The Physical Environment Portal: Module 5, LS Leadership

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY

Measures (ILSM) Process

Procedure DESCRIPTION/OVERVIEW

MISSION To prevent the loss of life and property and to reduce injury by providing emergency response, education and prevention services.

Building Codes & Standards for Healthcare. Healthcare Construction Certificate - Level 1

Accreditation Program: Hospital

First Aspen Federal Regulation Set: K LSC 2000 Health Existing

LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PREVENTION MANAGEMENT PLAN

Changes to Environment of Care, Equipment Management, and Life Safety Chapters Related to Life Safety Code Updates

JOINT COMMISSION PREPAREDNESS / STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS DRAWINGS WSSHE SOUTHWEST CHAPTER NOVEMBER 19, 2015

THE 2012 EDITION OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE HOSPITAL EDITION SESSION #5

Agency for Health Care Administration

Agency for Health Care Administration

THE 2012 EDITION OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE HOSPITAL EDITION SESSION #6

Agency for Health Care Administration

NFPA 101 Code Update from 2012 Edition to the 2015 Edition

Changes to the 2018 Joint Commission Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (CAMH)

Agency for Health Care Administration

FACILITY MANAGEMENT DEFICIENCIES IN CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS (CAH)

ASHE Advocacy Team. Q4 ASHE Advocacy Liaison Webinar 12/7/16 12/7/16. Tim Adams, FASHE, CHFM, CHC Director of Leadership Development

Richard B. Alpert, P.E. Senior FPE, Clark Nexsen

FACILITY MANAGEMENT DEFICIENCIES IN ACUTE CARE SETTINGS

First Revision No NFPA [ Global Input ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement

Interim Life Safety Measures. Healthcare Construction Certificate - Level 1

2016 Joint Commission Update

FIRE/SMOKE BARRIER FUNDAMENTALS

NFPA 101, 2012 EDITION IMPACT ON NEW AND EXISTING HEALTH CARE FACILITIES

Agency for Health Care Administration

Developing a Healthcare Facility Fire Door Inspection Program

9/23/ :20 AM. Second Revision No NFPA [ Section No ] Supplemental Information. Submitter Information Verification

Crosswalk of 2014 HFAP Standards against HFAP Standards Acute Care Hospital Manual

LIFE SAFETY COMPLIANCE: ADAPTING TO THE 2012 LIFE SAFETY CODE

Interim Life Safety Measures (ILSM)

Barrier Management- Defending the Safety of Patients, Visitors, & Staff

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

Agency for Health Care Administration

Taming the Health Care Building Codes NFPA vs. The International and Chicago Building Codes JENSEN & HALSTEAD LTD.

Report on First Revisions with Statement June 2014 NFPA 101

Agency for Health Care Administration

SAF-BCF SECOND REVISIONS WITH STATEMENTS

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT NO 68 (ENGLISH AND PHILOSOPHY)

Interim Life Safety Assessments and Infection Prevention Assessments

10/25/2018. Facilitators. Emergency Preparedness &Life Safety Code for Administrators. Participant Guide

Written Fire Safety Plans

Element C3.5 Means of Escape

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT NEW BUILDINGS

Agency for Health Care Administration

Agency for Health Care Administration

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

E25 (D) Automatic controls for general means of egress lighting

This policy may also be used for routine work orders that are Life Safety in nature and cannot be completed within 45-days.

Iowa State Fire Marshal

Agency for Health Care Administration

Agency for Health Care Administration

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY

Top 8 Findings & SAFER Matrix for the 2017 ACE Summit & Expo

Life Safety Crosswalk

9/20/2016 2:53 PM. Second Revision No NFPA [ Section No ] Supplemental Information. Submitter Information Verification

Other EC and LS documents may be requested by surveyors, as needed, throughout the survey.

EC 5.10 FIRE PREVENTION MANAGEMENT

Emergency Planning for Institutional Facilities

January 1, 2014 Mandatory Effective Date

ICC CODE CORNER 2012 IFC Code & Commentary

2000 to 2012 Hospital K-tag crosswalk matrix for hospitals 2000 Tag #

Life Safety Code Common Discepancies Course# LSC102. EZpdh.com All Rights Reserved

THE 2012 EDITION OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE NURSING HOME EDITION SESSION #4

Major Changes to the 2010 National Construction Codes Contractor s Breakfast January 2014

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT SPORTS CENTRE

SURREY FIRE SERVICE. Construction Fire Safety Plan Bulletin

TIPS FOR BETTER JOINT COMMISSION SURVEYS

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT HORSEFAIR HOUSE

Report on First Revisions with Statement June 2014 NFPA 101

10/28/2015. Enjoy Your TJC Survey. Bill H. McCully CHFM SASHE. Senior Consultant MSL Healthcare Partners. MSL Healthcare Partners, 2015 PREPARATION

Following are code change proposals submitted through Adhoc Health from General study group and related changes. General. Position.

3/6/2018. Design Tips For Fire and Smoke Barriers. Professional Development Hours (PDH) Certificates. Copyright Materials

NFPA 101 and NFPA 99, 2012 Editions Code Update. where art meets engineering

Building & Fire Code Academy. Building Better With Our Greatest Resource Education. Welcome!

Balloting Version First Draft NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Proposed 2015 Edition

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

DEALING WITH FIRE SAFETY

ASCs & LSC. Alice Epstein, DFASHRM, FNAHQ

Presented by: Bill Lauzon, PE Lauzon Life Safety Consulting, LLC Web: Lauzon-LSC.com

Preview of the MA Building Code (780 CMR) 9 th edition

EC EP 14 All other electrical K-920 equipment in patient care vicinity NFPA , Chapter 10

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO

C. None (No sprinkler system) K3 E. NUMBER OF BEDS CERTIFIED FOR MEDICAID

Fire Enforcement Report

SPRINKLER PROTECTION OF COMBUSTIBLE CONCEALLED SPACES WITH LESS THAN 6 BETWEEN OPPOSITE FACES IN CAVITY.

Agency for Health Care Administration

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

PROPOSED CODE CHANGES FOR REVIEW BY THE FIRE CODE ACTION COMMITTEE

New DATE OF BLDG. PERMIT OR PLAN APPROVAL: SURVEYOR (SIGNATURE) TITLE OFFICE DATE REVIEW AUTHORITY OFFICIAL (SIGNATURE) TITLE OFFICE DATE

Prepublication New Text Jan 2018 Changes to Environment of Care and Life Safety Chapters

Unit 2 Fire Safety (Zone 1)

Part 3 BUILDING CODE MYTHS & INTERPRETATIONS

FIRE PLAN. In order to assure the safety of patients, visitors and staff, a standard response to fire or the potential of fire is required.

Changes to Environment of Care and Life Safety Chapters Related to Life Safety Code Updates

2012 Life Safety and Health Care Facility Codes - Door Inspections and Other Critical Inspection, Testing and Maintenance

First Revision No NFPA [ Section No ]

The Healthcare Environment Update

Transcription:

The Physical Environment Portal: Module 5, LS.02.01.10 - Leadership Fire Safety: Background Fire safety impacts both the lives of the occupants and the physical structures. In the early 1900 s many buildings were wood construction that burned easily. Building owners managed business losses of the wood construction by insuring the structure. Several tragic fires killed people that were trapped in the burning buildings, which contributed to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) becoming part of the solutions. Insurance companies became concerned that a lack of fire safety resulted in building losses, and looked to the NFPA to help develop codes and standards to reduce building loss. As fire safety for the occupants improved fire losses to the building owners was also reduced. The NFPA created a Committee on Safety to Life in 1913, which led to the development of standards for the construction of stairways, fire escapes, fire drills and the arrangement of exits. In 1921 they published the Building Exits Code. Over the following years this code was updated and expanded, until 1963 when the committee was re-structured. Under this revised structure the 1966 code was published, with a new name: Code for the Safety to Life from Fire in Buildings and Structures. Fire Safety: Intent of the Life Safety Code The NFPA 101-2012 is referred to by its title, the Life Safety Code or LSC. In the first chapter under Administration are two statements: 1.2 Purpose. The purpose of this Code is to provide minimum requirements, with due regard to function, for the design, operation, and maintenance of buildings and structures for safety to life from fire. Its provisions will also aid life safety in similar emergencies. In our healthcare buildings we strive to protect the occupants by managing fire risk. We also benefit by protecting our financial investments in these healthcare buildings, which allows the organization to continue to achieve its mission and serve patients. Over the years the healthcare building have benefitted from the Joint Commission requirement of complying with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Life Safety Code (NFPA 101-2012) and the associated Life Safety Chapter. Part of the process also includes the proactive use of the Statement of Conditions provided to all Joint Commission accredited organizations. This module is focused on part of those Life Safety Chapter requirements, ensuring that: building and fire protection features are designed and maintained to minimize the effects of fire, smoke and heat. [Standard LS.02.01.10] This standard is based in NFPA 101-2012 language: 1.1.2 Danger to Life from Fire. The Code addresses those construction, protection, and occupancy features necessary to minimize danger to life from the effects of fire, including smoke, heat and toxic gases created during a fire.

The specific focus is on minimizing the effects of fire, smoke and heat. Healthcare buildings are built with a series of fire barriers, designed to restrict the movement of fire in a building. Fire barriers are a system of walls, floors, doors, fire windows, fire dampers, and managed penetrations. The fire barrier is not a single component. If a fire door fails, the fire barrier fails; if there are unprotected openings (i.e. holes) in the fire rated walls, the fire barrier fails. Most fire-related deaths are not caused by burns, but from smoke inhalation. Property damage is directly related to the fire conditions. Maintaining the integrity of fire barriers first protects the built environment and by default those occupants living in it. [NOTE: In a later module we will explore smoke barriers that are designed to protect occupants lives from smoke inhalation.] If a fire barrier is more than walls, just what is a fire barrier? As mentioned above a fire barrier is several components, that when properly maintained protect the structure and its occupants. Each component has been tested to establish how much protection can be anticipated. For example, what does it mean if a fire door is listed for 90 minutes? First, the phrase listed indicates that a recognized testing agency has, in fact, tested the door assembly and deemed the door suitable for use in a 2-hour fire barrier, with the door delivering 90 minutes of protection. (Note: The Code allows 90 minutes protection for openings in 2 hour barriers, see LS.02.01.10 EP 4.) The testing agency will build a 2-hour wall and install the door into the fire wall according to the door manufacture instructions. Next the testing agency will apply fire to one side of the assembly, monitor the door assembly integrity and at the end of the 90 minute fire test subject the door to a fire hose stream of water to see if the door assembly stays intact. If so, the door assembly is deemed acceptable by the testing agency, who then allows the door manufacture to place a label on the door and the door jamb indicating the protection rating. The fire door is required to have certain features to ensure it will pass the testing agency tests, including the door must have either self-closing or automatic-closing devices; functioning hardware, including positive latching devices; and the gaps between the meeting edges of door pairs are no more than ⅛ inch wide with the undercut being < ¾ inch (See LS.02.01.10 EP 5). In a similar manner the walls that hold the doors must be built to maintain their rating. For the 2- hour fire barrier, the wall construction must also pass the testing agency test. All components that affect the fire barrier must be tested to ensure the fire barrier as a system can perform as required. If a fire rated door or other fire barrier component were modified, the rating is no longer maintained. For example, if a person applied white surgical tape over the door latch to cause the door to no longer latch, the door would be ineffective in containing fire in a fire condition, allowing the fire to spread. In a similar manner, if a contractor were installing cables above the ceiling and penetrated a rated fire barrier and did not install an acceptable remedy, the entire fire barrier could be compromised. Suggested Solution to Managing Fire Barriers: Many organizations use a Barrier Management Program, restricting the access above ceilings to prevent unknown breaches in the fire barriers. This program is discussed in greater detail in Perspectives FIND THE ARTICLE ON BARRIER MGMT. However, leadership can be an important part of the solution as well. Supporting facilities by endorsing the Barrier Management Program is an important first step. But also, supporting facilities by insisting staff do not block fire doors open, do not compromise latching or closing devices and providing support during construction activities.

BUILDING COMPARTMENTATION: DEFEND IN PLACE Units of Defense: Building Compartmentation Healthcare occupancies are designed to protect occupants by defending in place, rather than evacuation (as in business occupancy). To accomplish this, healthcare occupancies are designed with certain features that protect the occupants. For this to occur, all features of fire safety, including the building construction and fire suppression/alarm systems, need to be fully operable. In 1978 the Joint Commission released an LSC model called the Unit Concept. This model was mainly developed to educate the surveyors about the LSC, but when it caught on, the Joint Commission published the concept and used it to teach health care professionals about code compliance. In a health care occupancy, because of the building type and staff-to-patient ratios, the reaction to a fire is to "defend in place." The Unit Concept includes the following: Building unit The compartmentation of the total structure, including appropriate building construction/type. This is the largest of all units, as it has to do with how well the building will perform in a standard fire. It also includes fire barriers and floor assemblies. Features such as roof construction, fire detection and suppression systems and exiting methods contribute to the building unit. Room unit Individual rooms are the first unit of defense, and the room unit is the smallest of the units in the Unit Concept. The term room unit is somewhat misleading in a nonsprinklered compartment, as there is no requirement for separation between patient rooms. In a sprinklered environment, due to the rapid response of the sprinkler head, the patient room certainly is the first unit of defense. In a nonsprinklered compartment, the original concept of the LSC was to separate use areas (rooms) from the exit access (corridor) to provide an environment free from the products of combustion. Compartment Based on the size of a smoke compartment (22,500 square feet maximum), this unit component includes rooms and corridors, and creates areas that may be accessed horizontally, which is the preferable method to rapidly move patients. The compartment unit includes all the requirements for separating an institutional occupancy into

smoke compartments. The maintenance elements include wall penetrations, smoke dampers, and door hardware. Smoke compartmentalization is one of the most important features in the LSC, and a facility must be diligent in making sure these features are properly maintained. The smoke barrier is identified as having 30 minute Fire Resistive Rated assemblies, and is easily identified as having cross-corridor doors without latching hardware, but with door closures and a gap at the meeting edges of < 1/8. The smoke barrier assembly reaches from the outside wall to the other outside wall, from the deck above to the floor, and is to be without unprotected openings. A fire barrier is similar, however a fire barrier must meet certain criteria related to how long the assembly can resist the penetration of fire from one side to another (typically either 1 hour construction with 45minute doors; or 2 hour construction with 90 minute doors). Like the smoke barrier, the fire barrier reaches from the outside wall to the other outside wall, from the deck above to the floor is to be without protected openings. The major difference is that a two hour rated fire barrier can separate building occupancies, provided certain criteria is met. This includes not exiting from a higher occupancy to a lesser occupancy in a fire situation (i.e. not exiting from a hospital occupancy through a business occupancy). However, in certain situations, it is allowable to exit from a business occupancy through a healthcare occupancy. Floor assembly Floor assemblies separate floors, with a fire rating determined by the building construction type and height of the building. The floor assembly unit contains the floor slab and all vertical penetrations of that slab. (If the smoke or fire barriers fail, then the floor assembly becomes the next unit of defense. Vertical penetrations of floor assemblies that are improperly maintained can cause smoke and fire to spread vertically throughout the building.) With the necessity to supply many mechanical, electrical, and patient support systems through chutes and shafts, and to provide vertical access by stairs and elevators, a facility must be diligent in making sure vertical penetrations are properly sealed and access panels are appropriately rated. Floor assemblies vertically separate occupancies. Exit A primary feature of life safety is the ability to exit a compartment and, as appropriate, to exit the building. Exits must be maintained so that if a fire (or other incident) occurs, the rapid movement of patients and visitors can take place. In a defend-in-place occupancy such as a health care occupancy, the likelihood of having to totally evacuate a building is

rare, but the possibility still exists. Even in a fully sprinklered building, the need to use the means of egress and exits may be necessary due to other internal or external disasters. When an occupant enters this type of component and leaves an unsafe environment, he or she is considered to be out of harm's way. Therefore, exit areas must be considered a priority in a PM Program. The Joint Commission will evaluate business occupancies in regard to the accessibility of the exits. No exit shall be compromised in a business occupancy.