DRAFT Subject to Modifications

Similar documents
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

This page left intentionally blank.

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8B5

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Section 1. Executive Summary

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Route 1 Corridor Study

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission Regional Land Use Planning

hermitage town center

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Complete Streets in Lancaster County

Creating Complete Roadway Corridors:

TORONTO COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

The transportation system in a community is an

Street Flooding Mitigation Plan KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission. Presented to AMPO National Conference October 18, 2017

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6c

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

Arlington County Retail Plan

Chapter 1: Introduction

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

master plan of highways bus rapid transit amendment

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

Comprehensive Plan ADOPTED APRIL 2014

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Road transport activities and infrastructure can have adverse effects on the environment and community.

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

NEW REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN HIGH LEVEL PROCESS & FRAMEWORK

TENNESSEE STATE ROUTE 109 CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT ALONG STATE ROUTE 109

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 ESRI User Conference Eastside Greenway

Blueprint Denver A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INCLUSIVE CITY. Executive Summary

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

PART 5: DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Figure 57: Proposed Height

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines Stakeholder Advisory Group #

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Economy Vision Statements: Social Wellbeing Vision Statements: Natural Environment Vision Statements:

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Safe Routes to School & Master Plans Walkable and Livable Communities Institute

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

Access Management Strategies for Major Corridors. Town of Amherst, New York Erie County

Silverdale Regional Center

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE

Coliseum Station Area Area Redevelopment Plan. Public Engagement #1 June 12, 2017

Chapter 7: Streetscape & Design Elements

Request for Proposals: Architectural/Design Guidelines

Creating a Supportive Organizational and Policy Framework Luisa Paiewonsky. John D. Pagini, AICP USDOT CCAPA PDO

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

, C-MS I June 3, 2016 $1500 pd chk #216918

Date: April 10, 2017 City Council Work Session April 24, 2017: Status Report on the Comprehensive Plan Update and Transportation Master Plan

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

18 May 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

San Francisco General Plan Preservation Element: Objectives 7-9. Historic Preservation Commission August 20, 2014

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

I-70 Corridor Enhancement Plan

Urban Planning and Land Use

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

2. AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVMENT

Staff Report and Recommendation

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

The Corporation of the Town of Milton

Local Growth Planning in North Central Green Line Communities

STAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting Date: April 12, City of North Las Vegas

PD&E STUDY SR 9/I-95 FROM SOUTH OF SR 870/COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD TO NORTH OF CYPRESS CREEK ROAD FM # ETDM 14222

DRAFT. Urban Development Areas Fairfax County. UDA Needs Profile: Tysons Corner 13% Location Characteristics. Socio-Economic Characteristics

Glenn Highway MP DSR. Landscape Narrative

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Transcription:

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8 From: Date: Subject: Staff May 19, 2017 Council Meeting Florida Department of Transportation Complete Streets Policy Introduction The purpose of this item is to provide a review and recommended revisions to the draft Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Complete Streets Handbook, which was published for review on April 25, 2017. This handbook is intended to help implement FDOT s Complete Streets policy, adopted in September 2014, to promote safety, quality of life, and economic development in Florida. Within that policy, the Department specifically recognized Complete Streets as context-sensitive facilities that require transportation system design to consider local land development patterns and the built form. The Handbook was developed after FDOT conducted a state-wide, year-long effort, including participation by Council as well as other partner agencies to evaluate existing conditions, FDOT documents and manuals, and develop a new Complete Streets approach for the state transportation network. Background More than twenty years ago, the Federal Highway Administration released guidance encouraging context-based transportation planning and design to improve safety, function, and sustainability of communities. Safety improvements in particular have been highlighted as a key benefit for multi-modal transportation networks that balance the needs of all users and integrate land use conditions in their design. National studies have consistently identified Florida s transportation network as one of the most dangerous in the nation for pedestrians and bicyclists. For example, the 2016 Dangerous by Design publication by Smart Growth America, the State of Florida was ranked as the most dangerous state in the nation for pedestrians due to the high number of injuries and fatalities on the state transportation network. In September 2014, FDOT responded to growing concerns about dangerous conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists with the adoption of the Statewide Complete Streets Policy. The goal of this policy is to improve safety, quality of life, and economic development in Florida by advancing a context-sensitive system of Complete Streets that considers the full range of users on the multi-modal transportation network: cyclists, motorists, pedestrians, transit riders, and freight handlers. To implement this policy, FDOT indicated it would coordinate with the full range of transportation partners, including local governments, metropolitan planning

organizations, transportation agencies, and fully integrate the Complete Streets policy into the Department s manuals, guidelines, and related documents for implementation. In 2015, FDOT initiated a broad, multi-agency effort to objectively and thoroughly evaluate regulatory documents, manuals, and procedures; and identify changes needed to advance Complete Streets through context-sensitive design. Council was invited to participate in this year-long effort, which was facilitated by Smart Growth America, a nationally recognized leader in the application of these concepts. The Complete Streets Handbook is a key implementation manual to assist FDOT, local governments, metropolitan/transportation planning organizations (MPO/TPOs), and other partners with guidance and criteria to advance a holistic readdress of the state s transportation network. The approach fully integrates local land use patterns and is designed to address the transportation needs of system users of all ages and abilities, regardless of mode choice. The Handbook is aligned with the Florida Transportation Plan, which is the statewide long-range transportation plan guiding Florida s transportation future. Analysis The Complete Streets Handbook provides a detailed overview of Complete Streets and how they may be implemented across the state s transportation network. It includes: An explanation of FDOT s Complete Streets approach and principles for state roads; Guidelines for FDOT s collaboration with local and regional partners; Definitions of context classifications used for state roads; Guidelines for applying a Complete Streets approach to state projects; Guidelines for roadway design considerations; Appendix A describing land use tools to support safe and comfortable multi-modal travel; and Appendices B-F providing context classification case studies, calculation of floor-area ratios, proposed design speed ranges by context, sample FDOT context classification letters of agreement for local governments, and a list of handbooks and guidance documents with tools for Complete Streets implementation. Each of these components is evaluated below. FDOT s Complete Streets Approach and Principles The cornerstone of FDOT s Complete Streets approach is the recognition that a context classification is needed to enable different types of transportation facilities to be designed in a manner that is appropriate for the different types of land use conditions in which they are located. While a high-speed rural context may be appropriately served by a facility with wider travel lanes and minimal bicycling and pedestrian features, an urban context requires facilities that are expressly multi-modal with design features to slow traffic and features that supports economic development and encourages bicycling and pedestrian activity. The Handbook includes a composite illustration that depicts the range of context classifications identified for Florida s varied geography, arrayed from the lowest intensity natural and rural conditions to the urban conditions with the highest density and intensity. 2

As illustrated in the transect image above, FDOT s Complete Streets approach establishes a context classification that acknowledges land use patterns in Florida range from the natural/rural to urban core. Accordingly, the approach anticipates transportation facilities will be provided in a form that corresponds to the place and character in which they are located. This provides for variation and design flexibility regarding roadway dimensions, amenities, access, and function. 3

Context Classifications Used for State Roads The Handbook provides a context classification matrix that differentiates classifications by land use, building heights, building placement, fronting uses, location of off-street parking, and roadway connectivity (e.g., intersection density, block perimeters, and block length). It also includes secondary measures such as residential density, non-residential intensity, and population and employment density. There are several measures that should be added into the list of primary measures for the definition of context classification: (1) the location of on-street parking, and (2) the alley network (as a measure of roadway connectivity). Both of these measures should be addressed in detail in the narrative and illustrations provided to more completely define context and recognize the benefits these features can provide in creating a sense of place, calming traffic, protecting bicyclists and pedestrians, and improving connectivity. This chapter also provides a series of factors for the identification of roadway-specific transportation travel demands, including land uses, vehicular trip types, travel patterns, the types of pedestrians and bicyclists, transit users, and freight. While the Handbook includes a broad approach to pedestrian considerations, the approach for bicycling facilities is too narrow and should be expanded to consider parallel and alternative bicycling facilities as well as those facilities provided within a subject roadway. This revision would create additional flexibility for communities to more efficiently plan for their mobility needs and enable more context-appropriate transportation facilities as prioritized locally. Collaboration with Local and Regional Partners The Handbook emphasizes the value of establishing regional and community visions to help define contexts. These approaches can engage both public and private partners and help inform land development regulations and policies. In particular, the Handbook notes the efficiency of early collaboration between FDOT and local governments to identify the context classification of a roadway and synchronize the land use/transportation relationship. MPO/TPOs are identified to assist in clarifying and defining visions and infrastructure design and funding. The chapter also identifies transit agencies, regional planning councils, and private sector stakeholders as key partners. In addition to the construction of new facilities, the Handbook highlights the opportunities presented by maintenance and resurfacing projects to spur the redesign of transportation facilities to better complement surrounding land use patterns. Applying a Complete Streets Approach to State Projects The Handbook acknowledges that Complete Streets are not a specific type of project. Instead, Complete Streets represents an approach to ensuring that projects are designed according to their unique context. An approach is presented to provide that FDOT consistently consider the context throughout the design, engineering, development, and implementation process. Early screening is recommended at the onset of project initiation to gain stakeholder input and broaden due diligence to further inform context classifications. The chapter includes a series of measures to be considered by mode; however, two key measures are missing: the presence of on-street parking and presence of alternative and parallel bicycle facilities. This chapter 4

should be modified to integrate these measures as well as a broader consideration of parking location and its contribution to a park once environment. The chapter describes the review processes for different types of FDOT projects, including those carried through the Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process as well as other FDOT projects that are screened independently. While the ETDM process notes the review of all applicable local documents (e.g., comprehensive plans, master plans, redevelopment plans, and other vision-based documents), the alternative review process omits these local documents in early screening. This section should be amended to include emphasis on the review of all applicable local documents to fully inform context considerations. The implementation chapter also includes a discussion of funding and maintenance of Complete Streets. Throughout the Handbook, there is emphasis on the value of leveraging routine maintenance projects, such as resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation (RRR) projects, to create Complete Streets. However, the chapter notes there is no separate FDOT funding category or source to advance this effort. To more effectively implement Complete Streets, a separate funding source should be established within the seven FDOT districts that could be accessed by MPO/TPOs for qualifying local government projects. This would accelerate the safety improvements provided by this approach and create potential to leverage state funding with other public and private funds for faster implementation. Roadway Design Considerations The final section of the Handbook is a detailed discussion of the context-based design controls utilized by FDOT for project design. This includes design users, design vehicles, design speeds, and traffic characteristics. A comprehensive discussion is provided regarding the needs of different users (e.g., drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists) in different contexts and questions that should be raised regarding how to best accommodate their needs. Additional guidance is provided regarding different types of design vehicles and the relationship between roadway speeds and roadway design. The chapter suggests levels of service be considered for all users - vehicles as well as pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. Additionally, this chapter emphasizes that roadways are part of a larger interconnected system that includes public rights-of-ways as well as the land use context within which they exist. Further, FDOT facilities are noted as part of a context-sensitive system of Complete Streets. A fine-grained system of roadways and crossing opportunities produces efficiency, reduces delay, and improves choices for the traveling public. More travel choices and multiple intersections enable smaller, safer roadways that can share the roadway demand instead of wider facilities and intersections that create barriers for bicyclists and pedestrians. This chapter also describes transition zones between various contexts with design guidance to help improve driver behavior. As noted for previous chapters, this chapter should also be revised to include on-street parking and the presence of parallel and alternative bicycling facilities. Further, an emphasis on local design guidance should be integrated into the network discussion, to highlight the leadership role of local governments in determining prioritization of facility types within their communities. 5

Appendix A - Land Use Tools to Support Safe and Comfortable Multi-modal Travel Appendix A includes a detailed overview of land use tools available to local governments to help advance Complete Streets. Because the transportation/land use planning process is iterative and interdependent, this section recommends local government land use and FDOT transportation planning decisions should be coordinated and collaborative. A series of local government tools is presented, including local network connectivity, investments in local multi-modal infrastructure and network plans, zoning, site design and building placement, access management, and parking standards. Consistent throughout the Handbook and again in the land use appendix is the omission of on-street parking as a beneficial consideration for Complete Streets. This section should be modified to add language describing on-street parking; its benefits to safety, quality of life, and economic development; the significant protections on-street parking provides for pedestrians; and its inclusion as part of the Complete Streets toolbox. Additional Handbook Appendices The balance of the Handbook includes valuable documents and reference materials to advance Complete Streets implementation. Conclusion The FDOT Complete Streets Handbook provides thorough and thoughtful guidance to enhance the state s transportation network in a manner that will promote safety, quality of life, and economic development across the State of Florida. FDOT utilized a thorough process, with broad participation and nationally recognized partners, to objectively evaluate the state s transportation network, regulatory and guidance documents, and produce a comprehensive approach to delivering a Complete Streets network over time. The Handbook employs a cuttingedge approach by recognizing the variation among different contexts, defining a range of context classifications and context-sensitive design features, and holistic roadway design considerations that embrace and integrate land use conditions. The Handbook lays out a step-by-step approach for roadway planning and design that celebrates local government leadership in land use planning and placemaking. Further, the Complete Streets Handbook emphasizes the value of establishing meaningful community and regional visions with broad public input for better integrated outcomes that can more effectively leverage transportation investments as part of an integrated land use/transportation system. There are several key considerations missing among the measures detailed throughout the Handbook, including on-street parking, the presence of alley networks, and alternative and parallel bicycle facilities. In addition, the Handbook would be improved by calling for non- ETDM projects to also review local plans and for all projects to integrate local design guidance. In addition, implementation would benefit greatly from a designated Complete Streets funding source. By revising the Handbook to include these measures as described above, the application of Complete Streets will be more comprehensive, enable more meaningful local government participation, and provide the appropriate flexibility for Complete Streets to be applied in all context classifications as envisioned. 6

Recommendation Council should approve the staff report evaluating the FDOT Complete Streets Handbook for transmittal to the Florida Department of Transportation. 7