Guardrail Design. Licking County Engineer s Office April 16, 2014

Similar documents
CHAPTER 10 ROADSIDE SAFETY

MASH Implementation for Guardrail

Bridge Railing Research for Local Bridges

Town of Weston Guardrail Overview Report

Numerical simulation of single- and doublefaced W-beam guardrails under vehicular impacts on six-lane divided freeways

APPENDIX I SECTION I-1-INTRODUCTION... I-1

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL & INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM

Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) W-Beam to Thrie-Beam Transition

TEMPORARY DESIGN GUIDANCE FOR GUARDRAIL

ENGINEERING DIVISION

CHAPTER 14: GUARDRAIL and BARRIERS

GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM. prepared by. Michael R. Monnig SAFETY ENGINEER

IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WEAK-POST W-BEAM GUARDRAIL

Ponderosa Pine Round Posts as Alternative to Rectangular SYP Posts in Retrofit G4(2W) Guardrail Systems

VALIDATION OF FINITE ELEMENT MODELS OF INJURY RISK IN VEHICLE-ROADSIDE BARRIER CRASHES

WHAT S WRONG WITH ROADSIDE DESIGN?

GUARDRAIL. December

GUARDRAIL. Project Design Services Unit September

Injury Risk in Frontal Crashes with Guardrail and Guardrail End Terminals

City of Richmond. Engineering Design Specifications

Column headings match the SEQ descriptions Both ends of guardrail accounted for All notes accounted for and make sense SP/funding splits shown

SET03a-b THRIE-BEAM BULLNOSE END TERMINAL ELEVATION PLAN SHEET NO. DATE: BEGIN STANDARD THRIE BEAM GUARDRAIL CONSTRUCTION 31 5/8" 804 B B.

Green Book 7 th Edition Summary of Changes. Jim Rosenow NCITE Geometric Design Committee August 30, 2018

Chapter 1 - General Design Guidelines CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

VALLEY COUNTY MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE ROAD DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Raft Island Right of Way Vegetation and Tree Management Plan

SGR53 SIDE-MOUNTED WEAK-POST GUARDRAIL ATTACHED TO CULVERT PLAN VIEW ELEVATION VIEW DETAIL B DETAIL A SHEET NO. DATE: 37 1/2" 953 (TYP) 150" 3810

CITY OF FORT LUPTON STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA SECTION 10 STREETS

CONFORMED AGREEMENT INCORPORATED REVISIONS PER AMENDMENT DATED: APRIL 2, 2013 FOR REFERENCE

Statistical In-Service Safety Performance Evaluation of Guardrail End Treatments

Use of Guardrails on Low Fill Bridge Length Culverts

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE VROOMAN ROAD BRIDGE and ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

MEMORANDUM. Jim Tomberlin, Mountain Valley Properties

900 Roadside Safety Landscaping Guidelines

GREEN SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS FOR THE IOWA HIGHWAY 100 EXTENSION

County of El Dorado Standard Plans

2 August 14, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CRESCENT COMMUNITY CENTER CORP. PROPERTY OWNER: S. L. ETHERIDGE, LLC

VDOT Vegetation Management Policy

Design Guidance for Construction Work Zones on High-Speed Highways

Fire & Life Safety Requirements For Fire Department Access and Water Supplies

Your town s subdivision or land use ordinance standards should reference the following street standards, for example:

APPENDIX F: DETAIL DRAWINGS

Creating Complete Roadway Corridors:

Concord, BRF-X-5099 (021), Draft Alternative Analysis

Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Clearinghouse Review Report

Fire Department Access and Water Supply

JOB CREATION PROJECTS

Title 11 Streets and Sidewalks

SILT FENCE MACHINE SLICED ERO-1A STEEL FENCE POST (T-POST), MINIMUM 5' LONG, 6' MAXIMUM SPACING.

A Captain Dies and Two Fire Fighters Are Injured in a Motor-Vehicle Crash - Texas

PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Nuts and Bolts (or Gravel and Asphalt) of the Main Street Project

Roadside Mowing. Spot mowing of noxious weeds should be done as necessary to reduce propagation.

Public Meeting. US Highway 14 (6TH Street) from Main Ave to Medary Ave Urban Reconstruction Project Brookings, SD P-PH 0014(179)419 PCN 027B

Public Information Centre. Welcome

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS Book 2 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS INCLUDES ADDENDUMS

New Stanton Project Update July 3, 2012

Definitions. Average Daily Traffic Demand (ADT): The actual number or projected number of cars that pass a point in a 24-hour period.

Design Speed / Target Speed Primer. Jim Rosenow AASHTO Technical Committee on Geometric Design June 12, 2018

Federal Project No.: PM03369

University of California at Davis California Department of Transportation. Report Number: CA AHMCT Research Report: UCD-ARR

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Prospect Community Plan Update Public Meeting November 2, 2017 OVERVIEW PROSPECT BEAUTIFICATION/CONNECTIVITY PLAN

Access Management: An Overview

DESIGN SCENE SUBJECT INDEX

5.4 Development Incentives for All Commercial and Industrial Districts (except the TC: Town Center District).

Moving The Metro. A special construction update for the metro Omaha area.

3. Additional driveways may be permitted where determined by the Planning Commission to adequately accommodate traffic or ensure public safety.

2. AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVMENT

EXHIBIT A STEAMBOAT SPRINGS FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY & PROCEDURE MANUAL

V. EROSION CONTROL. -Drainage swales separation -Under rip-rap protected -Under rip-rap unprotected

F. Driveways. Driveways which provide access to off-street parking or loading from public streets shall comply with the following:

Access Management and Site Plan Review. Robert W. Hofrichter Asst Administrator, Transportation and Mobility Planning Division April 2014

DYNAMIC TESTING OF MGS W6X8.5 POSTS AT DECREASED EMBEDMENT

Project Purpose. Project Need

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

SIGN PLACEMENT-ELEVATION VIEW: FREEWAY SIGN PLACEMENT-ELEVATION VIEW: FREEWAY ROADSIDE SIGN LOCATIONS & SUPPORT SPACING NOT TO SCALE

P A R K L E T 2016 PILOT PROJECT

Pennsy Greenway Trail

Urban Design Manual 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES. Background. Urban Design Challenges

LABOR-BASED ROUTINE ROAD MAINTENANCE (LBRRM)

Article 7.05 Manufactured Home Park Districts

Municipal Class EA Study Public Information Centre No. 1 December 13, :00 pm 7:00 pm. Please sign in so we can keep you updated on this study

INDEX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 BASIC INFORMATION AND PROCEDURES...3 EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING UTILITIES

Evolution of Filtrexx Living Walls. A Closer Look at Our GreenLoxx Living Wall Systems.

Reconstruction Project. Wayzata Task Force Meeting September 3, 2009

Successful Green Infrastructure Planning: A Micro-Scale Modeling and Field Investigation Approach

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening

TESTING OF M203x9.7 (M8x6.5) AND. S76x8.5 (S3x5.7) STEEL POSTS - POST COMPARISION STUDY FOR THE CABLE MEDIAN BARRIER

Federal Project No.: OC-095-1(365), OC-095-1(367)

Bypass #16 - Bend Parkway (new alignment for US 97) (MP )

Te c h S p e c 3. Edge Restraints for Interlocking Concrete Pavements

AASHTO SUBCOMMITTEE ON DESIGN. June 15, 2006 MARK ROBINSON, P.E. DISTRICT 5 INTERSTATE PROGRAM MANAGER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

I-25 / Rio Bravo Interchange. I-25 / Rio Bravo Interchange. Presenters 11/30/2016 THIRD PUBLIC MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2016 NMDOT CN A300280

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES

(BRIDGE NO. 36C-0223)

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient [1] Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent

Form DOT F (8-72) Technical Report Documentation Page 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. FHW A/TX-95/1392-9F

ARTICLE 6 ACCESS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIREMENTS; AND STREET IMPROVEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

Fifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee. DOWNTOWN Street Design

Transcription:

Roadside Design Guardrail Design Licking County Engineer s Office April 16, 2014

Roadside Design

National Roadside Fatalities (Most Harmful Event) Other 20% Trees 50% Barriers 8% Utility Embankment and Ditches 9% Poles 13%

Design Options In Order of Preference 1. Remove the obstacle 2. Redesign the obstacle so that t it can be safely traversed 3. Relocate the obstacle to a location where it is less likely to be struck 4. Make the obstacle breakaway 5. Shield the hazard with longitudinal barrier 6. Delineate the obstacle

Possible vs. Practical The Roadside Should Be Made As Safe as Practical

Barrier Warrants

EMBANKMENT WARRANT

Crash Testing Safety performance of fbarrier designs can be shown through standardized testing. Full scale crash testing is the standard method used.

Crash Testing Some criteria for passing a crash test: to determine if barrier is capable of containing the vehicle (structural test) if occupant deceleration and ride-down velocities are survivable (occupant test) no debris penetrating the vehicle or deforming the passenger compartment vehicle remains stable, it does not roll nor redirected back into traffic

MASH-08 Update Criteria Test Vehicle Specifications - Small car increases from 1,800# to 2,420#. - Pickup truck increases from 4,400# to 5,000#. - TL-4 truck increases from 18,000# to 22,000#. - No longer use vehicles older than 6 years.

Semi-Rigid Barriers Strong Post, Blocked-out W-Beam guardrail (ODOT Type 5) W-Beam rail with 6 3 post spacing, offset blocks, in strong soil.

W-Beam Guardrail SCD GR-2.1

W-Beam Guardrail Components: W-beam rail 12 ½ feet long Wood or steel posts usually 6 feet long Wood or plastic blockouts Soil support

W-Beam Guardrail Purpose of the: Rail - provides tension to capture and redirect vehicles Post hold the rail at the appropriate p height and absorb impact energy Blockout keep vehicle wheel from catching the post Soil provides resistance to the posts

W-Beam Guardrail Various blockout shapes

Roadside Design Guardrail Placement

Length of Need A guardrail must extend in front of a hazard to protect vehicles leaving the road in advance of the hazard.

Length of Need

Guardrail Deflection Once barrier is warranted and needed, the deflection distance may dictate t the type of barrier (flexible, semi-rigid, or rigid) to install. ODOT uses 5' 6 for w-beam guardrail.

Guardrail Deflection Type 5A guardrail has a post spacing of 3-1.5

Type 5 Guardrail 27 Tall Guardrail determined NOT crashworthy y( (too short) 29 Acceptable per NCHRP 350 Too Short

Guardrail Height 29 inches to top of rail +/- 1 10:11 shoulder slope

Post Embedment Posts resist impacts if installed deep h tto h t enough have soilil support

Maintain Rail height Reduce wheel snag potential

Post Embedment 9 ft. long posts should be specified at locations where the distance from the face of the barrier to the slope break point is less than 2 ft. (L&D 906) 6 ft. post everywhere else unless specified.

MGS with a MASH truck

Type 5 (27 ¾ ) with a MASH truck

Roadside Design Guardrail Anchors

Anchors Standard Construction Drawings GR-4.1 Type A Anchor GR-4.2 Type T Anchor

Anchors Guardrail works best if impact energy is allowed to be transferred both downstream and upstream through rail elements by utilizing the tensile capabilities of the w-beam material.

Anchors In a crash near the guardrail end, the anchor holds the guardrail in tension. The anchor prevents the rail from flapping and allowing the vehicle to go through.

Type A Turned-down ends are anchors. Previously considered crash worthy, but now limited to lower speed and lower volume roads.

SCD GR-4.1

Type A The Type A anchor assembly used as an approach or trailing guardrail end treatment in any of the following situations (L&D 603.3.4): On non-nhs arterials, collectors and local roads with a design year ADT of 4000 or less. On any roadway outside the clear zone. On any non-nhs roadway with a design speed of less than 50 mph.

Type T

Can Cause Terrible R lt

Type T The Type T anchor assembly may be used on any roadway in any of the following situations (L&D 603.3.5): On trailing ends of guardrail runs on multi-lane lane roadways, where located outside the clear zone of opposing traffic. In guardrail runs where directional changes are made using a radius of less than 25 ft. (see L&D Figures 603-3 and 603-4). On the ends of guardrail runs on drive approaches (see L&D Figure 603-3).

Type T

Intersections It is often difficult to protect di driveways or side roads: Sharply pycurved guardrail has not passed crash testing, because of the high angles of impact Angles can almost be 90 degrees, which usually exceeds the strength of the steel rail If it does capture the vehicle, blunt head-on crash forces usually exceeds occupant survivability

Intersections Typical driveway treatment.

Intersections Typical driveway treatment at a bridge.

Sometimes You Just Get Lucky

Sometimes You Just Get Lucky

Sometimes You Just Get Lucky

Questions???