Prosperity Hucks Area Plan. Transportation and Planning Committee May 11, 2015

Similar documents
Public Meeting Final Recommendations August 8, 2013

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. May 15, 2008

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Economic Development Committee Overview May 25, 2010

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

MALL REVITALIZATION CASE STUDIES

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

DOWNTOWN GEORGETOWN PLANNING STUDY

DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

Independence Boulevard Area Plan Planning Committee Public Comment May 18, 2010

NEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Economic Development Committee Overview March 10, 2011

MOUNT PLEASANT SECONDARY PLAN & VILLAGE BLOCK PLAN. Wednesday, March 5, 2008 Informal Public Open House

Community Information Meeting

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee June 21, 2016

Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015

Presentation of the Staff Draft. July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Draft Cary Community Plan Review Part 3: Shop, Engage, Serve, Special Area Plans, Other Updates. October 27, 2015 Police Department Training Room

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Broadway District Specific Plan. Community Workshop #2 February 23,2016

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. June 24, 2008

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Town of Westport. Design Guidelines Development Committee Public Informational Presentation

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TODAY

Staff Report and Recommendation

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity

A Neighborhood (Residential, Employment, or Mixed Use) has two components: a Center and a walkable area surrounding the Center.

SUBJECT: Proposed Downtown Mobility Hub Precinct Plan and Proposed Official Plan Policies

VISION, GOALS & CONCEPT DIAGRAM 2.0

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

Additional information about land use types is given in Chapter 5. Design guidelines for Centers and Neighborhoods are given in Chapter 7.

Development Agreement Public Meeting. June 26, 2013

Official Plan Review

Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements

4 C OMMUNITY D ISTRICTS

2 STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING AND INFORMATION REPORT FOR PUBLIC MEETING ON AMENDMENT NO. 62 TO THE YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Welcome! to Keller Town Hall

Behnke Ranch Property, Pasco County: Master Plan Development Approach


7Page 91 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 7 COMMUNITY CHARACTER

Elderberry, Pioneer, Junction

BRYN MAWR. Tier 2 Characteristics: Location: Lancaster Avenue from Old Lancaster Road on the east to Norwood Avenue on the west

THE TOWN OF WASAGA BEACH

ATTACHMENT A 09/12/2011. Attachment A - 1. A. Preliminary Future Transit Station Sub-area

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

Exhibit Planning and Design Workshop February 3-6, Commissioned by the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC)

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN

Rio/29 Small Area Plan. Design Plan & Implementation Framework Open House - January 25, 2018

1.0 Future Land Use. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Future Land Use Objectives

CRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1 DRAFT

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

McCowan Precinct Plan Study Background & Deliverables

CITY OF ANN ARBOR MASTER PLAN. Land Use Element

hermitage town center

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

Plan Framework Report. Attachment A

YONGE STEELES CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN. Young + Wright / IBI Group Architects Dillon Consulting Ltd. GHK International (Canada) Ltd.

2. Form and Character. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 The Downtown Addition Plan. 2.1 Introduction

A. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

A P P E N D I X B - O P P O R T U N I T Y S I T E S

Land Use. Hardware Street Vendor Mixed-Use

burlington mobility hubs study Downtown Burlington Mobility Hub

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DRAFT Land Use Chapter

City of Sugar Hill Planning Staff Report CBD Design Review

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR

CENTERS CORRIDORS WEDGES GLOSSARY

Brampton. Secondary Plan. Review. Bram West. A New Direction in Planning & Public Consultation

Mobility Districts and Traffic Studies

East Central Area Plan

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

Vision Statement for the Town of Flower Mound Master Plan The Town of Flower Mound Master Plan furthers the established community based vision to:

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITES

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Description of Preferred Alternative

GUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THIS CHAPTER

CITY OF WESTERVILLE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. BASSEM BITAR / (614) /

HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION APRIL 3, 2012

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Growth Area Reviews Preliminary Directions for Midtown Oakville, the Uptown Core and Palermo Village

Transcription:

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan Transportation and Planning Committee May 11, 2015

Presentation Outline 1. Background and Location 2. Community Dialog Process 3. Activity Center Recommendations 4. Wedge Recommendations 5. Next Steps 2

Process Background Began public process to develop the plan in November 2012. Draft Plan brought to TAP Committee in January 2014. Committee referred plan to Council for public comment. Just prior to public comment meeting, significant concerns arose in community: Extent of multi-family development Location and type of retail uses Level of detail in design guidance Provision of open space Staff undertook an intensive Community Dialog process to address concerns. New Refined Draft Plan addresses community concerns; provides greater detail in recommendations and design standards. 3

Location & Policy Context Centers, Corridors & Wedges Growth Framework Prosperity Hucks Policy Plans General Development Policies Guidance on Community Design Area Plans Parcel specific Future Land Use Uptown Mixed Use Activity Centers: Focal point of community activity (live-work-play) South Park Mix of use (retail-housing-office-civic) Cohesive pedestrian-oriented core Ballantyne Surrounded by lower density residential 4

Plan Area 5

Existing Land Use 6

Transportation Plan Major Street Network (parts still under construction) Envisioned in the 1999 Villages Plan I-485 Interchange Benfield Road Prosperity Ridge Road Ridge Road Johnston Oehler Road 7

Plan Format Adopted by City Council Vision Policies for land use, design, mobility, open space Used in future land use decisions Not adopted by City Council Tool for staff to track action steps can be updated Existing Conditions Trends & Forecasts 8

Vision for the Activity Center Activity Center will be a community serving Mixed Use place complementing and enhancing the surrounding neighborhoods; with a rich variety of retail, office, entertainment and residential uses in a well-designed and appropriately scaled form. 9

Community Dialog 2014 March 27 May 13 May 21 June 11-12 Aug 5 Aug 20 Sept 3 Sept 16-17 Sept 23 2015 April 15 Meeting at Oehler Barn Core Group meeting Core Group meeting Small Group Discussions (6 meetings in small groups, 70 participants) Core Group meeting Core Group meeting Core Group meeting Small Group Work Sessions (14 table groups, 70 participants) Public Summary Review (80 participants) Refined Plan Public Meeting (100 participants) 10

Community Dialog 14 Teams 70+ participants 11

Extent and location of multi-family development Limited to select locations (Mixed Use areas) Only when integrated with other uses With range of building/unit type & strong design standards Location and type of retail uses Small shops and restaurants, main street feel Some anchor retail boxes but no Big Box Office, hotel, especially south of I-485 Level of detail in design guidance Consistency in design character, 2-4 story Lush landscaping green feel Walkable, pedestrian friendly Provision of open space Community gathering space Greens, squares, plazas integrated with future development

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan Refined Draft What is different? Reduced Activity Center Boundary Geographically specific policies, 15 areas More detailed and specific Community Design guidance Finer grained residential density recommendations Open space expectations expanded 13

Activity Center Boundary 1. Focus on Interchange Small area similar to original Village Plan Tied to new roads 2. What s Outside the Center Single family homes Townhomes in select locations Institutional 3. What's Inside the Center Retail, office, institutional Parks & Open Space Apartments & townhomes (limited to select locations, with integrated design, community amenities, designed to support vibrant & walkable retail) 14

Focus on a Walkable Center Where is the Town Center? Walkable, pedestrianoriented Community gathering spaces Retail/restaurants Office Residential Institutional Comparable: Birkdale Village 48 acres Phillips Place 35 acres Downtown Davidson 35 acres 15

Activity Center Policy Areas 15 Policy Areas Specific Policy Guidance Greater detail 16

Activity Center Recommended Land Use 17 17

Activity Center Street Network 18 18

Activity Center Open Space Framework Map shows elements of a possible network: Existing open space, Approved site plan elements, Sensitive locations in Activity Center. Map does not show all open space that could result through private development: an expectation of all development in Activity Center. 19

Policy Areas C1, C2, C8, C9 Large undeveloped sites Mixed Use: Retail, Office, Residential. Institutional also appropriate. Residential only as part of a mix; maximum density differs slightly from area to area. Retail anchor uses permitted in some areas while also providing small shop space. New drive-through facilities and gasoline pumps generally limited to I-485 frontage roads, with design standards. Internal street network. Buildings oriented to streets, with most parking behind; additional design standards. Open spaces and plazas, connected to each other. 20

Policy Area C2: Northeast of Ridge and Prosperity Church Roads 21

Policy Area C2: Northeast of Ridge and Prosperity Church Roads 22

Policy Area C2: Northeast of Ridge and Prosperity Church Roads 23

Policy Areas C3, C4, C10 Sites with existing shopping centers or other development Mixed Use: Retail, Office, Residential. Institutional also appropriate. Residential only allowed if part of vertical mixed use. Retail anchor uses permitted in some areas while also providing small shop space. New drive-through facilities and gasoline pumps generally limited to I-485 frontage roads, with design standards. Internal street network. Buildings oriented to streets, with most parking behind; additional design standards. Open spaces and plazas, connected to each other. 24

Policy Area C10: Southwest of Prosperity Church Road and I-485 25

Policy Area C10: Southwest of Prosperity Church Road and I-485 26

Policy Area C10: Southwest of Prosperity Church Road and I-485 27

Policy Area C10: Southwest of Prosperity Church Road and I-485 28

Policy Area C11 Existing and planned townhouse developments Residential at a townhouse density. Apartment buildings not appropriate. Internal street network. Buildings oriented to streets, with most parking, driveways, and garages behind; additional design standards. Small open spaces and plazas, connected to each other. 29

Policy Areas C6, C13 Existing intensive residential developments C6 is a multifamily apartment development expected to remain. Provision for secondary Retail/Office as part of a mix on I-485 frontage with design guidelines. C13 is an seniors residential community expected to remain as an institutional use. Drive-through facilities and gasoline pumps not appropriate in thesse primarily residential areas. 30

Policy Areas C5, C12, C15 Properties at edge, adjoining neighborhoods Residential at a townhouse density. Provision for secondary Retail/Office use allowed only as part of a mix with residential, with design guidelines. Drive-through facilities and gasoline pumps not appropriate in these primarily residential areas. Buildings oriented to streets, with most parking behind; additional design standards. Small open spaces and plazas, connected to each other. 31

Policy Areas C7, C14 Properties at edge Retail, Office, Residential not to exceed townhome density also allowed. Institutional also appropriate. Drive-through facilities and gasoline pumps not appropriate due to residential adjacencies. Buildings oriented to streets, with parking behind; additional design standards. Small open spaces and plazas, connected to each other. 32

Vision for the Wedge Neighborhoods are the backbone to the stability of the area. Continuing development in and around the neighborhoods will take into account its impact on the quality of life of area residents and protect the tree canopy. 33

Wedge Recommended Land Use Few concerns expressed. Changes mainly to cover areas removed from Activity Center. Largely built out, but with scattered remaining parcels. Primarily single family residential with provision for small nodes of commercial or slightly higher density. 34 34

Addressing the Concerns New Refined Draft Plan addresses community concerns: Extent of multi-family development reduced and defined more precisely Location and type of retail uses specified by area, including appropriate locations for anchor uses, drive throughs, and gasoline pumps Level of detail in design guidance increased, and tailored to specific areas Methods for provision of open space laid out in greater detail Community was involved in the refined recommendations, and reception of the plan has been good to date. 35

Next Step: Planning Committee Public Comment 36

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan Next Steps - Tentative 2015 April 15 May 11 May 19 May 28 June 16 June 22 Public Meeting TAP Committee introduction Planning Committee public comment TAP Committee referral to Council for public comment Planning Committee recommendation City Council public comment July 13 TAP Committee recommendation July 27 or Aug 24 City Council Action 37

Questions? 38