Slope Stability in Harris County

Similar documents
CHAPTER 8 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (b) Fly Ash Reservoir II. Cardinal Plant Brilliant, Ohio. August, 2016

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

B & W Engineering Laboratories, Inc. P.O. Box Memphis, Tennessee (901)

4. Contractor (and subcontractors if applicable) certification statement(s)

Design Considerations for Open Channel and Detention Pond Design. Howard Redfearn, City of Mansfield

Pollutant Removal Benefits

EFFECT OF RELICT JOINTS IN RAIN INDUCED SLOPE FAILURES IN RESIDUAL SOIL

EAT 212 SOIL MECHANICS

CLOSURE PLAN. CCR (b) GERS Landfill Area. Pirkey Power Plant Hallsville, Texas. October, 2016

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Soil Exploration

Slope Stability of Soft Clay Embankment for Flood Protection

[Gupta* et al., 5(7): July, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

Kearney Post-Construction Stormwater Program

New Development Stormwater Guidelines

MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

Bioretention cell schematic key

FINAL COVER VENEER STABILITY ANALYSES FOR SCA DESIGN

GEOWEB slope & shoreline protection OVERVIEW

Groundwater Flow Modeling of ROW Bioswales Adjacent to Residential Buildings

Key elements : Filter Strips must be designed within parameters required by the Fort Wayne s Development Standards/Criteria Manual.

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Development and Design of Cost-Effective, Real-Time Implementable Sediment and Contaminant Release Controls

Soil Strength and Slope Stability

DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.3 STATIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES

APPENDIX E DESIGN CRITERIA FOR POST-CONSTRUCTION WATER QUALITY BMPS

2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens

A. Regional Detention Requirements

2008 SWMM, 2010 Revision City of Tacoma

Brigitte A. Berger, Director of Engineering

511 - RIP RAP - OPSS 511 ROCK PROTECTION - OPSS 511 GRAVEL SHEETING - OPSS 511 GEOTEXTILE - OPSS 511

B511 - RIP-RAP, ROCK PROTECTION AND GRANULAR SHEETING - OPSS 511

Vegetated Filter Strips and Buffers

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

1 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

C-12. Dry Pond. Design Objective

CLOSURE PLAN. CCR (b) GERS Little Broad Run Landfill. Mountaineer Plant New Haven, West Virginia. October, 2016

CHAPTER 4. SPECIAL CONDITION EROSION CONTROL MEASURES

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania

Vegetated Filter Strips and Buffers

Volume 6 - Low Impact Development. Table of Contents

Inventory and Assessment of Stormwater Infrastructure

Post Construction BMP Inspection. Scott Taylor, P.E. Stormwater

2016 Annual Inspection Report

Urban Conservation Practice Physical Effects ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND HARVEST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Landfill Closure, Intermediate Cover & Post-Closure Care. Municipal League Meeting

APPLICATIONS IN FILTRATION AND DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient [1] Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent

Part 4: CRS Stormwater Management Activity (450) and Urban Flooding Best Practices

1 Introduction. 2 General Pile Analysis Features. 2.1 Pile Internal Forces and Displacements

Rapid Drawdown with Multi-Stage

Directors Rules for Seattle Municipal Code, Chapters Stormwater Code

The Progress of Rehabilitation. Neil Dale

Appendix D - Technical Design Criteria for BMPs

Numerical Analysis of Leakage through Geomembrane Lining Systems for Dams

STORMWATER PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Soil Stabilization by Using Fly Ash

SEMSWA s Role in the Land Development Process

-AIHL NOISE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM. Aqx. R CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY APPENDIX A

An Experimental Study on Variation of Shear Strength for Layered Soils

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT LATHAM 200 MMSCFD GAS PROCESSING PLANT

Post Construction BMPs

DEALING WITH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

PULL-OUT RESISTANCE OF 3 DIFFERENT PLANT SPECIES AND THEIR APPLICATION IN SLOPE STABILIZATION WORKS

Technical Supplement 14D. Geosynthetics in Stream Restoration. (210 VI NEH, August 2007)

Shelbyville, KY Stormwater Best Management Practices. Section 2 EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN

ACTION PLAN FOR RETROFITTING THE EXISTING MS4 WITH STRUCTURAL BMPS

7. SITE DESIGN, RETAINING

2018 Annual Landfill Inspection Report

Sustainable Stormwater Retrofit Best Practices

2I-5 Bioswales (Numbering pending)

Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

Technical Manual for Dam Owners Impact of Plants on Earthen Dams FEMA 534

Table 4.7.1: Swales Potential Application and Storm Water Regulation

Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Executive Summary

Project Applicant Checklist for NPDES Permit Requirements SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM

Selecting the Right Closure Cap Option for Your Surface Impoundment or CCR Landfill

Subject Name: RESERVOIR AND FARM POND DESIGN (2+1) CONTENTS

Structural Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Inventory and Assessment of Stormwater Infrastructure

WET PONDS INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST

Rainwater Harvesting: Where does the Rainfall Go?

Chapter 8 REMEDIAL MEASURES 8.1 FACETS IN HAZARD CATEGORY

Shear Strength of Soils

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

Chapter 14. Stormwater Quality Introduction

5.0 Storm Water Landscape Guidance Introduction

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

6.1. INTRODUCTION 6.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

SITING CONSIDERATIONS

Before you build: Locating and Planning

STAFFORD TRACT NORTH OF US90A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVE

6.1 Bioretention Areas

Low Impact Development for your homes, businesses & streets

Fine Coal Refuse 25 Years of Field and Laboratory Testing Data and Correlations

Fellgate Estate, Jarrow Surface Water Management Plan 2015

Transcription:

Slope Stability in Harris County

Slope Stability in Harris County

Slope Stability in Harris County Overview of slope stability. Conditions, causes, and types of slope failures. HCFCD geotechnical investigation requirements. Variables in analyzing slope stability. HCFCD Research.

Harris County and Its Channels Harris County s population of 3.7 million is the third largest in the United States. The drainage and flood control infrastructure of Harris County are extensive and include more than 1,500 channels and about 2,500 miles of channels (about the distance from New York to Los Angeles). The HCFCD spends $7M to $8M each year to repair these 2,500 miles of channels, most of which are earthen channels.

Conditions and Causes of Slope Failures

Types of Slope Failures Deep rotational failure. Shallow rotational failure toe failure. Shallow sloughing failure. Wedge or block failure. Erosion failure. Failure due to presence of dispersive soil.

Types of Slope Failures

Types of Slope Failures Failures Due to Soil Weathering

Peak vs. Residual Shear Strength

Types of Slope Failures Failures Due to Dispersive Clays

Deep Rotational Failure

Shallow Rotational Failure

Progressive Shallow Rotational Failure

Seepage Through Sandy Soil Slope

Wedge or Block Failure

Channel Erosion

Slope Failure - Dispersive Clays

Background Adopted on October 5, 2004. Updates will be posted on www.hcfcd.org. It is not a cookbook. Good engineering practice and judgment are still necessary.

Manual Applies When Manual applies for all flood control features such as channels and basins that the HCFCD will maintain. This includes: New HCFCD Facilities Modification of Existing HCFCD Facilities

Geotechnical Investigation Requirements For HCFCD maintained facilities, a geotechnical investigation must be performed. Geotechnical investigation must follow guidelines in Appendix D of manual. Appendix D requires minimum numbers and minimum depths of borings; lab tests to include CU triaxial tests and pinhole dispersion tests; and, stability analyses must be performed for the short term, rapid drawdown, and long term conditions. Deviation from HCFCD design criteria requires a variance.

HCFCD Design Requirements for Channels and Basins Grass-lined earthen slopes of 4(H):1(V) or flatter for channels. Concrete lined slopes of 2(H):1(V) or flatter for channels. Grass-lined earthen slopes of 3(H):1(V) or flatter for detention basins.

Why Do We Require Channel Slopes 4(H):1(V) or Flatter? Stability analysis results vs. observations. Weathered soil shear strength. Weathered soil shear strength and rapid drawdown. Back-calculated weathered soil shear strength for failed slopes.

Back-calculated Weathered Soil Shear Strength for Failed Slope

Why Do We Allow Concrete Lined Channel Slopes 2(H):1(V) or Flatter? Very few failures of 2(H):1(1) concrete lined slopes. Soil weathering inhibited. Toe erosion precluded. Rapid drawdown condition precluded.

Why Do We Require Detention Basin Grass-Lined Earthen Slopes 3(H):1(V) or Flatter? Basin slope toe erosion not as prevalent as with channels. Wetting and drying of basin slope toe not as frequent as with channels. Basin slope failures may not be as critical as with channels. Observations of performance of basin channels with 3(H):1(V) slopes.

Back Slope Drainage and Dispersive Clays Mechanism for dispersive soil collapse. Goal is to keep water from ponding and infiltrating into dispersive clays. Decrease interceptor structure spacing and increase backslope swale gradient. Lime treatment or clay lining backslope swale and/or maintenance berm.

Slope inclination. Variables Soil types, soil strengths, soil plasticity, and layer thicknesses. Extent of strength loss due to weathering. Duration of periods of dry weathering. Ground water conditions. Surface water conditions. Shrinkage crack patterns, crack depths. Degree and rate of erosion channel hydraulics.

Mesri and Abdel-Ghaffar (August 1993 Geotechnical Journal)

Friction Angle vs PI

Correction Factor for Mobilized ( Weathered ) Shear Strength (c )

Research for Highway Embankments

Residual Secant Friction Angle vs. Effective Pressure and LL

Questions?