Northwest Corridor LRT Line to Irving/DFW. Mandalay Place HOA February 7, 2005

Similar documents
Northwest Corridor LRT Line to Irving/DFW Public Meeting No. 1 Project Overview

Mary Hills Nature Area. Roadway Lighting. The Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute

Elm Fork Land Use. Trinity River Corridor Project Committee May 13, 2013

Cotton Belt Regional Rail Corridor Project

Sustainable Development Call for Projects

Crenshaw Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis/EIS/EIR

Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2)

Meeting Display Boards for Public Hearing on the Wilson Transfer Station Project held Tuesday, February 18, 2014.

East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement

Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2)

Hopkins. Development Guidelines May Overview. Sponsored by: Blake Road Corridor Collaborative City of Hopkins

Welcome. to the 95th Street Terminal Improvement Project Public Hearing

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

LOS ANGELES MISSION COLLEGE MASTER PLAN Master Plan DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

Green Line North Centre City Alignment

D2 Subway Project Development. Stakeholder Committee October 24, 2018

Expo Line Transit Project. Project Status Update Meeting West End Corridor Segment C

APPENDIX D: Visual and Aesthetic Conditions for NCCU Station Refinement. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Cotton Belt Corridor Regional Rail

4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES

History: a Grand Urban Boulevard

Evaluation Criteria. Detailed Evaluation Criteria

Western Light Rail Transit Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study. Public Open House #2 25 April 2013

DESIGN PARAMETERS DESIGN OBJECTIVES. Design Focus and the Elements of the Corridor. Driver Confidence. Visual Organization.

SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Table 2-4: North Segment Alignment Analysis 2-21

Wiles Road from University Drive to Riverside Drive

U T D N o r t h C a m p u s T O D and D o w n t o w n D e n t o n T O D

4.13 Security and System Safety

The Urban Transit Challenge

Honorable Members of the Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure and Sustainability Committee

Equity and Environmental Justice B. MINORITY, ELDERLY, AND LOW INCOME POPULATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

Downtown Lead Revitalization Project Final Recommendations. Three Proposed Options for the Revitalization of Downtown Lead

Description of Preferred Alternative

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Bostwick Road. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre #2 June 14, City of London

Edmonton s LRT Setting the Stage for Heading Further South

Rosecrans/Marquardt Grade Separation Project. Community Open House Meeting

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of August 10, 2015

Open the. Possibilities. Discover the art along the Orange Line.

Cotton Belt Corridor. Area Focus Group (AFG) Richardson/Plano August 24, John Hoppie, Capital Planning

Welcome. Green Line LRT. Beltline Alignment Options. Stay engaged! Follow the Green Line story at calgary.ca/greenline

Welcome! MILLENNIUM LINE BROADWAY EXTENSION. Over the next 30 years, Metro Vancouver will welcome 1 million new residents and 600,000 new jobs.

Mount Dennis Mobility Hub Study Public Meeting December 12 th, :30pm 9:30pm York Memorial Collegiate, Cafeteria 2690 Eglinton Avenue West

Pine Hills Bus Transit Center Community Design Workshop. Presentation April 21, 2018

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

Good Neighbor Plan Dallas Love Field Airport Transportation and Environment Committee

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

Transit Terminal Design Surveillance Access Control - Territoriality. Ian Trites Supervisor Facilities and Architectural Design

April 21, 2007 CCRP Workshop Summary

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

Accessibility Improvement Study

Capital Improvement Program. Development Services Staff Recommended Projects

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

APPENDIX C Township 9 Consistency with Applicable Plans

7.0 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT

Corridor Management Committee. April 14, 2016

TIRZ 17/Redevelopment Authority Capital Improvements Plan Projects

1. Golf Course Residential Single Family and Townhome Community

Attachment D Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Technical Study Route Options Screening Analysis and Community Outreach Executive Summary April 2017

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS Book 2 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS INCLUDES ADDENDUMS

Pinellas County. Staff Report

Michigan City Alternative Analysis Realignment Study. Progress Status Update Report Presentation to City Council February 1, 2012

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Expo Light Rail Line. Expo Line Community Meeting Phase 2 Design Update November 2011

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY MIMP Condition Status Matrix: July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

D2 Subway Project Development. Public Meeting September 12, 2018

Jenifer Street Reconstruction Neighborhood Engagement Meeting November 4, 2015

Appendix D Community Impact Assessment

East Link Extension. June 28, South Bellevue Final Design Open House Public Involvement Summary

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

Lincoln Multi-Modal Center

Flooding Hearing: Long and Short Term Strategies

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

GUIDELINES. Transit Oriented Development. Approved by Edmonton City Council on February 15, 2012 in tandem with City Policy C565

Meeting Purpose: Date and Time: Location: Attendance: Handouts:

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

THE CITY OF WINNIPEG BY-LAW NO. 48/2014

2016 REVISIONS COMMENT FORM RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC WAY COMMENT PERIOD: JUNE 1 TO JUNE 30, 2015

Adelaide Street / Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) Grade Separation Class Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre 3

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PLAN CONCEPT... 3

Figure East End of 2 nd Street Tunnel

SOUTHWEST TRANSITWAY (STAGE 2) PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

City of Dallas Plans

Northwest LRT Downtown to. Northwest Edmonton Study. Public Workshops

9 th Street Sub Area Plan

Preliminary Recommendations Tk Takoma/Langley Crossroads Sector Plan

Request Alternative Compliance (Commercial Parking Lot in Restricted Area) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Ashby Moss

Retail Signage Options. Planning Commission Special Meeting February 19, 2015

Cotton Belt Corridor Regional Rail

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

Transcription:

Northwest Corridor LRT Line to Irving/DFW Mandalay Place HOA February 7, 2005

Agenda: Introductions North Lake College Station Issues from November Meeting Recommendations Q & A

Proposed Grade Separation Proposed Road Closure Proposed Grade Separation Proposed Parking Proposed Road Extension Proposed College Access North Lake College Station

NOVEMBER MEETING ISSUES Irving Issues: Explain how Mandalay Place streets became privatized? Can Mandalay Place streets become public? Alignment Considerations: Move Rail alignment further south Put Rail Underground

Brangus Issues: Can Brangus Remain Open What becomes of Brangus ROW if severed? (Sidewalks?) What will prevent confused motorist from driving through Mandalay Place? Impact Issues: How will DART address visual impacts? How will construction impact homes? What can be done to mitigate impacts of lighting? How will DART address neighborhood safety?

Information Requests: Does DART understand the soil conditions? How will soil affect construction? What are the LRT travel times? Request for fare evasion information Request to be kept current on design changes Can DART provide a Gated Community?

Irving Issues: Mandalay Place was originally platted in 1983 with private streets Streets do not meet City of Irving Standards for Public Streets

Alignment Considerations: Move Rail alignment further south A. Adjust alignment south to pull away from Mandalay Place B. Place LRT alignment within Brangus ROW going west C. Move alignment deeper into North Lake Campus A B C

A. Adjust Adjust alignment south to pull away from Mandalay Place Tight fit, further constricts platform, bus and parking (Fatal Flaw) Adds undesirable curves Increases Property Acquisition w/limited utility Not Preferred by North Lake

B. Brangus Place LRT alignment within Brangus ROW Very Problematic (Many Fatal Flaws) Limited ROW Profile issues Access issues Grade Separation? Crossings Displacements Tight Fit Parking/Buses Remain Traffic Impacts Expensive? 550 550

C. Campus Move alignment into North Lake Campus Operationally inferior: Adds curves, travel time, length, unnecessary crossings Divides campus (Not wanted by North Lake) North Lake Providing ROW Significantly alters existing infrastructure Uses much additional ROW Does not fit Campus Master Plan Cumulative Fatal Flaws

Tunnel Put alignment Underground Tunnel is not considered mitigation Tunnel only used when dictated by terrain, ROW or extreme circumstance Tunnel construction increases impacts Station surface elements include: Parking, mezzanine, buses, vertical access, ventilation Terrain would likely preclude tunnel Very expensive Cumulative Fatal Flaws

Proposed Alignment Uses Route reserved for DFW Access Operationally Superior Best Meets Station/LRT Requirements Campus Perimeter Serves Campus/Residential Does not divide campus: Fits Campus Master Plan Minimal infrastructure impact Segregates Residential/Station/Campus 400 LF Mandalay Place Adjacency 60,000 LF DART Residential Adjacency Impacts can be mitigated Cost Effective

Brangus Issues: Can Brangus Remain Open? Additional LRT Crossing Separating parking from platform is undesirable Crossing signals generate significant noise Station would generate high traffic volumes on Brangus Rail Profile does not match Brangus Profile Impacts can be mitigated

Brangus Issues: What becomes of Brangus ROW if severed at LRT? TBD (Many Options) Pedestrian way? Green space? Kiss & Ride? Cul de Sac? K&R

Brangus Issues: What will prevent confused motorists from driving through Mandalay Place? Depends on Disposition of Brangus Signage Placement of Cul de Sac No repeat offenders

Impact Issues: How will DART address visual impacts? Determine noise impact/mitigation (Sound Wall?) Standard LRT Visual Mitigation Trees spaced appropriately to break up views Vegetation to mitigate identified visual impacts Station Design May include buffer Station Standards/Irving Development Code Landscaping requirement Residential Betterments Policy Mandalay Place to be part of Art & Design Tree Preservation/Removal Permit Walnut Hill At-Grade vs. Grade Separation?

Walnut Hill At-Grade Walnut Hill Lane Crossing At-Grade vs. Aerial Addresses Visual Impacts Reduces LRT Profile Other Considerations Traffic Noise

405+50 (100 St. Croix Green) 405+50 (100 St. Croix Green) At-Grade Walnut Hill Ariel Walnut Hill

409+00 (1220 St. Monet) 409+00 (1220 St. Monet) At-Grade Walnut Hill Ariel Walnut Hill

How will construction impact homes? Identified Impacts will be mitigated Short term Construction Impacts Noise Dust Disruptions Long term Impacts Visual Changes Traffic Pattern Changes Improved Transit Potential to Improve Property Values www.dart.org/economicdevelopment.asp

What can be done to mitigate impacts of lighting? Irving Development Standards & DART Design Standards protect Residential neighborhoods Light Reflected away from Residential Property Minimize Pole Height Limit Brightness Sensitive Design Experience: DART has many facilities with Residential Adjacency Response to Complaints

How will DART address neighborhood safety? Transit Police Pilot Video Surveillance Program Emergency Call Boxes CPTED Homeland Security Initiatives DART Education Responsive to Specific Issues Work with Local Jurisdictions Irving Police Campus Police

Information Requests: Does DART understand the soil conditions? (How will soil affect construction?) Geotechnical Information is gathered at all levels of Design: Existing Conditions, PE, Final Design, Construction DART/Consultants/Contractors highly experienced with all soil conditions Rely of experience of others: City of Irving/TxDOT/ NTTA/ DFW

Approximate LRT Travel Times (Minutes) North Lake To: DFW (Future):10-15 Love Field: 17 AAC/Victory: 24 West End/CBD: 27 Mockingbird: 37 Richardson: 55 Plano: 63 2.50 1.75 1.75 2.25 North Lake To: (With Transfer) Deep Ellum: 36 Dallas Zoo: 36 Fair Park: 38 Carrollton: 39 Garland: 55 2.00 2.00 1.50 3.25

Fare Evasion Information Most of DART s LRT Customers use Monthly or Yearly Passes DART uses a barrier-free honor system Spot Checks Exact Ridership/Fare Compliance? Sampling indicates 98% Compliance 98%

Request to be kept current on design changes Public Involvement Process PE/EIS: Periodic Meetings Public Hearing Final Design: 30%, 65% & 95% Design Residential Betterments Construction: Periodic Meetings Extensive Public Information Mandalay Place: As Requested As design changes

Can DART provide a Gated Community? DART is limited in what it can provide Mitigation: Only mitigate identified impacts (Per Policy) Equity: Cannot provide more or less than elsewhere in LRT System Residential Betterments might be used Requires Board Approval $70 per linear foot (escalated) Would preclude other uses (screening, landscaping, vegetation) Would not include operation

Recommendations: DART with the City of Irving & North Lake College Proposes: Implementing LRT and Station along perimeter of North Lake as originally presented Realigning Brangus? Proposed Road Closure Proposed Grade Separation Proposed Parking Proposed Road Extension Proposed College Access

To Be Determined: 1. Final Mitigation of identified impacts (Per FEIS Standards) 2. Residential Betterments 3. Disposition of Brangus (DART will work with Mandalay Place) 4. Level of Station Access desired by Mandalay Place 5. Disposition of Walnut Hill Crossing 5 1 2 3 4

Neighborhood/Station Setting: Setting can incorporate many features Visual Mitigation: Sound Wall (If warranted) LRT Mitigation Station Mitigation Development Standards Tree Preservation Art & Design Program Residential Betterments Lower Profile: (At-Grade Walnut Hill Lane) Varying Degrees of Access Residential Betterments

Sound Wall (If warranted) Tree Preservation?

LRT Mitigation Station Mitigation Art & Design Program Development Standards

Access

North Lake College Station Q & A 409+00 (1220 St. Monet) www.dart.org/nwdfwcorridor.asp www.dart.org/economicdevelopment.asp