REZONING POLICY FOR CHINATOWN SOUTH (HA-1A) Adopted by City Council on April 19, April 2011

Similar documents
Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

Urban Design Principles

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]

Case Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law Amendment Request Robie, College and Carlton Streets Halifax Peninsula PAC August 20, 2018

Revitalization Guidelines for Corridors, Villages and Town Centres

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

CHINATOWN HA-1A DESIGN GUIDELINES

BROADWAY-ARBUTUS POLICIES. Adopted by City Council on July 7, NOTE: To be considered in combination with applicable guidelines

Crofton Manor 2803 West 41st Avenue WHAT WE HEARD. Public Consultation: Phase 1

RIVERSIDE DESIGN CD-1 GUIDELINES. Adopted by City Council August 9, 1983

6 Site Framework Strategies

July 18, 2017 City of Vancouver 453 West 12th Avenue Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 Attention: Ms. Linda Gillan. Dear Linda,

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

Bathurst Bloor Four Corners Study Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Final Report

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

GO Station Mobility Hubs: Draft Precinct Plans. Committee of the Whole July 12, 2018

FRASER LANDS CD-1 GUIDELINES (BLOCKS 68 AND 69) Adopted by City Council April 1989

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

13. New Construction. Context & Character

expectations for new development W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E

Central Village Design Guidelines Westport, MA

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning

BROADVIEW PLANNING STUDY Community Consultation Meeting 4. January 2016

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

Historic Yonge Street HCD Study Public Meeting #2

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

BROADWAY EAST. Revitalization Strategy. 2.1 Introduction

DESIGN GUIDELINES. Planning Commission Re-Submittal. December 23, 2014 Revised to include Mixed-Use Design District Guidelines

Community Design Plan

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

King-Spadina Secondary Plan Community Consultation Meeting. Michelle Knieriem, City Planner October 11, 2017

Council has directed that these guidelines be used by applicants and staff for development applications at the following CD-1 zoned sites:

DAVENPORT VILLAGE SECONDARY PLAN

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

TUSTIN RED HILL DEVELOPMENT TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

Urban Design Brief. Watson Parkway North & Watson Road North Guelph, Ontario. Prepared by Coletara Development

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

, C-MS I June 3, 2016 $1500 pd chk #216918

City of Vancouver Land Use and Development Policies and Guidelines

Duplex Design Guidelines

Workshop 3. City of Burlington Waterfront Hotel Planning Study. September 14, The Planning Partnership

BESSARION-LESLIE CONTEXT PLAN

Form & Character Development Permit Areas

East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood

QUEEN-RIVER SECONDARY PLAN

1354 CARLING AVENUE FORMAL RESUBMISSION HOLLOWAY LODGING

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials

Welcome to the Little Mountain Open House!

BROADWAY/COMMERCIAL C-3A GUIDELINES. Adopted by City Council August 2, 2001

SCHEDULE D Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4937, 2017

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Zoning By-Law Amendment. 4495, 4499, 4509 & 4515 Innes Road City of Ottawa

WQW Study Community Meeting June 26, 2017

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Mixed Use Centres Development Permit Guidelines

Commercial Development Permit Area

Introduction. Intent of the Plan. Urban Design and Land Use Approach

Agenda. 7 Wright Crescent Urban Design Study. Public Meeting and Urban Design Workshop. 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND (City of Kingston)

CHAPTER 5: GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Appendix A Tall Buildings Guidelines

CITY OF SANTA MONICA DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

TALL BUILDING GUIDELINES

Hamilton Pier 7&8 Public Meeting and Workshop #1

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

June 21, North. Spring Angeles. On behalf. other large. of new, high-rise. distinctive

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

LOWER MAIN. Urban Design Framework. 3.1 A New Urban Community

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3

general corridor design guidelines gen-0.0

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507

B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks

18. Form & Character Development Permit Areas

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER A By-law to adopt Amendment Number 1 to the Official Plan of the Vaughan Planning Area.

MINUTES OF THE ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY JULY 26, 2017 AT 12:00 P.M. 1. THE PANEL CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 12:10 P.M.

Rezoning Frequently Asked Questions

Draft Cary Community Plan Review Part 3: Shop, Engage, Serve, Special Area Plans, Other Updates. October 27, 2015 Police Department Training Room

1141 Bloor Street West, 980 Dufferin Street, and 90 Croatia Street Combined Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF NORTHVIEW FUNERAL HOME HIGHBURY AVE N, LONDON, ON

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

George Hotel application STAFF REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 14, 2014

Transcription:

$1 City of Vancouver Land Use and Development Policies and Guidelines Community Services, 453 W. 12th Ave Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 F 604.873.7000 fax 604.873.7060 planning@vancouver.ca REZONING POLICY FOR CHINATOWN SOUTH (HA-1A) Adopted by City Council on April 19, 2011 April 2011

Contents Page 1 Intent...1 2 Application...1 3 Definitions...2 4 Early Review Process...2 5 Height and Massing...2 6 Urban Design Provisions...3 7 Connectivity to a District Energy System...4 8 Public Benefits through Rezoning...4 Rezoning Policy for Chinatown South (HA-1A) Page i

Rezoning Policy for Chinatown South (HA-1A) Page ii

1 Intent The intent of this policy is to provide guidance on rezonings in Chinatown South (HA-1A), specifically related to proposals for additional height beyond provisions in the Zoning and Development By-law. Development of higher buildings in this area shall balance the opportunity for additional growth and resulting public benefits with preserving the important heritage and cultural character of Chinatown. Established in the 1880 s, Chinatown is one of the two formative communities of Vancouver. The community has an evolving and enduring cultural identity, with many active community organizations, a distinctive urban and cultural landscape, and a unique vernacular architecture. As such, the overall development scale of the Chinatown, in particular the HA-1 (Pender Street) area, should continue to reinforce and support the prevailing heritage context, fine-grained character, and generally low to mid-rise building forms. Higher buildings are appropriate in HA-1A (Chinatown South) only as outlined in this policy. Future growth in Chinatown South resulting from this policy is expected to contribute to the overall economic revitalization and residential intensification of Chinatown (HA-1 and HA- 1A), as well as to support innovative heritage, cultural and affordable and social housing projects in the Chinatown area. In addition to the provisions that follow, proposals for higher buildings in Chinatown South (HA-1A) shall adhere to the existing, applicable Council-approved plans, policies, and guidelines for each site. Further, the provisions in this rezoning policy do not preclude additional requirements that will be determined during the enquiry and rezoning process. 2 Application This Rezoning Policy applies to the HA-1A area, as identified in Map 1 below. For the purposes of this policy, Chinatown South is defined as the portion of the HA-1A zoning district south of Pender Street. In order to maintain an appropriate scale adjacent to the historically significant Pender Street (HA-1, as showing in Map 1) this policy does not apply to the small HA-1A area north of Pender Street. Map 1 Rezoning Policy Area for Chinatown South Rezoning Policy for Chinatown South (HA-1A) Page 1

3 Definitions For the purposes of this document: (a) (b) (c) Chinatown South means that portion of the HA-1A zoning district that is south of Pender Street. Higher building means a development proposal that exceeds the maximum height provided for in the site s zoning district schedule and other applicable Council-adopted policies. Main Street Sub-area means that portion of Chinatown South with properties fronting on Main Street, south of Keefer Street. 4 Early Review Process Prior to submitting a written rezoning enquiry for any site in Chinatown South, applicants shall meet with City staff early in their design process. The purpose of this meeting is to review the development concept, ensure proper contextual influences are considered, and clarify design strategies to meet heritage, land use, built form, scale and character objectives. Applicants are encouraged to prepare a site context analysis and preliminary urban design response for discussion at this meeting. The processing of rezoning applications that may result from this policy will include the typical review by City advisory bodies, including but not limited to the Urban Design Panel, Vancouver Heritage Commission, and the Chinatown Historic Area Planning Committee. Depending on the nature of a proposal, additional special review may be required, and could include: presentation of proposals at the enquiry stage, joint committee workshops, inclusion of guest panel members on committees, etc. 5 Height and Massing The following height limits shall apply to rezonings in Chinatown South, and as identified in Map 2 below, subject to consideration of the urban design provisions outlined in this policy (including view cones, shadow, and context analysis): (a) (b) Chinatown South Height up to a maximum of 120 ft. will be considered. Main Street Sub-area Height of approximately 150 ft. will be considered. Map 2 Possible Heights through Rezoning Rezoning Policy for Chinatown South (HA-1A) Page 2

There is no floor area density provision in the HA-1 and HA-1A Districts Schedule, therefore floor areas achievable and related building forms result from the application of maximum heights and the design guidelines to the context of a specific site and proposed development. This approach to managing achievable floor area shall continue under this rezoning policy, noting that both the urban design provisions listed below and the Chinatown HA-1A Design Guidelines shall be applied. 6 Urban Design Provisions (a) Respect historic Chinatown (HA-1) in terms of adjacent architectural scale, orientation, massing expression, details and materials. (b) The recommended development site frontage for rezoning to heights above the zoned maximum of 90 ft. is 75 to 125 ft. (c) Vary building facades in order to convey incremental development, and to reflect historic development patterns such as 25 ft. lots, sawtooth building heights, and the resulting asymmetrical streetwall character. Composition of the facades to incorporate the following: (i) (ii) On all developments over 90 ft. in height, and for all developments on parcels with Main Street frontage over 50 ft., all street-facing facades should be modulated into distinct increments of 20 35 ft. vertical bays, and emphasize vertical proportions up to 90 ft. Street facing facades should exhibit distinctly different architectural treatments for each 50-66 ft. frontage increment, as if developed incrementally over time and designed by different architects, and should not repeat an immediately adjacent design treatment. (iii) Facades should include at least one strong horizontal expression or 'beltline' between 20 35 ft. above grade; this does not need to align with adjacent beltlines and is in addition to the required horizontal expression of the lower street façade and storefront level, per the Chinatown HA-1A Design Guidelines. (iv) Any primary street wall longer than 66 ft., and taller than 70 ft., should vary the upper height of the primary street façade to create a sawtooth profile at 90 ft.; the vertical step should be a minimum of 2 stories, and align with the modulations described in (i) and (ii) above. The resulting sawtooth form does not need to be symmetrical on the parcel or align with street wall profiles adjacent. (d) Setbacks are described in the Chinatown HA-1A Design Guidelines. Additional setbacks for that portion of the building above 90 ft. will be determined upon contextually-based analysis towards effective and appropriate transition in form/massing, scale, and character. Setbacks and modulation of the upper building massing to incorporate the following: (i) The building form above 90 ft. should exhibit façade articulation and modulation that is compatible with the building forms below, but need not follow exactly the street wall increments described in (c) above. (ii) A setback of 25 ft. minimum should be provided at 90 ft. along the entire primary facade of the building, and a setback of 15 ft. minimum should be provided at 90 ft. from all other street fronting property lines. (iii) For all developments over 120 ft. in height, the building form above 90 ft. should exhibit a modulated skyline profile; any continuous roofline length over 66 feet, should step a minimum of 3 stories to break the roofline. Roof profiles other than flat are encouraged. (e) For all sites where a higher building would have a visual impact on the protected Olympic Village Pier view cone (G.1.2), upper building massing and roof profile shall be shaped to maintain and respect the mountain profile and further, modulated to provide permeable views to the mountain range and valley profile beyond. Where possible, floor plate dimensions and shape shall be oriented to maximize the open view to the mountains and valley. Rezoning Policy for Chinatown South (HA-1A) Page 3

(f) Developments with frontages on Main Street should emphasize it as a neighbourhood high street with street-oriented retail uses at grade, and lighting and signage distinct from historic Pender Street. 7 Connectivity to a District Energy System New developments in Chinatown shall be designed to include a hydronic heating system in order to easily connect to a district energy system when one becomes available. These developments will also require agreements to ensure that they connect to such a system when it is in place. Building design for connectivity and the connection agreement must be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. For further information, please refer to the District Energy Connectivity Standards - Information for Developers available online at: http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/bylaws/bulletin/d006.pdf Other Council-approved policies relating to the City s sustainability goals shall also apply, including but not limited to, the Green Buildings Policy for Rezonings available online at: http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/guidelines/g015.pdf 8 Public Benefits through Rezoning Appropriate public benefits shall be provided by developments rezoned through this policy, typically in the form of Community Amenity Contributions (CACs), transferable heritage density, or affordable or social housing. Public benefits will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis as part of a rezoning application, according to the Council-adopted policy Community Amenity Contributions - Through Rezonings, available online at: http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/guidelines/c025.pdf Public benefits provided by rezonings can help to address increased demands that may be placed on City facilities as a result of the rezoning, mitigate impacts on the surrounding community, as well as address neighbourhood needs as identified in plans and policies for the area. For Chinatown, Council endorsed the additional height through rezoning described in this policy for the purposes of supporting innovative heritage, cultural and affordable and social housing projects, as well as to support residential intensification and economic revitalization of the broader Chinatown area. Rezoning Policy for Chinatown South (HA-1A) Page 4