Coppice Road, Kingsclere. Protected Species Survey Report. Final Report February 2015 P14/173A

Coppice Road, Kingsclere Protected Species Survey Report Final Report February 2015 P14/173A

Coppice Road, Kingsclere Protected Species Survey Report Report Release Sheet Draft/Final: Issue Number: Final Report P14/17 3A Date: February 2015 Client: Mr Dominic Guinness, Mr Christopher Guinness and Mrs Annabel Rollo Goblins Hold Wootton Rivers Marlborough Wiltshire SN8 4NQ Main Author(s): Katie Rogerson BSc (Hons) CEnv MCIEEM Contributors/Surveyors: John Atkinson BSc (Hons) MSc MCIEEM Sarah White BSc (Hons) MSc Grad CIEEM Emma Heath BSc (Hons) PGCert Grad CIEEM Jodie Southgate BA (Hons) MSc Grad CIEEM Report Prepared for Issue by Katie Rogerson BSc (Hons) CEnv MCIEEM Report Approved for Issue by: Becky Brookbank BSc (Hons) PhD MCIEEM Ecological Planning & Research Ltd The Barn, Micheldever Station, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 3AR Tel: 01962 794720 Fax: 01962 794721 email: info@epr.uk.com www.epr.uk.com

Doc. No. EPR 10 Issue 04 Coppice Road, Kingsclere Protected Species Survey Report Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1 2. Relevant Legislation and Policy 2 3. Assessment Methodology 5 4. Activities Associated with the Scheme and the Likely Biophysical Changes 8 5. Baseline Conditions within the Zone of Influence 9 6. Potential Impacts in the Absence of Mitigation 12 7. Mitigation Strategy 14 8. Conclusion and Recommendations 16 9. References 17 Maps Map 1 Map 2 Map 3 Map 4 Map 5 Map 6 Site Location and designations Protected Species Records Ponds within 250m Dormouse Survey Map Bat Survey Summary Proposed Mitigation for Dormice Appendices Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Illustrative Layout Legislation and Policy edna Protocol Ecological Planning & Research Ltd The Barn, Micheldever Station, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 3AR Tel: 01962 794720 Fax: 01962 794721 email: info@epr.uk.com www.epr.uk.com

Coppice Road, Kingsclere Protected Species Survey Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ecological Planning & Research Ltd (EPR) was commissioned by Mr Dominic Guinness, Mr Christopher Guinness and Mrs Annabel Rollo to carry out an ecological appraisal for a parcel of land between the A339 and Coppice Road in Kingsclere, Hampshire. The aim of the exercise was to identify the constraints and opportunities associated with the promotion of the site for inclusion in the Kingsclere Neighbourhood Plan and subsequently, the future development of the site. The ecological appraisal identified that the site was of potential value for bats, Hazel Dormice Muscardinus avellanarius, reptiles, an assemblage of common birds and Great Crested Newt Triturus cristatus (GCN). Further surveys for Dormice, bats and GCN were subsequently undertaken prior to the site promotion stage to enable any constraints and opportunities to be identified as early as possible. Surveys for reptiles and breeding birds should be undertaken prior to any future planning application, along with update surveys for Dormice, bats and GCN if more than two years elapses between the survey dates and the submission of any future planning application. Water samples taken from a pond within 250m of the site tested negative for GCN DNA, indicating that GCN were not using that pond for breeding during the 2014 season. However, as there are other ponds within 250m of the site which were not tested, it is not possible to confidently conclude absence of GCN, therefore further surveys will be required. A Dormouse nest tube survey undertaken at the site confirmed the presence of Dormice. One bat activity survey identified a low level of activity by Common Pipistrelle Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Soprano Pipistrelle Pipistrellus pygmaeus and Serotine Eptesicus serotinus. The construction of new residential units and the associated access routes is likely to require some degree of vegetation clearance, although the extent of biophysical changes are currently unknown. In order to minimise the impact on protected species, a mitigation strategy will be required. An outline of the likely mitigation is provided within this report, but a more detailed mitigation strategy will be required to support any future planning application, which will be supplemented by additional protected species survey data and a more detailed master plan. The mitigation strategy will include the application of a European Protected Species Licence (EPSL) for dormice, habitat manipulation, a sensitive lighting strategy and enhancement of retained habitat. A management plan will also be required to ensure that the retained habitats are managed appropriately for protected species in the long term. If the mitigation strategy is adhered to then there will be no adverse impacts on protected species and the favourable conservation status of the population will be maintained. There are good opportunities to enhance the habitats onsite for a range of protected species. Nest boxes for dormice and birds as well as bat boxes should be installed on retained trees to act as enhancement in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Coppice Road, Kingsclere Protected Species Survey Report 1. INTRODUCTION Background 1.1 Ecological Planning & Research Ltd (EPR) was commissioned by Barton Willmore on behalf of Mr Dominic Guinness, Mr Christopher Guinness and Mrs Annabel Rollo to carry out an ecological appraisal for a parcel of land between the A339 and Coppice Road in Kingsclere, Hampshire. 1.2 The aim of the exercise was to identify the constraints and opportunities associated with the promotion of the Site for inclusion in the Kingsclere Neighbourhood Plan and subsequently, the future development of the site. 1.3 The ecological appraisal identified that the Site was of potential value for bats, Hazel Dormice Muscardinus avellanarius, reptiles, an assemblage of common birds and Great Crested Newt Triturus cristatus (GCN). Site Location and Description 1.4 The Site is situated at Ordnance Survey Grid Reference SU532588 within the village of Kingsclere in Hampshire (see Map 1). 1.5 The Site is accessed via George Street (B3051) and runs parallel to Coppice Road. It is a narrow, linear parcel of land which runs parallel to the A339 covering approximately 2ha. 1.6 As can be seen from Map 1, the Site is located on the northern fringe of Kingsclere, with Sandford Springs Golf Club located to the north and residential housing to the south. The proposed development site was formerly contiguous with the Golf Course prior to the construction of the A339 bypass. 1.7 Map 1 also identifies that part of the site has been designated as Fen Meadow Renmants Kingsclere SINC. The SINC has been considered separately and more information can be found within the Strategy for Managing Development at Strokins Road, Kingsclere, in the Context of the Kingsclere Fen Meadow Remnants SINC technical note, which was produced by EPR in November 2014. Outline of the Scheme 1.8 As this project is currently at site promotion stage, detailed design has not been undertaken. However, it is likely that the site would support between 20 and 30 residential units, should this site be included within the Kingsclere neighbourhood plan. 1.9 Access to the site is likely to be from the west, off of the B3051. Please refer to the illustrative layout, contained within Appendix 1. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 1

2. RELEVANT LEGISLATION AND POLICY 2.1 The following Legislation and Policy is of particular relevance to the Site. For full details of Legislation and Policy, please refer to Appendix 2. Legislation Relating to Dormice 2.2 The Dormouse is a Species of Principal Importance in England. It is legally protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and is afforded significant further protection as a European Protected Species under the Habitats Regulations 2010 (as amended). This legislation makes it an offence to: Intentionally or deliberately kill, injure or capture Dormice; Intentionally, deliberately or recklessly disturb Dormice in such a way as to be likely to significantly affect the ability of any significant group of Dormice to survive, breed, or rear or nurture their young or the local distribution of or abundance of the species; Intentionally or recklessly damage, destroy or obstruct access to places used by Dormice for shelter or protection (whether occupied or not) or intentionally or recklessly disturb a Dormouse whilst it is occupying such a place; Damage or destroy a breeding site or resting place of a Dormouse; Possess or transport a Dormouse (or any part thereof) unless under licence; and Sell or exchange Dormice. 2.3 Development proposals affecting the Dormouse require a European Protected Species licence from Natural England. Legislation Relating to Bats 2.4 There are 18 species of bat in the UK, seven of which are Species of Principal Importance in England. All bats and bat roosts are protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). Bats are also a European Protected Species protected under the Habitat Regulations 2010 (as amended). It is an offence to: Intentionally or deliberately kill, injure or capture bats; Intentionally, deliberately or recklessly disturb bats in such a way as to be likely to significantly affect the ability of any significant group of bats to survive, breed, or rear or nurture their young or the local distribution of or abundance of a species of bat; Intentionally, or recklessly damage, destroy or obstruct any place used for shelter or protection (i.e. bat roosts) or intentionally or recklessly disturb a bat whilst it is occupying such a place; Damage or destroy a breeding site or resting place of a bat; and Possess, sell or transport a bat, or anything derived from it. 2.5 Development proposals affecting bats or their roosts require a European Protected Species licence from Natural England. Legislation Relating to Great Crested Newts 2.6 The Great Crested Newt is a Species of Principal Importance in England. It is legally protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and is Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 2

afforded significant further protection as a European Protected Species under the Habitats Regulations 2010 (as amended). Collectively, this legislation makes it an offence to: Intentionally or deliberately kill, injure or capture Great Crested Newts; Intentionally, deliberately or recklessly disturb Great Crested Newts in such a way as to be likely to significantly affect the ability of any significant group of Newts to survive, breed, or rear or nurture their young or the local distribution of or abundance the species; Intentionally or recklessly damage, destroy or obstruct any place used by Great Crested Newts for shelter or protection, or intentionally or recklessly disturb a Great Crested Newt whilst it is occupying such a place; Damage or destroy a breeding site or resting place of a Great Crested Newt; and, Possess, sell or transport a Great Crested Newt, or anything derived from it. 2.7 Development proposals affecting the Great Crested Newt require a European Protected Species licence from Natural England National Level Policy 2.8 The National Planning Policy Framework sets out the Government s planning policies for England and how these should be applied in local-level policy and decision making. The NPPF has a clear presumption in favour of sustainable development (paragraph 14), with a requirement to consider its economic, social and environmental dimensions. This does not apply where development requiring Appropriate Assessment under the Habitats Directive is being considered, planned or determined (paragraph 119). 2.9 Section 11 of the NPPF provides guidance on conserving and enhancing the natural environment through the planning system and replaces the preceding Planning Policy Statement 9 (PPS9): Biodiversity and Geological Conservation. It specifies that when determining planning applications, local planning authorities should aim to conserve and enhance biodiversity. Regional Level Policy 2.10 The South East Plan Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) no longer provides Regional level planning policy applicable to the proposals, as the planning provisions of the Localism Act 2011 came into force in March 2013, revoking the South East Plan. Local Level 2.11 The Basingstoke and Deane Borough Local Plan 1996-2011 is of relevance to these proposals and in particular, Policy E7- Nature/Biodiversity Conservation. 2.12 The Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Landscape and Biodiversity Supplementary Planning Document (June 2008) sets out standards for biodiversity survey and assessment, and approaches to mitigation and habitat creation in respect of biodiversity. 2.13 Policy EM4 (Biodiversity, Geodiversity and Nature Conservation) within the emerging Basingstoke and Deane Revised Pre-Submission Local Plan 2011-2029 is of relevance to the proposals, although will have limited weight until the Plan is adopted. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 3

Biodiversity Action Plans 2.14 The NERC Act 2006 places a duty on local authorities to have due regard to biodiversity when exercising their normal functions, and the NPPF requires planning policies to promote the preservation, restoration and re-creation of priority habitats, ecological networks and the protection and recovery of priority species populations, linked to national and local targets (paragraph 117). These targets are set out in a range of biodiversity plans and strategies from the international through to the district level. An overview of the key biodiversity plans and strategies in the UK, and their implications for development, are set out below. 2.15 The UK Biodiversity Action Plan 2007 (UK BAP) has been superseded by the UK Post- 2010 Biodiversity Framework and individual national biodiversity strategies. The UK framework sets out the overarching vision, strategic goals and priority activities for the UK s work towards international biodiversity targets (known as the Aichi Targets ), as agreed by 192 parties at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity in 2010. The Framework s overall vision is that by 2050, biodiversity is valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people. 2.16 In England, Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for England s wildlife and ecosystem services is the national biodiversity strategy, which has the stated mission ( )to halt overall biodiversity loss, support healthy well-functioning ecosystems and establish coherent ecological networks, with more and better places for nature for the benefit of wildlife and people. In order to focus activity and assess performance in achieving this mission, Biodiversity 2020 sets objectives relating to terrestrial and marine habitats and ecosystems, species and people Local level 2.17 Despite the changes to national level biodiversity policy described above, county and district level BAPs still apply. The following BAPs are relevant to this development: Living Landscapes, Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Natural Environment Strategy 2010 Green Infrastructure Strategy for Basingstoke and Deane 2013-2029 (2013) More information can be found within Appendix 2. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 4

3. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Introduction 3.1 This report has been prepared having regard to the latest Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) guidance from the Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (IEEM, 2006). These guidelines provide a robust framework for ecological assessment at any scale and have been approved by all relevant country agencies. The targeted survey methodologies are outlined below. Desk Study 3.2 A desk study was performed as part of the ecological appraisal, which informed the requirement for further targeted protected species surveys. A data request was submitted to Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre (HBIC), the results of which can be seen on Map 2. Field Survey Methodology Dormouse nest tube survey 3.3 The Dormouse survey methodology followed the Dormouse Conservation Handbook 2nd Edition (English Nature, 2006). The Guidelines recommend that a minimum of fifty nest tubes are deployed in suitable and connected habitat in order to determine the presence or absence of Dormice. The nest tubes should be checked monthly or bi-monthly across the season (April to November inclusive). 3.4 The thoroughness of a Dormouse survey can be measured using an index of probability (Table 3.1). The table below assumes that 50 tubes have been placed in suitable habitat. It is recommended that a search effort based on a score of less than 20 is not sufficient to detect absence. The points system can be multiplied if using more than 50 tubes for the survey (doubled where using 100 tubes for example). Table 3.1: Index of probability of finding dormice present in nest tubes in any one month. Month Index of Probability April 1 May 4 June 2 July 2 August 5 September 7 October 2 November 2 Taken from the Dormouse Conservation Handbook, 2006. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 5

3.5 Fifty tubes were placed within habitat suitable for dormice within the boundary of the site as well as within other suitable connected habitat by an experienced surveyor on 29 th May 2014. The tubes were checked bi-monthly in July, September and November 2014. Bat activity survey 3.6 The purpose of the single bat survey was to assess bat activity levels across the site with particular emphasis on features of potential importance for bat roosting, foraging and commuting. The survey comprised a fixed point emergence survey, focussing upon features with bat roosting potential, followed by a walked transect to assess overall bat activity levels across the site. 3.7 During the survey, the number, species and activity of all bats encountered were recorded and mapped using heterodyne/time expansion bat detectors and recording equipment as appropriate. 3.8 The survey was carried out by two ecologists during the period of time considered to be the active bat season. Details of the timings of the survey are given in Table 3.2. Table 3.2: Timing of Survey Type Date Start End Sunset Activity 24.06.14 20.52 22.52 21.22 3.9 The weather conditions on the survey were considered suitable for bat activity. A summary of weather conditions is given in Table 3.3. Table 3.3: Weather Conditions during survey Start Temperature (ºc) End Temperature (ºc) 18.2 C 16.4 C Cloud cover (%) 30 Wind (Beaufort Scale) 1 Rainfall 0 Great Crested Newt e-dna testing 3.10 E-DNA sampling is a technique recently approved for use by Natural England, whereby pond water samples are collected and analysed for the presence of Great Crested Newt genetic material. The approved method of E-DNA sampling requires a single visit for water sample collection during the newt breeding season between 15 April and 30 June. 3.11 A test kit was purchased from the approved supplier (ADAS Ecology) and the samples were collected from Pond 2 (Map 3) by a suitably qualified ecologist on 16 th June 2014 in accordance with the ADAS edna Survey Protocol (contained with Appendix 3). 3.12 The E-DNA testing technique has been approved only to confirm the presence or absence of Great Crested Newt within a given waterbody. It is therefore advised that all ponds within Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 6

250m of the site are subject to testing in order to provide a level of confidence in a negative result. 3.13 Should the test return a positive result, it will be necessary to carry out further survey work to assess the size and composition of any populations present in order to inform any future planning application. Survey Limitations and Constraints 3.14 Due to land ownership and access restrictions, only one pond out of a possible five were subject to edna testing for GCN. It is recommended that all ponds within 250m of the site are subject to further survey prior to any future planning application. 3.15 All surveys were undertaken at an appropriate time of year and in good weather conditions. However, bats are nomadic and invariably move between roosts, therefore, any bat survey will only provide a snapshot of how bats are using a particular site at that time. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 7

4. ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SCHEME AND THE LIKELY BIOPHYSICAL CHANGES Introduction 4.1 In order to assess the likely ecological impacts of the proposed scheme, it is necessary to identify likely development activities, during the site preparation, construction or operational phase, which may lead to biophysical changes. Where possible the likely biophysical changes occurring as a result of the activities and the relevance of the impacts on protected species that may be present on site are predicted and described below. Predicted Activities and Likely Biophysical Changes Activities and Resultant Biophysical Changes Likely during the Construction Phase Removal of vegetation/soil leading to the loss of habitats; Fragmentation of habitats; and, Changes in hydrology. Activities and Resultant Biophysical Changes Likely during the Operational Phase Presence of people, cars and pets, which may lead to disturbance or harm to protected species; Predation from cats may cause injury or death to protected species; Fragmentation of habitats; Implementation of habitat management plans, resulting in the enhancement of existing and creation of new habitats; Creation of new habitats through implementation of the soft landscaping scheme; and, Operational lighting may lead to disturbance of nocturnal species. Predicted Zone of Influence 4.2 The zone of influence of a proposed development is defined in the EcIA guidelines as the areas/(ecological) resources that may be affected by the biophysical changes caused by a development, both in the construction and operational phases. The predicted impacts of the proposed scheme are not expected to extend beyond the site boundary. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 8

5. ECOLOGICAL BASELINE WITHIN THE ZONE OF INFLUENCE Introduction Scope of the Surveys 5.1 The aim of the surveys was to establish the presence or likely absence of bats, Dormice and GCN within the zone of influence of the scheme. 5.2 It also allowed an assessment of the impact any future development would have on the existing habitats and species populations if a mitigation strategy were not implemented. 5.3 Recommendations for an appropriate mitigation strategy are detailed to ensure compliance with relevant legislation and policy. Description of the Habitat suitable for Dormice 5.4 The woody habitat which surrounds the perimeter of the Site is suitable for supporting Hazel Dormice, with fruit, nut and nectar producing tree and shrub species such as Hazel Corylus avellana, Honeysuckle Lonicera periclymenum, Oak Quercus robur and Rose Rosa canina. Dormice use these tree and shrub species as important sources of food as well as for constructing their characteristic nests. 5.5 The structure of the habitat is also suitable for dormice, with good canopy cover and an understorey which is important to allow for aerial connectivity and avoidance of movement across open ground. 5.6 There is good connectivity between favourable habitats on-site. The habitat which bounds the Site is connected to suitable offsite habitat and it is likely that Dormice are transient between onsite and offsite habitat. Description of the Habitat suitable for Bats 5.7 Although none of the trees or vegetation are likely to have potential to support roosting bats, they are likely to be of value to bats for foraging and/or commuting. Description of the Habitat Suitable for GCN 5.8 Great Crested Newts generally occupy suitable terrestrial habitat comprising woodland, scrub and grassland up to 250m from breeding ponds, except where large populations are present such that given an absence of barriers to dispersal habitats up to 500m from a breeding pond may be utilised. All ponds within 250m were identified during the desktop study, as displayed on Map 3. Results Dormouse Nest Tube Survey 5.9 The results of the dormouse surveys are summarised in Table 5.1 and shown on Map 4. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 9

Table 5.1: Dormouse Survey Results Date Nest tube number Evidence of Dormice 16.07.14 N/A No evidence identified 17.09.14 17 Dormouse nest 18 Dormouse nest 44 1 adult female Dormouse 47 Green leaves/start of dormouse nest 12.11.14 35 I adult male dormouse (19g) 49 Dormouse nest GCN edna 5.10 Water samples taken from one pond (pond 2) within 250m of the site tested negative for GCN DNA, indicating that GCN were not using that pond for breeding during the 2014 season. However, as there are other ponds within 250m of the site which were not tested, it is not possible to confidently conclude absence of GCN, therefore further surveys will be required. Bat Survey Results 5.11 One bat survey identified a low level of activity by Common Pipistrelle Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Soprano Pipistrelle Pipistrellus pygmaeus and Serotine Eptesicus serotinus. The results of the bat survey are summarised on Map 5. The Site was used for foraging by both species of Pipistrelle, with one brief pass from a Serotine. No roosts were identified as present onsite. Evaluation Dormice 5.12 Dormice have been confirmed as present onsite. Nest tubes are intended only to detect presence of Dormice, rather than allow for a population estimate to be made from the results obtained. 5.13 The Dormouse Conservation Handbook suggests that the average mean spring density of Dormice per hectare is likely be to between 4 and 10 adults in optimal habitat (diverse deciduous woodland with abundant scrub and vigorous understorey). The mean spring density of dormice in hedgerows is estimated at 1.3 adults per hectare. As Hampshire is a known stronghold for this species, it is reasonable to assume that the population is likely to reflect the upper scale of the population estimates. The habitat onsite includes mature and diverse hedgerows and some deciduous woodland, therefore the Dormouse population is estimated to consist of 3 to 6 adults per hectare of suitable habitat. 5.14 The Dormouse population is considered to be of Local Value for nature conservation due to the relative abundance in Hampshire. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 10

Bats 5.15 Bats have been confirmed as present onsite, mainly using the site for foraging or passing through briefly during their commute to other areas. It is considered that the value of the bat population onsite is of zone of influence only due to the low levels of activity and the relatively widespread species encountered. GCN 5.16 The edna test of Pond 2 was negative, suggesting that the pond had not been used by GCN for breeding during the 2014 season. However, it is recommended that all suitable water bodies within 250m of the Site are subject to further survey to ensure confidence in the negative result. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 11

6. POTENTIAL IMPACTS IN THE ABSENCE OF MITIGATION Introduction 6.1 In this section the potential unmitigated impacts are outlined with reference to the predicted development activities and biophysical changes outlined in Section 4. 6.2 The proposed scheme is likely to result in the loss of hedgerows and trees; if unmitigated this loss may affect the favourable conservation status of Dormouse and bat populations within the zone of influence, which is against national and local planning policy. In addition, individual animals may be harmed during the construction phases of the proposed scheme, which would result in a breach of wildlife legislation. Dormice Removal of Habitat 6.3 Removal of habitat suitable for Dormice will result in a reduction foraging resources and resting places to support a Dormouse population and may limit breeding productivity. This would have a significant permanent negative impact at the local level that is considered probable. Fragmentation of Habitat 6.4 Fragmentation of habitat suitable for Dormice will result in the isolation of habitat. This will prevent dispersal of Dormouse populations which may limit breeding productivity. This would have a significant permanent negative impact at the local level that is considered probable. Predation by Pet Cats 6.5 Pet cats introduced by new residents may kill or injure Dormice captured from suitable habitat. However a study by Woods et al (2003) has shown that pet cats rarely predate on Dormice, as the cats are usually hunting at ground level whilst the Dormice are inhabiting the canopy/ shrub layer. Therefore a significant permanent negative impact at the local level that is considered unlikely. Operational Lighting causing Disturbance 6.6 Dormice are nocturnal, therefore the additional of artificial lighting will affect their behaviour and may limit foraging, breeding and dispersal. This would have a significant permanent negative impact at the local level which is considered likely. 6.7 In view of the fact that Dormice are present within the zone of influence of the scheme and impacts are likely, a mitigation strategy needs to be developed and implemented. It is considered that, in the absence of mitigation the proposals have the potential to harm Dormice and are likely to have an adverse impact on the favourable conservation status of this species. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 12

Bats 6.8 Given the value of the bat assemblage recorded on site and the absence of a bat roost, potential negative impacts on bats, predominantly a loss of foraging habitat, in the absence of mitigation are not considered to be significant within the zone of influence. GCN 6.9 As it is not possible to confidently conclude whether GCN are present or absent within the zone of influence of the scheme, it is considered that, in the absence of mitigation the proposals may have the potential to have an adverse impact on the favourable conservation status of this species. 6.10 Further surveys should therefore be undertaken in order to determine presence/absence of GCN, population class estimates and the level of impact and mitigation required. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 13

7. PROPOSED MITIGATION STRATEGY Introduction 7.0 To comply with the applicable legislation and policy, a mitigation strategy is required to ensure protected species are protected from harm during construction works and to ensure that the favourable conservation status of the species in the local area is maintained. Survey work has already influenced the design of the concept layout. This mitigation strategy will now inform the master plan as it progresses into more detailed design. Dormice 7.1 Dormice are present onsite and are vulnerable to the impacts which will be caused by development, such as injury and killing during the construction phase and habitat fragmentation post construction as a result of vegetation clearance. Map 6 provides a summary of recommendations with regard to Dormouse mitigation. 7.2 The following actions would minimise the impact of the development on Dormice and should be considered during the master planning stage wherever possible: Minimise breaches in the hedgerow caused by vehicular and pedestrian access; Consider pinch points in the access roads where they bisect existing hedgerows, with mature planting either side of new access points which will reconnect the canopy over the road in time with appropriate management; Consider protecting the hedgerows through ensuring that the gardens of new houses do not back on to existing hedgerows; Sensitive lighting strategy throughout site (low level lighting with features to restrict skyward light spill); Ensure the boundary hedgerows are protected with adequate buffer zones from development. 7.3 A European Protected Species Licence (EPSL) will be required in order to undertake activities associated with development of the Site which would otherwise constitute an offence under the Habitats Regulations, such as habitat loss which would result in a risk of killing/injury and loss of breeding sites/resting places. In order for an EPSL to be granted, a detailed mitigation strategy will need to demonstrate that the proposals will not have a detrimental impact upon the favourable conservation status of Dormice (Regulation 53(9)(b)). The following mitigation is likely to be required in order to ensure a net gain in habitat suitable for Dormice is achieved: Production of a management plan for the retained habitat; Enhancement of dormouse habitat through new planting in the eastern part of the site to create a woodland walk; Adding new planting to retained hedgerows and providing them with a buffer from development; A sensitive working methodology, to include timing of vegetation clearance to avoid hibernation and breeding periods; Erection of wooden nest boxes in suitable habitat and ongoing monitoring surveys for at least 3 years post construction. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 14

7.4 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) encourages the inclusion of biodiversity enhancements within new developments and the proposed Open Space could provide a good opportunity to achieve this with respect to Dormice. The development could incorporate a planting scheme which includes a variety of nut and berry producing trees and shrubs which would benefit Dormice through increasing available food and nesting resources. The sensitive management of existing hedgerows and woodland as well as the erection of dormouse nest boxes would also enhance biodiversity in accordance with the NPPF. Bats 7.5 The bat assemblage on site is of zone of influence value, and potential negative impacts on bats in the absence of mitigation are not considered to be significant at this level. However, in line with NPPF (DCLG, 2012) enhancements can be made to the site which will provide benefits for bats. Foraging Habitat 7.6 The new planting as outlined above will include native tree and shrub species with a high yield of berries, fruits or pollens. These will increase the invertebrate biomass on site and therefore increase foraging opportunities for bats. Lighting 7.7 Any external lighting on the new buildings or in the surrounding areas will be kept as low as Health and Safety regulations permit, and where necessary be limited to low height and low flux, UV filtered, directional lighting. 7.8 It is recommended that an ecologist is consulted during the design of the lighting for the scheme, so that the impact to bats can be minimised. 7.9 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) encourages the inclusion of biodiversity enhancements within new developments and the proposed Open Space could provide a good opportunity to achieve this with respect to bats. The enhancement of existing habitat through planting as well as the erection of bat boxes on retained trees would also enhance biodiversity in accordance with the NPPF. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 15

8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 Targeted surveys for Dormice, bats and GCN were undertaken, which recorded a population of Dormice and a low level of bat activity. As a result, an outline mitigation strategy has been developed to ensure that the scheme is compliant with all relevant legislation and planning policy. 8.2 The edna test of Pond 2 was negative. However, it is recommended that all ponds within 250m are subject to further survey so that presence/absence of GCN can be confidently concluded. 8.3 Further surveys for reptiles and breeding birds should be undertaken prior to any future planning application, along with update surveys for Dormice, bats and GCN if more than two years elapses between the survey dates and the submission of any future planning application. 8.4 Implementation of the mitigation strategy will ensure that no protected species are harmed during the primary construction phase (removal of the vegetation and topsoil). If mitigation is implemented then there will be no adverse affects resulting from the development proposals and the conservation status of Dormice and bats within the zone of influence will be maintained. 8.5 It is considered that the enhancement and management of habitat onsite will not only compensate for the loss of habitat resulting from the development but will also promote the ecological value, increasing overall biodiversity. Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 16

9. REFERENCES Bat Conservation Trust (2012). Bat Surveys Good Practice Guidelines. Bat Conservation Trust, London. Defra. 2014. Analytical and methodological development for improved surveillance of the Great Crested Newt. EPR, 2014. Strategy for Managing Development at Strokins Road, Kingsclere, in the Context of the Kingsclere Fen Meadow Remnants SINC. Natural England. 2001. Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines. Natural England. 2006. Dormouse Conservation Handbook. Natural England. 2014. EPS Newsletter, April 2014, Revised. Woods, Michael; McDonald, Robbie A and Harris, Stephen (2003) Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain Mammal Review 33(2): 174-188 Coppice Road, Kingsclere Final Report February 2015 Protected Species Report P14/17-3A 17

Maps Map 1 Map 2 Map 3 Map 4 Map 5 Map 6 Site Location and designations Protected Species Records Ponds within 250m Dormouse Survey Results Bat Survey Summary Proposed Mitigation for Dormice

Greenham and Crookham Commons SSSI Greenham and Crookham Commons SSSI MAP 1 Site Location & Nature Conservation Designations Greenham and Crookham Commons SSSI Wasing Wood Ponds SSSI KEY Ashford Hill Woods and Meadows SSSI Ashford Hill Woods and Meadows SSSI Wasing Wood Ponds SSS Site boundary 2km linear distance from site boundary 5km linear distance from site boundary Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) Catt's & Redlands Copses SINC Ashford Hill Woods and Meadows SSSI Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) Parsons Grove SINC Northwood Copse SINC Water Close Copse SINC Northwood Copse Remnants SINC Pitchorn Copse SINC Birchwood Copse SINC Upper House Farm Copse SINC Alder Strip at Upper House Farm SINC Haughboys Moor/Maggotty Moor Copses SINC Broom Close Copse Complex SINC Skittle Hill SINC Skittle Hill Copse & The Hervent SINC Norley & Summer Copses SINC Frith Farm Meadows SINC Summer's Copse Meadow SINC Morrell's & Clinker's Copses SINC Frobury Park Copse SINC Strokins Farm Alder Grove & Fen SINC Sandford Wood West SINC Withy Bed Copse Meadow SINC Sandford Wood East SINC Fen Meadow Remnants, Kingsclere SINC Kingsclere Recreation Ground SINC Coneygrove Copse SINC Allwick Dell & Wolverton Plantation North SINC Ladle Hill SSSI SCALE: 1:38,000 at A3 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Metres ± Ecological Planning & Research CLIENT: Mr Dominic Guinness PROJECT: A339 Kingsclere DATE: February 2015 C:\Project Data\A339_Kingsclere\GIS\CoppiceRoad\Map1_SiteLocDesig_P1417_190215.mxd P14/17 Ordnance Survey (c) Crown copyright 2007. All rights reserved. License number 100005596.

MAP 2 Protected & Notable Species Records KEY Site boundary 2km linear distance from site boundary GF GF kj kj kj GF kj Record only accurate to 1km - record placed at SW corner of grid square Record only accurate to 2km - record placed at SW corner of grid square kj kj GF GF GF GF kj GF GF GF kj kj GF kj GF kj kj kj GF ") kj kj GF GF GF GF GF ") kj GF kj ") ") ") ") GF kj kj kj kj GF kj kj GF ")") GF kj GF kj GF GF Birds Barn Owl Brambling Common Bullfinch Common Cuckoo Common Kingfisher Common Linnet Common Quail Common Starling Eurasian Hobby GF GF GF Eurasian Siskin European Golden Plover Fieldfare Grey Heron Grey Partridge Hawfinch House Sparrow Lesser Black-backed Gull Lesser Redpoll Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Marsh Tit Northern Lapwing GF GF GF GF GF GF kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj Mammals Northern Shoveler Northern Wheatear Red Kite Redwing Reed Bunting Ring Ouzel Sand Martin Short-eared Owl Sky Lark Song Thrush Spotted Flycatcher Whinchat Willow Tit Yellowhammer Eurasian Badger Hazel Dormouse West European Hedgehog Herptiles ") Adder ") Common Toad ") Grass Snake kj GF kj kj kj GF kj kj GF kj SCALE: 1:25,000 at A3 0 500 1,000 1,500 Metres ± GF kj kj GF kj GF kj kj GF kj GF GF GF Ecological Planning & Research CLIENT: Mr Dominic Guinness PROJECT: A339 Kingsclere DATE: February 2015 C:\Project Data\A339_Kingsclere\GIS\CoppiceRoad\Map2_PNSR_P1417_190215.mxd P??/?? Ordnance Survey (c) Crown copyright 2007. All rights reserved. License number 100005596.

MAP 3 Ponds Within 250m of Site Boundary KEY Site boundary 250m linear distance around site boundary Ponds (with reference) 1 2 3 4 SCALE: 1:5,000 at A3 0 90 180 270 Metres ± 5 Ecological Planning & Research CLIENT: Mr Dominic Guinness PROJECT: A339 Kingsclere DATE: February 2015 C:\Project Data\A339_Kingsclere\GIS\CoppiceRoad\Map3_ponds250m_P1417_190215.mxd P14/17 Ordnance Survey (c) Crown copyright 2007. All rights reserved. License number 100005596.

050 MAP 4 Dormouse Survey Results 017 016 Dormouse nest 018 049 019 048 047 020 021 046 022 045 023 024 044 025 Adult female Dormouse (17/09/14) 026 043 027 042 041 040 028 029 Adult male Dormouse (12/11/14) 039 030 038 KEY Site boundary Survey area Dormouse tube locations 031 036 037 032 035 034 033 012 011 013 010 009 014 008 007 006 005 004 003 015 002 001 SCALE: 1:1,750 at A3 0 30 60 90 Metres Ecological Planning & Research CLIENT: Mr Dominic Guinness PROJECT: A339 Kingsclere ± DATE: February 2015 C:\Project Data\A339_Kingsclere\GIS\CoppiceRoad\Map4_DormouseTubeLoc_P1417_190215.mxd P14/17 Ordnance Survey (c) Crown copyright 2007. All rights reserved. License number 100005596.

MAP 5 Bat Results Summary Dusk 24/06/2014 KEY Site boundary Transect Common Pipistrelle Pipistrelle species!s Surveyor position 21:48 (p)!s 22:18-22:25 (f) 21:51 (p) 22:48 (f) Heard but not seen Common Pipistrelle Serotine (f) (p) Foraging Pass 22:15 (f)!s 21:59 (f) x2 22:01 (p) 22:34-22:46 (f) 22:07 (f) SCALE: 1:2,500 at A3 0 40 80 120 Metres ± Ecological Planning & Research CLIENT: Mr Dominic Guinness PROJECT: A339 Kingsclere DATE: February 2015 C:\Project Data\A339_Kingsclere\GIS\CoppiceRoad\Map5_Batresults240614_P1417_190215.mxd P14/17 Ordnance Survey (c) Crown copyright 2007. All rights reserved. License number 100005596.

Plant up existing access. Sensitive lighting strategy throughout site (low level lighting with features to restrict skyward light spill). MAP 6 Recommended Dormouse Mitigation Buffer existing planting at least 3m. VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV Plant this section with a native species mix suitable for Dormice to create a "woodland walk". Manage to maintain open rides and glades. Maintain green corridor along edge separate from garden plots to create a "green loop" through site. VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV ^_ Dormouse found here. Protect existing planting using fencing and buffer with new scrub planting. SCALE: 1:2,000 at A3 0 25 50 75 100 Metres ± Ecological Planning & Research CLIENT: Mr Dominic Guinness PROJECT: A339 Kingsclere DATE: February 2015 C:\Project Data\A339_Kingsclere\GIS\CoppiceRoad\Map6_Mit_P1417_190215.mxd P14/17 Ordnance Survey (c) Crown copyright 2007. All rights reserved. License number 100005596.

Appendix 1 Illustrative Layout

P D Edgemoor Collects The scaling of this drawing cannot be assured Revision Date Drn Ckd - - - - Site Boundary Mast B3051 B3051 A339 R O A D L E Y R O A K Heatheralls Copse CL 103m C O P P I C E R O A D Hall ket Project KINGSCLERE Ground E N N Y ' S H A T C H S O U T H L I N K R D Drawing Title Illustrative Layout Option 4 Date Scale Drawn by Check by 05.09.14 1:2000@A3 JW MU Project No 23444 Drawing No RG-M-06 N 20 60 100m Revision R O A D S A 0 40 80 116m N D F R O A D B A S I N G S T O K E R D O R C Planning Master Planning & Urban Design Architecture Landscape Planning & Design Project Services Environmental & Sustainability Assessment Graphic Design bartonwillmore.co.uk Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. Crown Copyright Reserved. Licence No 100019279. Y E W A J:\23000-23999\23400-23499\23444 - Land Adj A339 Kingsclere\A4 - Dwgs & Registers\M Planning\23444 - RG-M-06A - Illustrative Layout Option 4.dwg - (1-2000@A3) L Certificate FS 29637 Offices at Reading London Bristol Cambridge Cardiff Ebbsfleet Edinburgh Leeds Manchester Solihull

Appendix 2 Legislation and Policy

Appendix 2 Legislation & Planning Policy Relating to Wildlife & Development in England This Appendix is intended to provide an overview of the main features of legislation and policy relating to nature conservation in England and the implications for development. KEY WILDLIFE LEGISLATION Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 1 (known as the Habitats Regulations ) transpose Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (the European Habitats Directive ) into UK legislation. These regulations consolidate all the various amendments made to the preceding Conservation Regulations 1994 for England and Wales. The Habitats Regulations were amended by the Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) Regulations 2012. 2 The Habitats Regulations provide for the designation of both Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in the UK, which form part of the Natura 2000 network of protected areas across Europe. The Regulations also prohibit the deliberate capture, killing or disturbance of European Protected Species (EPS), which include inter alia Dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius, Great Crested Newt Triturus cristatus, Otter Lutra lutra and all native species of bat, and make it an offence to destroy or damage either the nesting or breeding sites of these species. The above actions can be made lawful through the granting of licenses after Natural England (the licensing authority in England) is satisfied that there are no satisfactory alternatives and that such actions will have no detrimental effect on wild population of the EPS. Further information on SPAs, SACs and European Protected Species (Licensing and Protected Species) is provided in the relevant sub-sections of this Appendix. Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 3 is the principal mechanism for the legislative protection of wildlife in Great Britain. Various amendments have occurred since the original enactment. Certain species of bird, animal and plant (including all of the European Protected Species listed above) are afforded protection under Schedules 1, 5 and 8 of the Act. Reference is made to the various Schedules and Parts of this Act (Table A1.1) in the section of this Appendix dealing with Legally Protected Species. The Act also contains measures for the protection of the 1 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/490/contents/made 2 The Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) Regulations 2012. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1927/contents/made 3 The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/69/contents

countryside, National Parks, Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and public rights of way as well as preventing the establishment of invasive non-native species that may be detrimental to native wildlife. Table A1.1: Key Schedules of the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) Schedule Schedule 1 Part 1 Schedule 1 Part 2 Schedule 5 Section 9.1 (killing/injuring) Schedule 5 Section 9.1 (taking) Schedule 5 Section 9.2 Schedule 5 Section 9.4a Schedule 5 Section 9.4b Schedule 5 Section 9.5a Schedule 5 Section 9.5b Schedule 8 Schedule 9 Protected Species Protects listed birds through special penalties at all times Protects listed birds through special penalties during the close season Protects listed animals from intentional killing or injuring Protects listed animals from taking Protects listed animals from being possessed or controlled (live or dead) Protects listed animals from intentional damage or destruction to any structure or place used for shelter or protection Protects listed animals from intentional disturbance while occupying a structure or place used for shelter or protection Protects listed animals from being sold, offered for sale or being held or transported for sale either live or dead, whole or part Protects listed animals from being published or advertised as being for sale Protects listed plants from: intentional picking, uprooting or destruction (Section 13 1a); selling, offering for sale, possessing or transporting for the purpose of sale (live or dead, part or derivative) (Section 13 2a); advertising (any of these) for buying or selling (Section 13 2b). Prohibits the release of species listed in the Schedule into the wild. Further information on legally protected species, designated wildlife sites and invasive nonnative species is provided in the relevant sub-sections of this Appendix. Countryside & Rights of Way Act 2000 Many of the provisions of the Countryside and Rights of Way (CRoW) Act 2000 4 have been incorporated as amendments into the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) and some provisions have now been superseded by later legislation such as The Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act (2006). The most relevant changes provided by the CRoW Act include the added protection given to SSSIs and other important sites for nature conservation. Importantly, under the Act it became a criminal offence to "recklessly disturb" Schedule 1 nesting birds and species protected under 4 The Countryside and Rights of Way (CRoW) Act 2000. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/37/contents