REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS THEATER DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING STUDY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO. Proposals due February 6, 2018

Similar documents
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING STUDY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

implementation r expression in landscape

Phase 1 : Understanding the Campus Context. Phase 2 : APPROACHES - Alternates & Preferred Plan

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION WORKING GROUP!

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES PEER REVIEW OF BAKER PARK. Request for Qualifications (RFQ)

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Winston-Salem State University Campus Master Plan 2016 Update

University of Saskatchewan CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. Senate Meeting Preliminary Presentation. April 21, 2018 DIALOG ECS DA WATT

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

11 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Design Guidelines

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Planning Study. University of California, San Diego. Prepared by: Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP The Office of James Burnett Fehr and Peers

A Campus Within Context

Request for Proposal

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development

INTRODUCTION. Strive to achieve excellence in all areas of operational sustainability.

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Vision & Land Use. Discussion. Historic Preservation Plan. Foggy Bottom Campus Plan:

12 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Wayfinding & Signage

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

ANC 2A Presentation. November 9, 2006

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Request for Proposals: Architectural/Design Guidelines

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

CAL POLY MASTER PLAN UPDATE, March 2015

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

11 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Research Park

Request for Proposals For the purchase and redevelopment of Cityowned property in the Historic Downtown. 109 South Boyd Street

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY EQUITY WORKING GROUP!

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

6. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Derry Green Corporate Business Park

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Loebl Schlossman & Hackl

2019 Hillcrest Campus LRDP EIR Scoping Meeting

Development Solicitation Request for Qualifications. The Historic Hollering Place Development

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MOUNT VERNON CAMPUS

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP!

Chapter Master Planned Communities (MPC) District

M i s s i o n B a y W a t e r f r o n t

Sewanee Village + Request for Builder/Developer Proposals

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WHITEBELT VISIONING EXERCISE ADDENDUM TO THE GTA WEST LAND USE STUDY WORK PROGRAM

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008


Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

UAA School of Engineering Parking Garage Master Plan Amendment. 1. Purpose

Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:

DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP

18 May 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

TH E U N IVE RSIT Y O F FLO R I DA LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN REPORT

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

Goal 1: To Encourage the Orderly, Harmonious and Judicious Use of University Resources in the Development of University Land.

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

2 STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING AND INFORMATION REPORT FOR PUBLIC MEETING ON AMENDMENT NO. 62 TO THE YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN

III. Design Principles

NORTH TORONTO COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE. the Journey to a New Urban School + the Partnerships which gave it Life

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

Transcription:

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS THEATER DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING STUDY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Proposals due February 6, 2018 Issue date January 19, 2018

I. INTRODUCTION The Theater District Neighborhood Planning Study ( TDNPS ) will provide a general development plan and associated design guidelines for future development of a new housing/mixed-use neighborhood to be located at the southwestern portion of UC San Diego s West Campus. This Study will expand on the 1989 UC San Diego Master Plan Study ( Master Plan see here), a comprehensive urban planning analysis which identified key physical planning principles that are guiding the evolution of UC San Diego s built environment. The Master Plan recommends that future planning for the campus include more detailed urban design studies to guide development. It states that "the campus should develop plans for each neighborhood to address patterns of building and development, buildable sites, program capacity for suggested sites, open space, building massing, and phasing strategy." In 2006 the Revelle/Muir College Neighborhood Planning Study was prepared that included development envisioned for this location (see neighborhood studies here and here). The TDNPS will reevaluate that plan in addition to studying other development opportunities within this study area as related to the future long-range vision and associated space needs, including student housing. Through this Study the future development capacity will be identified to provide a realistic framework to guide future growth. The Study area is influenced by its adjacency to Revelle College (UC San Diego s first campus neighborhood ), the Theatre District that includes the La Jolla Playhouse, The Department of Theatre and Dance, the northeast portion of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography to the southwest (which includes future development of science research and potential faculty housing) and is located within proximity to single family residential neighborhoods. The study will need to incorporate findings from an ongoing Campus Retail study, and will need to respond to Transit Oriented Development resulting from the forthcoming Regional Light Rail Station located at Pepper Canyon. II. BACKGROUND The Theatre District Neighborhood Study Area ( Study Area ) comprises of approximately 10 acres and is bounded by Revelle College to the north, North Torrey Pines Road to the west, and the Revelle College Drive entry to the south. The Study Area will be influenced by the existing Theatre District complex that includes the La Jolla Playhouse and Mandell Weiss Forum and Theater and Revelle College to the north. The Study area includes Revelle College Drive and portions of Scholars Drive that are components of the campus loop road. It is important to note that the Study Area is adjacent to single-family residential to the west and south that create an opportunity for this neighborhood to create a new campus gateway to the community. UC San Diego views the undergraduate college system as one of its unique strengths. The colleges are intended to be modest-sized, cross-disciplinary units (a student may have any major in any college), each with a distinctive pattern of primarily lower division general education requirements. Each college has a distinct location on campus that includes both academic and residential space. The colleges give students REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 1

and the faculty, each of whom is affiliated with a college, a sense of belonging to a unique community within the context of a great research university. The colleges provide a comprehensive array of programs that address the intellectual, social, and cultural needs of their students. There are currently six undergraduate colleges each headed by its own provost at UC San Diego (Revelle, Muir, Marshall, Roosevelt, Warren, and Sixth). With the ongoing increase in undergraduate students, it has been determined that the existing six colleges are at or over capacity, posing a significant challenge to the colleges ability to provide a quality academic and social support environment for students; especially for incoming first-year students. The University anticipates the development of up to two more residential colleges to meet campus growth. The University currently has in design phase a Living and Learning Neighborhood located between Marshall and Muir Colleges. The North Torrey Pines Living and Learning Neighborhood includes Academic and Residential program, along with requisite ancillary program of retail, parking and community serving program, and will be the new home of Sixth College. This Living and Learning Neighborhood is being delivered under a single Design Build contract. The Theatre District Neighborhood Planning Study will include a Living and Learning Neighborhood as the primary programmatic element informed by the effort. The University may choose to proceed into a Detailed Project Program (DPP) phase with the team selected in this process. This DPP phase would be exercised under separate contract with the University, and the TDNPS Statement of Qualifications will require demonstrated excellence in Architectural Planning as well as associated Selection Criteria. The consultant selected in this process will be disqualified from pursuit of any Design Build project that is identified in the resulting Planning Study, including the contemplated Living and Learning Neighborhood. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION UC San Diego will be selecting an urban planning, landscape architecture or architecture firm to prepare a Planning Study for the Theater District Neighborhood. STUDY OBJECTIVES Analyze the Study Area to determine its development capacity. Define the amount, location and desired adjacencies of academic, housing, recreation, open space, retail/commercial, and parking facilities to meet future programmatic needs. Guidelines for future building heights and setbacks should be developed to meet programmatic goals while ensuring that the proposed massing is appropriate for the area given its context. Define the open space network of greens, plazas, courtyards and interconnecting pathways. Identify key characteristics and design features to enable the TDNPS Plan Area to develop as a vibrant community for staff, faculty, students, residents and visitors. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 2

Identify pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation routes within the study area that will connect buildings within the neighborhoods, provide routes to other adjoining campus neighborhoods, and strengthen connections to the off-campus community. The project will include portions of Ridge Walk which is a primary circulator and urban design feature. Identify service and fire access to all existing and proposed buildings. Develop a conceptual urban plan for the Study Area to guide the implementation of future redevelopment. The concept should adopt an urban design approach that promotes sustainability and creates a unique neighborhood identity with a distinct sense of place. IV. SCOPE OF WORK The TDNPS will consist of the following tasks: A. Assess existing conditions of the Study Area and identify features that may pose opportunities or constraints to design and development. Features to evaluate should include, but not be limited to, the area topography, view corridors, circulation patterns, historical/cultural resources, parking locations and capacity, utility corridors, environmental and sustainability considerations (including carbon-neutrality mandates), and the character of the existing or planned development within and adjacent to the Study Area (including off-campus areas). Evaluate existing land uses and buildings with respect to density and access. B. Prepare a comprehensive development plan, after consideration of alternative concept options, along with associated design guidelines and criteria. The Study should address the following elements: 1) Land Use Concepts - Establish land uses based on appropriate adjacencies for academic and research needs, potential housing, parking, amenities, recreational spaces and other supporting program elements to be further defined in the planning process. 2) Development Potential - Identify and define capacity of building parcels, infrastructure, and open spaces. The plan should demonstrate by way of massing study and test fit the accommodation of the forecasted programmatic need identified by the University. 3) Development Guidelines - Prepare development guidelines including, where necessary, parcel boundaries, building orientation and massing (with respect to pedestrian and service access, views, daylighting, open spaces, and other buildings and activity areas); location, size and function of entries; service areas; utilities and infrastructure. These guidelines will be influenced by and evolve existing University Planning studies, including specific guidelines for Ridge Walk, and a Campus-wide Retail Study. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 3

4) Open Space Framework Develop a network of open spaces of adequate scale and design to provide relief from the built environment while providing human-scaled places for socialization, contemplation, and circulation. These include quads, plazas, courtyards, recreational spaces, and transitional spaces. 5) Development Phasing - Establish a phased develop and delivery plan to allow for future development to meet identified programmatic need in a systematic way. Phasing options should consider the advantages and disadvantages of necessary displacements (open space, parking, roadways, utilities, infrastructure, adjacent programmatic components, ongoing Campus Capital Improvement on Campus, etc.) Consider financial matters to ensure feasibility of implementation. 6) Circulation - Determine the circulation and access routes for pedestrians (conformance with The Americans with Disabilities Act), bicyclists, and vehicles (public, service, transit, and emergency). The circulation framework should encourage alternative transportation, walking and biking. 7) Parking - Identify locations, initial design and capacity of parking facilities (surface and structured) necessary to accommodate future program needs. Locate parking to minimize impacts to adjacent housing/community (massing, visual impact, noise and glare). 8) Neighborhood Identity - Develop an urban design approach that would create a distinct identity and sense of community for the TDNPS Study Area while integrating appropriately with the existing campus and adjacent community fabric. Architecture and landscape architecture guidelines should be developed to reinforce this identity. 9) Architecture - Prepare design guidelines to address: a) building height and mass, b) exterior building materials and colors (the exterior color palette to be developed in coordination with the campus color consultant), c) character of fenestration, especially at the pedestrian level, and d) treatment of accessory structures. 10) Landscape Guidelines - Develop a landscape concept for the Study area with associated design guidelines regarding the tree palette, hardscape, and site furniture (i.e. seating, bicycle racks, locations of outdoor lighting fixtures, signage, etc.). The landscape framework should provide a cohesive landscape palette for the Study Area with high attention being given to maximizing sustainable planting, use of recycled water and drought resistant design. Coordinate with all applicable, approved UC San Diego planning studies including the landscape, lighting, bicycle and signage studies. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 4

11) Utility Corridors - Incorporate requirements for the relocation or expansion of existing utility systems, and new utility corridors as identified by the UC San Diego offices of Capital Program Management and Facilities Management. 12) Sustainability Provide feasible approaches that promote sustainable site, building orientation, materials, green infrastructure, alternative energy opportunities and building and circulation designs consistent with University of California policy. C. Prepare a report describing the plan concepts and design guidelines with text, tables, images and illustrations in sufficient detail to provide clear guidance to future consultants involved in the development of individual projects within the Theater District Neighborhood. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 5 SCHEDULE Consultant s work will be directed by the UC San Diego's Campus Planning staff. Throughout the course of the Study, the consultant will work closely with UCSD Design & Development Services (DDS) and a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) consisting of campus staff and stakeholders. In addition to regular interaction with the Campus Planning staff and the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), the Campus/Community Planning Committee (C/CPC), the Open Space Committee (OSC) and the Design Review Board (DRB) will formally review the Study, at appropriate intervals. As required, meetings with the campus Fire Marshal, campus engineers, and, as needed, other Campus stakeholders will be coordinated to occur during regularly scheduled staff and/or PAC meetings. Meetings with Senior Administrators and Leadership may also be required. Following review and comment by these campus groups, design concepts and guidelines will be revised as necessary. The consultant should expect 2 presentation meetings with C/CPC, 2 meetings with OSC, 1 meeting with DRB, 6 meetings with the PAC, in addition to meetings with Planning Staff and others as necessary. The C/CPC will be responsible for final endorsement of the Development Plan; the DRB will be responsible for final endorsement of design guidelines and color and materials palette associated with the Development Plan. The University, under separate contract, will contract for services with Celia Conover the campus color consultant and be responsible for coordinating development, review and approval of a color and materials palette for the Study. The tentative Study schedule anticipates that the project will begin in February 2018 and conclude with receipt of the consultant s final submittal NO LATER THAN May 2018. The consultant's final submittal will include:

AutoCAD, Building Information Modeling, Illustrator (or other University approved Adobe product,) and/or GIS (or other native electronic format) files of development plan graphics/maps. Report originals (electronic PDF and native format (e.g. InDesign or Illustrator)) and 15 paper copies of the final report. The paper report may include folded maps of the neighborhood planning study. V. CONSULTANTS The University is selecting a firm that specializes in urban design, physical planning, programming, landscape architecture, and architecture. Although timing and funding of a future project is unknown, implementation of the Study may include Design-Build project delivery. Please be aware that the selected firm will not be eligible to compete in subsequent Design/Build selection process that seeks to implement the plan. VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND SELECTION CRITERIA UC San Diego, requests the following submittal qualifications for use in the selection of a planning and/or architectural firm to perform the Scope of Services described in Section IV. Applicants shall respond to each item below and will be evaluated in all these areas. A. Relevancy/Quality of Project Experience: Demonstrated experience and excellence in master planning and urban design for major academic institutions, and demonstrated ability to analyze complex site and building information and develop credible comprehensive, longterm solutions. Demonstrated experience with delivering Planning solutions in an urban environment, with Transit Oriented Design influence. Demonstrated experience in planning and detailed programming of buildings associated with a Masterplan. B. Project Team Experience: Demonstrated relevant qualifications of the Principals and Project Team Members, including a clear definition of the primary responsibility of each. Principals and proposed team members proposed in the Statement of Qualifications will need to demonstrate contribution to the projects submitted as relevant Project Experience. Provide a matrix that includes the proposed team member and role, and identifies their role on submitted relevant experience. C. Client Relationships/UC Experience: Demonstrated ability to work harmoniously with university administrative staff and past experience with the University of California is desirable. D. Team Collaborations/Presentation Experience: Solid experience in organizing and facilitating group discussions, guiding consensus-building and making effective and persuasive presentations to large groups with the ability to listen and respond. The lead firm must have the ability to develop and analyze planning alternatives in a complex and collaborative REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 6

institutional planning environment. Provide a description of the visioning and implementation process utilized in the projects submitted as Relevant Project Experience. E. Production Capability: Ability to produce high quality graphics (including 3D visualizations) and documents using a variety of computer programs including GIS, CAD and Illustrator. The utilization of Virtual or Augmented reality is a desired tool for engaging University stakeholders. F. Work Plan: Outline of the work plan and schedule to accomplish the work. G. Insurance: Ability to provide Professional Liability Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 Each Occurrence and $2,000,000 per Project Aggregate. VII. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING All Short-listed firms will be required to sign a Statement of Understanding. By signing the document it is acknowledged that a draft copy of the standard Professional Services Agreement (PSA) has been read, and with reservation of rights, the terms and conditions are generally agreed upon. Additionally, notwithstanding this is a qualification based selection process, it is understood that fees for basic services are expected to fall within a limited and commercially reasonable range for work. VIII. PROCEDURES FOR SUBMISSION Consulting firms wishing to be considered should submit electronic materials, under a coversheet, indicating their past experience preparing urban planning studies including references, using University Statement of Qualifications form (Attachment B). (Attachment A is not a part of this RFQ). One electronic copy on CD or flash drive, in pdf format, should be submitted, with any graphic images, spreadsheets or pages larger than 8.5 x 11 submitted in landscape view. No paper copies requested. Proposals are due no later than 4:00 P.M. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2018. Mailing Address: University of California, San Diego Jessica Cuevas, Senior Contracts Administrator Office of Capital Program Management 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0916 La Jolla, CA 92093-0916 Delivery or Overnight Mail Physical Address: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 7 University of California, San Diego Jessica Cuevas, Senior Contracts Administrator Office of Capital Program Management 10280 North Torrey Pines Road, Suite 465 La Jolla, CA 92037

Hours of business: Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Technical questions or questions regarding the scope of the project should be directed to Todd Pitman, Assistant Director Campus Planning, at tdpitman@ucsd.edu. UC San Diego requests that interested firms refrain from contacting any other party regarding this project. UC San Diego encourages the participation of Small, Disadvantaged, Minority-owned, Women-owned and Service/Disabled Veteran-owned Business Enterprises (S/D/M/W/DVBE s) and is committed to promote a diverse pool of firms for our building programs. Every effort will be made to ensure that all persons have equal access to contracts and other business opportunities with the University within the limits imposed by law or University policy. Each candidate firm may be required to show evidence of its equal employment opportunity policy. The University of California is an Equal Opportunity Employer minorities and women are encouraged to apply for consideration. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION 8