Lake O the Pines Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting April 25 & 27, 2017

Similar documents
Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016

Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017

Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017

Public Information Meeting

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

EAU GALLE PROJECT MASTER PLAN APPENDIX C PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Raystown Lake Master Plan Revision. Public Meeting April 25 & 26, 2018 How does the revision process work?

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Prado Basin Project Updates

Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Chapter 5: Recreation

Welcome. to the Bull Shoals Lake Master Plan Revision Open House

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

Town of Lyons Parks Flood Recovery Planning Process. Photograph courtesy of Ed Bruder

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Westside Creeks Restoration Plan Merit Award AECOM, Fort Collins. Planning & Urban Design

State Parks and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fund Act

City of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

Provide and maintain sufficient public parks, recreation facilities, and open space to meet the recreational needs of County residents and visitors.

Parks and Open Space Preservation and Dedication. January 26, 2016 Fort Worth City Council Pre-Council Meeting Randle Harwood and Richard Zavala

PARTF Scoring System for Grants

This page intentionally blank.

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

MASTER PLAN TRAINING MODULE 1: INTRODUCTION

138 ATTACHMENT 17. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WlLMlNGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft Vers

A. Selma Park, Davis Bay and Wilson Creek

San Diego River Coalition 2012 Work Plan

PARKS AND RECREATION

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Please read the entire document

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES DISTRICTS

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

Arkansas River Corridor

{Best Practices. Summary of Tools, Strategies and Best Practices from 11 Michigan Case Study Communities

Community Conservation Workshop. Lake Placid

EXHIBIT A CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

RE: Application for FERC Project No , Scott s Mill dam hydropower proposal

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

Chapter PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS

Subject: Hendry County Evaluation and Appraisal Report Letter of Understanding - Identification of Major Issues

Wisconsin downtown action council Downtown project case study profile

Support the implementation of Cape Coral's Comprehensive Plan. Protect and utilize the unique natural resources in the City.

Summary of Changes in the DRAFT Rivers Project Natural Resource Master Plan from the 2001 approved plan to 2014 plan

SCC PRD (2016) COUNTY PARK MASTER PLAN

& SUSTAINABILITY PLAN

Mark Greenig Recreation and Land Use Planner CH2M Hill

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Central Lake Ontario Conservation Conservation Lands Master Plan

SECTION FOUR: MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS & OBJECTIVES

ROSEMONT 138kV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT. Public Open House Meeting #2 August 27, 2009

Lake Arlington Master Plan. Presented by Randle Harwood, Planning and Development Director October 27, 2015

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

The City shall enhance and improve the accessibility of parks and recreational facilities while protecting their quality. by:

1. Executive Summary. SECTION 1 Executive Summary. City of Arlington Lake Arlington Master Plan

Map Development 5/15/2012. New Virginia Modeling Tools

2.4 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives and Policies

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Objective: Resolution to recommend adoption of the Big Thompson Assessment to the Planning Commission

SALISBURY TOMORROW Our Vision

CHAPTER 1 Introduction

Section 4: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies

Master Plan Goals. 1. Outdoor Exhibition Project Background. 2. Master Plan Goals 3. Research + Site. Analysis. Location Investigation

BASS PONDS, MARSH, & WETLAND HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT

Pinellas County Greenways

OPEN SPACE CHAPTER 7: OVERVIEW. Preserve open space to protect natural resources, enhance character and provide passive recreation opportunities

CHAPTER 13 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Albion Hills Conservation Area Master Plan. Public Information Session

The Trust for Public Land. in Minnesota

Best Practices Appendix: Waterfront Communities

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

RIVER RECREATION AND CONSERVATION: LESSONS FROM COLORADO S 2013 FLOODS

Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies

Yadkin River Greenway Feasibility Study Fact Sheet Village of Clemmons, Town of Lewisville, Town of Bermuda Run

Finger Lakes National Forest. Backbone Horse Camp Water Hydrant Project

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET ARROYO PROJECTS

13 Maintenance and Operations Plan 223

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Portage County Parks, Trails and Greenways Plan

National Association of Conservation Districts. Kris Hoellen Vice President, Sustainable Programs The Conservation Fund September 19, 2013

4. What are the goals of the Kawarthas, Naturally Connected project? 7. What are watersheds and why are they being used as the project boundaries?

Edgeley Pond + Park Public Meeting

APPENDIX C Township 9 Consistency with Applicable Plans

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) ; TDD (651)

5 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space

ROLE OF LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION COOPERATIVES IN EVERGLADES RESTORATION

G A R Y G R E E N L I N K APPENDIX A

Urban runoff in my neighborhood (Capitol Hill) is heavy with trash and other debris.

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

PARKS. Chapter Introduction

LAND USE MANAGEMENT PLAN ARTICLE

APPENDIX I Presentations

Transcription:

Lake O the Pines Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting April 25 & 27, 2017 Presented By Matthew Like, Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers

Purpose of this Meeting Describe Purpose of Master Plan Describe the Revision Process Answer Questions Seek Your Participation & Input Explain Why Revision is Needed

Purpose of Master Plans The Corps defines a Master Plan as The strategic land use management document that guides the comprehensive management and development of all project recreational, natural and cultural resources throughout the life of the water resource development project. Source: Chapter 3 of EP 1130-2-550 available at www.usace.army.mil/library/publications

The Corps Vision for Lake O the Pines The land, water surface and recreational resources of Lake O the Pines will be managed to protect, conserve, and sustain natural and cultural resources, especially environmentally sensitive resources, and provide outdoor recreation opportunities that complement overall project purposes for the benefit of present and future generations.

Why Revise the Lake O the Pines Master Plan? Current Master Plan is dated May 1989 and has exceeded its useful life. The way the lake is managed today is different from the way it was managed in 1989. Land classifications have not been updated since the 1989 Master Plan Some changes that have occurred at LOP since 1989. Changes in concession lease areas or within parks. The Master Plan must be revised to address population changes within the region.

Key Points Regarding Master Plans Main focus is stewardship of natural and cultural resources and operation of quality outdoor recreation areas Proposed effective life of a Master Plan is 25 years Recreational use of the water surface is addressed

Additional Key Points Key sections of the Master Plan Revision include resource management objectives revised land use classifications management plan for each land classification Potential outcomes could be Changes to the designation of lands Protection of environmentally sensitive areas is given priority

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Applies to federal actions that affect the environment such as Master Plan revisions Requires federal agencies to CONSIDER and DOCUMENT the environmental impacts of their proposed actions as part of an agency s OVERALL planning and decision-making Requires federal agencies to cooperate with other federal, state and local governments as well as with organizations and citizens during project planning Scoping is where the federal agency asks for initial input from other agencies, citizens and organizations regarding project area, resources and uses

What Master Plans Are Not Master Plans do not address in detail the technical aspects of: Regional water quality Water management for flood risk management Water supply or water level management Shoreline management plan Private boat docks and vegetation management by adjacent landowners

What Will Not be Addressed National policy places strict limitations on the proposed construction of new public roads on Corps lands. With few exceptions road proposals that would cross federal land will not be addressed. Shoreline policy governing mowing, removal of vegetation and debris as well as pedestrian paths will not be addressed in the Master Plan. This is administered through the shoreline management plan.

Stakeholders Stakeholder input is very important to the process. They include: The general public Agencies that manage lands, such as State and Federal Wildlife agencies Concessionaires Tribes Historical and Cultural Societies Visitors and residents of the Lake

What About Drought/Flood? Master Plans cannot change how water in the lake is managed addressed in separate Water Control Plan Natural resources and recreation management must be implemented within the constraints of the primary missions of flood risk management and water supply

Lake O the Pines Missions Flood Risk Management Water Supply Environmental Stewardship Recreation

Fast Facts about Lake O the Pines Created by the construction of the Ferrell's Bridge Dam on the Big Cypress Creek. Construction began in 1955 Impoundment began in 1957 when cofferdam was closed Construction completed in 1958. Approaching 60 years old! Non-Federal Partner, Water Supply Contract Northeast Texas Municipal Water District 100% conservation pool

Caddo Watershed

Fast Facts continued Visitation: 750k-1 million per year Gross revenues (returned to the treasury): 600k-900k per year 4 Campgrounds, 359 campsites 3 major day-use areas 7 swim beaches and 19 boat ramps

Master Plan Revision Process Accomplished by a team of Corps employees with input from other agencies Public and stakeholder input will be carefully considered An Environmental Assessment of the Master Plan will be prepared and included as an appendix

The Master Planning Process Data Collection Agency/Public Scoping 25 & 27 April 2017 Resource Analysis Development of Land Classifications and Resource Objectives Agency/Public Review Finalize Master Plan Based on Comments Received Adoption of Master Plan Revision Where we are today

Possible Major Changes Needed in the Current Master Plan Re-examine the classification of project lands and the water surface Portions of currently designated parks and even non-park areas could be reclassified as environmentally sensitive areas Reclassify lands formerly occupied by commercial concessions Prepare New Resource Management Objectives

Additional Major Changes Prepare new Resource Objectives Need current recreation objectives that reflect major trends identified by TPWD and through public input Need current natural resource objectives that reflect major habitat and open space needs identified by TPWD, USFWS and public input

Lake O the Pines Land Classification Project Operations Recreation Multiple Resource Management Low density recreation Vegetation management Inactive or future recreation area Environmentally sensitive areas Easement Lands

Insert Current LOP MP map

Land Classifications Project Operations - This category includes those lands required for the dam, spillway, powerhouse, switchyard, levees, dikes, offices, maintenance facilities, and other areas that are used solely for the operation of the project or water supply activities.

Land Classifications High Density Recreation - Lands developed for intensive recreational activities for the visiting public such as day use parks, campgrounds as well as concessions like marinas and resorts.

Land Classifications Environmentally Sensitive Areas - Areas where scientific, ecological, cultural or aesthetic features have been identified. Designation of these lands is not limited to just lands that are otherwise protected by laws such as the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act or applicable State statutes. These areas must be considered by management to ensure they are not adversely impacted. Examples may include mature bottomland forests, river and stream corridors, scenic bluffs, and native prairie.

Land Classifications Low Density Recreation - Lands with minimal development or infrastructure that support passive public recreational use such as primitive camping, fishing, hunting, trails and wildlife viewing areas.

Land Classifications Wildlife Management - Lands designated for stewardship of fish and wildlife resources

Land Classifications Vegetative Management - Lands designated for stewardship of forest, prairie, and other native vegetative cover

Water Classifications Water Surface- Restricted Water Surface-Designated No Wake Insert images Water Surface-Fish and Wildlife Sanctuary Water Surface- Open Recreation

Utility Corridors Linear strips of federal land used for consolidation of multiple utility lines Establish only where no viable alternative to crossing Federal land exists Main purpose is to reduce negative environmental Impacts Generally follow existing roads or utility lines

Attend Meetings Visit our website at: (http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/about/lakesandrecreationinformation/ MasterPlanUpdates/LakeOThePines.aspx) Send us an e-mail: (CESWF-OD-LP@usace.army.mil) Visit with Corps personnel Tell your friends How Can I Participate? Fill out a comment card now or take it home and send later (30 days)

Master Plan Next Steps Typical lake master plan update will take 24-36 months to finalize. The Lake O the Pines Master Plan update is in the early stage of development First 30 day public comment 25 April thru 28 May Draft MP / EA public meeting in Summer of 2018, followed by another 30 day Public/Agency comment period Final document: 6-8 months (Winter 2018-2019)

The End Please feel free to visit with staff members, view the maps, ask questions and help us produce an excellent Master Plan