MATERIALS AND METHODS

Similar documents
GRAFTING OF VEGETABLES TO IMPROVE GREENHOUSE PRODUCTION

Vegetable Grafting: Watermelon

Grafting Techniques for Watermelon 1

TigerPrints. Clemson University. Frederic Memmott Clemson University,

Cultivation of Grafted Vegetables II. Development of Grafting Robots in Japan

How to Splice Graft Cucumber Plants. Vegetable Grafting ag.purdue.edu/hla

Vegetable Grafting a Pest Management Perspective

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

Emerging Technologies

Response of Cucurbit Rootstocks for Grafted Melon to Root-knot

Microplot Evaluation of Rootstocks for Control of Meloidogyne incognita on Grafted Tomato, Muskmelon, and Watermelon

Cucurbit Grafting. Emily Silverman

Side Grafting Tomatoes

Top Grafting Tomatoes

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

Specialty Melon Yield and Quality Response to Grafting in Trials Conducted in the Southeastern United States

Grafting Watermelons and other Cucurbits. Presented by Rob Brown, Grower & Owner, Flattop farm

Effects of U niconazole and Gibberellic Acid Application on Elongation of Hypocotyl and Internodes in Figleaf Gourd for Rootstock

INTRODUCTION OF GRAFTING AS A NEW IPM TOOL IN ARIZONA MELON PRODUCTION

EFFECT OF INDOLEBUTYRIC ACID (IBA) AND PLANTING TIMES ON THE GROWTH AND ROOTING OF PEACH CUTTINGS

USE OF GRAFTED CUCURBITS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO METHYL BROMIDE

Tomato / Pepper / Eggplant

Grafting Tomatoes to Improve Plant Health

Grafting Technologies and Their Trends

The Effects of Precooling Temperatures and Durations on Forcing of Lilium longiflorum, Nellie White

Effect of Nitrogen and Potassium on Growth and Development of Curcuma alismatifolia Gagnep.

GRAFTING INSTRUCTIONS

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Effect of Hypocotyl Morphology on Survival Rate and Growth of Cucumber Seedlings Grafted on Cucurbita spp.

Effect of Different Scion Varieties of Mango on Growth and Biomass Production per Formance of Stone Grafts (Mangifera indica L.)

WG1: Vegetable rootstock breeding: genetic variation and selection strategies

Floral Notes. By . In This Issue. A Publication of the UMass Extension Floriculture Program

Plant Propagation PLS 3223/5222

Evaluation of Grafted and Non-Grafted Hybrid and Heirloom Tomatoes in a High Tunnel

Unit 7. Grafting and Budding. During this laboratory you will be introduced to various methods used to graft and bud horticultural crops.

Growth and Quality of Oriental Lilies at Different Fertilization Levels

Introduction. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley

CHECKLIST EFFECTS OF GROWING MEDIA CHARACTERISTICS ON WATER AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Project Report: Grafting Vegetables for Soil-Borne Disease Resistance

Recirculating Nutrient Solution in Strawberry

RESIDUAL LIME IN COMMERCIAL MEDIA DURING CROP PRODUCTION

THE USE OF PLUG TRANSPLANTS IN KOREA

Agronomy Notes Vol 32 No Root growth and development of float tobacco transplants before and after. transplanting

Propagation by Grafting and Budding

Options for Managing Striped Cucumber Beetle and Bacterial Wilt on Organic Farms

Fifty-Fourth Annual Report

Sprout length (cm), number of leaves per budded plant and diameter of the bud sprout (mm) sprouting from bud were taken at an interval of 15 days.

Abstract. a a a a a

Growth Inhibitor Accumulates in the Nutrient Solution of Closed System Rose Cultivation

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Transplant Growth and Stand Establishment of Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Plants as Affected by Compost-Amended Substrate

COST ACTION FA nd WORKING GROUPS MEETING AND STEERING MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE

USE OF THE ETIOLATION TECHNIQUE IN ROOTING AVOCADO CUTTINGS

Comparison of Field Seeding of Sugar Beets and Mangel Wurzels with Two Methods of Transplanting 1

Grafting and Rootstock Effects on Fruit Yield and Composition in Organic, Field-grown Tomato

Grafting Tomatoes PRESENTED BY ROB BROWN, GROWER & OWNER, FLATTOP FARM

Evaluating Suitable Tomato Cultivars for Early Season High Tunnel Production in the Central Great Plains

Title: Development of Micropropagation and Acclimation Protocols for the Commercialization of a New Bonsai Ornamaental Tree for the California Market.

Establishing new trees possible impacts of rootstock propagation method on young tree growth Ute Albrecht

2. Prepare a suspension of 500 ppm dichloran. The method has only been validated using Botran 5F, but other formulations may be effective.

EVALUATION OF RELATIVE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT STRAWBERRY CULTIVARS TO PHYTOPHTHORA

Lesco Fertilizer Evaluation

Why transplants? Raising high quality vegetable transplants 2/27/2018. Dr. Ajay Nair Department of Horticulture Small Farm Conference

Evaluation of Composted Household Garbage as a Horticultural Substrate

Herbaceous grafting is often. Microclimate and Scion Leaf Removal to Improve the Success of Grafted Tomato Seedlings

Grafting and Budding Nursery Crop Plants AG-396. Grafting

Tree growth over multiple years

ONIONS TRANSPLANTS. Kevin Vander Kooi Dept. of Plant Agriculture University of Guelph

4. VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION

PO Box 1866, Palm City, Florida, (772) Fax (772)

Production of Evergreen Shrubs in Paper Sludge- Amended Media. University of Idaho. Report Series: Final Report, January through July 2000

Forcing Containerized Roses in a Retractable Roof Greenhouse and Outdoors in a Semi-Arid Climate

Growth and Yield of Broccoli under Different Rain Protectors During the Rainy Season in Songkhla Province, Southern Thailand

Vegetable Grafting International Field Trip Report Part I: Taiwan and Japan Xin Zhao 1 and Chieri Kubota 2

When evaluating a potting mix for tomato transplant production, consider the following properties:

Vegetarian Newsletter

EFFECT OF GROWING MEDIA ON THE CORMELIZATION OF FREESIA UNDER THE AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF PESHAWAR

Nitrogen Source Effects on the Growth and Development of Burley Tobacco Transplants in the Float System

Research Article IJAER (2017);

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Evaluation of new low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in coastal southern California

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

Improvement of Propagation by Hardwood Cuttings with and without Using Plastic Pavilions in Fig (Ficus carica L.)

Rootstock-scion interactions of selected Annona species

California Pistachio Research Board. Workgroup/Department: Pistachio Work Group / Plant Sciences Department at UC Davis

Effects of Seedling Container Size and Nursing Period on the Growth, Flowering, and Yield of Cut Flowers in Snapdragons (Antirrhinum majus L.

Commercial Floriculture Survey. Project Code = 922

What is Plant Propagation? Propagation of Horticultural Plants. Woody Plant Crop Improvement. Plant Propagation History

Plant Propagation for Successful Hydroponic Production

Chap 12. Plant Propagation. I. Three Methods of Plant Propagation

'UF Multi-flora Peach' and 'UF Multi-flora Pink Frost' Gerberas - University of Florida Cultivars for Landscapes and Large Pots 1

VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION OF MATURE SYCAMORE. Samuel B. Land, Jr, 1

Cleft Grafting Avocados. The Garden Academy Propagation Series Grafting Unit

Effect of Fruit Crop Load on Peach Root Growth

A study of the plants produced by different methods of vegetative propagation in mango (cvs. Amrapali and Gopalbhog)

Virginia Tech VIRGINIA POLYTEHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY

Plant Propagation-The Union of

Plant Propagation. Anna Warner

Tim Smith; Dana Faubion and Dr. William Proebsting,

Changes in Root Growth and Physical Properties in Substrates Containing Charred or

Transcription:

Continuation of Improved Grafting Method for Watermelons Transplants Richard L. Hassell Department of Horticulture, Clemson University Coastal Research & Education Center, 2700 Savannah Highway, Charleston, South Carolina, USA INTRODUCTION Watermelon grafting is an important part of watermelon production to avoid soil-borne diseases and/or chemical fumigation in areas where land rotation is not feasible. Current commercial grafting practices depend on maintaining at least one rootstock cotyledon during the healing period following grafting for high survival (Cushman, 2006; Lee, 1994; Lee and Oda, 2003; Oda, 1995). Rootstock re-growth originating from meristematic tissue next to the remaining cotyledon is one main contributing barrier preventing affordable costs which prevent its introduction into the United States agricultural system (Edelstein, 2004). With the phase-out of methyl bromide fumigant, new interests are being reviewed for potential alternatives (Cohen et al., 2007; Davis et al., 2008). For many years grafting in watermelons has been viewed as an option solely in areas where labor costs are minimal. This benefit has great potential to have a very positive effect for commercial production in the United States by improving the plants overall environmental efficiency and overcoming soil-borne pathogens. An alternative grafting method which eliminates potential re-growth is needed in order for grafting technology and benefits to progress into the United States. Removal of both cotyledons in a one step fashion at time of grafting eliminates all potential re-growth and greatly reduces overall grafting costs. Observations indicate however that the rootstock hypocotyl begins to yellow and declines until death when grafted at the 1 st leaf stage or younger which is customary for current commercial grafting techniques. The yellowing and steady decline of the hypocotyl, which results in rootstock death, simulates leaf senescence and suggests that insufficient nutrient reserves were available to the hypocotyl prior to grafting. Without sufficiently stored carbohydrates, the hypocotyl cannot sustain itself long enough before receiving photosynthates from the newly grafted vegetative tissue. When plants are allowed to mature to the appearance of the 2 nd or 3 rd leaf, hypocotyl deterioration is not observed, which suggest that more reserves are available with maturity to maintain the rootstock until graft healing is complete. MATERIALS AND METHODS Material for growing seedlings For this experiment four rootstocks were tested: Lagenaria siceraria Emphasis (bottle gourd), Citrulus lanatus var. citroides Ojakkyo (wild watermelon), Cucurbita moschata x Cucurbita maxima Strongtosa (inter-specific squash hybrid), and Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus Tri-X 313 (triploid seedless watermelon). Scion material was Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus Tri-X 313. All seeds were obtained through Syngenta Seeds, Inc. (Boise, Idaho). The soilless mix used for this research has the following composition: 75% NB nursery peat, 25% coarse perlite, 198 grams/square meter of dolomitic limestone, and 454 grams/square meter of gypsum, (Conrad Fafard, Inc., Agawam, MA). No premix (nutrient charge) was added to the soilless mix. Rootstocks were grown in 72 square vented plug trays with cell depths of 5.71 cm and top and bottom cell diameters of 3.96 cm and 2.54 cm respectively (TLC Polyform, Inc. Morrow, GA). Scion was seeded in 288 square plug trays with cell depths of 3.81 cm inches and top and bottom cell diameters of 2.05 cm and 1.14 cm respectively (TLC Polyform, Inc. Morrow, GA). All

fertilizer applications consisted of 100 parts per million (ppm) of 15-5-15 Peters Excel water soluble fertilizer (Scotts-Sierra Horticultural Products Company, Marysville, OH) using the Anderson Injector Series S (H.E. Anderson Company, Muskogee, OK). Material for grafting Rootstocks species were seeded in 72 cell flats and divided into ten plant subsamples replicated five times for grafting and tissue analysis. Rootstocks were grafted at separate times starting with interspecific squash hybrid, followed by the bottle gourd, wild watermelon, and the seedless hybrid watermelon. The 1 st leaf stage in this study is defined as visibly seeing the first unexpanded true leaf. The 2 nd leaf stage is defined as seeing the fully expanded 1 st true leaf and the unexpanded 2 nd true leaf. The 3 rd leaf stage is defined as seeing the 1 st and 2 nd expanded true leaves and the unexpanded 3 rd true leaf. Prior to grafting separate plants samples were then severed from the roots at the cell line and divided into cotyledons, leaves, and hypocotyls for area measurements of the vegetative tissue which was calculated using the LI-3100 area meter (Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska). At each leaf stage all the rootstock plants were grafted using the cotyledon devoid grafting method (Figure 1). The cotyledon devoid grafting technique is a new method aimed at eliminating rootstock re-growth and is the method under investigation. The cotyledon devoid graft is described as follows: using sterile single edge kobalt blade (Warner Manufacturing Company, Minneapolis, MN) rootstocks were first cut just below both the cotyledons at a 90º angle. This was performed to increase accessibility and precision for the grafting slant cut. An approximate 65º slant cut was then made at the tip of the hypocotyl. The scion was cut at the base from the roots in large quantities and set on sterile paper towels. It was then individually cut at approximately 1.9 cm below the cotyledons with an opposing but complimentary 65 o angle to the rootstock slice and preserved in a 3.8 liter size zip-lock bag to help prevent wilting until it was used. Finally the scion was joined together to align the vascular bundles with the rootstock and secured with a spring loaded clip (Syngenta Seeds Inc., Boise, Idaho) (Figure 1). Grafting treatments consisted of ten plants replicated five times. Following grafting, the newly grafted plants were immediately placed randomly inside a custom made healing chamber for seven days which was located inside the greenhouse. The healing chamber was constructed with a top wire hooped rectangular wooden box with the following dimensions: width of 86 cm, a length of 300 cm, and a depth of 14 cm and covered with clear polyethylene sheet. The humidity was maintained using the 707U-duct mount centrifugal atomizer humidifier (Herrmidifier, Effingham, Illinois). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION There was a significant rootstock by leaf stage interaction suggesting that the four rootstocks responded differently at each of the leaf stages (Table 1). The seedless watermelon type did not significantly increase in hypocotyl length with each leaf stage but the diameter did increase significant with growing time. This then was reflected on the overall hypocotyl area with a decrease at the third leaf stage. However an increase in grafting success was not seen until the rootstock had reaches the third leaf stage. The wild watermelon type did significantly increase at both the hypocotyl length and diameter at each of the leaf stages which resulted in an overall increase in the hypocotyls area. However grafting success was fully achieved at the second leaf stage of plant development. Both the interspecific hybrid and the bottled gourd rootstock significantly increased in both hypocotyl diameter and length with each increase of leaf stage resulting in a significant increase in hypocotyl area and grafting success. There was a strong correlation with grafting success and hypocotyl growth (Table 2). As hypocotyls

increased in both length, diameter and area grafting success also increased. The weakest correlations seemed to be with the wild and seedless watermelon rootstock types in the hypocotyl length. However the strongest correlation came with the interspecific hybrid rootstock with the hypocotyl length. These results suggest that as the rootstock increases in size and development the greater grafting success can be seen in the absence of the cotyledon leaf. CONCLUSION Larger hypocotyls suggest an increase in storage capacity or an overall increased carbohydrate reserves from the 1 st leaf stage to the 2 nd and 3 rd due to larger hypocotyl size. Results indicate that this new method could be used to reduce costs by eliminated rootstock side shoots when performed at the developed of the 2 nd or 3 rd true leaf stage for these rootstocks. We also found that using scion material at the 3 rd leaf stage may be another contributing factor to increase grafting success. Literature Cited Cohen, R., Burger, Y., and Horev, C. (2007). Introducting grafted cucrbits to modern agriculture an Israeli experience. Plant Disease 91, 916-923. Cushman, K. (2006). Grafting Techniques for Watermelon. University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences HS1075, 1-5. Davis, A. R., Perkins- Veazie, P., Sakata, Y., López- Galarza, S., Maroto, J. V., Lee, S.-G., Huh, Y.-C., Miguel, A., King, S. R., Cohen, R., and Lee, Y.-M. (2008). Cucurbit Grafting. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 27, 50-74. Edelstein, M. (2004). Grafting Vegetable-Crop Plants: Pros and Cons. Acta Hort. 659, 235-238. Lee, J.-M. (1994). Cultivation of grafted Vegetables I. Current Status, Grafting Methods, and Benefits. Hort Sci 29, 235-239. Lee, J.-M., and Oda, M. (2003). Grafting of Herbaceous Vegetable and Ornamental Crops Horticultural Reviews 28, 61-123. Oda, M. (1995). New grafting methods for fruit-bearing vegetables in Japan. JARQ 29, 187-194.

Figures Fig. 1. Cotyledon devoid method described as a five step process. Tables Table 1. Grafting success and hypocotyl growth of seedless watermelon grafted on various rootstocks at different leaf stages of development. Rootstock Leaf Hypocotyl w Grafting Cultivar Type Stage x Area (cm 2 ) Diameter (mm) Length (cm) Success (%) y Ojakkyo Wild Watermelon 1 0.56 g z 2.53 f z 28.98 e z 57.60 d z 2 1.10 e 2.70 e 37.85 d 100.00 a 3 1.80 b 3.25 cd 55.00 b 100.00 a Strong Tosa Interspecific Hyb. 1 1.30 d 3.59 bc 39.00 d 15.00 f 2 1.50 c 3.30 c 48.61 c 60.00 d 3 4.30 a 5.30 a 73.72 a 84.00 bc Emphasis Bottled Gourd 1 0.72 f 2.72 ef 27.40 e 39.12 e 2 1.10 e 3.30 c 30.15 e 84.70 bc 3 1.80 b 3.09 d 57.29 b 98.33 a Tri-X 313 Seedless Watermelon 1 0.66 fg 2.25 g 28.18 e 75.00 c 2 1.76 f 2.80 e 31.63 e 83.18 c 3 1.00 e 3.22 cd 30.16 e 95.00 ab z Means within columns followed by the same lowercase letter are not significant at the P < 0.05. y Analysis was performed after arcsin transformation of the percentage data. x The 1 st leaf stage in this study is defined as visibly seeing the first unexpanded true leaf. The 2 nd leaf stage is defined as seeing the fully expanded 1 st true leaf and the unexpanded 2 nd true leaf. The 3 rd leaf stage is defined as seeing the 1 st and 2 nd expanded true leaves and the unexpanded 3 rd true leaf. w Hypocotyl measurements represent a total of a five plant sample replicated five times.

Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients between rootstock hypocotyl area, diameter or length and grafting success. Hypocotyl y Rootstock Area Diameter Length Cultivar Type (cm 2 ) (mm) (cm) Ojakkyo Wild Watermelon 0.781 z 0.681 0.565 Strong Tosa Interspecific Hyb. 0.784 0.655 0.828 Emphasis Bottled Gourd 0.825 0.655 0.676 Tri-X 313 Seedless Watermelon 0.721 0.874 0.630 y Hypocotyl measurements represent a total of a five plant sample replicated five times. z Values are significant at P = 0.05.