Route 66 Business Corridor

Similar documents
Route 66 Business Corridor

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

TORTI GALLAS and partners, inc. How to Retrofit Your Suburb to Make a Downtown

- Document 2 - Algonquin Interpretation and The Continuing Conversation toward a Vision for a Revitalized Lansdowne

CHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

Goals AND Guiding principles

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

edmonton.ca/ribbonofgreen #ribbonofgreen

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

Community Open House March 26 th, 2018

Comprehensive Plan. Faribault, Minnesota. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Claybaugh Preservation Architecture Inc. Howard R. Green Company Bonz/REA

What Pioneer Grove Will Look Like?

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

POCKET COMMUNITY PLAN

Sherri Ferguson. President/CEO Portland Chamber of Commerce. Tennessee Certified Economic Developer Capstone Project

Niagara National Heritage Area

6-GATEWAYS, WAYFINDING & PUBLIC SIGNS

5.0 WAYFINDING STREETSCAPE DESIGN MASTER PLAN 55

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Al Hansen, Director of Parks and Recreation City of Petoskey, Michigan

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 AUTHORITY 2.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT 2.3 SITE LOCATION

January Galashiels Development Parcels

The Palisades Interstate Parkway and Henry Hudson Drive designated a New Jersey State Scenic Byway, 2005

Community and Economic Development

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

c h a p t e r one Introduction

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

CITIZEN S ADVISORY COMMITTEE PUBLIC REALM CONCEPT PRESENTATION. October 25, 2018

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECTS AND THE PUBLIC ART MASTER PLAN

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

1.0 PLANNING MARKHAM S FUTURE CONTENTS

CAMPUS PLACEMAKING: CAC WORK SESSION. August 23, 2018

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION WORKING GROUP!

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Transportation Chapter 1 - Introduction and Purpose of Planning to 1-3. Utilities

October 25 Downtown Partnership and Action Plan Workshop Record of Group Table Results

Historic Preservation Element

PARK AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Attachment 1 PFAC Resolution #394 of December 4, 2014

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

Niagara Region Official Plan. Table of Contents

GRAND AVENUE PARK DESIGN: an exploration of urban flexible strategies, possibilities, programs and convictions.

ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

section five BEAUTIFICATION PLAN

Corridor Enhancements

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

Newcourt Masterplan. November Exeter Local Development Framework

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

S C O P E O F W O R K A P R I L

Summary of Action Strategies

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & SIX THEMES OF THE PLAN

TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 12, The Planning and Development Department and the Engineering Department recommend that Council:

LAND USE PLAN 7. Housing

Planning Commission March 14, Presented by: City of Bellingham Port of Bellingham

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Please read the entire document

City Center Master Plan

The transportation system in a community is an

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

CITY CLERK. Parkland Acquisition Strategic Directions Report (All Wards)

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

8implementation. strategies

Station Area Plan Introduction & Draft Alternatives Review

Grantsburg Community Design Team (CDT)

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

LUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY

THE GARDEN CITY PLAN. City of St. Catharines Official Plan. City of St. Catharines

Goals and Action Items

Mendota-Lebanon Hills Greenway Master Plan Executive Summary. August draft for more information visit

SOUTH NATOMAS COMMUNITY PLAN

4.8 LAND USE AND PLANNING

INTRODUCTION. Strive to achieve excellence in all areas of operational sustainability.

Parks, Open Space and Trails

CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report. August 21, 2013 Council Meeting UPDATE ON TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN (TAM) GREENBRAE CORRIDOR WORKING GROUP

Municipal Development Plan 2013

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Interchange Justification Report (IJR) and PD&E for S.R. 8 C.R. 4 (Antioch Road) Interchange

Bourne Downtown Site Planning

Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project

I. INTRODUCTION. Project Background and Study Area

2. AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVMENT

CHAPTER 4: LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Downtown Streetscape Manual & Built Form Standards

Transcription:

Route 66 Business Corridor DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AND CULTURAL DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN Draft April 2016

Acknowledgments Text Acknowledgments here etc... LIST NAE

Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions, Opportunities and Constraints... 3 3. Specific Plan Framework... 19 4. Downtown Pedestrian Improvements... 22 5. Development Standards... 30 6. Design Guidelines... 35 7. Branding, Wayfinding and Interpretation... 42 8. Circulation and Public Infrastructure... 50 9. Implementation Action Plan... 51 APPENDICES Existing Conditions Report Draft Historic Designation Application Draft CalTrans Signage Application

Chapter 1. Introduction PURPOSE BACKGROUND PLANNING AREA APPLICABILITY In 2015, the City of initiated development of In 2014, the City Council passed a resolution Route 66 traverses the length of, a major California Government Code Section 65450 the Route 66 Business Corridor Downtown Business designating a portion of Route 66 from I-40 to SR-58 transportation hub within San Bernardino County establishes that a Specific Plan serves as the zoning and Cultural District Specific Plan (the Specific Plan), as the Route 66 Business Corridor and the portion and the ojave Desert. With several major for the properties within the Specific Plan area. an effort to reenergize historic Route 66 through of Route 66 from Otis Avenue to 7th Avenue as highways and railroad lines converging in the city, Development plans, site plans, and use permits must, also known as ain Street, between State the Downtown Business and Cultural District. The its strategic location afforded a rich and be consistent with the Specific Plan for the area. Route 58 (SR 58) and Interstate 40 (I-40). The Specific Plan identifies wayfinding and branding, land use and urban design guidelines for the corridor, with specific focus on increasing tourism in the original Downtown area between Otis and 7th Avenue. The Specific Plan aims to: Improve the overall visitor experience; Identify opportunities for events and activities for tourists and residents; City s designations offer the combined benefits of demonstrating its interest and commitment to maintaining and enhancing the corridor, raising awareness of the Route 66 and Downtown, and improving the prospects of securing grants and other funding sources to support the business enhancement, historic preservation, infrastructure improvements and cultural enrichment efforts concurrently underway in these areas. long history shaped by settlers, travelers, railroad workers, miners and businesspersons. Route 66 in is also known as ain Street and is home to the city s original Downtown and center of commerce. The planning area, illustrated in Figure 1.1 encompasses parcels abutting Route 66 and areas up to approximately one block on both sides of the corridor, spanning from SR-58 to I-40. Sub Areas The City has crafted the Specific Plan to be consistent with the land use policy directives and build-out assumptions in the General Plan and that have been addressed in the previously approved General Plan aster Environmental Impact Report (EIR). A key objective of the General Plan aster EIR is to reduce the need for future detailed planning and environmental review procedures related to development within the planning area. The Specific Create a compelling identity that draws on the history of Route 66; Develop interactive materials that highlight the historic gems along the corridor; Support established businesses and increasing economic development; Identify tools and techniques needed to keep Downtown s historic authenticity while enhancing visitor experience; and Discover potential funding sources to achieve the The City s General Plan includes several policy statements that reflect the need to focus on Route 66 as a key tourist corridor. Additionally, the California Historic Route 66 Needles to Corridor anagement Plan (BL, 2015) also identified several issues related to Route 66 in. The outcomes and policy guidance of both the General plan and the California Historic Route 66 Needles to Corridor anagement Plan have been incorporated into this document. The planning area has four distinct sub areas along the corridor from SR-58 to I-40. The sub area boundaries were developed by assessing the existing development pattern, topography, and architectural styles along the corridor. Chapter 2 provides additional description of each sub area. Terms used in this plan Plan provides the necessary development and design guidelines for future development and reuse proposals and may proceed without a requirement for new or additional environmental documentation. California law requires that a specific plan be consistent with a local jurisdiction's general plan. To ensure consistency, City staff conducted a thorough analysis of goals and policies of the 2015 General Plan as part of the planning process for this plan. Goals, policies and strategies related to this plan are incorporated into the implementation City s goals. Project Vision The community-based vision for the Route 66 Corridor was developed through businesses, community organizations, and input from residents. It provides the foundation for the specific plan implementing actions. The Specific Plan s vision supports specific policies and strategies to guide future development, particularly in the Downtown area, improve wayfinding along the corridor, and identify branding and interpretive elements that will boost interest from tourists and provide economic opportunities for Specific Plan Vision Route 66 in celebrates the romance of Americana by providing opportunities to explore, stop and experience the area s rich natural, cultural, and travel history, supporting existing and future businesses and increasing interest in Downtown and the larger business corridor. Downtown: Portion of Route 66 and adjacent land uses between Otis Avenue and 7th Avenue (Sub area 2) (also known as Downtown Business and Cultural District). Planning Area: Portion of Route 66 and adjacent land uses between SR-58 and I-40 Route 66 Historic District/Corridor: Portion of Route 66 within the City of. measures of this Specific Plan. No General Plan amendments are needed to implement this plan. This plan implements Land Use POLICY 1.B, specifically STRATEGY 1.B.1: Prepare Specific Plans for the Route 66 Historic District along Route 66. residents and businesses. 1 Route 66 Business Corridor Introduction

Figure 1.1 VICINITY Sub Areas 1-4 BASE AP FEATURES Route 66 other Road useum 1ST ST er Downtown Specific Plan Project Area Western America Railroad useum Waterman Sub Area Boundary RIVER SIDE 1 DR YUCC A AVE Central High School e Riv ojav 2 Spanish Trail Specific Plan Area s and Open Space Sturnacle Route 66 1 Passenger and Freight Rail Lillian 3 Highways 15 Foglesong STE Academy Freeways City Hall Dana and Community Center ojave River Valley useum Desert Discovery Center Cora. Harper Fitness Center useum Junior High School ontara Elementary School Donald A. Stringham Heights 15 ONTARA RD URIEL DR 6 Parcels 40 TE 6 ROU Cameron Elementary School BARSTOW RD AVE H ST / AVE L 4 AIN H Ave Soccer Adult Fields Education YUCCA AVE Spanish Trail Specific Plan Area Sub Area Number Crestline Elementary School Community College Panamint SOURCES: GIS files provided by the City of, City of website: http://www.barstowca.org/, Google aps N 0 1000 2000 Feet Downtown Business and Cultural District Specific Plan Introduction 2