Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

Similar documents
CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

L 4-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Kodors House. 35 Rosedale Avenue West

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Cultural Heritage Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Adversely impact the cultural heritage value of properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA).

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

COMMONWEALTH HISTORIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

240 and 242 Finch Avenue West Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division

Authority: North York Community Council Item 31.7, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No.

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE34.30, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

WQW Study Community Meeting June 26, 2017

Lancaster Conservation Area Appraisal. Character Area 8. Cathedral

Conservation Area Designation, amendments and Review

Cultural Heritage Impact Statement SoBa Catherine Street, Ottawa

APPENDIX 9 HERITAGE CHARACTER

NEW EDINBURGH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Historic Yonge Street HCD Plan Community Consultation October 14, 2015

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Plan Heritage Workshop Public Open House September 10, 2013

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Urban Design Brief 1576 Richmond Street City of London

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station

385 Sussex Drive, Ottawa. Application for Minor Zoning By-law Amendment

Duplex Design Guidelines

New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief

Cultural heritage impact statement - addendum

HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 62 Union Street. Prepared By:

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Greystone Village Main Street. Terraces at Greystone. City of Ottawa. Planning Rationale

Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

BENSON / HUNT TERTIARY PLAN

1296 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

141 GEORGE STREET PLANNING RATIONALE

SUBJECT: Report recommending 563 North Shore Boulevard East remain on the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #1 SEPTEMBER 28, 2016

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER

280 Manse Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

Cultural Heritage Landscapes Strategy

1071 King Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

646 Kingston Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

Carleton University Amphitheatre History and Significance

Russell Avenue-Range Road

770 BRONSON AVENUE. Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control

KING-SPADINA COMMERCIAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION MEETING #1

Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4783,2014

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. Terms of Reference. Purpose. When is an Urban Design Brief Required

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

Part D. College Avenue Campus PAGE 121 UNIVERSITY OF REGINA / CAMPUS MASTER PLAN 2011

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

GUIDELINES REPLACEMENT HOUSING GUIDELINES LOCATION INTRODUCTION URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

Historic Yonge Street HCD Study Public Meeting #2

Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

From: Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary of Heritage Input

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ON TUESDAY MARCH 29, 2016

Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]

Municipal Inventory of Cultural Heritage Properties - St. Joseph Inventory of Designated and Potential Heritage Properties

L 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. Cheyne Family Cemetery. Main Street South

PLANNING RATIONALE FOR 1127, 1128 MILL STREET AND 1125 CLAPP LANE CITY OF OTTAWA

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

Director, Community Planning, North York District

Municipal Heritage Awards Program

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF REPORT

Hendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

667 BANK STREET Planning Rationale Rick Milito June 2017

Central Village Design Guidelines Westport, MA

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

Broadview Avenue Properties Inclusion on Heritage Inventory

CATARAQUI RIVER THIRD CROSSING EA Landscape Analysis Background Report. October 23, Corush Sunderland Wright Limited

PLANNING RATIONALE 3843 INNES ROAD, ORLEANS 78 UNITS CONDOMINIUM PROJECT MELKART DEVELOPMENTS Inc.

QUEEN-RIVER SECONDARY PLAN

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

776 and 784 St. Laurent Boulevard City of Ottawa

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North York District

PLANNING RATIONALE FOR THE PROPOSED RIVERSIDE SOUTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 715 BRIAN GOOD AVENUE, OTTAWA, ON

5959 Yonge Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

Royal Thai Embassy Ottawa. Major Zoning Amendment Proposal for 180 Island Park Drive. Planning Rationale

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 OCTOBER 24, 2017

4.3 Dudley Area Plan. Introduction. History and Existing Character. Desired Future Character for Dudley

Courtice Main Street Study Community Vision Workshop PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Yonge Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Urban Design Brief Woodland Cemetery Funeral Home 493 Springbank Drive

Transcription:

6 1 3. 5 4 2. 3 3 9 3 6 1 3. 5 4 9. 6 2 3 1 c a r l @ b r a y h e r i t a g e. c o m Memo To: Jennifer Murray, Windmill Development Corporation From: Carl Bray, Bray Heritage Date: Monday, June 5, 2017 RE: 15 Aylmer Avenue/Southminster United Church CHIS/Preliminary Summary Dear Jennifer, This is in response to your request for a summary of my preliminary research into, and assessment of, the cultural heritage resources that may exist on the subject lands and vicinity and an assessment of the potential impacts of the proposed development on these resources. This memo is to be submitted as part of your application for a Zoning By-law Amendment and is in advance of the final CHIS, which would accompany the Site Plan Application. Development Context The subject lands are located in Old Ottawa South, and area of downtown Ottawa that is separated from the Glebe neighbourhood to the north by the Rideau Canal and the Driveway scenic roadway. The Canal and its adjacent 30-m. buffer zone are part of the Rideau Canal World Heritage Site and are managed by Parks Canada, while the Driveway and its associated lands are the responsibility of the National Capital Commission. Both of these are commenting agencies (to the City of Ottawa) for developments near or adjacent to their lands. The property s history is tied to the development of the surrounding neighbourhood. Formerly agricultural land, Old Ottawa South was urbanized in the late 19 th century once the area was linked to the rest of the city by streetcar and was annexed in the early 20 th century. Churches were built to serve the newly constructed residential and commercial areas and two of those congregations Methodist and Presbyterian amalgamated in the 1920s to form Southminster United Church. The current church building, constructed in the early 1930s, replaces the original Methodist church on that site. Following World War II, the congregation was able to add a church hall (Christian Education Wing) providing meeting rooms, offices and an apartment. Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Resources The City of Ottawa has not assessed the 1932 church and 1955 church hall for potential cultural heritage significance. The Church property containing these buildings is not Listed on the City s Heritage Register or designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. As part of this Cultural Heritage Impact Statement, my firm has completed an inventory of potential cultural heritage resources on, and in the vicinity of, the subject property, and prepared an evaluation of the subject property using the criteria in Regulation 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act. BRAY Heritage Memorandum Page 1

Design/Physical Value The existing church is a representative example of the Gothic Revival style popular for institutional buildings up until the mid-20 th century. It is not a rare or unique example. The church exterior and interior display a high degree of craftsmanship and artistic merit; however, the church hall is a competent but otherwise unremarkable addition. As a result, only the original church portion of the property meets this criterion, and not the Christian Education Wing (church hall). Historical/Associative Value Southminster United Church has direct associations with the development of Old Ottawa South, especially through its incorporation of two earlier local congregations (Methodist and Presbyterian). Its construction during the Depression was made possible in part by labour donated by members of the congregation. The church and hall are the work of a well-known Ottawa architect, J.A. Ewart. As a result, the property meets this criterion. Contextual Value The church is a local landmark as well as supporting the character of the area and being functionally, visually and historically linked to its surroundings. The church hall is compatible with the church and with the streetscape character. As a result, the property meets this criterion. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest Southminster United Church is a local landmark and cultural centre for the Old Ottawa South neighbourhood of downtown Ottawa. Located overlooking the Rideau Canal at Bank Street, the Gothic Revival church is linked historically to the development of the neighbourhood, to the amalgamation of local Protestant churches and to the work of Ottawa architect J.A.Ewart.

6 1 3. 5 4 2. 3 3 9 3 6 1 3. 5 4 9. 6 2 3 1 c a r l @ b r a y h e r i t a g e. c o m Heritage Attributes (church) Gothic Revival architectural design Cladding in Nepean sandstone Original wooden doors Copper cresting and ashlar decorative trim Original stained-glass windows Interior wall and ceiling structure and materials Interior gallery, transepts and chancel (church hall) Cladding in Nepean sandstone Memorial window Aylmer Street entrance door and ashlar surround Policy Context The heritage policies applicable to the subject property and its proposed development include those from the Province as well as from federal agencies and the municipality. The Provincial Policy Statement section 2.6 requires the conservation of cultural heritage resources, including built heritage and cultural heritage landscapes (2.6.1) and areas of archaeological potential (2.6.2). The latter will be addressed through a separate archaeological assessment. Section 2.6.3 also requires proposed development to be assessed in terms of its impact on adjacent cultural heritage resources. Federal policies include the Rideau Canal World Heritage Site Management Plan (2005). Section 10 of that Plan has general policies relating to development within or beyond the 30-m. buffer zone flanking the Canal to ensure that development there does not degrade the heritage values of the nominated property but there are no specific policies for the urban sections of the Canal. The National Capital Commission (NCC) does not have specific policies relating to development adjacent to their lands, and the Driveway is not designated as a cultural heritage resource. The City of Ottawa Official Plan Section 4.6.3 has specific policies for conservation of the Rideau Canal corridor s visual quality and cultural features and requires consultation with Parks Canada and the National Capital Commission for development adjacent to their lands. The subject property is also subject to the urban design guidelines for Traditional Mainstreets (Section 2.5.1) because the site is within the Bank Street corridor. Proposed Development The proposed development entails retention of the existing church, which has been assessed in this CHIS as having cultural heritage significance, and demolition of the existing church hall (Christian Education Wing) which has been assessed as having no cultural heritage significance except for a few components suitable for salvage and reuse. This development is proposed in order to permit construction of a three-storey residential building and a six-storey residential building with a central open space linked to Galt Street and the rear wall of the church. The three-storey building consists of four townhouses and is to be located facing Aylmer Avenue between the west side entrance to the church and the corner of Galt Street. The six-storey building is to be located facing Galt Street and running alongside the north property line. The building mass is stepped back from Galt Street at the upper three storeys: it also overlaps approximately one third of the north side of the church, along the north property line, with landscaped open space in the intervening area. Parking is provided within each of the townhouses and in an underground parking structure beneath the mid-rise residential building, with access from Galt Street. There will also be on-street parking on both municipal streets. There is an internal courtyard between the two residential buildings, centred on the west gable end of the church (with the rose window above). BRAY Heritage Memorandum Page 3

The proposed development conserves the most significant cultural heritage resource of the property -the church and is designed to fit within the development pattern, urban scale and architectural styles of the neighbourhood. This approach responds to the policies and guidelines of the Official Plan. The design of the development ensures that the church building remains prominent as a landmark and as a key feature of views from the Rideau Canal and the Bank Street bridge while screening the majority of new construction behind the existing trees on the NCC property and behind the existing church. Impacts on Cultural Heritage Resources and Mitigation Measures As the property does not currently have any heritage designation, the primary impact issue that the City has identified relates to the effects of the proposed development on views from the nearby Rideau Canal World Heritage Site and, to a lesser extent, on views from the adjacent lands of the National Capital Commission. That said, in the context of this CHIS, there have been cultural heritage resources identified on the subject property and the impact of the proposed development on these resources has also been addressed. Conservation and mitigation measures follow the policies and guidelines of the City-adopted Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (2010). The church is proposed to be preserved with some minor rehabilitation of its basement interior spaces. If, in accord with this evaluation, the City determines that the church portion of the property meets the requirements for designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, the municipality may wish to proceed with designation. The church hall is proposed to be demolished. Mitigation measures proposed as part of the development are as follows: Photographic recording of the existing church hall building exterior and interior prior to and during demolition, identifying elements for potential salvage and re-use; Assessment of the existing trees on the church property and abutting the property line for current condition and for potential impact from construction and preparation of a tree preservation plan; and Where feasible, salvage and re-use elsewhere in the new development of the existing hall building materials and components. In addition, the proposed design of the new building mitigates the impact of new development on the local context (through compliance with the design guidelines found in the Official Plan Section 2.5.1 and in the urban design guidelines for Traditional Mainstreets), and on the existing church, in the following ways: The architectural design of the new building is consistent with the overall architectural character of the neighbourhood and is compatible with and respectful of the design of the existing church building and of the branch library across Bank Street. Views to the existing church from the abutting streets and from the Canal are retained and a new axial view of the west wall and rose window is being created in the space between the two new buildings. The new mid-rise building is configured to retain views of the north transept of the existing church. The new building massing is compatible with that of the church: the townhouses reflect the height of the main block of the church (and the existing church hall) while the top of the stepped back sixth storey of the mid-rise building approximates the crestline of the church roof. The architectural style and cladding materials of the new buildings are influenced by the design of the existing church (e.g. colour palette, townhouse rooflines, stone on the first three storeys). Where possible, some of the existing materials and elements of the church hall may be re-used in the new buildings or in the existing church (e.g. the Memorial Window, stone cladding, entrance doors and surround). Existing mature trees and ornamental plantings on the Aylmer Avenue and Bank Street frontages are to be retained, where feasible. The church and its associated landscape remain highlighted as community landmarks, with the new development located behind and away from the gateway at Bank Street. There are no properties adjacent to, or in the vicinity of, the subject lands that are Listed on the City s Heritage Register or designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

6 1 3. 5 4 2. 3 3 9 3 6 1 3. 5 4 9. 6 2 3 1 c a r l @ b r a y h e r i t a g e. c o m The proposed development s potential impact on views from the Canal and NCC lands is minimal. The church hall is currently screened from view of the Canal and Driveway by mature trees located on the south side of the NCC s Driveway right-of-way. The dense distribution of these trees, including a stand of coniferous trees, also provides a partial screen in winter. Mitigation of the proposed development s impact on views from the Canal navigation channel (which, in this narrow section of the Canal, includes the full width of the waterway), from the Driveway and from the Bank Street bridge will be accomplished by: Retaining existing mature trees on the slopes of the Driveway exit route, on NCC lands adjacent to the subject property; and Designing the mid-rise building and townhouses so that they approximate the height of the church and are compatible with the church architectural design and materials. When viewed from Bank Street and the bridge, the new development will be located behind the church except for a portion of the mid-rise building that extends along the north side of the church. This part of the building will be partially (or, in full summer, almost entirely) hidden by the existing trees on the NCC property and church grounds; otherwise, its glazed cladding will contrast with the stone cladding of the church and, as an element in the foreground, direct visual attention to the church. BRAY Heritage Memorandum Page 5

6 1 3. 5 4 2. 3 3 9 3 6 1 3. 5 4 9. 6 2 3 1 c a r l @ b r a y h e r i t a g e. c o m CB BRAY Heritage Memorandum Page 7