Fall 2003 CRP 336: REGIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING FOUNDATIONS READING Course Reader Table of Contents (DRAFT, 6-5-03) PAGE I. THE CONTEXT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING Smith, Z. (1999). Ecosystem interdependence. In The environmental policy paradox. (pp. 1-5). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Miller, G. T., Jr. (Table 5.3). Comparison of a natural system and a simplified human system. In Environmental science: An introduction. (p. 92) Meadows, D. (1996, Spring). How we talk can determine how we live. Population Press. (League of Women Voters). 2 Wackernagel, M. & Rees, W. (1996). Ecological footprints for Beginners. In Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth. (pp. 7-16). Gabriola Island, BC. The New Catalyst. Randolph, J. (forthcoming). Managing Human-Environment Interactions. In Environmental Land use Planning and Management. (pp. 1-1-1-8).Covelo, CA. Island Press, II. HISTORIC OVERVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT Runyan, C. & Norderhaug, M. (2002, May/June). The path to the Johannesburg Summit. Worldwatch. 15. 31-35. III. THE POLICY PROCESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING Clark, T.W. (2002). Introduction. In The policy process: A practical guide for natural resource professionals. (pp. 1-16). New Haven, CT. Yale University Press. Bardach, E. (2000). Introduction, part I. The eightfold path. In A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving. (pp. xiii-xvi, 1-46). New York. Seven Bridges Press, LLC. (Reference) Cortner, Hanna J. & Moote, M.A. (1999). Policy paradoxes. In The politics of i
ecosystem management. (pp. 57-72). Covelo, CA. Island Press. IV. WHAT IS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING? & ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES AND ETHICS Randolph, J. (forthcoming). Environmental planning: Theory, process, considerations. In Environmental Land use Planning and Management. (pp. 2-1,-2-12).Covelo, CA. Island Press, Paehlke, R.C. (2000). Environmental values and public policy. In Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century (fourth ed.). (pp. 77-97). Washington, D.C. CQ Press. (reference) Beatley, T. (1994). Land-use policy and ethical choices. In Ethical land use: Principles of policy and planning. (pp. 3-17). Baltimore, MD. The Johns Hopkins University Press. V. THE SPRAWL DEBATE: THE CENTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES? Gillham, O. (2002). What is spawl? & Preserving Open Space. In The limitless city: A primer on the urban sprawl debate. (pp. 3-23, 259-261, 161-177, 275-6). Covelo, CA: Island Press. VI. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT: BRIZZIOLARI WATERSHED SITE VISIT Randolph, J. (forthcoming). Ecosystem and watershed management. In Environmental Land use Planning and Management. (pp. 4-1,-4-39, assorted pages).covelo, CA. Island Press. VII. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL: OUR NATIONAL PARKS & WILDERNESS Nash, R. (2001). Preface to the fourth edition. Introduction, Prologue, & Wilderness preserved. In Wilderness & the American mind (4 th ed.). (pp. vii-x, xi-xiv, 1-7, 108-121). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. O Brien, B.R. (1999). Care and feeding of visitors & Case study: Yosemite National Park. In Our National parks and the search for sustainability. Austin: University of Texas Press. 158-183, 230-1. Gold, S. (2002, September 13). BLM, wildlife agency at odds over off-roading at dunes. Los Angeles Times. P. B-1, 14. VIII. FEDERAL-STATE-REGIONAL &LOCAL PLANNING: THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL PLANNING PROCESS, ETC. ii
The California Coastal Planning Process Lecture Outline Wheeler, S.M. (2002). The new regionalism: Key characteristics of an emerging movement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 267-278. Beatley, T. (2000). Preserving biodiversity: Challenges for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 5-20. IX. SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING: BUILDING BRIDGES OR CASTLES IN THE SAND? Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296-312. Berke, P.R. (2002, August). Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(1), 21-36. Berke, P.R. & Manta Conroy, M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21-33. (reference) Sustainability and Community Planning: Need for New Directions Lecture Outline X. THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA): MITIGATIONS REVISITED WITH A TOUCH A SUSTAINABILITY California Governor s Office of Planning and Research. (1994). Tracking CEQA Mitigation Measures Under AB 3180. Sacramento. Author. The Planning Center. (1998). Mitigation monitoring. In The last practical guide to CEQA for this century! (p. 20). Costa Mesa, California: Author. Dennis, N., Grassetti R., & Odland, R. (2001, Spring). An analytical framework for addressing the sustainability of development in environmental impact reports (Part 1). Environmental Monitor, 14-17. Dennis, N., Grassetti R., & Odland, R. (2001, Summer). An analytical framework for addressing the sustainability of development in environmental impact reports (Part 2). Environmental Monitor, 18-21. XI. PRESERVING AGRICULTURAL LAND: CULTURE & ENVIRONMENT Preserving Agricultural Land: Culture & Environment (lecture materials) iii
(includes a number of related Ventura County documents) Institute for Local Self Government. (2002). Farmland protection action guide: 24 strategies for California. (pp. 3-8, +) Sacramento: Author. Simon, S. (1997, June 9). Throwback farm thrives in suburbia. Los Angeles Times. P. A-1 XII SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES AND GREEN PLANS Resource Renewal Institute. What are green plans? Retrieved June 5, 2003, From http://greenplans.rri.org/pdf/primer.pdf 6-11. Johnson, H. D. (1995, Summer). Green plans: The Netherlands leads the way. Earth Island Journal. 30-2. Resource Renewal Institute. 2000. New Zealand s resource management act. In Green plan leadership program: Learning module two. (pp. 23-35). New Zealand Policy Tour. December 3-9, 2000. Williams, J.M. (2000, September). The importance of futuring. Planning Quarterly. 139, 26-7. Vaughan, B. New report points the way towards a sustainable California. Retrieved September 3, 2002. Report available from http://www.pacinst.org/ege/sustainable_california.htm XIII. SUSTAINABLE INDICATORS (ALWAYS UNDER CONSTRUCTION) Kline, E. (1997). Sustainable community indicators: How to measure progress. In Roseland, M., (Ed.). Eco-city dimensions: Healthy communities, healthy planet. ( pp. 152-166 ).Gabriola Island, BC, Canada. New Society Publishers. Flynn, P., Berry, D., and Heintz, T. (2002). Sustainability and quality of life indicators: Toward an integration of economic, social, and environmental measures. Indicators: The Journal of Social Health. 1(4). 1-21. Maclaren, V.W. (1996). Urban sustainability reporting. Journal of the American Planning Association. 62(2): 184-202. City of Santa Monica. (February 11, 2003). Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan. Retrieved at http://www.santa-monica.org/environment/policy/scp2003.pdf iv
Parris, T.M. (2003). Toward a sustainability transition: The international consensus. Environment. 45 (1). 12-22. Also, Hecht, J.E. Sustainability Indicators on the Web. (same issue), 3-4. XIV. MISCELLANY PLANetizen. PLANetizen top 50 websites 2002. Retrieved June 5, 2003, From http://www.planetizen.com/sites. v