CROWN POINT SUBDIVISION

Similar documents
Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Holmberg & Howe, Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers Zoning District: R-35

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

SECTION II SECTION II STATEMENT OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, ASSUMPTIONS, POLICIES AND STANDARDS

Red Fox Commercial Outline Plan

CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS & SITE DESIGN

2.1 Principles & Objectives

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

THREE-STEP DESIGN PROCESS FOR OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISIONS

O l so n M e morial Highway, S t e , G o l d e n V a l l e y, MN Delano Laketown Homes Concept Plan

A Guide to Open Space Design Development in Halifax Regional Municipality

Conservation Development

4. UTILITIES ELEMENT.

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

Essential Skills: Reading and Interpreting Maps and Plans

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

IOWA HIGHWAY 57 / WEST 1 ST STREET STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING APRIL 22, 2014


Catawba Area Plan Advisory Group

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Exhibit A. 8:9 Scuffletown Rural Conservation District

OP Council Resolution June 16, Planning and Development Services

APPENDIX A 6 CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS CARRBORO DEVELOPMENT GUIDE APPENDIX A

Chapter 9 Community Facilities & Services Plan. Introduction. Cooperative Efforts. Monitoring of Needs

1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails

CONCLUSION AND IMPLEMENTATION

2. Would the proposed project comply with the Land Use map? 3. Would the proposed project require a rezoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning district?

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Department February 17, 2014

Leduc Industrial Outline Plan SE W4

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania

The following principles guide the development of goals and strategies to protect and promote these amenities:

PepsiCo R & D Facility Expansion Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, NY Draft Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Outline

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

RRW Stonebrook, LLC Tentative Map Findings

E. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION GENERAL OBJECTIVES LAND USE DESIGNATIONS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 4

STORMWATER GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING/ZONING BOARDS

STORM WATER UTILITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CHAPTER 22 Rural Open Space Community Developments

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Arlington County Watershed Retrofits. Greg Hoffmann Center for Watershed Protection

2. Analysis. DRAFT Gerald Richards & Pleasantview Park Master Plan

Importance of Master Planning Marcy Colclough

RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT / SUBDIVISION AND REZONING CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE

USA Addition of South & East Side Residential Parcels. USA Deletion of a Town of Christiana Parcel. Conversion from USA to Limited Service Area

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

3/7/2013. Compliance & Sustainability

Advance Engineering & Surveying PLLC

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN:

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

7.0 OPEN SPACE 7.1 OPEN SPACE DEDICATION CHAPTER 7: OPEN SPACE

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. Proposed Land Use: 120 single-family lots. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection


tinyan lee the hastings experience masterplan : hastings corridor individual design sustainable urbanism : the hastings corridor

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN 7

DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK POST 2030 LAND USE PLAN INTRODUCTION

Coco Palms Community Development District. Engineer s Report Infrastructure Improvements

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Dr Kathy Chaston Coral & Coastal Management Specialist NOAA Office of Ocean & Coastal Resource Management

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) ; TDD (651)

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

Stormwater & South Carolina. A Case for Low Impact Development

CHAPTER 2 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Description of Preferred Alternative

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

Old Brick Township DRI Recommendation Report

Gloucester County s Comprehensive Plan. The Community Connection

APWA Expo August 27, Ground Water Recharge With Storm Management: A Sustainable Development

Harvesting the Rain: Green Infrastructure for a Healthier Rahway River Watershed

Green Infrastructure Planning Design Guidelines

Environmental Protection Ordinances (Performance Zoning) Bedminster Township, Bucks County

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

Vaughan Metropolitan Centre (VMC) Black Creek Renewal CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

EXISTING PLANS Harriet Festing Center for Neighborhood Technology Midlothian Community Meeting March 12, 2015

Stormwater Utility and Connection Fees

CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

INTEGRATING NATURAL RESOURCES INTO A DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROLES

Michael Clark, P.E. & Michael Moonan, RLA Weston and Sampson Engineers & David Lachance Woodbury Ridge Developer

Outflow to Saw Mill Run

One County s Success in Linking Watershed Protection and Land Use Planning

Sanford/Lee County Technical Review Committee (TRC) DEADLINES & MEETING DATES

The Art and Science of Stormwater Retrofitting

Tennessee Stormwater Management Program. Stormwater Management Site Assessment and Inventory Checklist. Quick Check o Vicinity Map within Watershed

MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual

GENERAL INFORMATION What is Stormwater? What is a stormwater utility? What is an impervious surface?

GRACE CHURCH EXPANSION

Saranac River Trail Greenway C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T

Urban Stormwater Management. Rebecca Leonardson Rui Teles Brooke Ray Smith

PROJECT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Project Site Location FIGURE 1 - REGIONAL LOCATION MAP

Low Impact Development Guidance Manual

Transcription:

CROWN POINT SUBDIVISION A COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL VERSUS CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION DESIGN DEVELOPER: PAUL LUCIANO BUILDERS LAND PLANNING & DESIGN: DAVID LAIRD ASSOCIATES FUNDING PROVIDED BY: PA SEA GRANT

WHAT CHARACTERISTICS CAN BE FOUND IN CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION DESIGN?

WHAT CHARACTERISTICS CAN BE FOUND IN CONSERVATION DESIGN?

CHARACTERISTICS OF CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION DESIGN ACHIEVE MAXIMUM DENSITY LIMITED PRESERVATION OF OPEN SPACE MAJORITY OF SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION MAY RESULT IN NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT INCREASED STORMWATER RUNOFF REDUCED GROUND WATER RECHARGE LITTLE EFFORT MADE TO PRESERVE WOODLANDS AND EXISTING VEGETATION MINIMAL BUFFERS PROVIDED FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS

CHARACTERISTICS OF CONSERVATION DESIGN: CONSERVATION OF OPEN SPACES, GREENWAYS AND NATURAL RESOURCES MINIMIZE SITE DISTURBANCE MAXIMIZE ACCESS TO AND VIEWS OF OPEN SPACE AREAS ACHIEVES THE DEVELOPERS OBJECTIVES

CROWN POINT SUBDIVISION CONVENTIONAL DESIGN EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS

AERIAL VIEW OF CROWN POINT

CROWN POINT CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION DESIGN 63.4 ACRES TOTAL SITE AREA 6.1 AC. - ROAD RIGHT OF WAY 0.94 AC - FUTURE R/W(PER TRANSPORTATION PLAN) 3.7 AC. - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA 2.4 AC. WETLANDS 7.8 AC OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 3.0 AC. STEEP SLOPES 39.46 AC OF DEVELOPABLE LAND ALLOWABLE DENSITY IS 2.5 UNITS PER AC (39.46 X 2.5 = 99 UNITS PERMITTED) 64 UNITS PROPOSED PROPOSED DENSITY 1.5UNITS/AC

CROWN POINT CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION DESIGN 63.4 TOTAL SITE AREA 3.3 AC - ROADS & SIDEWALKS 0.94 AC - FUTURE R/W(PER TRANSPORTATION PLAN) 2.1 AC - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA 2.4 AC. OF WETLANDS 7.8 AC OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 3.0 AC. OF STEEP SLOPE 43.86 AC OF DEVELOPABLE LAND ALLOWABLE DENSITY IS 2.5 UNITS PER AC (43.86 X 2.5=110 UNITS PERMITTED) 110 UNITS PROPOSED 38.54 AC OF COMMON OPEN SPACE - 61%

ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING OF PROPOSED CONVENTIONAL LAYOUT

ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING OF PROPOSED CONSERVATION DESIGN

LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPOSED CONVENTIONAL LAYOUT

SKETCH PLAN FOR PROPOSED CONSERVATION DESIGN

AERIAL VIEW OF PROPOSED CONVENTIONAL LAYOUT

AERIAL VIEW OF PROPOSED CONSERVATION DESIGN

WHAT IS THE PROCESS FOR DESIGNING A CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION?

CONSERVATION DESIGN A FOUR-STEP PROCESS STEP ONE: IDENTIFY LAND TO BE PROTECTED/CONSERVED STEP TWO: IDENTIFY BUILDABLE AREAS TO MAXIMIZE THEIR VIEW OF OPEN SPACE STEP THREE: PROVIDE CRITICAL VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS CORRIDORS STEP FOUR: LAYOUT PROPOSED PARCEL BOUNDARIES

PRIMARY CONSERVATION AREAS

SECONDARY CONSERVATION AREAS

LOCATE HOUSES

PROVIDE CRITICAL VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS CORRIDORS

BREAK DOWN OF DEVELOPMENT COSTS & POTENTIAL PROFIT FOR CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION = $800,000 DESIGN & PERMITTING FEES = $200,000 STORM SEWER = $333,000 WATER LINE = $210,000 SANITARY SEWER = $375,000 ROADWAY = $520,000 EARTHWORK & GRADING = $250,000 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST = $2,688,000

BREAK DOWN OF DEVELOPMENT COSTS & POTENTIAL PROFIT FOR CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION DESIGN TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS = $2,688,000 TOTAL # OF UNITS = 64 DEVELOPER TOTAL PER UNIT COST = $42,000 AVERAGE PRICE PER UNIT (LAND) = $65,000 ESTIMATED PROFIT ON BASED ON 64 LOTS (64x$23,000) = $1,472,000 ESTIMATED PROFIT ON CONSTRUCTION OF 64 HOMES ($300,000 x 12% PROFIT MARGIN : $36,000 x 64 = $2,304,000 TOTAL PROFIT LOT PROFIT + HOUSE CONSTRUCTION PROFIT $1,472,000 + $2,304,000 = $3,776,000

BREAK DOWN OF DEVELOPMENT COSTS & POTENTIAL PROFIT FOR CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION = $800,000 DESIGN & PERMITTING FEES = $200,000 STORM SEWER = $225,000 WATER LINE = $225,000 SANITARY SEWER = $460,000 ROADWAY = $400,000 EARTHWORK & GRADING = $110,000 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST = $2,420,000

BREAK DOWN OF DEVELOPMENT COSTS & POTENTIAL PROFIT FOR CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION DESIGN TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST = $2,420,000 TOTAL # OF UNITS = 110 DEVELOPER TOTAL PER UNIT COST = $22,000 AVERAGE PRICE PER UNIT (LAND) = $40,000 ESTIMATED LAND PROFIT (110 UNITS) (110 x $18,000) = $1,980,000 ESTIMATED PROFIT ON CONSTRUCTION OF 110 HOMES $200,000 x 12% PROFIT MARGIN: $24,000 x 110 = $2,640,000 TOTAL PROFIT LOT PROFIT + HOUSE CONSTRUCTION PROFIT $1,980,000 + $2,640,000 = $4,620,000

ADDITIONAL PROFIT $4,620,000 - CONVENTIONAL -3,776,000 - CONSERVATION $ 844,000

WHO BENEFITS FROM CONSERVATION DESIGN?

BENEFITS TO THE MUNICIPALITY NO ROAD MAINTENANCE NO ROAD PLOWING MORE UNITS TO TAX OPPORTUNITY TO BE ONE OF MANY MUNICIPALITIES LEADING THE CHARGE IN CONSERVATION LAND PLANNING

BENEFITS TO THE POTENTIAL HOME OWNER ACCESS TO COMMON OPEN SPACE & RECREATION AREAS GREATER ANTICIPATED APPRECIATION OF HOME MAINTENANCE FREE LIVING (ASSOCIATION)

BENEFITS TO THE BUILDER/DEVELOPER GREATER # OF UNITS=MORE PROFIT LESS EARTH WORK AND CLEARING COST MORE MARKETABLE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL TAX WRITE-OFF FOR OPEN SPACE DONATION

BENEFITS TO THE ENVIRONMENT LARGE AREA OF EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN AND ACT AS NATURAL FILTER IMPROVEMENTS IN STORM WATER RUNOFF QUALITY DEVELOPMENT AREA CONCENTRATED=LESS SURFACE WATER DISTURBANCE REDUCTION OF POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES PROMOTES GROUND WATER RECHARGE & INFILTRATION LIMITED IMPACT ON EXISTING HIGH QUALITY WATERSHED PRESERVES NATURAL HABITAT MAINTAIN GREENWAYS