and GAF were not subject to the annual limit or daily closures in 3A. NMFS issues GAF in numbers of halibut based on a conversion factor from the average weight of GAF harvested in the area in the previous year. The conversion factors for GAF leases in 2017 were 74 lb. IFQ per GAF in 2C and 42 lb. IFQ per GAF in 3A (Table 1). For 2018, the conversion factors will be 71 lbs. IFQ per GAF in 2C and 44 lbs. IFQ per GAF in 3A (Table 1). Table 2 indicates that in 2017, NMFS processed 229 GAF transfers totaling 62,992 lbs. of IFQ to 47 different charter halibut permit holders. These transfers authorized the potential harvest of up to 952 additional halibut as GAF by charter vessel anglers. Table 2 also indicates the number of transfers and the pounds of IFQ transferred has increased each year from 2014 through 2017, although the number of fish that could be harvested has varied from year to year, depending upon the conversion factors mentioned above. The number of charter halibut permit holders who obtained GAF permits has ranged from 40 to 47 persons each year over the 2014-2017 period. Eleven percent of the total GAF transfers in 2017 were self-transfers; that is, the same person held both the IFQ and the charter halibut permit and transferred the IFQ to themselves (Table 2). The percentage of self-transfers has consistently been higher in 3A than 2C: over the 2014-2017 period in 3A, self-transfers ranged from 38% to 47% of the total, whereas in 2C 7% to 14% were self-transfers. GAF participants are given the option of self-reporting cost information for GAF transfers. Of the transfers for which price information was reported, and excluding self-reported prices for self-transfers, lease prices in 2017 averaged $5.32/lb. in 2C and $4.59/lb. in 3A (weighted averages). The overall weighted average price per pound of IFQ leased as GAF in 2017 was $5.27, which is comparable to prices reported in earlier years (Table 2).

Charter vessel anglers harvested 733 GAF from the combined IPHC areas in 2017, which is similar to the GAF harvested in 2016 (Table 3). The result is that in 2017, 77% of available GAF were harvested, which is comparable to the last three years. The increased cost of GAF in recent years (owing to the larger conversion factors) and increased familiarity with the program likely increased the percentage of GAF that was used, compared to the first year of the program. As the program developed, it is likely that charter halibut permit holders were better able to predict how many GAF they would need. Unused GAF are returned to the commercial IFQ holders either voluntarily in September, or automatically 15 days before the end of the commercial halibut season, which ended on November 7, 2017. Forty-five voluntary returns of GAF to IFQ totaling 5,184 lbs. were processed at the end of August. Automatic returns of GAF to the original IFQ account occurred in late October 2017; 8,812 total lbs. were returned under 46 individual, automatic transfers: 6,586 lbs. of IFQ was returned in 2C, and 2,226 lbs. of 3A IFQ were returned. Guides are required to electronically report the length of each GAF harvested. The average length of GAF harvested in 2017 was 55 inches in 2C (Table 3) and 48 inches in 3A (Table 3). Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the frequency distribution of the lengths of GAF harvested over the 2014-2017 period. In all years, the majority of GAF in 2C falls between 45 and 64 inches, whereas in 3A, the length of GAF are somewhat smaller and more widely distributed, with the majority of fish taken in the categories of 30 to 59 inches. As mentioned above, using the IPHC halibut length/weight conversion table, the average net weight of GAF harvested in 2017 was 70.9 lb. in 2C and 44.1 lb. in 3A. These weights are converted to the nearest whole pound for the 2018 conversion factor. The 2018 2C conversion factor is three pounds less than it was in 2017, and increased in 3A by 2 pounds from 2017. The actual number of pounds harvested annually as GAF is calculated by summing the weights for individual fish, which are determined from the IPHC halibut length conversion table. Table 4 summarizes the estimated pounds of halibut harvested as GAF for each year since the program was implemented. NMFS costs associated with management, data collection, and enforcement of the GAF Program are recoverable through IFQ Program cost recovery fees. NMFS does not track fees associated with GAF separately from other IFQ Program fees. Table 1. IFQ to GAF conversion factors Conversion Factor (IFQ lb. / GAF) 2C 3A 2014 26.4 12.8 2015 67.3 38.4 2016 65.1 36.1 2017 74 42 2018 71 44 Note: Starting in 2017, the conversion factor is rounded to the nearest whole number to more accurately reflect regulatory requirements of 50 CFR 300.65(c)(5)(E). 2

Table 2. Summary of IFQ to GAF transfers IPHC Regulatory IFQ Pounds Transferred GAF Transferred GAF Permits Issued GAF Permit Holders Weighted Avg. price per pound Percentage of selftransfers 2014 2C 29,498 1,117 92 30 $ 5.62 14% 3A 11,654 910 19 13 $ 5.01 47% Total 41,152 2,027 111 43 $ 5.46 20% 2015 2C 36,934 548 119 27 $ 5.62 7% 3A 10,337 269 25 13 $ 4.66 40% Total 47,271 817 144 40 $ 5.48 12% 2016 2C 47,064 723 132 32 $ 5.43 10% 3A 10,442 289 26 11 $ 5.46 38% Total 57,506 1,012 158 43 $ 5.43 21% 2017 2C 53,206 719 207 34 $ 5.32 7% 3A 9,786 233 22 13 $ 4.59 41% Total 62,992 952 229 47 $ 5.27 11% Table 3. Summary of GAF landings IPHC Regulatory GAF Harvested (% of amount transferred) Average Length in Inches (range) 2014 2C 800 (72%) 55 (18-77) 3A 269 (30%) 45 (30-75) Total 1,069 (53%) 2015 2C 428 (78%) 53 (27-83) 3A 143 (53%) 45 (31-84) Total 571 (70%) 2016 2C 529 (73%) 56 (32-82) 3A 220 (76%) 47 (24-74) Total 749 (74%) 2017 2C 576 (80%) 55 (18-79) 3A 157 (67%) 48 (29-72) Total 733 (77%) 3

Table 4. Actual pounds of IFQ harvested as GAF, as estimated from reported lengths. Actual Pounds Harvested as GAF, Determined From Reported Lengths and IPHC conversion 2014 2C 53,864 2015 2C 27,849 2016 2C 38,968 2017 2C 40,860 2014 3A 10,336 2015 3A 5,158 2016 3A 9,332 2017 3A 6,920 IPHC length/weight conversions can be found at: www.iphc.int/publications/bulletins/lenwtimp.pdf Guided Angler Fish Harvested in 2C 250 Frequency 200 150 100 2017 2016 2015 2014 50 0 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 Length in Inches Figure 1. 2014 through 2017 GAF length frequency distribution in IPHC Regulatory 2C. 4

Guided Angler Fish Harvested in 3A 80 Frequency 70 60 50 40 30 20 2017 2016 2015 2014 10 0 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 Length in Inches Figure 2. 2014 through 2017 GAF length frequency distribution in IPHC Regulatory 3A. 5