David Cronin-Ohio Valley Area Manager Heat Transfer, Controls & Instrumentation, Metering.
Heat Exchangers
Selection Issues Selection Issues Maximum design Capacity Steam Supply pressure Materials of construction Space and access Controls/Communication Steam Quality Load TURNDOWN Condensate quality & system Issues Maintenance of ALL components Maximum Pressure Drop allowed Water Quality-TDS, hardness, chlorides
Selection Issues Selection Issues Maximum design Capacity Steam Supply pressure Materials of construction Space and access Controls/Communication Steam Quality Load TURNDOWN Condensate quality & system Issues Maintenance of ALL components
Heat Transfer Q = U x A x DT Heat Transfer Steam Metal Wall Water Being Heated Scale Film Air Film Condensate Film Stagnant Water
Steam Supply Quality Steam Supply Quality LP steam carries more Btu s, increases efficiencies. LP steam is normally better quality, increasing efficiencies. LP steam REDUCES scaling (The lower the better). LP steam typically requires PRV s to generate from HP. PRV s require space and give more to maintain. LP steam requires large pipes. LP condensate is difficult to drain from HX. HP steam requires no PRV s and smaller pipe. HP steam makes HX, conditioning, & control equipment smaller. Installation less expensive with HP steam. We can combine the benefits from both systems!
Methods of Control Methods of Control Constant Pressure with float & thermostatic steam trap- Wild loop Constant Pressure with float & thermostatic steam trap in conjunction with mixing valve Constant Pressure with control of the heating surface Control Mass flow of steam with discharge temperature of the Secondary Side
Typical HX???-Open System Typical HX???-Open System
Steam and Condensate Quality Steam and Condensate Quality Vacuum breakers introduce air!!!! Reverses Heat Transfer!!!! Wastes steam!!!! Increases duty cycles of heat transfer equipment!!!! Increases duty cycles of Control equipment!!!! Barriers heat transfer, reduces heating efficiency!!!! Reduces equipment capability to handle load changes!!!! Corrodes (oxygen pitting) Heat Transfer Equipment!!!! Generates Carbonic Acid!!!! Erodes Heat Transfer Equipment!!!! Corrodes/erodes Condensate System!!!! Increases Chemical requirements!!!!
STALL Issues STALL Issues Definition: The point at which the necessary pressure differential across the trap is below the point at which condensate can be removed from the heat exchanger. Poor Control!!!! Slow response to load changes!!!! Noise!!!! Waterhammer!!!! Leaking Gaskets!!!! Damaged / Failed Equipment!!!! Increased Maintenance!!!! Premature failure due to thermal Cycling
Loss of Positive Differential Pressure Loss of Positive Differential Pressure Stall due to elevated return line APT range 1.0 bar g Air Air Heater Battery 1.5 1.5 bar bar g 15 15 metres A steam trap is is being used to to drain the the system www.spiraxsarco.com www.spiraxsarco.com
Condensate backing up into heat exchanger-loss of A Stall conditions APT range Product Temperature Input Heat Exchanger P 1 1 P 2 2 www.spiraxsarco.com www.spiraxsarco.com
Temperature Control Valve Opens and positive differential pressure is increased. Stall conditions APT range Product Product Temperature Temperature Input Input Heat Exchanger P 1 1 P 2 2 www.spiraxsarco.com www.spiraxsarco.com
Stall Chart Stall Chart Variable inlet temperature stall chart Temperature ºC ºC Product Temperature Initial Temperature Product -- 30 30 o o C 200 200 180 180 160 160 140 140 Steam pressure (temp) P1 P1 1 --2 bar bar 120 120 3 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 T1 T1 20 20 0 100 10090 9080 8070 7060 6050 5040 4030 3020 2010 10 0 www.spiraxsarco.com % www.spiraxsarco.com Flow Flow (% (% control control valve valve opening) 2 APT range 14.5 14.5 11.6 11.6 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 Air Heater 5.2 5.2 Application 3.8 3.8 2.6 2.6 1.7 1.7 1.0 1.0 0.4 0.4 P2 Total back P2 pressure 0 --0.4 0.4 bar bar 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 T2 T2 Final Temperature product 0.3 0.3 --80 80 o o C 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 Pressure bar bar g
Waterhammer.
Typical Heat Exchanger Types Used Typical Heat Exchanger Types Used Shell and Tube-most common Plate and Frame Plate and Shell
Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger Horizontal or Vertical Installations Lowest U value of the 3 types Withdrawal distance equal to length of heat exchanger Lowest Cost in low to medium flowrates Simple Design Steam should be installed in the shell side Lowest Pressure Drop on Product Side
Plate & Frame Heat Exchanger Plate & Frame Heat Exchanger Very High U Value Ability to increase/decrease area with process changes Stainless steel is standard in gasketed models Small Footprint and floor space No Withdrawal distances required Install new plate pack WITHOUT pipe disruptions Long history of use in the process industries History of failure in steam systems due to Stall Perception that they do not work in steam systems
Plate & Shell Plate & Shell Very High U Values Typically used for high flowrates Not susceptible to thermal cycling Long History in the OPC Market Repairable Units relatively expensive Sealed units can be cost effective in high flow conditions Higher Pressure drop on process side
Closed Loop Drainage Closed Loop Drainage
Steam Supply Quality Steam Supply Quality LP steam carries more Btu s, increases efficiencies. LP steam is normally better quality, increasing efficiencies. LP steam REDUCES scaling (The lower the better). LP steam typically requires PRV s to generate from HP. PRV s require space and give more to maintain. LP steam requires large pipes. LP condensate is difficult to drain from HX. HP steam requires no PRV s and smaller pipe. HP steam makes HX, conditioning, & control equipment smaller. Installation less expensive with HP steam. We can combine the benefits from both systems!
Closed Loop Drainage + Closed Loop Drainage + HP Steam LP Heat Transfer
Closed Loop Drainage + Closed Loop Drainage + HP Steam LP Heat Transfer HX Size???
Plate & Frame HX Plate & Frame HX Smaller Footprint Large Surface Area s for LP Transfer. NO Tube Withdrawal space req d Easier to maintain Some Flexibility with capacity Stainless wetted parts as standard Higher efficiency Better control Accuracy More responsive
Old LP Steam New HP Steam Pipe size! Trap New Condensate Old Condensate Drain Gutter!!!
EASI-HEAT UNITS EASI-HEAT UNITS
EASIHEAT UNITS EASIHEAT UNITS EASIHEAT Maximizes Efficiency Minimizes Install Cost Maximizes ROI
Natural Gas Technologies Centre Report Natural Gas Technologies Centre Report The thermal efficiency of a Plate & Frame averages 93.8% while that of the shell-and-tube with automatic pump trap (APT) averages 87.4%, a 6.4% efficiency advantage for the Plate & Frame heat exchanger
Summary Heat Transfer HP Supply Minimizes Installation issues LP Heat Transfer Max efficiency Min maintenance Closed Loop Correct condensate removal Max Efficiency / Min Maintenance APT
Heat Exchangers
Hot Water Heat Exchangers Hot Water Heat Exchangers Instantaneous variable load capability Eliminates hot water storage and Legionella bacteria risk Accurate temperature control P&F construction designed for steam use
THANK YOU!!!
Questions????? EASIHEAT Maximizes Efficiency Minimizes Install Cost Maximizes ROI