Guiding Principles for the SR 520 Replacement Project

Similar documents
The University District envisions, in its neighborhood


A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

LOS ANGELES MISSION COLLEGE MASTER PLAN Master Plan DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BOTANIC GARDENS FINAL DRAFT - 2/2/04 VOLUNTEER HANDBOOK

Port of Seattle Street Vacations Summary April, 2016

University of Washington Burke Gilman Trail Corridor Study

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

July 12, Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH RE: I-70/71 Columbus Crossroads Project

Urban Planning and Land Use

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

6.0 Recreation and Open Space

Green Line North Centre City Alignment

2010 Campus Master Plan Update - USF TAMPA Campus Master Plan Update USF TAMPA

Illustrative Campus Plan with Proposed Development

AUSTIN MEDICAL DISTRICT MASTER PLAN"

Manchester. Vision for Manchester

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

6. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Taming Tysons Corner Transforming the Quintessential Edge City

117 E. Louisa St. #1 Seattle, WA January 29, 2016

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Promoting Economic Development Through Upfront SEPA Review: Lessons from South Downtown Tacoma

Transportation. Strategies for Action

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER

State Highway 121 Southwest Parkway. Fort Worth s Transportation Success Story in Design and Cooperation

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MASTER PLAN SEATTLE CAMPUS

12 Intergovernmental Coordination

11.0 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Phasing and Implementation

Economy Vision Statements: Social Wellbeing Vision Statements: Natural Environment Vision Statements:

CITY OF UNION CITY MINUTES GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2

R.O.M. = Rough Order of Magnitude

CENTRAL AND EAST CORRIDORS

FACT SHEET: COMMUNITY INPUT S IMPACT ON THE DESIGN FOR THE OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Working Group Meeting #11 September 2, 2014

Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk Final EIS Appendix D - Supplemental Draft EIS Comments and Responses October 2016.

North Salt Lake General Plan Update 2013

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Whittier Greenway Trail. Est. 2009

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY MASTER PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Tables Table UC Davis Park and Open Space Resources

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

CAL POLY MASTER PLAN UPDATE, March 2015

CAMPUS PLANNING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT SAMARITAN SPORTS MEDICINE INSTITUTE AT OSU 10/21/2013

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Neighborhood Districts

This page left intentionally blank.

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March Table of Contents

Ashland BRT Environmental Assessment: logos of CTA, CDOT, Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development

iii. Visioning framework

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

Phase 1 : Understanding the Campus Context. Phase 2 : APPROACHES - Alternates & Preferred Plan

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

The transportation system in a community is an

Campus Sign Plan. Adopted by the Campus Planning Committee Adopted: June 26, 2006 Revised: April 14, 2016

Green Streets and Green Infrastructure Planning A Tale of Two Cities: San Mateo and Emeryville

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

THE GREEN VISION WORKSHOP Friday, November 6, 2009

West Ocala Vision & Community Plan City Council Work Session. Presented by West Ocala Community Plan Steering Committee

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

Silverdale Regional Center

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

Access Management: An Overview

APPENDIX D: Visual and Aesthetic Conditions for NCCU Station Refinement. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel

Derry Green Corporate Business Park

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

PIKE PINE RENAISSANCE: ACT ONE. October 19, 2017

I-95 Interchange & Ellis Road PD&E Study

Route 1 Corridor Study

Subcampus Recommendations

Welcome. Community Consultation Meeting November 28, Review and discuss the Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Plan Framework

December 1, 2014 (revised) Preliminary Report -- Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation

4 Park Planning and Design

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

A.1 New Policy Topic Areas

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

Northwest LRT Downtown to. Northwest Edmonton Study. Public Workshops

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

CENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

TOPIC AREA #1 SUSTAINABILITY, OPEN SPACE & CONSERVATION

From: Sent: To: Subject: Zoning: Landscaping:

José Campos Manager of Planning and Design Review SPUR San José Symposium October 12, 2018

Presentation to Town Council in association with Kubilins Transportation Group Rose & Associates Equinox Environmental

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

Designing for Sustainability: A Consultant s Perspective

Chapter 22. Alternatives to the Proposed Project

Transcription:

Guiding Principles for the SR 520 Replacement Project Presentation to the Board of Regents Theresa Doherty Assistant Vice President for Regional Affairs May 18, 2006 F-14

The University of Washington is committed to transportation solutions that reduce traffic and congestion on campus and in surrounding neighborhoods. The U-Pass Program is nationally recognized for reducing the number of faculty, staff and students who drive to campus. 77% of the campus population arrives on campus using an alternative to driving alone The University has fewer parking spaces on campus than it did in 1983 despite 12,000 or 25% more people coming to campus The Husky Stadium Transportation Management Plan encourages fans to travel to campus activities using alternative transportation methods including transit, carpools, biking, walking and boating. 96% of people travel to games at Husky Stadium using an alternative to driving alone The University is working with Sound Transit on construction of a light rail station at Husky Stadium to further increase the use of public transportation to campus. 2

The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is considering four and six-lane alternatives to replace the SR 520 Evergreen Point Bridge. Construction will begin in 2009 and end in 2015 or 2017 depending upon option chosen Projected Replacement Costs: 4-Lane Alternative 6-Lane Base Alternative $1.7 to $2.0 billion $2.3 to $2.8 billion 6-Lane Base Alternative with options Second Bascule Bridge = Increase number above by $60 to $70 million Pacific Street Interchange = Increase number above by $195 to $255 million plus 2 years of construction No Montlake Freeway Transit Stop (part of Union Bay Bridge) Reduce number above by $16 to $20 million A total of $1.25 billion in funding has been identified to date: $52 million from 2003 gas tax increase $500 million from state sources $1 million from federal sources $700 million from projected toll revenues 3

The University of Washington has five guiding principles to evaluate SR 520 replacement options. The replacement proposal must: 1. Promote a vibrant, healthy and livable academic, business, and residential community at the University of Washington and in surrounding neighborhoods 2. Promote carpool, bus, rail, bicycle and pedestrian transportation solutions that improve access to the University and limit the impact of single occupancy vehicles on campus and surrounding neighborhoods 3. Preserve and enhance the recreational and educational habitat of the Washington Park Arboretum and UW Botanic Garden 4. Preserve the ability of the University to meet current and future development needs 5. Allow for the efficient and effective management of construction projects included in the University s Capital Improvement Program for the Seattle campus 4

Base 6 lane alternative 5

Base 6 with Second Montlake Bridge 6

Base 6 with Pacific Interchange 7

Details of the Base 6 lane alternative with the Pacific Street Interchange (or Arboretum Bridge) option include: The existing Montlake/SR 520 interchange would be closed and replaced by an interchange above Marsh Island A new 110 foot bridge, 6 lanes across is constructed between Pacific Street and SR 520 above Marsh Island. An expanded intersection is created at Montlake and Pacific Street Montlake Boulevard is widened from 4 to 6 lanes north of Pacific Street to 45 th Street to accommodate increased traffic volumes associated with the 6- lane bridge option. Current Monlake crossing Expanded intersection at Pacific Street New Arboretum Bridge New Pacific Street Interchange Source: WSDOT 8

Based on the guiding principles, the Pacific Street Interchange (Arboretum Bridge) design option would have a significant impact on the University of Washington campus. This option would: Have an adverse impact on the health and vitality of the academic, business and residential community at the University of Washington and in surrounding neighborhoods. Promotes the use of single occupancy vehicles due to an increase in road capacity on the new bridge and the expanded intersections at Montlake and Pacific and two new lanes along Montlake. Harm the Washington Park Arboretum due to increased shading and land usage and degrade the educational habitat of the area. Permanently removes development capacity on the Seattle campus. Creates adverse impacts and costs on the University s Capital Improvement Projects. 9

An expanded intersection at Pacific Avenue and Montlake Boulevard will adversely impact campus operations and will further divide and reduce access to the Seattle campus. During construction, 2009 to 2017: Congestion will impact the ability of patients to access the University of Washington Medical Center -- 18,000 admissions and 350,000 clinic visits each year Dust from construction may impact patients with compromised immune systems Congestion may result in decreased attendance and associated revenues at events hosted by Intercollegiate Athletics Conflicts with Sound Transit and other University development projects After construction, an expanded interchange at Montlake & Pacific combined with 2 additional lanes on Montlake Boulevard will: Increase single-occupancy vehicle traffic into the University of Washington and surrounding neighborhoods (counter to the purpose of the Sound Transit station project) 30% more traffic volume on the streets in SE campus New traffic volume on and around campus will add to congestion in these areas and create bottlenecks that may degrade access to campus Reduce the accessibility of the South and East quadrants of campus by pedestrians and bicyclists 10

Increased traffic, noise, air pollution, and shading or displacement of plants will harm the plant collections and recreational habitat at the Washington Park Arboretum. The University of Washington and the City of Seattle are joint stewards of the Washington Park Arboretum The Arboretum and the UW Botanic Gardens are places where internationally recognized research is conducted and educational and recreational habitat is enjoyed by 320,000 visitors each year A bridge over Marsh and Foster Island may result in the shading or displacement of plants Youth Education at Washington Park Arboretum 11

The permanent loss of land available for future development poses operational and capital planning challenges. Dense residential communities or water surround the University of Washington s Seattle campus and restricts the amount of land available for future growth Campus development is further limited by: Master Plan for the Seattle Campus (2003) City of Seattle University of Washington Agreement Arboretum 2001 Master Plan The placement of the Arboretum bridge and expansion of the Pacific Street intersection will have unintended consequences on future development by the University in the Southeast quadrant of campus 12

The cumulative effects of University planned capital projects, Sound Transit station development, and an expanded interchange at Pacific Street have not been adequately assessed. The University has a Capital Improvement Program of over $1 billion planned for the Seattle campus during 2009-2015 Sound Transit will begin construction on a light rail station adjacent to Husky Stadium in 2008/2009 The station platform will be located 100 feet underground with two main entrances Construction will last 6 years Source: Sound Transit website The University of Washington Medical Center and Intercollegiate Athletics have plans to expand their facilities during construction of SR 520. ICA plans will require the same footprint as the Pacific Street Interchange proposal The combination of these projects will put additional pressure on traffic flows in surrounding neighborhoods 13

In summary, the University of Washington is committed to improving transportation options for the academic, business and residential communities on campus and in surrounding neighborhoods. To achieve these goals, the University will: Continue to meet with WSDOT to identify issues associated with various replacement options paying special attention to the Pacific Interchange Option The third meeting between UW and WSDOT is scheduled for May 24 th WSDOT plans on selecting a preferred design alternative by mid-2007 Continue to work with community groups to assess various proposals Continue to work with the City of Seattle s SR 520 Advisory Committee as City officials assess the various proposals Use the five guiding principles as a framework to determine whether a SR 520 replacement proposal is acceptable to the University of Washington. 14