Albert R. Jarrett. Annual and Individual-Storm Green Roof Stormwater Response Models

Similar documents
HYDROLOGICAL PERFORMANCE OF THE GREEN ROOF AT SYRACUSECOE

Green Roof Benefits. Green Roof Media Selection for the Minimization of Pollutant Loadings in Roof Runoff

Development and Design of Cost-Effective, Real-Time Implementable Sediment and Contaminant Release Controls

Hydrologic Assessment of using Low Impact Development to Mitigate the Impacts of Climate Change. Chris Jensen, AScT Master of Science Thesis

VANCOUVER PUBLIC LIBRARY GREEN ROOF MONITORING PROJECT

Attachment 2: Permeable Pavement Design Guidelines

Green and Gray Infrastucture

23.0 Green Roof STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY KEY CONSIDERATIONS

Millburn, NJ, Residential Area Stormwater Analyses

INEEL (1500) [45] 5.6 C 217 mm 60. Precipitation (mm) Temperature (oc) Month

Green Roof Research at. Michigan State University

Environment Protection Engineering

STORMWATER MONITORING TWO ECOROOFS IN PORTLAND, OREGON, USA

Evaluating Low Impact Development Practices for Stormwater Management on an Industrial Site in Mississippi

Outfall Flow Analysis for the Oswego Canal and Blue Heron Canal

My Soil Won t Drain, Can I Still Use LID? Rob Buchert, John Knutson, Erik Pruneda

Green Infrastructure Sub-irrigated Raised Beds - Green Roof

Green Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Technologies

Monitoring Flow and Quality for Stormwater Control Measures

Green Roof Technology. Karen Liu, Ph.D. Xero Flor International

Modeling Cumulative LID Features for Floodplain Impacts in an Urban Watershed in Houston, TX

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.


PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT GREEN ROOF DESIGNS CHENGDU, CHINA

Microirrigation of Young Blueberries in Florida 1

Placement of the soil should be in lifts of mm and loosely compacted (tamped lightly with a backhoe bucket).

THE INNOVATION OF GREEN ROOF TO DADICATE THE BUILDING ENVIRONMENT IN HONG KONG

Roof Runoff Harvesting Benefits for Regional Conditions in Low Density and Medium Density Residential Areas. Leila Talebi 1 and Robert Pitt 2

SEASONAL CROP COEFFICIENT OF GERBERA SOILLESS CULTURE

BRISBANE BAYLANDS INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FEBRUARY 2011 APPENDIX O DRAFT

THE ROLE OF GREEN ROOFS IN URBAN DRAINAGE A REVIEW OF THE CASE FROM AUGUSTENBORG ECO-CITY

From a Census of 680,000 Street Trees to Smart Stormwater Management: A Study of Efficacy and Economics of Street Tree Guards in New York City

Probably the world s cleverest green roof. Optigreen Meander Retention Roof. Reduces peak water run off by up to 99%

DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS

Case Study: Dallas Green Infrastructure for Stormwater

(Source: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CREDITS

Selecting Appropriate Stormwater Control Measures for Your Development Project

Modeling Rain Garden LID Impacts on Sewer Overflows

A Guide to Retrofitting an Existing Roof to a Vegetated Green Roof

Monitoring the Hydrologic and Water Quality Effects of a Simple-Intensive Green Roof

STORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO

How to Read the South Plains Evapotranspiration Information

Permeable Pavement Systems

Calibration and Testing of Simple Mass Balance Model for Quantifying Stormwater Management Benefit of an Extensive Green Roof

PLANT TRANSPIRATION IN THE CLOUD FOREST Transpiration Introduction

Using Garden Roof Systems to Achieve Sustainable Building Envelopes

IRRIGATION AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN TREE FRUIT PRODUCTION SYSTEMS.

Bioretention cell schematic key

Chapter 12 Greenroof design, construction and maintenance

Proposed Credit Program

ENVISIONING THE POSSIBILITIES OF A DIGITAL CITY: A CASE STUDY OF RAIN GARDENS AS FLOOD CONTROL IN AUSTIN, TEXAS CE 394K FALL 2011 PROF.

Decentralized Irrigation methods to sustain LID in Arid climates. Dasch Houdeshel, M.S. and Christine Pomeroy, PhD, P.E.

Post Construction BMPs

Pollutant Removal Benefits

Soil Plant Water Relationships 1

OPTIGRÜN RETENTION ROOF MEANDER. Reduces peak water run off by up to 99 % Probably the smartest green roof in the world

Användning tak för att minska risken för översvämning orsakade av skyfall

Appendices: Glossary. General Terms. Specific Terms. Low Impact Development Approaches Handbook

ARIZONA WATER COMPANY

2012 Saginaw Bay Watershed Conference

Irrigating Olives. Janet Caprile UCCE Farm Advisor Alameda & Contra Costa Counties

Green Roofs and Stormwater Management Virginia Stovin

A REVIEW OF GREEN ROOFS. BY ERICA SCHUTT MSRE Class of 2012 University of San Diego

Low Impact Development Calculations using the Source Loading and Management Model (WinSLAMM)

AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Fred Milch. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report

LID Retrofit of a Sloped, Impervious Parking Lot:

C.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE. Table of Contents. Glossary... viii. Chapter 1 Introduction/How to Use this Handbook

Quan%fying the Magnitude and Quality of Green Roof Runoff

GEPETO Project. Rémy BOURNIQUE INSA Lyon Jean-Luc BERTRAND-KRAJEWSKI INSA Lyon Jean-Christophe GRIMARD VEGETAL id

Beyond Rain Gardens Advancing the Use of Compost for Green Infrastructure, Low Impact Development, & Stormwater Management

AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report

Rainwater Management an issue for the 21 st Century. Hydrological Cycle

EXTENSIVE INTENSIVE SIMPLE INTENSIVE. We specialise in producing and installing our Extensive Green Roof System, using our sedum mats.

City of Columbia BMP Manual. Volume Calculation Tool and Examples

Flowering Behaviour of Helichrysum obconicum DC.

Pistachio Project Planning, Irrigation Systems and Irrigation Management. Trevor Sluggett Irrigation Agronomist AgriExchange Pty Ltd

Traditional. Attachment I Roof Garden Care & Maintenance Requirements. February 2013

Going Green with the NYS Stormwater Design Standards

Application of a Green Roof on the College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture

Acopian Engineering Center Green Roof

Green Inspirations for Landscapes

Why and How to Evaluate the Feasibility of Infiltrating or Harvesting and Using Stormwater. Laura Prickett, EOA, Inc.

Planning, Design, and Construction of Green Infrastructure.

Mechanical Analysis Energy Savings Graph 1 Built-up Roof Graph 2 Green Roof

Full Season Comparison of Weather Based Smart Controllers

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

AASHTO NTPEP Rolled E rosion Control Product (R ECP) Test Report

Low Impact Development (LID) and Bioretention Techniques

LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE MANUAL AND LID WORKING GROUP ACTIVITIES. Powerpoint Templates. MS4 Statewide Stormwater Summit June 18, 2013

Citywide Integrated Stormwater Management Plan (ISMP) DRAFT ACTION PLAN REVIEW Public Consultation November 16 th, 2016

GLOBAL CENTRE FOR PLURALISM 330 Sussex Drive Ottawa, Ontario SITE SERVICING & STORMWATER MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW UPDATE REPORT.

Soil, Water & Plant Relationships. Lecture note for Soil and Water Management Course Prepared by Dr ND Nang

Quantitative Evaluation of Water Needs in Citrus Nurseries Using Three Different Irrigation Systems For Seedling Production

4.1 Green Roofs. City of Indianapolis: Stormwater Design and Specification Manual

Primocane-fruiting Blackberry Cane Management

Design Standards. Green Development. Shadow Studies. Standards. July 2010 Updated October 2014

Scheduling Irrigation for Horticultural Crops. Patrick Byers Regional Horticulture Specialist Greene County

Scheduling Irrigation for Horticultural Crops

Transcription:

Annual and Individual-Storm Green Roof Stormwater Response Models Albert R. Jarrett Professor of Agricultural Engineering Penn State University arj@psu.edu www.abe.psu.edu/fac/jarrett.html D. J. Beattie, R. D. Berghage, F. Rezaei

Green Roof Types xtensive large areas Intensive roof gardens

Typical Extensive Green Roof Vegetation Growth Medium Drainage Layer Waterproof Membrane and Root Barrier

Drainage Layer ½-inch plastic wire grid. Geotextile glued to grid. Porosity = 78% Field Capacity = 5%

Media 12.5% sphagnum peat moss 12.5% coir 15% perlite 60%hydrolite 6.23 lb/in-ft 2 Saturated Porosity = 55% Field Capacity = 34%

Green Roof Plants Crassulacae Acid Metabolism (CAM) Plants Arid Region (Desert) Plants Stomates open at night (to reduce water loss). Stomates close during day (to conserve water). Plants get smaller as water becomes limiting.

Benefits Attenuate stormwater Runoff volume reduction. Peak runoff rate reduction. Delay the runoff event. Delay the peak runoff rate.

Impact of Development Flow Rate (Cfs) 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Post-Development Runoff Pre-Development Runoff 0 2 4 6 8 Time (Hrs)

Green Roof Stormwater Management To understand how a Green Roof can help us manage stormwater, we must look at stormwater in three different ways: Individual storms (actual data collected). Annual rainfall basis. Extreme storm effects.

Individual Storm (Measured Data) Green roofs compared to non-green (traditional) roofs Stormwater runoff volume and flow rates

October 25, 2002 Rain Event Depth (in) 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Retained = 0.18 in Rain Green Roof Runoff 0 6 12 18 24 Time (hr)

October 2002 Days Green Since Roof Delay to Storm Last Rainfall Runoff Start of Date Rain Depth Depth Retention Retention Runoff (Days) (in) (in) (in) (%) (hr) 16-Oct 3 1.15 0.79 0.36 31.3 1.0 25-Oct 8 0.94 0.76 0.18 19.1 4.0 Average = 1.045 0.78 0.27 25.23 2.50

November 2002 November 2002 7.75 42.58 0.31 0.50 0.81 Average = 2.0 34.6 0.54 1.02 1.56 4 16-Nov 4.0 33.3 0.15 0.30 0.45 1 12-Nov 18.0 69.0 0.29 0.13 0.42 5 10-Nov 7.0 33.3 0.27 0.54 0.81 4 5-Nov (hr) (%) (in) (in) (in) (Days) Runoff Retention Retention Depth Depth Rain Date Start of Runoff Rainfall Last Storm Delay to Roof Since Green Days

May 2003 May 2003 6.00 48.35 0.28 0.37 0.65 Average = 5.0 32.4 0.36 0.75 1.11 4.1 31-May 9.0 58.3 0.28 0.20 0.48 1.1 25-May 4.0 54.3 0.19 0.16 0.35 0.8 23-May (hr) (%) (in) (in) (in) (Days) Runoff Retention Retention Depth Depth Rain Date Start of Runoff Rainfall Last Storm Delay to Roof Since Green Days

June 2003 June 2003 2.88 53.13 0.20 0.24 0.44 Average = 0.5 11.1 0.02 0.16 0.18 1.4 21-Jun 0.5 69.2 0.18 0.08 0.26 1.4 19-Jun 12.0 49.0 0.49 0.51 1.00 3.0 17-Jun --- 100.0 0.19 0.00 0.19 2.0 14-Jun 1.0 85.7 0.12 0.02 0.14 3.4 12-Jun 0.5 60.9 0.14 0.09 0.23 1.4 8-Jun 3.0 39.7 0.27 0.41 0.68 2.2 7-Jun 0.5 33.3 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.5 4-Jun 5.0 29.2 0.33 0.80 1.13 2.0 3-Jun (hr) (%) (in) (in) (in) (Days) Runoff Retention Retention Depth Depth Rain Date Start of Runoff Rainfall Last Storm Delay to Roof Since Green Days

July 2003 July 2003 2.28 77.76 0.40 0.22 0.63 Average = 4.0 51.4 0.71 0.67 1.38 3.8 31-Jul 1.0 94.9 0.37 0.02 0.39 5.7 27-Jul 0.5 90.6 0.48 0.05 0.53 0.4 22-Jul 0.5 87.5 0.42 0.06 0.48 2.5 21-Jul 2.5 88.2 0.30 0.04 0.34 5.0 16-Jul 1.0 32.1 0.52 1.10 1.62 3.5 10-Jul 4.0 75.0 0.09 0.03 0.12 0.3 7-Jul 5.0 95.5 0.64 0.03 0.67 4.0 6-Jul 2.0 84.6 0.11 0.02 0.13 12.2 2-Jul (hr) (%) (in) (in) (in) (Days) Runoff Retention Retention Depth Depth Rain Date Start of Runoff Rainfall Last Storm Delay to Roof Since Green Days

Summary of Retention Results Retention (%) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 77.8 53.1 48.4 42.6 25.2 Oct Nov May June July

Modeling Annual Green Roof Impact Assumed Simple ET curve; f(month) = daily ET Drainage layer, roof media, and plants had maximum of 1.582 inches of retention storage. For each daily rain amount Estimated water lost to atmosphere. Estimated water remaining in green roof. Added rain to green roof.

Schematic of Green Roof Rain Evaporation Transpiration Max. Retention = 1.582 in (3.5 in)

1986, GR Max Retention = 1.582 in 3.0 2.5 Rain Runoff Depth (in) 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1/1 3/2 5/1 6/30 8/29 10/28 12/27 Date

1993, GR Max Retention = 1.582 in 3.5 3.0 2.5 Rain Runoff Depth (in) 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1/1 3/2 5/1 6/30 8/29 10/28 12/27 Date

Modeling Results Based on 28 years (1976-2003) of rain data from State College, PA Roof maximum retention = 1.582 inches Average annual rain = 40.3 inches. 22.9 inches if average annual rain was retained on Green Roof Average annual rain retained = 65%. This captured water is returned to the atmosphere by Evaporation Transpiration

Extending the Annual Model If we assume the roof in question has maximum retention capacities different from our green roof, Retention values from 0.125 inches to 3.0 inches were evaluated.

70 Annual Rain Retained (%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Maximum Roof Retention (in)

Stormwater; ; Extreme Storm Response Stormwater Management is based on extreme hydrologic events. 2-year rainfall/runoff. 25-year rainfall/runoff. 100-year rainfall/runoff. How well can a Green Roof be expected to attenuate these large design storms?

Extreme Storm Response Modified Puls Routing Model Accounts for capillary & hygroscopic water stored in: drainage layer 3.5-in media CAM plants Accounts for 0.05 in interception. Blaney-Criddle ET Model applied on a daily basis to remove water from roof. Rain must fill all layers to field capacity before runoff starts.

Extreme Storm Response Model Validation. Inputted rainfall hyetographs for 16 storms measured at Rock Springs. 24-hour rains varied from: 0.14 in to 1.62 in Averaged 0.84 in Computed runoff from roof. Compared to measured runoff.

Green Roof Runoff, ver 5 1.4 Predicted (in) 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 R 2 = 0.930 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Observed (in)

Peak Runoff Rate, ver 5 0.4 Predicted (in/hr) 0.3 0.2 0.1 R 2 = 0.907 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Observed (in/hr)

Start of Runoff, ver 5 Predicted (hrs) 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 R 2 = 0.938 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Observed (hrs)

Extreme Storm Response Applied synthetic rainfall to Green Roof. Type II Rainfall Distributions. Assumed State College, PA Assumed Green Roof had same characteristics as our research roofs. Simulated the Roof s runoff hydrographs for a 270- by 70-foot Roof: 1 day since last storm in February and July. 5 days since last storm in February and July. 2-Year Synthetic Rain. 100-Year Synthetic Rain.

2-Year Rain After 5 Dry July Days 2.5 2.0 Flow Rate (cfs) 1.5 1.0 0.5 2-yr Pre-Dev, CN = 79 Rain Roof Runoff 0.0 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time, t (hrs)

Cumulative Green Roof 2-Y After 5 Dry July Days Cumulative In & Out Flow (In) 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Rain Roof Runoff 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (Hrs)

100-Year Rain After 5 Dry July Days Flow Rate (cfs) 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 100-yr Pre-Dev, CN = 79 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time, t (hrs) Rain Roof Runoff

Cumulative Green Roof 100-Y After 5 Dry July Days 6.0 Cumulative In & Out Flow (In) 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (Hrs) Rain Roof Runoff

100-Year Rain After 5 Dry Feb. Days Flow Rate (cfs) 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 100-yr Pre-Dev, CN = 79 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time, t (hrs) Rain Roof Runoff

Cumulative Green Roof 100-Y After 5 Dry Feb. Days 6.0 Cumulative In & Out Flow (In) 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Rain Roof Runoff 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (Hrs)

Summary of Extreme Storms 2-Year (2.6 inches in 24 hours)) July w/ 5 Dry Days = 85% reduction in peak. July w/ 5 Dry Days = 61% reduction in volume. 100-Year (5.3 inches in 24 hours) July w/ 5 Dry Days = 60% reduction in peak. July w/ 5 Dry Days = 30% reduction in volume. Rain water retained and detained Detained water released after storm

Thank You arj@psu.edu www.abe.psu.edu/fac/jarrett.html Questions?