Municipal Heritage Bridges Cultural, Heritage and Archaeological Resources Assessment Checklist Revised April 11, 2014

Similar documents
GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

APPENDIX K WINDSOR OFFICIAL PLAN

The MSII reports for the bridge indicate that the Annual Average Daily Traffic at the bridge is 100. The road can be considered a low volume road.

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Bridge Type Assessment and Evaluation

Appendix C Draft Cultural Heritage Self-Assessment DRAFT

You Don't Know What You've Got 'til it's Gone. Creative Cities Summit 2012 Victoria, British Columbia Kate Hagerman Cultural Heritage Specialist

TOWN OF WHITBY REPORT RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Better Cycling. The City will update the cycling master plan (London ON Bikes) based on the approved BRT network.

Public Meeting #3 May 9, 2009 MVVA Team

Purpose of Open House #3

Victoria Bridge Municipal Class EA Civic Works Committee

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE TWO November 28, 2018

Provincial Heritage Places Recognition Program

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Victoria Street Pedestrian Bridge

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

Cultural Heritage Resources

Cultural Heritage Resources

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

The Rideau Canal Corridor: Planning for a Proud Future. Heather Thomson Heritage Planner Parks Canada

WELCOME TO PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2. Please Sign In

HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT SALEM BRIDGE, COUNTY SITE No. B IRVINE CREEK (LOTS 15 & 16, CONCESSION 11 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF NICHOL)

Cultural Heritage Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Environmental Guide for Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscapes

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

Second Line West Pedestrian/Cyclist Crossing of Highway 401 Class EA. Second Line West Pedestrian/Cyclist Crossing of Highway 401 Class EA

STAGE 1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF YONGE STREET SUBWAY EXTENSION, LOTS 37-41, CONCESSION EYS, TOWNSHIP OF MARKHAM, CITY OF TORONTO, YORK COUNTY

To qualify for federal Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds a project must meet two basic federal requirements:

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

Glen Road Pedestrian Bridge Environmental Assessment

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

ONLINE PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE

F2. Draft Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Net Effects Analysis & Comparative Evaluation Report

The purpose of tonight s PIC is to:

MONITORING STRATEGY. CRM Lab Archaeological Services

Burloak Drive Grade Separation

Mavis Road Class Environmental Assessment

Summary of Changes for the Comprehensive Draft Proposed Official Plan Amendment

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

Telecommunication Facility Policy

Cultural Heritage Landscapes Strategy

Municipal Obligations Archaeological Heritage Screening. Heritage Conservation Branch Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport November 14, 2018

Variance from Chapter 297, Signs, of the Former City of Toronto Municipal Code Bloor Street West (High Park)

Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Executive Summary

Pedestrian Project Award Institute of Transportation Engineers

APPENDIX F: EXTERNAL APPROVALS

HURON COMMUNITY PLAN

MUNICIPALITY OF NORTH GRENVILLE. PROPOSED WATERFRONT TRAILS AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ON THE SOUTH BRANCH OF THE RIDEAU RIVER Kemptville, Ontario

Services Department B September 10, 2007

Executive Committee Meeting Addendum. #7/15 July 3, :30 A.M. HEAD OFFICE, 101 EXCHANGE AVENUE, VAUGHAN Members:

7437, 7439 and 7441 Kingston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Preliminary Report

Recreational Pathway Crossing of Richmond Street Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre #2 April 22, 2015

Inform you of the purpose and scope of the study for PTH 100 and a proposed future St. Norbert Bypass;

Bostwick Road. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. October 13, City of London. Bostwick Road Municipal Class Environmental Assessment

THE GARDEN CITY PLAN. City of St. Catharines Official Plan. City of St. Catharines

CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT TERMS OF REFERENCE

GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 OCTOBER 24, 2017

North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North York District. Ward No. 26, Don Valley West

DAVENPORT VILLAGE SECONDARY PLAN

DRAFT Regional Implementation Guideline. Conserving Regionally Significant Cultural Heritage Resources

Project Output Indicators for Federal Gas Tax Investments

Name of Action: Arrangement of beach locations on the River Vikhra

Environmental Study Report

II PREVIOUS REPORTS PERTINENT TO THIS MATTER II

Figure 1- Site Plan Concept

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

A General Summary of Land Use Zones 1

L 3-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Wiley Bridge Gorewood Drive, Claireville Conservation Area

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Public Information Centre #1

4. What are the goals of the Kawarthas, Naturally Connected project? 7. What are watersheds and why are they being used as the project boundaries?

PROJECT INFORMATION. The type of development

Elevated Water Storage Facility and Pumping Station Municipal Class EA for Pressure District 7: PIC # 1 Summary

TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM

Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

Red Hill Valley Project More Than A Road October 16, 2006

A Technical Guideline for Cultural Heritage Resources. for Projects Planned Under the

Table 8-4: Road Classification Local Roads, second table, of Chapter 8 Create a Multi-Modal City, be amended by adding the following:

PRELIMINARY DESIGN + DEVELOPMENT PLAN

The Evolution of Cultural Heritage Landscapes as a Means of Protecting Heritage Resources

Cultural Heritage Evaluation and Heritage Impact Assessment: Hillsburgh Dam Bridge

Standards and Guidelines for Ontario s Heritage Bridges Managing Ontario s Industrial Heritage

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM MEETING SUMMARY LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM UPDATE

Cc~tporate Sers~ic:es

City of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan

Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

PennDOT. single spann lanes and 3- mayy need to be to accommodate. any bridge. addition to III. Date: CRP 07/27/2015 CRP.

Page. I. Introduction 1. II. Project Purpose and Need 2. IV. Description of Section 4(f) Property 2. V. Impacts to Section 4(f) property 3

West London Dyke, April 1947 Flood. Forks of the Thames, July 2000 Flood. Source: UTRCA

2.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT

Municipal Class EA Study Public Information Centre No. 1 December 13, :00 pm 7:00 pm. Please sign in so we can keep you updated on this study

London s Bus Rapid Transit System

Leaside to Main Infrastructure Refurbishment Project

Revised License Report

Transcription:

Municipal Heritage Bridges Cultural, Heritage and Archaeological Assessment Checklist Revised April 11, 2014 This checklist was prepared in March 2013 by the Municipal Engineers Association to assist with determining the requirements to comply with the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. View all 4 parts of the module on Structures Over 40 Years at www.municipalclassea.ca to assist with completing the checklist. Project Name: Location: Municipality: Project Engineer: Checklist completed by: Date: NOTE: Complete all sections of Checklist. Both Cultural Heritage and Archaeological Sections must be satisfied before proceeding. Part A - Municipal Class EA Activity Selection water crossings? This includes ferry docks. grade separation? underpasses or overpasses for pedestrian recreational or agricultural use? interchanges between any two roadways, including a grade separation and ramps to connect the two roadways? Schedule B or C Schedule B or C Schedule B or C Schedule B or C

or result in reconstruction of a water crossing where the structure is less than 40 years old and the reconstructed facility will be for the same purpose, use, capacity and at the same location? (Capacity refers to either hydraulic or road capacity.) This include ferry docks. or result in reconstruction of a water crossing, where the reconstructed facility will not be for the same purpose, use, capacity or at the same location? (Capacity refers to either hydraulic or road capacity). This includes ferry docks. or result in reconstruction or alteration of a structure or the grading adjacent to it when the structure is over 40 years old where the proposed work will alter the basic structural system, overall configuration or appearance of the structure? Schedule A+ Schedule B or C Assess Archaeological Part B - Cultural Heritage Assessment Does the proposed project involve a bridge construction in or after 1956? Does the project involve one of these four bridge types? Rigid frame Next Precast with Concrete Deck Next Culvert or Simple Span Next Steel Bean/ Concrete Deck Next

subject of a covenant or agreement between the owner of the property and a conservation body or level of government? listed on a register or inventory of heritage properties maintained by the municipality? designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? subject to a notice of intention to designate issued by a municipality? located within a designated Heritage Conservation District? subject to a Heritage Conservation District study area by-law? included in the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport s list of provincial heritage properties? part of a National Historic Site? part of a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Site? `

designated under the Heritage Railway Station Protection Act? identified as a Federal Heritage Building by the Federal Heritage Building Review Office (FHBRO) the subject of a municipal, provincial or federal commemorative or interpretive plaque that speaks to the Historical significance of the bridge? in a Canadian Heritage River watershed? Will the project impact any structures or sites (not bridges) that are over forty years old, or are important to defining the character of the area or that are considered a landmark in the local community? Is the bridge or study area adjacent to a known burial site and/or cemetery? Is the bridge considered a landmark or have a special association with a community, person or historical event in the local community? contain or is it part of a cultural heritage landscape? Prepare Cher Assess Archaeological

PART C - HERITAGE ASSESSMENT Does the Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report identify any Heritage Features on the project? Does the Heritage Impact Assessment determine that the proposed project will impact any of the Heritage Features that have been identified? Part D - Archaeological Schedule B or C Part D - Archaeological PART D - ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Will any activity, related to the project, result in land impacts/significant ground disturbance? Have all areas, to be impacted by ground disturbing activities, been subjected to recent extensive and intensive disturbances and to depths greater than the depths of the proposed activities? Has an archaeological assessment previously been carried out that includes all of the areas to be impacted by this project? Does the report on that previous archaeological assessment recommend that no further archaeological assessment is required within the limits of the project for which that assessment was undertaken, and has a letter been issued by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport stating that the report has been entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports? Schedule A - proceed Schedule A - proceed Archaeological Assessment Schedule A - proceed Obtain satisfaction letter - proceed ** Include Documentation Summary in Project File**