Aquatic Vegetation of Big Swan Lake Todd County, Minnesota (DOW ) June 3, 4, 15, 2004

Similar documents
Aquatic Vegetation of Edward Lake Crow Wing County, Minnesota (DOW ) July 8, 9, 14, 26; August 2, 2004

Serpent Lake (DOW # )

Latimer Lake (DOW # )

Fish Trap Lake (ID # )

Farm Island Lake (DOW # )

Aquatic Vegetation of Norway Lake (DOW ) Cass County, Minnesota May 27 and 28, 2008

Upper South Long Lake (ID # ) and Lower South Long Lake (ID # )

Aquatic Vegetation of Grace Lake (DOW ) Hubbard County, Minnesota July 24 and 25, 2006

Aquatic vegetation of Grand Lake

Aquatic Vegetation Survey of Upper, Middle and Lower Cullen Lakes Crow Wing County, Minnesota 2007

Aquatic vegetation of Roemhildts Lake

Aquatic Vegetation of Ten Mile Lake (DOW ) Cass County, Minnesota June 2006

Aquatic Vegetation Survey of Boy Lake (DOW ) Cass County, Minnesota

Aquatic vegetation of Cross Lake

Trout Lake (DOW # )

To whom it may concern:

Aquatic Vegetation Surveys of Pleasant Lake (DOW ) Cass County, Minnesota

memo Project Name Spider Lake Point Intercept Survey 2017 Date 9/5/17 To / Contact info Jerry Spetzman Cc / Contact info Greg Graske, PE

Aquatic Vegetation of Ban Lake St. Louis County, Minnesota (DOW ) August 3-4, 2004

2015 Aquatic Plant Surveys

2017 Assessment of Native Plants in Treatment Plots

Aquatic Vegetation of Little Sand Lake ( ) and Sand Lake ( ) Cass County, Minnesota July 11-12, 2006

Aquatic Vegetation of Big Pine Lake

Aquatic vegetation of Whitefish Lake

Lake Mansfield 2012 Aquatic Vegetation Survey

Aquatic vegetation of Pelican Lake

Aquatic Vegetation of George Lake

Aquatic Vegetation of Round Lake

memo Project Name Little Lake Point Intercept Survey 2017 Date 9/5/17 To / Contact info Jerry Spetzman Cc / Contact info Greg Graske, PE

WELCOME. Scott Provost Water Resources Specialist - WDNR Wisconsin Rapids, WI

Aquatic Vegetation of Borden Lake

Saugus River Watershed Invasive Aquatic Vegetation Assessment

Fact Sheet Series Potamogeton crispus 1 CURLY LEAF PONDWEED. An Invasive Plant heading towards Manitoba: Potomogeton crispus

Aquatic Macrophyte Survey for Lower Turtle Lake Barron County, Wisconsin WBIC:

Designation of Critical Habitat Areas Bear Lake, Portage County. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Eau Claire, WI

Identification and Control of Common Invasive and Nuisance Vegetation in Stormwater Management Systems

Wycamp Lake Aquatic Plant Survey 2006 by Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council

Aquatic Macrophyte Survey of the St. Croix/Gordon Flowage Douglas County, Wisconsin JANUARY 2008

Fact Sheet Series 1 FLOWERING RUSH. An Invasive Plant Found in Manitoba: Butomus umbellatus

RappFLOW Pond Workshop

Public Information Meeting on Aquatic Plant Management: Lakes Mendota, Monona, Wingra, Waubesa, and Kegonsa. October 2 and 9, :00-8:30 p.m.

APPENDIX E AQUATIC WEED CONTROL. Revision 5

Natural Shorelines. for Inland Lakes. A Landowner s Guide to using. to STABLIZE SHORELINES, Michigan s inland lakeshore.

NEIGHBORHOOD WATER RESOURCES ENHANCEMENT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes. Introduction. Workshop for Property Owners. Photo by Jane Herbert

Designation of Critical Habitat Areas Jacqueline Lake, Portage County. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Eau Claire, WI

A Cooperative Effort Between:

Project Initiated by: Burnett County Land and Water Conservation Department, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and the Ham Lake Association

NW SE 42 wetland

Plant Propagation Protocol for Potamogeton amplifolius ESRM 412 Native Plant Production

Wisconsin NRCS Direct Volume Method Bank Recession Rate Categorizations

The Effects of the Contact Herbicide Diquat on Mixed Stands of Flowering Rush and Hardstem Bulrush in Lake Sallie, Minnesota 2015

Quantitative Plant Surveys: Arcadia and Metacomet Lakes

2015 Report. Adirondack Aquatic Regional Response Team. Adirondack Watershed Institute Paul Smith s College P.O. Box 265 Paul Smiths, NY 12970

Curly-leaf Pondweed and Full Warm Water Point/Intercept Macrophyte Surveys Fawn Lake Spider Chain (WBIC: ) Sawyer County, Wisconsin

Guidelines for Designing Wildlife Friendly Ponds

Myriophyllum aquaticum. Parrot feather milfoil

Service Learning Project. Bender Park

Site Preparation. What to Look for in a Vegetation Implementation Plan. Plant Community Goals (restoration checklist) Plant Community Goals

Eleanor Burkett. Smart Landscaping to prevent spread of AIS

Meadowbrook Condominium Association c/o Mr. Scott Locke 7868 Ashbrook Drive Haslett, MI

Draft Mayflower Lake Management Plan. Goal: Reach a balance between high quality, unimpeded recreation and a healthy, balanced aquatic plant community

Lake Nokomis Shoreline Enhancement Project

BACKYARD POND. Backyard Pond. A pond or water garden will likely become the focal point for all your backyard conservation.

Aquatic Plant Surveys in the Bureau of Land Management, Medford District,

A Field Guide to Common Aquatic Plants of Pennsylvania

Syfeld Keene Associates

Lakefront Revegetation

Table 1. Physical Characteristics of Your Lake.

Flowering Rush (Butomus umbellatus)

Quita Sheehan Conservation Specialist Vilas County Land and Water Conservation Dept.

ME DOT Route 3. File No.: City and State: Bar Harbor, ME

Storm Water Quality and Shoreline Restoration Improvements - Grant Funding Request City of Mound Carlson Park Bolton & Menk Project No.

PLANTS FOR LAKEFRONT REVEGETATION

Final Coastal Lakes Aquatic Plant Survey Report

Glyphosate Applications MPRB NATURAL RESOURCES

BLACK CREEK VALLEY CONNECTION SIGNIFICANT WETLAND CONNECTION PROPOSED OFFSITE NATURAL AREAS MANAGEMENT STRATEGY BLACK CREEK WATERSHED

Please find the latest bioassessment for your lake below. Key highlights of this update include:

Module 1 ~ Silent Invaders (MS/HS) Emersed Plants Reading Activity

There are 11 different micro-ecosystems that are found in 76 different areas throughout Stoneybrook. They are divided into three major groups.

In addition to adding height, color and texture to your pond / water garden...

Phase 1 Habitat Replacement & Reconstruction

BASS PONDS, MARSH, & WETLAND HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT

Maintaining Your Sparkle. Maintenance Issues. by Kathy Danforth

is the Cree word for beautiful

Problem aquatic plants

Aquatic Weed Management: Control Methods

Gregory J. Bugbee Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Department of Environmental Sciences Invasive Aquatic Plant Program

Hunts Point Landing, Bronx, New York

Benefits of Native Vegetation. Presented by: Mary Beth Falsey DuPage County Senior Wetland Technician

Healthy Living Strategy: Shorelines

Water plants. function. management AND

Lake Ogallala Bathometric Project

Ponds of. Ballantrae

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

NATURAL LAKE & STREAMBANK PROTECTION & NATURAL BUFFERS. By Sam Martin, Water Management Specialist, Pine SWCD

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Herb Robert (Geranium robertianum) (Family Geraniaceae Geranium Family)

las vegas wash coordination committee

Environmental Laboratory. Propagation and Establishment of Native Plants for Vegetative Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems ERDC/EL TR-13-9

2012 Lake Puckaway EPS Planting Report Andrew Sabai November 2012

Transcription:

Aquatic Vegetation of Big Swan Lake Todd County, Minnesota (DOW 77-0023-00) June 3, 4, 15, 2004 N 200 0 200 400 Meters Report by: Donna Perleberg Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological Services 1601 Minnesota Dr., Brainerd, MN 56401 Phone: 218.833.8727 Fax: 218.828.6043 Email: donna.perleberg@dnr.state.mn.us COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005

Acknowledgements Big Swan Lake (77-0023-00) Todd Co. 2004 Vegetation Survey Lake sampling: Donna Perleberg, MnDNR Division of Ecological Services, Brainerd Joe Backowski, MnDNR Division of Ecological Services, Brainerd Data Entry/ Analysis / Maps: Donna Perleberg, Nicole Brown, Patrick McGowan, MnDNR Division of Ecological Services, Brainerd Report review: Audrey Kuchinski, MnDNR Fish and Wildlife Division, Aquatic Plant Management Specialist, Little Falls. Report contributions: Emergent vegetation mapping was conducted in 2000 and 2001 by Carl Bublitz, MnDNR, Little Falls Area Fisheries. Funding: Collection of these data was made possible by support from the Heritage Enhancement Fund. This report should be cited as: Perleberg, D. 2005. Aquatic vegetation of Big Swan Lake, Todd County, Minnesota (DOW 77-0023-00), June 3, 4, 15, 2004. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Ecological Services Division, 1601 Minnesota Dr., Brainerd, MN 56401. Summary Big Swan Lake, (DOW 77-0023-00), Todd County, Minnesota is an example of a eutrophic lake where the non-native species, curly-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus) dominates. Curly-leaf pondweed was present in 64 percent of the sample sites during the 2004 survey and was the most common species at all water depths sampled. Submerged plants were found to a depth of 24 feet but lower water clarity limits most native submerged vegetation to water depths of ten feet and less. Common native submerged plants include star duckweed (Lemna trisulca), muskgrass (Chara sp.), coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum), narrow-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton sp.) and flat-stem pondweed (Potamogeton zosteriformis). COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 2 of 14

Introduction Lake Description Big Swan Lake (DOW 77-0023-00) is located about five miles west of the town of Swanville in Todd County, Minnesota. It occurs within the ecological region known as the Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province, which is the transition zone between the western prairie region and the true forested region to the northeast (Fig. 1). Prior to European settlement, the upland area around Big Swan Lake was predominantly forested with a mix of sugar maple, basswood and other hardwoods and some opening of tallgrass prairie. Figure 1. Location of Big Swan Lake, (77-0023-00) Todd Co., MN Tallgrass Aspen Parklands Prairie Parkland Laurentian Mixed Forest ÊÚ Eastern Broadleaf Forest Big Swan Lake Today, within the subwatershed that includes Big Figure 2. Land use within the subwatersheds containing Big Swan Lake (77-0023-00) and Schwanke Creek. Swan River N 0 0.5 1 Miles Schwanke Cr. Big Swan Lake Long Buck Lady Trace Mound COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 3 of 14

Swan Lake, about 65 percent of the area is classified as cropland or grassland, while only 11 percent is upland forest (Fig. 2.). Big Swan Lake receives flow from Schwanke Creek to the west and several other minor tributaries (Fig. 2). Swan River flows from the north end of Big Swan Lake and eventually to the Mississippi River. Figure 3. Water depth contours of Big Swan Lk (77-0023-00) Photo source: FSA 2003. depth data:: MnDNR 1973. Water depth contours 45 ft 40 ft 30 ft 20 ft 10 ft 5 ft r Public access Big Swan Lake has a surface area of about 918 acres, which does not include the extensive areas of cattail marsh that occur along shore. The lake has a maximum depth of about 45 feet and about 44 percent of the lake is less than 15 feet deep (Fig. 3). The lake is described as eutrophic (high nutrients) with low water clarity as indicated by the 1992 to 2004 mean summer Secchi depth of 6.7 feet (MPCA 2004). The lakeshore is mix of residential homes, agricultural land, wetlands and small woodlots. A state owned public access is on the southeast side of the lake. Vegetation Survey Objectives The purpose of the 2004 survey of Big Swan Lake is to describe the current aquatic plant community including: 1) Estimate the maximum depth of rooted vegetation 2) Estimate the percent of the lake occupied by rooted vegetation 3) Record the aquatic plant species that occur in the lake 4) Estimate frequencies of occurrence of individual species 5) Develop maps of the distribution of the common species N 0 200 400 Meters r Data from the 2004 vegetation survey can be used to monitor annual changes in the native and non-native plant species composition and may also be used to guide vegetation management decisions. COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 4 of 14

Methods Figure 4. 2004 Vegetation survey sites in Big Swan Lake (77-0023-00). Point-Intercept Survey 20 ft contour 2004 vegetation survey sites N 0 200 400 Meters A Point-intercept vegetation survey of Big Swan Lake was conducted on July 3, 4, and 15, 2004 following the methodology described by Madsen (1999). At a minimum, we wanted to sample 100 points within the vegetated zone and place sample points no further than 100 meters apart for mapping purposes. Sample points were established in using ArcView GIS program using a 90 meter by 90 meter grid across the lake surface. In the field, surveyors decided not to sample in depths greater than 25 feet because they consistently were not finding vegetation beyond the 24 feet depth. As a result, 219 sites were actually sampled (Fig. 4). Survey waypoints were created and downloaded into a Garmin GPS. The GPS unit was used to navigate the boat to each sample point. One side of the boat was designated as the sampling area. At each site, water depth was recorded in one foot increments using a measured stick in water depths less than eight feet and an electronic depth finder in water depths greater than eight feet. The surveyors recorded all plant species found within a one meter squared sample site at the pre-designated side of the boat. A double-headed, weighted garden rake, attached to a rope was used to survey vegetation not visible from the surface (Fig. 5). If curly-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus) was present at a site, surveyors recorded whether or not it formed surface mats at that site. Nomenclature followed Crow and Hellquist (2000). Voucher specimens were collected for most plant species and are stored at the MnDNR in Brainerd. Data were entered into a Microsoft Access database and frequency of occurrence was calculated for each species as the number of sites in which a species occurred divided by the COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 5 of 14

total number of sample sites. Figure 5. Rake used to sample vegetation Example: There were 219 sample sites. Curly-leaf pondweed occurred in 141 of those sample sites. Frequency of curly-leaf pondweed = 141 / 219 = 64 percent Frequency was calculated for the entire sampled zone (0 to 25 feet) and sampling points were also grouped by water depth and separated into five depth zones for analysis: 0 to 5 feet, and 6 to 10 feet, 11 to 15 feet, 16 to 20 feet and 21 to 25 feet. Emergent vegetation mapping Beds of emergent and floating-leaf vegetation were mapped by MnDNR Fisheries staff in 2000 and 2001. Surveyors boated around the perimeter of each plant bed and marked the bed outline using a hand-held GPS. Emergent plant species present in each bed were recorded along with an estimate of abundance. Results Maximum depth of vegetation and distribution with water depth In Big Swan Lake, plants occurred to a depth of 24 feet, but were most common in depths from shore to 15 feet where 99 percent of all sites contained vegetation (Fig. 6). In the zone from 16 feet to 20 feet, 50 percent of the sites were vegetated and from 21 to 24 feet, only 33 percent of the sites contained plants. Types of aquatic plants Figure 6. Frequency of plants vs. water depth. Big Swan Lake (77-0023-00), June 3,4, 15, 2004. found Twenty-seven native aquatic 100% plants species were located during the 2004 Big Swan 80% Lake survey, including five emergent, three floatingleaved 60% and 20 submerged species (Table 1). One nonnative 40% submerged species, curly-leaf pondweed 20% (Potamogeton crispus) was 0% identified in the lake. 0 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 21 to 25 The water depth zone from Percent of sites with vegetation water depth (ft) COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 6 of 14

Table 1. Aquatic Plants of Big Figure Swan 7. Lake, Total number Todd County and types (77-0023-00) of species at each water depth interval. June 3, 4, 15 2004 Big Swan Lake (77-0023-00) June 2004. Frequency calculated for sampled zone (shore to 25 feet depth) submerged- Frequency anchored = percent free-floating of sites in floating which species emergents occurred 219 sample sites total number of species 30 Life Forms Common Name Scientific Name Frequenc SUBMERGED These plants grow primarily under the water surface. Upper leaves may float near the surface and flowers may extend above the surface. Plants are usually rooted or anchored to the lake bottom. 25 Curly-leaf 20 pondweed Potamogeton crispus (v) 64 Star duckweed 15 Lemna trisulca. 33 Muskgrass Chara sp. 23 10 Coontail Ceratophyllum demersum 23 Narrow-leaf 5pondweed Potamogeton sp. 19 Flat-stem pondweed 0 Potamogeton zosteriformis 13 Northern watermilfoil 0 to 5 Myriophyllum 6 to 10 11 sibiricum to 15 (v) 16 to 20 6 21 to 25 White water buttercup Ranunculus sp. 6 White-stem pondweed Potamogeton water praelongus depth (ft) 5 Clasping-leaf pondweed Potamogeton richardsonii (v) 5 Sago pondweed Stuckenia pectinata 3 Greater bladderwort Utricularia vulgaris 3 Water stargrass Zosterella dubia 2 Water moss Drepanocladus sp. (v) 2 Illinois pondweed Potamogeton illinoensis (v) 1 Large-leaf pondweed Potamogeton amplifolius (v) 1 Water marigold Megaladonta beckii <1 Wild celery Vallisneria americana <1 Ribbon-leaf pondweed Potamogeton epihydrus (v) present* Marestail Hippuris vulgaris (v) present y FLOATING These plants are rooted in the lake bottom and have leaves that float on the water surface. Many have colorful flowers that extend above the water EMERGENT These plants extend well above the water surface and are usually found in shallow water, near shore. Yellow waterlily Nuphar variegata 7 White waterlily Nymphaea odorata 3 Floating-leaf pondweed Potamogeton natans (v) present Bulrush Scirpus acutus** (v) 20 Wild Rice Zizania palustris (v) 3 Cattail Typha sp. 1 Cane Phragmites australis <1 Arrowhead Sagittaria sp. (v) present * present indicates plant was found during survey but did not occur within a specific sample site. ** Scirpus acutus was identified in the lake but it is not known if all bulrush were S. acutus. Therefore, SCS = Scirpus sp. was entered in database. COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 7 of 14

Figure 7. Distribution of aquatic plants in Big Swan Lake (77-0023-00) June 2004. S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S N 0 200 400 Meters vegetation present vegetation absent floating-leaf beds emergent beds 20 ft contour to five feet contained the most species and number of species found decreased with increasing water depth (Fig. 6). Emergents, floating and seven of the submerged species were restricted to this shallow depth zone. Only five submerged species were found in depths greater than ten feet. In depths greater than 15 feet, only two submerged species were found. Emergent and floating-leaved plants Emergent species occupy the shallowest zone, from wet, moist shoreline soils to approximately five feet deep. Emergent species help minimize shoreline erosion by stabilizing soils and dissipating wave action. The most common emergent species in Big Swan Lake were Cattail (Typha sp.) and Bulrush (Scirpus spp.). Extensive cattail stands occur along the northeast and southwest shores and large bulrush beds are found in both the south and north basins of Big Swan Lake (Fig. 7). Floating-leaved plants occurred at several locations around the lake to a depth of about five feet (Fig. 7). Yellow waterlily (Nuphar variegata) occurred in seven percent of the sample sites while white waterlily (Nymphaea odorata) was found in three percent. Within the zone from shore to five feet, floating-leaved species were found in 18 percent of the sample sites. Non-native submerged species Curly-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus) (Fig. 8) is a non-native submerged species that was confirmed in Big Swan Lake during the 2004 survey, but has likely been present in the lake for several years. This species has been present in Minnesota since at least 1910 (Moyle and Hotchkiss COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 8 of 14

1945) and is now found in at least 700 Minnesota lakes (Invasive Species Program 2005). It is closely related to native pondweeds, such as flatstem pondweed, but it has a unique life cycle that, in some lakes gives it a competitive advantage over the native species. Figure 8. Curly-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus) (photo source: Univ of Florida Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants Curly-leaf pondweed is actually dormant during late summer and begins new growth in early fall (Fig. 9). Winter foliage is produced and continues to grow under ice (Wehrmeister and Stuckey, 1978). Curlyleaf reaches its maximum growth in May and June, when water temperatures are still too low for most native plant growth. In late spring and early summer, curly-leaf plants form structures called turions which are hardened stem tips that break off and fall to the substrate. Turions remain dormant through the summer and germinate into new plants in early fall (Catling and Dobson, 1985). In Big Swan Lake, curly-leaf pondweed was the most abundant species, occurring in 64 percent of the sample sites (Table 1). Curly-leaf was widespread in distribution around Big Swan Lake and formed surface mats at 38 percent of the sites (Fig. 10) at depths from four to 15 feet. It was found from shore to a depth of 23 feet and was most frequent in depths from six to 15 feet, where it occurred in 95 percent of the sample sites (Fig. 11). At each depth interval, curly-leaf pondweed was the most abundant species (Fig. 11). Figure 9. Life cycle of Curly-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus). Winter Spring Late Spring Summer Fall Winter Plants Plants Plants begin Turions Turions Newly Continue reach to die back remain germinate sprouted Growing maximum and form dormant plants under ice growth turions continue growth COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 9 of 14

Native submerged and free-floating species Star duckweed (Lemna trisulca) is a free-floating species that often occurs submerged near the lake bottom but it does not anchor to the substrate and can float freely with the current. This was the most common native species within Big Swan Lake and was found in 33 percent of the sample sites (Table 1). It was found to a depth of 24 feet, deeper than any other plant species in the lake. Star duckweed was most abundant in depths from shore to five feet where it occurred in 51 percent of the sites (Fig. 11). Muskgrass (Chara sp.) is a macroscopic, or large, algae that is common in many hardwater Minnesota lakes. It has brittle texture and a characteristic musky odor. Because this species does not form true stems, it is a low-growing plant, often found entirely beneath the water surface where it may form low carpets on the lake bottom. Muskgrass is adapted to variety of substrates and is often the first species to invade open areas of lake bottom where it can act as a sediment stabilizer. In Big Swan Lake, muskgrass was found in 23 percent of the survey sites (Table 1) but was restricted to depths of ten feet and less. It was most frequent in water depths up to five feet (Fig 11). Coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum) grows entirely submerged and is adapted to a broad range of lake conditions, including turbid water. Coontail is perennial and can overwinter as a green plant under the ice and then begins new growth early in the spring. It is loosely rooted to the lake bottom and spreads primarily by stem fragmentation. In Big Figure 10. Distribution and abundance of curly-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus) in Big Swan Lake, Todd Co. (77-00-2300), June 3, 4, 15, 2004. N 0 200 400 Meters matted curly-leaf plants curly-leaf present, not matted 20 ft contour COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 10 of 14

Figure 11. Frequency of common aquatic plants vs. water depth. Big Swan Lake, Todd Co. (77-0023-00), June 3, 4, 15, 2004. 1.0 frequency of occurrence 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Flat-stem pondweed Coontail Chara Curly-leaf pondweed Star Duck Narrow-leaf pondweed 0.0 0 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 21 to 25 water depth (ft) Swan Lake it occurred in 23 percent of the sites (Table 1). It was also restricted to depths of 10 feet and les and was most common in depths of five feet and less (Fig. 11). Narrow leaf pondweed (Potamogeton sp.) is a rooted, perennial submerged plant with small, thin leaves. Leaves grow entirely below the water surface but flowers extend above the water. This plant also overwinters as rhizomes and winter buds. There are several different types of pondweeds that are included in this general group and without fruit or flowers they are difficult to distinguish. Narrow-leaf pondweeds were found in 19 percent of the sample sites in Big Swan Lake (Table 1). This plant occurred to a depth of 15 feet, but was most common in depths of five feet and less (Fig. 11). Flat-stem pondweed (Potamogeton zosteriformis) is a rooted, perennial submerged plant with flattened, grass-like leaves. Depending on water clarity and depth, it may reach the water surface in areas of lakes and its flower stalk may extend above the water. It overwinters by rhizome and winter buds and does not grow well in turbid lakes. In Big Swan Lake, it was found in 13 percent of the sites surveyed in 2004 (Table 1), occurring to a maximum depth of ten feet but most frequent in depths less than six feet (Fig. 11). Distribution maps for curly-leaf pondweed and the five most common submerged species are shown in Fig. 12. COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 11 of 14

Figure 12. Distribution of common submerged plants, Big Swan Lake, Todd County, (77002300), June 3, 4, 15, 2004. Curly-leaf pondweed Star Duckweed Muskgrass Coontail Narrow-leaf Pondweed Flatstem Pondweed S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S Discussion Light availability is one of the greatest factors that influences submerged vegetation. Curly-leaf pondweed may be able to dominate the plant community of Big Swan Lake because it reaches it maximum growth in early spring, before water clarity declines in the lake. Additionally, curlyleaf pondweed is better adapted to lower clarity than are many of the native plant species. The native submerged plants that are common in the lake are most abundant in shallow waters in depths less than six feet, where adequate sunlight reaches the lake bottom. The lake supports a relatively high number of native species but they are present in low abundance compared to the non-native curly-leaf pondweed. Once introduced into a lake, curly-leaf pondweed does not always become the dominant species. For example, curly-leaf has been present in Mound Lake, to the southeast of Big Swan (Fig. 2) for at least 20 years but it occurs in only eight percent of the sample sites (Perleberg, 2005). One factor that may contribute to the low abundance of curly-leaf in Mound Lake is a more abundant native plant community, which may be due in part to higher water clarity related to a relatively intact shoreland buffer zone of forested land around Mound Lake. COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 12 of 14

Management of curly-leaf pondweed alone will not likely result in a healthy native plant community in Big Swan Lake. Water clarity will likely need to increase before native plant species can grow more abundantly. In general, factors that may lead to change in native and non-native aquatic plant communities include: Change in water clarity Light availability is a significant factor limiting plant distribution and abundance. The amount of light available to submersed aquatic plants is typically dependent on both water clarity and depth. Excess nutrients, such as elevated phosphorus levels, often result in nuisance algal levels that contribute to decreased water clarity. If Big Swan Lake water clarity increases, submerged aquatic plant growth would be expect to increase also. Snow cover Curly-leaf pondweed, in particular, may fluctuate in abundance in response to snow cover. Many native submerged plants also have the ability to grow under the ice, particularly if there is little snow cover and sunlight reaches the lake bottom. In years following low snow cover, curly-leaf and some native submerged plants may increase in abundance. Water temperatures / length of growing season In years with cool spring temperatures, submerged plants may be less abundant than in years with early springs and prolonged warm summer days. Aquatic plant management activities Herbicide and mechanical control of aquatic plants can directly impact the aquatic plant community. Monitoring these control activities can help insure that non-target species are not negatively impacted. Shoreland management activities Water quality improvements that lead to increased water clarity would benefit the submerged aquatic plant community. Information is available on how to minimize disturbance to the aquatic environment through the use of shoreline best management practices. These include minimizing activities that contribute to eutrophication (highnutrient lake with poor water quality due to nuisance algal blooms) such as fertilizing lawns and malfunctioning septic systems, both of which add nutrients to a lake. A strip of shoreline vegetation provides a buffer zone between the lake and developed residential areas. Benefits include minimizing soil erosion from wave action while the plants uptake excess nutrients that may otherwise flow into the lake. Information on restoring shoreland buffer zones can be found at: lakescaping and shoreline restoration. The 2004 vegetation survey gives a snapshot of the Big Swan Lake conditions. Data collected during the 2004 survey can be compared to future quantitative surveys of Big Swan Lake to better estimate how the plant community may be changing. Monitoring changes in aquatic plant communities can help reflect changes in the overall water quality of the lake and watershed. COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 13 of 14

Literature Cited Big Swan Lake (77-0023-00) Todd Co. 2004 Vegetation Survey Catling, P.M. and I. Dobson. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 69. Potamogeton crispus L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 65:655-668. Crow, G.E. and C.B. Hellquist. 2000. Aquatic and wetland plants of Northeastern North America. 2 volumes. The University of Wisconsin Press. Invasive Species Program. 2005. Invasive Species of Aquatic Plants and Wild Animals in Minnesota: Annual Report for 2004. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, MN. http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/ecological_services/invasives/annualreport.pdf Madsen, J. D. (1999). Point intercept and line intercept methods for aquatic plant management. APCRP Technical Notes Collection (TN APCRP-M1-02). U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. www.wes.army.mil/el/aqua Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources. Division of Fisheries Lake files. 500 Lafayette Rd., St. Paul, MN 55155. MPCA. 2004. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency website. Lake Water Quality Assessment Program. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/clmp/clmpsearchresult.cfm?lakeid=77-0007 Moyle, J.B. and N. Hotchkiss. 1945. The aquatic and marsh vegetation of Minnesota and its value to waterfowl. Minnesota Department of Conservation. Technical Bulletin 3. 122 pp. Perleberg, D. 2005. Aquatic Vegetation of Mound Lake, Todd County, Minnesota (DOW 77-0007-00), June 16, 2005. Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources, Ecological Services Division, 1601 Minnesota Dr., Brainerd, MN 56401. http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/natural_resources/water/lakes/vegetation_reports/77000700.pdf COPYRIGHT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2005 Page 14 of 14