City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program Update Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 10, 2009

Similar documents
Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

Public Visioning City of Kelso Planning Commission

Introduction to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update. City of Bellingham Planning Department 2005

I am writing regarding the SMP update draft as a citizen and a neighbor who is impacted by shoreline uses.

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

Stevens County Partnership Shoreline Master Program Update

Clallam County Shoreline Master Program Update. Salt Creek and Tongue Point, 2006

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

YEAR 2 FIRST QUARTER REPORT

Chapter 14. Shorelines

Gibsons Foreshore & Seawalk Improvements

City of Tacoma Community & Economic Development Department

4. What are the goals of the Kawarthas, Naturally Connected project? 7. What are watersheds and why are they being used as the project boundaries?

Welcome. Tannery and Waterworks Parks Shoreline Improvements Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre #1 November 27, pm to 8 pm

VIRGINIA KEY CONSENSUS MASTER PLAN

Walk plan will lead to future

Port of San Diego Sea Level Rise Ad Hoc Committee Meeting 1 of 3.. September 18, 2018

Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

CITY OF BELLINGHAM PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

TERMS OF REFERENCE MALASPINA COMPLEX COASTAL PLAN

PDS June 1, 2016 Page 1. Planning and Development Committee. MEETING DATE: Wednesday, June 01, 2016

Manchester. Vision for Manchester

Master Plan for Preservation and Scenic Conservation (1995)

Welcome. to the Bull Shoals Lake Master Plan Revision Open House

Advice from Department of Ecology

APPENDIX L3. Table of Contents. SWP EA Information Sheets

PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

MAYFIELD WEST SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 2

SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM

City Center Neighborhood Plan

Options for addressing City of Edmonds Alternatives to Ecology s Required Changes addressing Edmonds Marsh Buffers and Setbacks.

TO: Port of Orcas FROM: Tina Whitman, Science Director SUBJECT: Master Plan Update DATE: September 7, 2018

Welcome! Agenda. South Downtown

Kevin M. Rampe, President -- Lower Manhattan Development Corporation

STUDY AREA. Tonight s Agenda. Project Tasks Completed. Next Steps. Town of Oyster Bay Eastern Waterfront Community Vision & Revitalization Plan

Planning Commission March 14, Presented by: City of Bellingham Port of Bellingham

Sustainable Natural Environment Wetlands

Waterfront Redevelopment. City Council Briefing May 15, 2006

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLANS (OCPs) AND ZONING BYLAWS (ZBs): PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

FAQ S about Restoration Planning FROM THE Department of Ecology WEBSITE:

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION

Raystown Lake Master Plan Revision. Public Meeting April 25 & 26, 2018 How does the revision process work?

Deb Grube, Sr. Zoning Officer

CAO Update Status Work continues on products: Draft ordinance BAS report CAO process summary (2002 to present) Comprehensive e Plan policy review Some

Preserving Recreational & Commercial Working Waterfronts. Jennifer Z. Carver, AICP August 2007

City of Kingston. North King s Town Secondary Plan Open House + Workshop #1 February 28, 2018

MAYFIELD WEST SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 2

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

April 11, 2016 Park Board Chair and Commissioners General Manager Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation New Brighton Salt Marsh - Preferred Concept

Nick Sigmund, Sr. Zoning Officer

Cherry Beach Shoreline Protection Infrastructure Conceptual Design and Class EA

PARKS AND RECREATION

Brice Prairie Master Plan

Discussion: ELSI comments re Colwood Draft Official Community Plan

Baselands Trails Master Plan Public Meeting. April 28, 2015 Fire Academy, 895 Eastern Avenue, Toronto 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014

Conservation Corridor Base and Thematic Maps

PARTF Scoring System for Grants

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Preservation of Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfronts

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

Point Defiance Park. Master Plan Update. April 23 rd 2015

Cohasset Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting #1. Harriman GEI Consultants FXM Associates May 31, 2018

Lake O the Pines Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting April 25 & 27, 2017

Mississauga Waterfront. Parks Strategy - Draft

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES DISTRICTS

The Planning Partnership Baird + Associates TCI Management Consultants Ltd. Plan B Natural Heritage Wills Consulting Engineers Poulos & Chung Limited

LU Encourage schools, institutions, and other community facilities that serve rural residents to locate in neighboring cities and towns.

MAKING LIVABLE AND ATTRACTIVE WATERFRONTS

City of Richland Comprehensive Plan: Integrated Non-project Final Environmental Impact Statement

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

SHORELINE, FLOOD AND COASTAL DEFENCE MANAGEMENT PLANS

6 Utility Systems Utility System Policies 6.2 Implementation Strategies 7 Parks, Open Space and Trails 63

AREA-WIDE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION

New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project

Gibsons Foreshore & Seawalk Improvements

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE Fisheries Division nd Avenue SE. Auburn, Washington

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Appendix C Agency Correspondence

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

PHASE ONE. A summary report: What the community told Alcoa during Phase One of the community engagement program for Point Henry 575.

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Folly Beach Planning Commission

Introduction to the Seahurst Park Ecosystem Restoration Project: A Process of Transformation. Presented by Peter Hummel, ASLA, LEED AP

TACOMA WATERFRONT. Design Guidelines

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Prado Basin Project Updates

TRANSFORM BALTIMORE NEW ZONING CODE. Laurie Feinberg, Asst. Director

Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017

A Vision for Walnut Creek

Ecosystem Restoration Business Line Budgeting A Systems Approach

WATERFRONT PLACE CENTRAL MIXED USE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

THE PROTECTION OF CHATHAM COUNTY S NATURAL RESOURCES - THE POLICY SIDE

Transcription:

City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program Update Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 10, 2009

Agenda Overview Progress to Date Upcoming Schedule Structure of the SMP Shoreline Environment Designations (SEDs( SEDs) Shoreline Districts & Boundaries Land Uses

Overview State requires update of SMP by 2011 Initiated process in 2006 with shoreline critical areas Prepared draft study documents Changes in CAPO completed in 2008 Re-initiate focus on SMP now through 2010

Draft Study Documents Prepared: Inventory & Characterization Report Public Access Plan Use Analysis Restoration Plan Thea Foss Public Access Study Thea Foss Design Guidelines

Structure of the SMP

Table of Contents Introduction Goals & Policies Shoreline Environments Shoreline Districts Permit and Administrative Procedures (codified) Development Regulations & Standards (codified) Appendices

Shoreline Environment Designations What are they? A nomenclature to differentiate the variety of conditions along the shoreline SEDs serve as the tool for prescribing appropriate levels of protection for distinct areas of the shoreline

Shoreline Environment Designations What can be considered in Tacoma? High Intensity Shoreline Residential Urban Conservancy Natural Aquatic or Alternative systems

Shoreline Environment Designations What are some of the designation criteria? Existing land use pattern Biological and physical character Goals and aspirations of the community

Shoreline Environment Designations Tacoma s s approach: Existing SEDs are largely appropriate Change only where obviously needed for: Critical resource protection Consistency with underlying district boundaries As directed by the Comprehensive Plan unless new information directs a Comp Plan change

Shoreline Environment Designations What must the SMP include for each designation: Purpose statement Classification criteria Management policies Regulations (per shoreline district)

Components

Existing Shoreline Designations

Factors for Analysis Bulkheads/armoring Historic Fill Overwater Structures Vegetation Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas and Buffers Nearshore Processes Comprehensive Plan Land Use Intensities Existing Land Use Patterns Goals and Aspirations of the Community (?)

Bulkheading

Historic Fill

Overwater Structures

Vegetation

Nearshore Processes

Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area Buffers

Comprehensive Plan Land Use Intensities

Natural/conservancy Name: Brown s Pt. UGA Proposed: Shoreline Residential Aquatic Name: Point Ruston Existing Designation: Urban Proposed: High Intensity Name: Marine View Drive Existing Designation: Urban Proposed: Urban Conservancy Conservancy High Intensity High Intensity Name: Hylebos Creek Existing Designation: Urban Proposed: Urban Conservancy Name: Narrows Marina/Day Island Existing Designation: Urban Proposed: High Intensity and Shoreline Residential Name: Puyallup River Existing Designation: Urban Proposed: Urban Conservancy Name: Ruston Way Existing Designation: Urban Proposed: Urban Conservancy

High Intensity 50 Buffer Potential restoration sites Narrows Marina Patchy kelp University Place Shoreline Jurisdiction

Direction of Longshore Transport Overwater residences Urban - Conservancy 115 Buffer Shoreline Residential 50 Buffer Patchy Kelp and Eelgrass High Intensit y Intensity 50 Buffer

Land Use Patterns

Longshore Drift Urban - Conservancy 115 Buffer Existing Restoration Site Slag Peninsula: Cleanup Site Patchy Kelp throughout High Intensity 50 Buffer

Town of Ruston Jurisdiction Patchy Kelp Beds High Intensity 50 Buffer

Potential Restoration Site Longshore Drift Urban - Conservancy 115 Buffer High Intensity 50 Buffer

Shoreline District Boundaries Analysis and Recommendations City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program Update

Existing City of Tacoma Shoreline Districts

Potential Boundary Changes Former Asarco Site S13: Commencement Bay Marine View Dr. Districts 11 & 12 Chinese Reconciliation Park And Salt Marsh S-1: Multi family and single family residential; 6 th Ave Park Hylebos Creek

Narrows Marina: S1 Shoreline District

Character of the Area Overwater residential and multifamily Water-dependent marina and boat launch facilities Single family residential

Current District Boundary Proposed District Boundary (6 th Ave ROW)

Residential Character Cluster of multifamily Residential Division between multiand single family residences Shoreline Residential High Intensity

Point Ruston/Ruston Way: S6 Slag Peninsula Point Ruston: Former Asarco Smelter site RUSTON

Character of the Area

Chinese Reconciliation Park and Salt Marsh: S7 District Ruston Way S6 Chinese Reconciliation Park And Salt Marsh Sperry Ocean Dock

Character of the Area Existing salt marsh Restoration site Site of Chinese Reconciliation Park (In construction)

Hylebos Creek: S10 Port/Industrial Uses Hylebos Creek Port/Industrial Uses

Marine View Drive: S11 and S12

Proposed Designations

Environment Designations vs. Designations Shoreline Districts Broad management policies Districts Define allowed and prohibited uses Specific development

Example: Different Designations Natural Policy: maintain intact ecological functions through preservation S-4 4 District Limited uses allowed 200-ft nearshore buffer Vegetation preservation requirements High Intensity Policy: maintain waterfront location for water-dependent uses S-10 District Water-dependent industry, port facilities and marinas allowed Other uses restricted 50-ft nearshore buffer

Example: Same Designation - Different Districts Urban Conservancy Policy: Promote public access and recreation Policy: Preserve and restore ecological functions Policy: Allow variety of uses while meeting no net loss S-6 6 District Ruston Way Good public access; few in-water/over water/over-water uses Water-enjoyment enjoyment and recreation 115-ft marine buffer Height standards S-12 District Marine View Drive North Less public access; more water-dependent uses (marinas) Low density overwater residential 115-ft marine buffer S-14 District Wapato Lake Fewer allowed uses Wetland buffers - 300-ft

What we want to take away Set the stage for the next discussion Encourage comment on proposed designations and boundaries Increase understanding of what role these designations play Achieve a preliminary consensus on high level concepts