Grade. % of Survey Area 1. Staplehay. 2 3a. 3a 3b Non Ag Organ Ag Bldgs. 1 Non Ag Urban

Similar documents
PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992

MAFF Ministry of Ifinil Agriculture Rsheries and Food

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LAND NEAR SHIRE HILL FARM SAFFRON WALDEN ESSEX

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LAND AT BOLE INGS, WESTBURTON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE (SK805875)

MAFF I^inistry of IfiriEE Agriculture Fisheries and Food

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT LAND AT BRANT FARM, STOURPORT-ON-SEVERN

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

SUMMARY. alcholnie.doc\ih\jk

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

The entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.

ACRE NOOK EAST QUARRY, CHELFORD, CHESHIRE. Statement of Site Physical Characteristics January 1998

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION GREAT GRIMSBY LOCAL PLAN SITE AG 2. GREAT COATES AUGUST 1993

Agricultural Land Classification and Statement of Physical Characteristics Higbfield Farm Whitley Bridge North Yorkshire October 1996

M AFT Ministry of Ifin&l. Agriculture Rsheries and Food

AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND NEAR MINDALE HOUSE PRESTATYN. Report 762/1

If A rr Ministry of. IfiriEI. Agriculture Fisheries and Food

LAND NORTH OF TAMWORTH. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report April 1998

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION VULCAN VILLAGE (PROPOSED GOLF COURSE) ST HELENS MBC

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION KNOWSLEY UDP, SITE 45.01

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS EXTENSION TO CLOUD HILL QUARRY, BREEDON ON THE HILL, LEICESTERSHIRE

MAFF Ministry of iflmll Agriculture Fisheries and Food

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OLDWICK FARM, WEST LAVANT, WEST SUSSEX

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX

STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON- TRENT STRUCTURE PLAN Site 7: Priory Farm. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report November 1998

CORNFORTH EAST QUARRY COUNTY DURHAM

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

ADy^S. Whelpley Farm, Whiteparish, Wiltshire. Resource Plaiming Team Taunton Statutory Unit. November 93

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION SEMI-DETAILED SURVEY EGG FARM KINGS LANGLEY HERTFORDSHIRE

NORTH DEVON LOCAL PLAN: BARNSTAPLE AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION. Report of Survey 1. SUMMARY

CAVIL HEAD OCCS ACKLINGTON NOVEMBER 1997

HUMBLEBURN OCCS, CRAGHEAD, COUNTY DURHAM SURVEY OF RESTORED LAND OCTOBER RPT Job Number: 73/97 MAFF Reference: EL LURET Job Number: ME3RTP

FROGS HALL FARM, TAKELEY, ESSEX. Agricultural Land Classification Report & Statement of Soil Physical Characteristics. May 1999

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND OFF HOLT ROAD, ROSSETT. Report 1067/1

HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH LOCAL PLAN Land south of Earl Shilton - Site G Agricultural Land Classification February 1997

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS TYTTENHANGER QUARRY EXTENSION, LONDON COLNEY, HERTFORDSHIRE

P/2014/00830 Received 27/06/2014 SOIL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND AT ROLLESTON PARK FARM TUTBURY, STAFFORDSHIRE.

HARRINGTON CEMENT WORKS, HASLINGFIELD ROAD, HARRINGTON, CAMBS. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Soil Physical Characteristics Report

Oaklands College, St. Albans, Hertfordshire. Agricultural Land Classification & Soil Physical Characteristics Report.

Wooodside Lane-Kings Stanley. Agricultural Land Classification. September RPT Job Number; ^/98

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

SOIL RESOURCES REPORT HALVERGATE MARSHES, NORFOLK 1. BACKGROUND

Preliminary Soil Survey at N Fifikh Site

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION FAVERSHAM LOCAL PLAN

MAFF Ministry of Ifini.! Agriculture Fisheries and Food. (.L,^ fu Ai-c lot^sr

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LEEDS AND LANGLEY BY-PASS, KENT

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

c?3a2-t)a3-<s^ BUCKINGHAMSHIRE MINERALS PLAN REVIEW LAND AT DENHAM MAFF Ministryof lfuu& Agriculture Fisheries and Food

SOIL SURVEY FOR PROPOSED WET ASH DISPOSAL FACILITY, HENDRINA POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 8. Sobig

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

York Potash Project Mine, MTS and MHF Environmental Statement, Part 2 Chapter: 16 Land Use and Soils Appendix 16.5 Outline Soil Management Plan

3.44b. Soil Classification AK & BR

Report on a soil survey and agricultural suitability investigation of the property known as Erf 660, De Doorns.

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

SETEC SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, INC

Soil Maps for Production Agriculture. Jarrod O. Miller, Extension Agronomist

Soil Colors, Texture & Structure

WHITWELL QUARRY, DERBYSHIRE

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION MID-BEDFORDSHIRE DISTRICT LOCAL FLAN

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 11. Pukemutu

SOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Kenya Soil Survey P.O. Box Tel: /

Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity. Laboratory #4

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS. DERBYSHIRE MINERALS PLAN - EGGINTON (Shes A and B)

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL ASSESSMENT

2 Older farm homes on the land

Lesson 3: Understanding Soil Color

Unit II Soil Management

TP73 4PTP101 TP45 TP9 TP74 TP46 TP47 TP115 TP48 TP32 TP5 TP31 TP22 TP49 V58 TP57 4F TP50 TP51 3PD 3PD TP80 TP28 TP55

TAXONOMIC CLASS: Loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Vitrandic Durochrepts

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL

Reference Card S-2, Side A: Delineating Horizon Boundaries

Investigation of soil ph variability. Andrew Harding Peter Ciganovic

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED SUB-APPENDIX A2: SOIL ANALYTICAL SUITES

SUBSURFACE DRIP DISPERSAL OF EFFLUENT for LARGE SYSTEMS. Presented by: David Morgan and Rodney Ruskin

Report on the soil evaluation at Harakeke 2015 Ltd Properties, Tasman District, Nelson

Soil Horizons cont. Oa- highly decomposed Oi-undecomposed

5 RESULTS FOR THE REJECT EMPLACEMENT AREA

Land Capability Classifications

Team number Page 1 of Canon Envirothon Soils Station Test. Soils and Climate Change

^6/^1. Gloucestershire Minerals Plan Cerney Wick. Agricultural Land ClassiHcation. September <j pcs^^^^*^ Job Number 56/97

1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)

SOIL CHARACTERIZATION USING DIAGNOSTIC PROPERTIES

Land at Lydney. Agricultural Land ClassiHcation. January Resource Planning Team Bristol FRCA Westem Region. Job Number 84/97.

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)

SOILS IN URBAN / SUBURBAN LANDSCAPES. Lisa Krall Soil Scientist CT USDA NRCS Tolland, CT

Sydney Road Reclaimed Water Main, Plant City, Florida. Prepared for: Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc.

THE SCORE CARD. Observed Soil Properties. Interpretive Soil Properties

Urban Soils Career Development Event

Transcription:

^ ( ^ ^fcj 2JiOc^ TAUNTON LOCAL PUW FIRST ALTE31ATI0N AOtECULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE SITES R^»rt of Survey 1. Introduction Agricultural Land Classification surveys were carried out at 3 sites around Taunton, Somerset, in response to a statutory planning consultation. Field work was carried out during Febiruary 1989 by the Resource Planning Group, Bristol, Auger observations were carried out at each site on a 100 m grid, and 8 pits were described overall. The results of the surveys are summarised below and illustrated in the accompanying maps. Site Location Grade Area (ha) % of Survey Area 1. Staplehay 2 3a 1.8 5.2 26 74 2. Comeytrow Manor 3a 3b Non Ag Organ Ag Bldgs 11.9 8.3 0,3 0.2 1.6 53.4 37.2 1.3 0.9 7.2 3, Norton Fitzwarren 1 Non Ag Urban 14.4 1.3 0.3 90 8 2 4. Staplegrove 2 9.6 100 2. Climate Climatic variables were interpolated from a 5 km grid database as follcws:- Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Altitude (m) 61 Accumulated Temperature ( days) 1511 Average Armual Rainfall (mm) 863 Moisture Deficit, vtieat (mm) 101 Moisture Deficit, potatoes 92 Field Capacity Days (days) 182 61 1510 811 103 94 173 30 1545 788 107 99 170 30 1544 774 107 99 167 Acctimulated temperature is a measure of the relative warmth of a locality, and average annual rainfall is a measure of the overall wetness. In combination, these two parameters determine climatic limitations. Climate was not found to be limiting at any of these sites. The other climatic variables are used for soil wetness and ciroughtiness assessments.

3. Agricultural Land ClassificatiOTi Site 1 - Staplrfiay Grade 2: The eastern part of the site was classified as grade 2, Soil pit No 3 is representative of this eastern area (see appendix 2 for detailed pit descriptions). The soils are deep heavy clay loams with a medium clay loam topsoil. The profile is slightly stoney throughout, the stone content increasing from approximately A% at the surface to 1% below 20 on. The colours are re<3dish, and distinct ochreous mottles occur in the subsoil, with gleying below 60 cm. No slowly permeable layer was found. A medium textured soil, gieyed at 60 cm, with no slowly permeable layer above 80 cm, and 182 field capacity days, has a wetness class of I. The combination of a medium clay loam surface textture and 182 field capacity days lead to a classification as grade 2, with soil wetness as the most limiting factor. Siib-Grade 3a: The remainder of the site was classified as sub-grade 3a. Most of the area is represented by pit No 2 (see appendix 2). The soils are similar to the grade 2 soils with gleying occurring at 60 cm, but a slowly permeable layer occurs above 70 cm, leading to a wetness class of III, and hence a grade of 3a, A small area near the southern boundary consists of an infilled depression. Here the surface stoniness (>5% stones larger than 6 cm) led to the classification of sub-grade 3a. Droughtiness is not a limitation. Site 2 - Comeytrowe Manor Sub-grade 3a: Much of the eastern and central area of the site has been placed in this grade. Wetness is the most limiting factor in these predominantly red soils, Topsoil textures are medium clay loams which grade into heavy subsoils. Mottling is usually not evident, but gleying can be assessed by the presence of pale ped faces and common manganese. The soils typically fall into wetness class III at this FCD level (171 days) either as a result of shallow gleying in association with slowly permeable layers (SPL's) occurring around 50 cm, or no clear evidence of gleying in these red soils but with SPL's occnarring above 60 an and extending to depth. Sub-grade 3b: The western and southern area of the site has been classified as 3b. Here, the topsoil textures are significantly heavier than elsev^ere (heavy clay loams), and this, therefore, restricts the grade to 3b for both wetness class III and IV soils. The subsoils are again typically red clays and the final wetness class therefore depends upon the presence or absence of distinct gleying and the exact depth to an SPL (typically above 50 cm).

The isolated map unit of 3b in the east has been identified as a result of locally steep slopes. Part of the main 3b unit in the west also contains slopes in the 3b range. Site 3 - Norton Fitzwarren Grade 1: The entire site, with the exception of 1,6 hectares of urban and non agricultural land, was classified as grade 1. Ihe soils are deep heavy clay loams with a medium clay loam topsoil. Colours are brown with no mottling occurring above 60 cm and no gleying occurring above 100 cm. The soils are generally stone free, with a stoney layer occasionally occurring below 80 cm. The site is flat, and a small area near the eastern edge may be subjected to occasional short winter flooding. This would lead to a classification of grade 2 for that part of the site, but insufficient data is available to map it as such. Site 4 - Staplegrove Grade 2: The entire site was classified as grade 2. Two soil pits were described (see appendix 2). Ihe soils are deep heavy clay loams or clays, with a medium clay loam topsoil. Colours are brown to reddish. The topsoil is slightly stoney (approximately 3^ stones), and a stoney layer was encountered at about 30-40 cm deep in places. Measurement of the stone content of this layer by sieving showed a content of 25% stones. The overall stone content led to a droughtiness assessment of grade 2 for pit No 1, which is considered representative of the site. Gley characteristics occurred at most observation points at approximately 40 cm, but no slowly permeable layer was identified. This led to a wetness assessment of class I, borderline to class II. This puts the site at the grade 1/2 borderline for wetness. Overall, therefore, the site is classified as grade 2 due to droughtiness and possibly c3ue to wetness. [RPG.0004/CC]

TAUmOm SITE 1 - SOIL PIT DESCRIPTIC»B Fit No 3 Topsoil 0-20 cm 7,5YR3/2 daric brown Slightly stoney (4%) Subsoil 1 20-60cm 5YR4/4 reddish brown Few distinct ochreous mottles 7% stone content (sieve method) Moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable Subsoil 2 60-90+ cm 5YR5/4 reddish brown Common distinct ochreous mottles and pale ped faces (gley) No slowly permeable layer Moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable 7% stone content (assumed) Droughtiness calculation: AP vi^eat 0-20 TAV 18 stones 4% 20-50 TAV 21 stones 7% - 50-120 EAV 14 stones 7% 35 mm 59 mm 92 mm 186 mm MD Wheat = 101 AP potatoes 0-20 TAV 18 stones 4% 20-70 TAV 21 stones 7% = 35 mm = 98 mn 134 nm MP potatoes = 92

TAUNTC»I SITE 3 - SOIL PIT DESCRIPTICW Pit No 1 Topsoil Subsoil 1 0-20 cm 7.5YR4/2 dark brown Weak mediura granular structure; very friable 20-50 cm 7,5YR5/4 brown Moderate medium and coarse subangular blocky structure; friable Subsoil 2 50-100 m 7,5YR5/4 brown Moderate medium and coarse subangular bloclq^ structure; friable

TAUNTC»J SITE 4 ; SOIL PIT DESCRIPn(»e Pit No 1 Topsoil Subsoil 1 Subsoil 2 Subsoil 3 0-25 cm 7.5YR4/2 dark brown slightly stoney (3%) 25-35 cm 7.5YR4/4 dark brown Weak medium subangular blocky; friable Slightly stoney (3%) 35-50 cm 7.5YR5/4 brown Moderate coarse granular; friable Stoney (259^ by sieving) 50-70 cm continuing 7.5YR5/4 brown Weak coarse granular; friable Stoney (35% estimated) Droughtiness calculation:- AP wheat 0-25 TAV 18 25-35 TAV 21 35-50 TAV 21 50-120 EAV 10 AP potatoes Stones 3% Stones 3% Stones 25% Stones 35% 44 mn 20 mm 24rnri 48 mn 136 mn MD vrfieat = 107 0-50 as for \^tieat 50-70 TAV 15 Stones 35% 88 mm 22 mn 110 mm MD potatoes = 99

TAUNTON SITE 4 - SOIL PIT DESCRIPTIC»B Pit No 2 Topsoil 0-20 cm 7,5YR3/2 dark brown Slightly stoney Subsoil 1 20-30 cm 7,5YR5/4 brown Subsoil 2 30-70 cm Heavy clay loara 7.5YR4/4 brown Conmon distinct ochreous mottles Moderate coarse subangular blocky; friable Subsoil 3 70-90 cm continuing 10YR5/3 brown Many distinct ochreous mottles - gieyed Moderate medium subangular blocky; friable Wetness Class I borderline II Grade 1 borderline to 2

8 Fcs 2g04- TAUNTON LOCAL PLAN FIRST ALTERATION AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE SITES Report of Survey 1. Introduction Agricultural Land Classification surveys were carried out at 3 sites around Taunton, Somerset, in response to a statutory planning consultation. Field work was carried out during February 1989 by the Resource Planning Group, Bristol. Auger observations were carried out.at each site on a 100 m grid, and 6 pits were described overall. The results of the surveys are summarised below and illustrated in the accompanying maps.?.ite Location Grade Area ( h a 1 % of : carve y Area (f.^^f 1. Stapiehay 2 1.8 26 f 3a 5.2 74 I}f a Comevtr.rowe Manor 3a 8. 3.i 7. 2 3b 11..)31 4 Non Ag 0.3 1..3 Urgan 0.2 0.9 Ag Bldgs 1.6 7.2. t+i Nort r Fitzwarren 1 14.4 90 Non Ag 1.3 8 Urban 0.3 2 4. Stapl egrove 2 9.6 100 2. Climate Climatic variables were interpolated from a 5 km grid database as follows:- Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Altitude (m) 61 61 30 30 Accumulated Temperature ( days) 1511 1510 1545 1544 Average Annual Rainfall (mm) 863 811 788 774 Moisture Deficit, wheat (mm) 101 103 107 107 Moisture Deficit, potatoes 92 94 99 99 Field Capacity Days (days) 182 173 170 167 Accumulated temperature is a measure of the relative warmth of a locality, and average annual rainfall is a measure of the overall wetness. In combination, these two parameters determine climatic limitations. Climate was not found to be limiting at any of these sites. The other climatic variables are used for soil wetness and droughtiness assessments.

3. Agricultural Land Classification Site 1 - Staplehay Grade 2 : The eastern part of the site was classified as grade 2. Soil pit No 3 is representative of this eastern area (see appendix 2 for detailed pit descriptions). The soils are deep heavy clay loans with a medium clay loam topsoil. The profile is slightly stoney throughout; the stone content increasing from approximately 4% at the surface to 7% below 20 an. The colours are reddish, and distinct ochreous mottles occur in the subsoil, with gleying below 60 cm. No slowly permeable layer was found. A medium textured_soil, gleyed at 60 cm, with no slowly permeable layer above 80 cm, and 182 field capacity days, has a wetness class of I. The combination of a medium clay loam surface texture and 182 field capacity days lead to a classification as grade 2, with soil wetness as the most limiting factor. Sub-Grade 3a: The remainder of the site was classified as sub-grade 3a. Most of the area is represented by pit No 2 (see appendix 2). The soils are similar to the grade 2 soils with gleying occurring at 60 cm, but a slowly permeable layer occurs above 70 an, leading to a wetness class of III, and hence a grade of 3a.. A small area near the southern boundary consists of an infilled depression. Here the surface stoniness (>5% stones larger than 6 cm) led to the Classification of sub-grade 3a. Droughtiness is not a limitation. Site 2 - Comeytrowe Manor. Sub-grade 3a: Muchof the eastern and central area of the site has been placed in this grade. Wetness is the most limiting factor in these predominantly red soils. Topsoil textures are medium clay loans which grade into heavy subsoils. Mottling is usually not evident, but gleying can be assessed by the presence of pale ped faces and common manganese. The soils typically fall into wetness class III at this FCD level (171 days) either as a result of shallow gleying in association with slowly permeable layers (SPL's) occurring around 50 cm, or no clear evidence of gleying in these red soils but with SPL's occurring above 60 an and extending to depth. Sub-grade 3b: The western and southern area of the site has been classified as 3b. Here, the topsoil textures are significantly heavier than elsewhere (heavy clay loans), and this, therefore, restricts the grade to 3b for both wetness class III and IV soils. The subsoils are again typically red clays and the final wetness class therefore depends upon the presence or absence of distinct gleying and the exact depth to an SPL (typically above 50 cm).

The isolated map unit of 3b in the east has been identified as a result of locally steep slopes. Part of the main 3b unit in the- west also contains slopes in the 3b range. Site 3 - Norton Fitzwarren Grade 1: The entire site, with the exception of 1.6 hectares of urban and non agricultural land, was classified as grade 1. The -soils are deep heavy clay loams with a medium clay loam topsoil. Colours are brown with no mottling occurring above 60 cm and no gleying occurring above 100 an. The soils are generally stone free, with a stoney layer occasionally occurring. below 80 cm. The site is flat, and a small area near the eastern edge may be subjected to occasional short winter flooding. This would lead to a classification of grade 2 for that part of the site, but insufficient data is available to map it as such. Site 4 - Staplegrove Grade 2: The entire site was classified as grade 2. Two soil pits were described (see appendix 2). The soils are deep heavy clay loams or clays, with a medium clay loam topsoil. Colours are brown to reddish. The topsoil is slightly stoney (approximately 3% stones), and a stoney layer was encountered at about 30-40 cm deep in places. Measurement of the stone content of this layer by sieving showed a content of 25% stones. The overall stone content led to a droughtiness assessment of grade 2 for pit No 1, which is considered representative of the site. Gley characteristics occurred at most observation points at approximately 40 cm, but no slowly permeable layer was identified. This led to a wetness assessment of class 1, borderline to class II. This puts the site at the grade 1/2 borderline for wetness. Overall, therefore, the site is classified as grade 2 due to droughtiness and possibly due to wetness. [RPG.0004/CC]

8(--CS 2 x,04 4-J2t1 c., d. TAUNTON LOCAL PLAN: DRAFT FIRST ALTERATION ASSESSMENT OF 1987 ORIGINAL ALC SURVEY INFORMATION UNDER REVISED.ALC GUIDLINES Pool Farm: this site was surveyed in 1987 with an approximate auger example density of 1 boring per 200m. The original =c ALC identified of grade 2 and sub-grade 3A. In order to re-evaluate the site under the revised criteria two soil pits were examined either side of one of the main 2/3A boundaries (see attached map). The pits confirmed the original classification. In the light of this, we see no need, given current re sources and the fact that MAFF is not objecting to development, to do a more detailed re-survey of the site. Pricrswood : originally surveyed in similar fashion to the Pool Farm area. A classification of sub-grade 3A resulted 039 OL for the site. The soil records, however, show that the site was borderline 3A/2 but that 3A was deemed the most appropriate classification given the shale of mapping. Subsequent discussions with representatives from Boddington's soil. consultants produced an agreed st,.tement in which MAFF recognised the site as variable (Boddington had classified part of the site as Grade 2), and that the variability war: within grades 3A and.2. In order to re-evaluate the site under the revised criteria three soil pits were examined (see attached map). The pits confirmed the borderline nature of the land quality but that, given a close examination of stoniness, soil structure and wetness throughout the profile, the land would be more appropriately classified as Grade 2. As a result, a new map for the Priorswood site proposed in the Local Plan has been produced identifying the site as Grade 2. This decision may have a knock-on effect for adjacent areas east of Nerrols Farm which were also classified as 3A in 1987. Given current resources MAFF does not intend to re-survey this area (or dig soil pits) because, at present, the area is outside the Local Plan. However, any future applications on this site would necessitate MAFF re-assessing its original classification before possible objection to development. [MAR-111SJ s; to Monkton Heathfield: this -s e was classified originally as 3A. MAFF wished to confirm this classification by digging one soil pit but was refused permission for access bythe farmer. In the light of this refusal, MAFF has not been able to re-assess its position in the field and would therefore presume that there is no significant difference between original and revised classifications. The land is, therefore, best and most versatile.