DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Similar documents
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Planning Commission Agenda Item

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Architectural Review Board Report

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

PC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

ZONING: C-1-T. PARKING PROVIDED On-Site Valet 51 On-Site Holman Dedicated 14 Off-Site Valet TOTAL 113. (Mechanical Lifts)

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

OCEANSIDE DEVELOPER S CONFERENCE. 1. 9:30-10:30 a.m. Proposed hotel on a 12,000 sq. ft. site at the northeast corner of Topeka St. and Tremont St.

1071 King Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

13. New Construction. Context & Character

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

M E M O R A N D U M SITE DATA

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2190 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SANTA ROSA PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 23, 2016 APPLICANT. Joseph Rubin MJP15-005

Architectural Review Board Report

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan. Transportation and Planning Committee May 11, 2015

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3

PLANNING STAFF REVIEW

Standards (R-3) Figure B-11: R-3 Residential Standards Exhibit

Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL

Staff Report and Recommendation

Division VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

City of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

PRESENTED: April 15, 2008 FILE: DP No. 273/ Development Permit No Government Road Townhomes

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

393, 395, 397, 399, 401 and 403 Spring Garden Avenue Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief

July 6 th, Re: The Sugarmont Apartments Planned Development. Dear John,

TUSTIN RED HILL DEVELOPMENT TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP

Welcome! to Keller Town Hall

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

599 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

U.S. Highway 377 North Overlay District. 1. General Purpose and Description

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY

I Street, Sacramento, CA

CRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1 DRAFT

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

Chapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis September 17, 2018

Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Residential Development

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT / SUBDIVISION AND REZONING CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards September, 2014

Subject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park

Summary of Planning Commission Votes Regular Meeting of the Aurora Colorado Planning Commission February 14, 2018

City Council Presentation November 6, 2017

ZONING. 300 Attachment 1. City of Oneonta. Design Guidelines ( )

Transcription:

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 2, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director Monique Schwartz, Assistant Planner DESIGN REVIEW NO. 4914-17 FOR A NEW 727 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to redevelop an existing office complex with a 727-unit apartment and townhome development (653 apartments and 74 townhomes). The property will be subdivided into three parcels: Parcel 1 (Building A) and Parcel 2 (Building B) would each include apartment units configured around multi-level parking structures with the following amenities: fitness centers, club rooms, pool and lounge courtyards, and amenity decks located on the top floor of each parking structure. Parcel 3 (Townhomes) will include 74 townhomes with attached two-car garages and surface level parking. Townhome amenities will include a pool and lounge courtyard and passive open courtyard. RECOMMENDATION - PRELIMINARY REVIEW Staff is requesting preliminary comments from the Design Review Committee (DRC) concerning the proposed infill project. The project will return to the Committee at a later date for a recommendation to the Planning Commission along with the environmental document. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Applicant: FF Realty III LLC / Trevor Boucher Owner: The Colton Company Property Location: 702-1078 W. Town and Country Road (Town and Country Office Plaza) General Plan Designation: Urban Mixed Use (UMIX) 30-60 dwelling units/acre; 1.5-3.0 FAR Zoning Classification: Urban Mixed Use (UMU) Existing Development: Seven two-story office buildings totaling 197,874 square feet Property Size: 12.13-acres

Page 2 of 6 Associated Applications: Previous DRC Review: Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 0045-17, Major Site Plan Review No. 0906-17, Administrative Adjustment No. 0253-17, and Environmental Review No. 1855-17 None PUBLIC NOTICE No Public Notice was required for the preliminary Design Review phase of this project. The project will ultimately go before the Planning Commission and City Council, and public hearing notification will be posted and mailed at that time prior to decision making actions. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Mitigated Negative Declaration is being prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the project in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 and in conformance with Local CEQA Guidelines. PROJECT DESCRIP TION The existing Town and Country Office Plaza complex will be demolished and the site will be redeveloped with 727 multi-family units (653 apartments and 74 townhomes), resulting in a density of 60 dwelling units per acre. The property will be subdivided into three parcels: Parcel 1 (Building A) will include 295 five-story apartment units arranged around a seven (7) level parking structure, leasing office, landscaped swimming pool/outdoor lounge area, clubhouse, fitness center, and two interior landscaped courtyards. Access to the individual apartment units will be from an interior corridor system that ties in with each level of the parking structure. An 8,051 square foot amenity deck equipped with fire pits, outdoor kitchen, lounge area, dining area, herb garden, and landscaping is proposed on an eighth level of the parking structure with no parking. Parcel 2 (Building B) will include 358 five-story apartment units arranged around a seven (7) level parking structure, leasing office, landscaped swimming pool/outdoor lounge area, clubhouse, fitness center, and four (4) interior landscaped courtyards. Similar to Building A, access to the individual apartment units will be from an interior corridor system that ties in with each level of the parking structure. A 9,038 square foot amenity deck equipped with an outdoor entertaining space, fireplace, bar area, lounge area and dining area is proposed on the seventh level of the parking structure. The majority of units in Buildings A and B have a private balcony area with views towards the interior courtyards, or are oriented towards Parker Street and Town and Country Road. Parcel 3 (townhomes) will include 74 three-story townhomes with attached twocar garages, arranged within eleven (11) detached buildings. Each unit will be provided with a private balcony with views towards interior courtyards, landscaped areas, Town and Country Road, and Parker Street. Common amenities include a landscaped swimming pool/outdoor lounge area and landscaped passive interior courtyard. Surface parking is also provided for residents and guests. The applicant is also proposing streetscape enhancements on the site frontages along Lawson Way, Town and Country Road, and Parker Street consisting of trees and landscaped planters. Existing

Page 3 of 6 street trees (Crape Myrtles and Plane Trees) will remain or be replaced with similar trees. The frontage landscaping is intended to provide a friendly pedestrian-oriented interface with the sidewalk for existing and anticipated patterns of pedestrian activity in the area. EXISTING SITE AND AREA CONTEXT The 12.13-acre site is presently developed with seven 2-story office buildings and associated surface parking lot. To the north of the project site is Town and Country Road and a 4-story office building with associated surface parking lot. Also to the north, on an adjacent parcel, is a 5-story office building with associated surface parking lot. To the south is the Celebration Church and Town and Country Manor senior living community/health center in the City of Santa Ana. To the east is Parker Street, multiple office buildings, and Santiago Park Nature Preserve. Santiago Creek is located beyond the Nature Preserve a short distance to the east and southeast. To the west is Lawson Way and a 16-story office building (Orange Executive Tower) with associated parking structure, and a 260 unit multi-family residential apartment complex over 2-story subterranean parking currently under construction (Eleven 10 West). EVALUATION CRITERIA Orange Municipal Code (OMC) Section 17.10.070 establishes the general criteria the Design Review Committee should use when reviewing the project. This section states the following: The project shall have an internally consistent, integrated design theme, which is reflected in the following elements: 1. Architectural Features. a. The architectural features shall reflect a similar design style or period. b. Creative building elements and identifying features should be used to create a high quality project with visual interest and an architectural style. 2. Landscape. a. The type, size and location of landscape materials shall support the project s overall design concept. b. Landscaping shall not obstruct visibility of required addressing, nor shall it obstruct the vision of motorists or pedestrians in proximity to the site. c. Landscape areas shall be provided in and around parking lots to break up the appearance of large expanses of hardscape. 3. Signage. All signage shall be compatible with the building(s) design, scale, colors, materials and lighting. 4. Secondary Functional and Accessory Features. Trash receptacles, storage and loading areas, transformers and mechanical equipment shall be screened in a manner, which is architecturally compatible with the principal building(s).

Page 4 of 6 ANALYSIS/STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES Issue 1: Building Architecture: The proposed project features a modern architectural style that reflects an urban housing aesthetic. Parcels 1 and 2 include two, 5-story (66-81 -8 tall) apartment buildings (Buildings A and B) configured around 7-story (77-81 -8 tall) parking structures. Parcel 3 will feature eleven, 3-story (36 feet tall) townhome buildings with attached two-car garages located on the ground floor. Taking into consideration the City s Urban Mixed Use land use designation and the future development objectives of the South Main Street Corridor/Town and Country General Plan Focus Area, the applicant has designed a project that integrates with surrounding retail, professional office, and residential development, provides high density innovative housing options, considers existing pedestrian activity in relation to adjacent office and retail uses as well as future pedestrian activity that is expected to increase over time as infill development occurs in the area. Apartments: Buildings A and B incorporate a variety of architectural features that strive to achieve a distinctive urban character. These features include varied roof lines, extensive use of windows and balconies, alternating and repetitive rectangular wall planes, and dimensional accent details. While both buildings display similar design details and style, the alternating and repetitive wall planes appear heavier and more articulated on Building A. The use of a variety of exterior building materials also contribute to the distinctive architectural character of the project. These materials include wood plank tile, horizontal metal siding, sand finish stucco, metal and glass balcony railing, metal awnings, aluminum storefront systems on the ground floor, white vinyl windows and balcony doors, and concrete/cmu parking structure construction. Townhomes: The three-story building height and more conservative architectural features of the townhome buildings distinguish this product type from the adjacent apartment buildings. The townhome buildings display varied wall planes, alternating window sizes, and covered balconies. Exterior building materials include stucco, horizontal and vertical siding, stone veneer, metal balcony railing, vinyl windows and paneled sectional garage doors. Streetscape: Streetscape treatment includes retention of existing street trees (Crape Myrtles and Plane Trees) or replacement with similar trees, foundation planting, and landscape planters to enhance the streetscape and create a relationship between the buildings and the pedestrian.

Page 5 of 6 Staff is seeking feedback from the DRC on the proposed architectural design and materials for the project in its own right, as well as an element of the emerging new mixed-use character of Town and Country Road. While the design of the buildings present a modern urban character, the apartment buildings (Buildings A and B) appear to have many similar architectural features (alternating rectangular wall planes, extensive windows and balconies, dimensional accent details) as the proposed five-story residential development located on the north side of Town and Country Road, at 999 W. Town and Country Road. Because of the similar architectural aesthetics, the projects appear to be related to one another, and perhaps without adequate distinction when considered together as part of the overall foreseeable development context on Town and Country Road. In addition, the repetitive and alternating rectangular wall planes on Buildings A and B may appear busy and distracting over the expansive street frontage along Town and Country Road. Also, there is a 260 unit multi-family residential apartment complex over 2-story subterranean parking currently under construction at 1110 W. Town and Country Road that will display similar architectural characteristics; however, the project is buffered by an existing 16 story office building (Orange Executive Tower) that is situated at the southwest corner of W. Town and Country Road and Lawson Way, providing enough separation to be considered a separate and distinct project. Elevations of nearby development projects have been provided as Attachment 4 for the DRC s reference. Staff is also seeking feedback from the Committee on the design approach regarding the configuration of the apartment units around the multilevel parking structures. Issue 2: Landscape and Streetscape Treatment: The proposed landscape palette incorporates a range of drought-tolerant plant material. Because of the urban context of the site, the majority of the landscaping occurs in the pool and lounge courtyards, as well as interior passive courtyards. New landscaping is integrated on the street frontages along Lawson Way, Town and Country Road, and Parker Street to provide a transition between the project and sidewalk, and to provide a friendly pedestrian environment. Enhanced landscaping, including Date Palms and decorative paving articulate the main vehicular entrances adjacent to the leasing offices/club houses/fitness centers of Buildings A and B and at the main entrance to the townhome parcel along Parker Street. Although not included on the project Landscape Plans (Sheet L.1), trees will be planted within a landscape planter along the entire southern project boundary, adjacent to the vehicle drive aisle providing access to Buildings A and B, and along the south property line of the townhome parcel. These trees will provide a buffer between the scale of the proposed buildings and the adjacent development to the south. Planting areas also play a role in the water quality features of the project and are under review by the Public Works Department s Water Quality Division. The townhome parcel Landscape Plans (Sheet L.5) do not adequately illustrate pedestrian access throughout the development. Enhanced/decorative pavement may be implemented to simulate atgrade walkways/sidewalks in order to provide connectivity between each building, and to common open space areas. Staff is seeking feedback from the DRC on the proposed landscape design and plant palette.

Page 6 of 6 ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION The project went before the SMART Committee (inter-departmental staff review) on December 7, 2016 and May 3, 2017 for preliminary comments. CONDITIONS Staff is recommending that the Design Review Committee provide comments and design direction only on the proposed project. No findings are stated. This is only a preliminary review. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Photos 3. Project Booklet dated July 3, 2016 4. Project Elevations for 999 W. Town and Country Road and 1110 W. Town and Country Road cc: FF Realty III LLC Attn: Trevor Boucher 5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 N:\CDD\PLNG\Applications\Tentative Tract Maps\TTM 0045-17 Town and Country Apartments and Townhomes\DRC\ Staff Report 8.2.17