Objective based approach

Similar documents
A fire safe future? Eindhoven University of technology: Fellow Fire Safety Engineering (Dept. Built Environment Unit BPS)

Case Study 1 Underground Car Park

Case Study of Underground Car Park. Team Japan

PART 1 THERMAL & MECHANICAL ACTIONS. DIF SEK Part 1: Thermal & Mechanical Actions 0/ 50

F I R E A L A R M R E C O G N I T I O N A N D E X I T C H O I C E I N U N D E R G R O U N D S TAT I O N S

How to Use Fire Risk Assessment Tools to Evaluate Performance Based Designs

Fire Severity for Structural Design

CHOOSING A FIRE VENTILATION STRATEGY FOR AN UNDERGROUND METRO STATION

Fire Resistance - Implications for regulations and standards of the September 11th terrorist attacks on the world trade centre Tom Lennon, FRS, BRE

This document is a preview generated by EVS

COSTCO, SAN FRANCISCO A PRESCRIPTIVE AND PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN

Culminating Project. Fire Protection and Life Safety Engineering Analysis. Cal Poly. Center for Science and Mathematics. Fire Protection Engineering

Case Study 1 Underground car park

Anatomy of a Fire. Christopher Crivello, MSFPE, PE. Douglas Nadeau, MSFPE, PE, CFPS, LEED AP

The Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning s general recommendations on the analytical design of a building s fire protection, BBRAD

A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBABILISTIC AND DETERMINISTIC MODELLING USED IN FIRECAM

Date: Place: Technical University of Denmark. Knowledge FOr Resilient society

How design fires can be used in fire hazard analysis

Applying the New Zealand Performance Based Design Fire Framework to Buildings Designed in Accordance with NFPA5000

ARCHIVED. C/VM2 Verification Method: Framework for Fire Safety Design For New Zealand Building Code Clauses C1-C6 Protection from Fire

Statue of Liberty: A Risk Analysis

Heat Release Rate of an Open Kitchen Fire of Small Residential Units in Tall Buildings

WHTM Welsh Health Technical Memorandum. Firecode Fire safety in the NHS. Part J: Guidance on fire engineering of healthcare premises

Virtual Compartment: An Alternative Approach to Means of Egress Design in Airport Pedestrian Tunnel

FRAM-ini A qualitative fire risk assessment method FRAME Erik De Smet

IJsbrand van Straalen, Ph.D. Senior scientist TNO The Netherlands

New developments in Nordic countries in fire safety engineering guidance

Comparative Evaluation Method for Fire Safety Design of Large Storage Spaces

Third Runway Project APM Depot Fire Engineering Design. Presented by Ir Wilson Sau-kit TSANG

Current Research at University of Naples

Application of the New Italian Fire Safety Code (D.M. 3 agosto 2015) to Case Study 3 Mall. Enrico Danzi Luca Fiorentini Luca Marmo Vincenzo Puccia

Active & Passive Fire Protection System. Page 1 Kalidasan S BT IN SSP-OP

Y. ORMIERES. Fire risk analysis method for nuclear installations

F.R.A.M.E. EVENT NETWORKS used in "FRAME".

On Estimating Heat Release Rate for a Design Fire in Sprinkler Protected Area

FINDINGS FROM FIRE TESTS IN TUNNEL CONSTRUCTIONS WITH VENTILATION SYSTEMS AND FIXED FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS

Are we using the wrong design fires for tall building fire strategies, in light of recent full height fires?

Is Prescription the Future of Performance-Based Design?

ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS

Construction Innovation Center Building 186

PERFORMANCE OF CLT ASSEMBLIES IN FIRE

COST-EFFECTIVE FIRE-SAFETY RETROFITS FOR CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICE BUILDINGS

( )

F.R.A.M.E. calculation report. This report is generated by the "FRAME for Windows program " The calculation is made for: Airport_building

26 June 2001 GUIDELINES ON ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR FIRE SAFETY

SMOKE MANAGEMENT AND EGRESS ANALYSIS OF A SPORTS ARENA USING THE PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN

Tunnel Fire Dynamics and Evacuation Simulations

BRE: Stay-put or Evacuate? Carl Sherwood BRE Fire Safety Group 22 nd July Part of the BRE Trust

ZONE MODEL VERIFICATION BY ELECTRIC HEATER

How to know if a residential or domestic water mist system is performance compliant to BS 8458:2015?

CAN THE CONE CALORIMETER BE USED TO PREDICT FULL SCALE HEAT AND SMOKE RELEASE CABLE TRAY RESULTS FROM A FULL SCALE TEST PROTOCOL?

Considerations in the Design of Smoke Management Systems for Atriums

Modelling Concepts for the Risk-cost Assessment Model FIRECAMTM and its Application to a Canadian Government Office Building

Practical problems of applying performance-based structural fire engineering in building design

The Italian National Guidelines for the fire safety of façades

Design of Fire safety in Multi Occupancy Residential Accommodation

Simple Equations for Predicting Smoke Filling Time in Fire Rooms with Irregular Ceilings

A New Zealand Case Study Building Design 11 th International Conference on Performance

C/VM2 Verification Method: Framework for Fire Safety Design For New Zealand Building Code Clauses C1-C6 Protection from Fire

FIRE PROTECTION AND SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR AN OFFICE HIGH RISE BUILDING. Fabio Mazza June 2016

Fire Scenarios Assessment

The Dutch Approach to the Escape from Large Compartments

Technical Information

Table EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE a OCCUPANCY SYSTEM SYSTEM. A, E, F-1, I-1, M, b,d R, S-1. B c. F-2, S-2, U c

Evacuation modelling: Comparison of (FDS + Evac) with Simulex

Research Needs for the Fire Safety Engineering Profession

FIRE DEPARTMENT - RULES FOR FIRE PROTECTION IN AUSTRIA

NHSScotland Firecode Scottish Health Technical Memorandum 81

Tampa, FL Fire Cause Classification Task Group Tue, 14 April 2011

Schueco Fire and Smoke Protection Systems

Calculation. Danish Concrete Institution DIFLAGER DIFT. Industry, plastics Concrete :51:00 13

Comment on Hawker Stall Fires

NFPA 45 NFPA 211 NFPA 1600

A tool to design steel elements submitted to compartment fires - OZone V2 Part 2: Methodology and application

CHANCES AND LIMITS OF THE TIME-EQUIVALENCE-METHOD IN STRUCTURAL FIRE DESIGN

Case Study 2 Production and Storage. SFPE Polish Chapter Wojciech Węgrzyński, Grzegorz Krajewski Building Research Institute (ITB)

UL268 7 th challenge with single infrared smoke detector

ANALYSIS OF SMOKE MOVEMENT IN A BUILDING VIA ELEVATOR SHAFTS

Fire Protection System and Life Safety Evaluation of Building X. Anthony W. Sublett

MEDIUM-DENSITY HOUSING # 7. Fire safety

RATIONAL FIRE SAFETY ENGINEERING APPROACH TO FIRE RESISTANCE OF BUILDINGS. CIB Report Publication 269. W014 Fire

Copy of article submitted to Fire Safety Engineering for publication January/February 2009

IFE Level 5 Diploma in Fire Engineering Design

MODULE DESCRIPTOR CREDIT VALUE

DCN: ENGINE COMPANY OPERATIONS CHAPTER 4 March 15, 1997 FIRE SCENE OPERATIONS

2015 SFPE Europe Conference on Fire Safety Engineering

BOABC Level III Exams 7, 8, 9 and 10 Beginning April 1, 2015

Passive fire protection. 6 Passive fire protection. 6.1 Fire compartmentation. Passive fire protection

Franz Evegren. Robust brandriskbedömning ur ett IMO-perspektiv

Residential ventilation concepts based on the idea of displacement airflow distribution

Commentary. for Building Code Clauses C1 C6 and Verification Method C/VM2

Smoke Master SMIA Compact pressurisation and smoke exhaust system

TUNPROTEC. Active Tunnel Fire Protection

and SUMMARY current building code provisions, and alternative

The Code of Practice for Fire Safety in Buildings 2011 It comprises 7 parts and 1 annex:

Will Clay Spring 2014

Ensuring safe passage HI-FOG for underground stations

BULLETIN: Subchapter 4 Retrofit Requirements for Nightclubs

Research on fire protection methods and a case study "Futurum"

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

Transcription:

Objective based approach Failure probabilities Introduction: fire safety objectives Example 1: personal safety Example 2: fire compartment 15-11-2017 1 Introduction RUUD VAN HERPEN Eindhoven University of technology: Fellow Fire Safety Engineering 0,2 fte Saxion University of applied sciences: Professor Fire safety in buildings 0,1 fte Nieman consulting engineers ANNEMARIE WEERSINK Saxion University of applied sciences: Researcher Smart Buildings Lecturer Building Physics and sustainability 2 1

Fire safety chain Pro-action Prevention (passive: building) (active: installation) (active: organization) Preparation Suppression (automatic: installation) (manual: organization) Aftercare 3 Fire safety chain Link TU/e with Dutch Fire Service Academy Prevention and suppression 15-11-2017 4 2

Fire safety chain Link TU/e with Dutch Fire Service Academy 15-11-2017 5 Definition of fire safety (Fire)safety in the Dutch building code: Personal safety of building users and fire fighters Protection of neighbouring plots and adjacent buildings NO Protection of environment and public space NO damage control NO sustainability/robustness 6 3

Building code: objectives Critical event fire start Pre flashover (localized fire): Safe egress in compartment Safe attack in compartment (offensive fire attack) 7 7 Building code: objectives Critical event flashover Post flashover (compartment fire): Safety of adjacent buildings and plots Safety of building (load bearing structure) Safety of fire and smoke spread (compartmentation) Safety of escape and attack routes Are fire safe buildings possible: - Without compartmentation? - Without escaperoutes? 4

Two examples: Objectives: assessment 1. Safe escape routes Probabilistic analysis for a large compartment: ASET > RSET (Available vs. Required safe egress time) 2. Safe fire compartments Probabilistic analysis for a retail function: AST > RST (Available vs. Required safe time in min. SFC) Assessment: Acceptable failure probability? Example 1: personal safety Combination of fire load and people in a large compartment; Pre-flashover situation is important for safety of building users: Markthal Rotterdam (example) ASET > RSET: ASET depends on smokelayer conditions RSET depends on evacuation process 5

Example 1: personal safety ASET: Assessment criterions: RSET: Smokefree height > 2,5 meter Smokelayer temperature < 200 o C Assessment criterion: 100 % of building occupants outside compartment ASET > RSET Market hall, large compartment Market hall, simplified model 10,000 m 2 floor area 7 m height P(fi) = 2. 10-6 per m 2 6

Market hall, boundary conditions Mean conditions for ASET (smokelayer calculations): Uniform distribution of fuel (NEN-EN 1991-1-2/NB): Fire load 900 MJ/m 2 RHR = 500 kw/m 2 Time constant tc = 150 s (fast) Plume = Heskestad Stoichiometric constant r = 1,27 (cellulose fuel) External separation constructions: adiabatic (except floor) Market hall, boundary conditions Mean conditions for RSET (evacuation calculations): Uniform distribution of people Number of people N = 3000 (mean) 3 exits available (mean) Walking speed = 1 m/s Detection time = 2 min. Pre movement time = 2 min. 7

Market hall, ASET 1000 Gas Temperature 900 800 700 600 500 400 Hot Zone Cold Zone 300 200 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time [min] Market hall, ASET 7.0 Zones Interface Elev ation 5.6 4.2 Elevation 2.8 1.4 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 Time [min] 8

Market hall, ASET and RSET ASET (H>2,5 m): ASET (T<200 o C): RSET (building occupants): 14.6 min 13.9 min 7.7 min ASET-RSET = 6.2 min Safe evacuation? Failure probability analysis Take into account uncertainty of boundary conditions (stochastic parameters) Calculate failure probability under fire conditons: P(f fi) = P (ASET RSET) < 0 Total failure probability: P(f) = P (fi) P(f fi) 9

Failure probability analysis Acceptable failure probability (eurocode EN 1990 c.a.): CC 2, lethality P(f) = 7.23 E-05 P(f fi) = 3.62 E-03 CBS Statline: fire injuries/fatalities = 14.5 CC 2, injuries P(f fi) = 5.25 E-02 Failure probability analysis Required: ASET-RSET > 7,3 min 10

Improving personal safety Active fire control: sprinkler system Source reduction improving ASET Active smoke control: smoke outlet system Increasing smokelayer buffering improving ASET Example 2: safe compartments Supermarket 1.000 m2 AST > RST: AST depends on fire resistance of separation construction RST depends on thermal load by a natural fire 11

Example 2: safe compartments AST: Assessment criterion: Thermal load standard fire curve Fire resistance 60 min. EIW (classification: EN 13501-2) RST: Assessment criterion: Thermal load natural fire curve Probability analysis reliability? AST > RST Supermarket, 1000 m2 Supermarket, simplified model 1,000 m 2 floor area 5 m height P(fi) = 2. 10-6 per m 2 12

Supermarket, boundary conditions Mean conditions for RST (natural fire calculations): Uniform distribution of fuel (NEN-EN 1991-1-2/NB): Fire load 900 MJ/m 2 RHR = 500 kw/m 2 (medium) Time constant tc = 150 s (fast) Plume = Heskestad Stoichiometric constant r = 1,27 (cellulose fuel) External separation constructions: Adiabatic Entrance facade open Supermarket, RST 13

Supermarket, RST and AST AST : RST : 60 min SFC 70.5 min SFC AST-RST = -10.5 min Safe compartmentation? Failure probability analysis Take into account uncertainty of boundary conditions (stochastic parameters): Fire Load (MJ/m 2 ) RHR (kw/m 2 ) Time constant (s) Height of fire source (m) Openings (m 2 ) Most important parameter? 14

Failure probability analysis AST: 60 min SFC, RST: 70.5 min SFC failure probability: 67.5 % Improving safety compartments Increase fire resistance of compartmentwall Active fire control (sprinkler system) Active smoke control (smoke outlet system) Or Manual suppression/cooling by fire service Without fire service: BURN DOWN SCENARIO in case of insufficient fire resistance compartmentwall 15

Adjoining separation constructions (facade, roof, floor) What did we forget? Openings (doors, ducts, windows) We need your expert judgement! Wall-roof details 16

Wall-facade details Your expert opinion please. https://play.kahoot.it/#/?quizid=12a18e30-08ce-4743-956f-f01d2b4cea35 www.kahoot.it 17