From a Census of 680,000 Street Trees to Smart Stormwater Management: A Study of Efficacy and Economics of Street Tree Guards in New York City

Similar documents
Green Infrastructure & Low Impact Development

Green Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Technologies

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Fred Milch. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

Green Infrastructure and the Urban Forest: Thinking Outside the Planter Box

Low Impact Development Site Design

Reducing New York City s CSOs Using Green Infrastructure

NYC Green Infrastructure Program

Site design measures. Chapter. This Chapter explains how site design measures can reduce the size of your project s stormwater treatment measures.

Rainwater Management an issue for the 21 st Century. Hydrological Cycle

2012 Saginaw Bay Watershed Conference

HEALTH SCIENCES BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Selecting Least Cost Green Infrastructure. James W. Ridgway, PE September 29, 2015

Green Innovation Grant Program

Sustainable Stormwater Management through Green Infrastructure. Jersey City Public School #5

Green Infrastructure Overview

Going Green with the NYS Stormwater Design Standards

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Evaluating Low Impact Development Practices for Stormwater Management on an Industrial Site in Mississippi

NEORSD Green Infrastructure Grant (GIG) Program Opening Remarks

Final Impervious Cover Assessment for Upper Deerfield Township, Cumberland County, New Jersey

Separate Storm Sewer System Study Questions/Answers

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. APPENDIX G - Stormwater Study Findings & Stormwater Solutions

CHAPTER 8. Mrs. Zimman s Class - Central Elementary

Managing Stormwater Naturally. July 17, 2013

Planning, Design, and Construction of Green Infrastructure.

Relationships Between Land Cover and Infiltration Rates in Urban Landscapes

Post Construction BMPs

INTRODUCTION TO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE HOW WE CAN PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES AND OUR WATERS Maywood Public Library Bergen County, New Jersey

Hydrologic Assessment of using Low Impact Development to Mitigate the Impacts of Climate Change. Chris Jensen, AScT Master of Science Thesis

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West New York, Hudson County, New Jersey

Green Infrastructure Modeling in Cincinnati Ohio. Small Scale Green Infrastructure Design Using Computer Modeling

FACT SHEET: Pervious Pavement with Infiltration

Three Rivers Park District Administration Center Rain Garden

Green Roofs and CSO Mitigation:

Green Roofs and Stormwater Management Virginia Stovin

Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for City of Vineland, Cumberland County, New Jersey

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecosystem Services in the City. City of Burnaby Environmental Sustainability Strategy

Keep the Rain, not the runoff! Residential Best Management Practice (BMP) Incentive Program Criteria

FLEET AVENUE GREEN STREET USES VACANT LOT FOR CSO REDUCTION. Thomas M. Evans, AECOM Cleveland, Ohio

C.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE. Table of Contents. Glossary... viii. Chapter 1 Introduction/How to Use this Handbook

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Newark, Essex County, New Jersey Volume 2

Monitoring and Modeling of the Hydrologic Performance of the Carroll Street. Right-of-Way Bioswale. Wei Chen

Neighborhood-Scale Water Quality Improvements The Broadway Neighborhood Stormwater Greenway Project

Community Gardens: Rainwater and Solar Harvesting Project

Monitoring and Documenting Green Stormwater Best Management Practices

From and

SUNY Green Infrastructure Summit. April 17, 2014

ENVISIONING THE POSSIBILITIES OF A DIGITAL CITY: A CASE STUDY OF RAIN GARDENS AS FLOOD CONTROL IN AUSTIN, TEXAS CE 394K FALL 2011 PROF.

3. Are there any projects exempt from the definition of Regulated Projects?

GIS-Enabled Rain Garden Design: A Case Study in Austin, Texas. GIS in Water Resources (C E 394K-3) Clint Smith, E.I.T.

Stormwater Management Techniques WMPF LAND USE TRAINING INSTITUTE MARCH 14, 2018

Intercept, Detain and Release. Custer Avenue CSO Relief GRESHAM, SMITH AND PARTNERS

LID. Low Impact Development: Protecting Oregon s waters as we grow

An Integrated Green Infrastructure Plan to Address Combined Sewer Overflow, Stormwater and Nutrient Reductions in Lancaster City, PA

1. Provided a hands-on educational experience for 450,000 people during the series of the Smart Home and Garden Exhibit.

LID/GI and BMP Case Studies

Beyond Rain Gardens Advancing the Use of Compost for Green Infrastructure, Low Impact Development, & Stormwater Management

Draft. Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Dunellen Borough, Middlesex County, New Jersey

Draft Impervious Cover Assessment for West New York, Hudson County, New Jersey

Time Value of Money and Optimization Process

Planning & Designing for Green Infrastructure: Implementation in the Public Right-of-way

Citywide Integrated Stormwater Management Plan (ISMP) DRAFT ACTION PLAN REVIEW Public Consultation November 16 th, 2016

Methods to Simulate the Impact of BMPs

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West Long Branch Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey

Local Stormwater Retrofit Case Studies. Westmoreland County Conservation District Updated 11/2011

Slow it, Spread it, Sink it using Green Stormwater Infrastructure

Draft Impervious Cover Assessment for Fair Haven Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey

LANDSCAPING. Design. Development of the site shall not unreasonably impair the ability of adjoining properties to utilize solar energy.

MSD faces big challenges in reducing sewage overflows into Mississippi

Monitoring Performance and Effectiveness of Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices. Jim Duncker, USGS Kuldip Kumar, MWRDGC David Leopold, CDOT

Roof Runoff Harvesting Benefits for Regional Conditions in Low Density and Medium Density Residential Areas. Leila Talebi 1 and Robert Pitt 2

Albert R. Jarrett. Annual and Individual-Storm Green Roof Stormwater Response Models

Structural Measures at a Glance

October 7, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY DRAINAGE FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS WITH ONE OR TWO UNITS REVISED JANUARY 4, 2018

Green Infrastructure on Brownfields

Appendices: Glossary. General Terms. Specific Terms. Low Impact Development Approaches Handbook

HUDSON VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCIL 3 Washington Center, Newburgh NY

LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE MANUAL AND LID WORKING GROUP ACTIVITIES. Powerpoint Templates. MS4 Statewide Stormwater Summit June 18, 2013

Rainwater Harvesting: Where does the Rainfall Go?

Bioretention cell schematic key

Raingardens. Conserving and Protecting Water L

Deer Creek Watershed Stakeholders Committee

Green and Gray Infrastucture

Juniper Networks CO-8

GUIDELINES FOR ECOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE

Harvesting the Rain: Green Infrastructure for a Healthier Rahway River Watershed

Kittson Parkway / Watershed Park Parking Lot

Draft. Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Fair Haven, Monmouth County, New Jersey

Retrofitting SuDS. Virginia Stovin. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering Pennine Water Group University of Sheffield.

Lincoln 270. City of Lincoln. Stormwater Management Plan. April 2, 2013

GREEN ON THE HORIZON. Challenges of Integrating LID into New Development. Southeast Stormwater Association

Artful Rainwater Design

Small Scale Green Infrastructure Retrofits on Private Properties in New York City Green Infrastructure Program of the New York City Soil & Water

Draft Impervious Cover Assessment for North Plainfield Borough, Somerset County, New Jersey

Figure 1 SSIP Watersheds (Source: SFPUC) North Shore Watershed

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Newark, Essex County, New Jersey Volume 3

Example Stormwater Control Plan For a Residential Subdivision Project. Whispering Pines Lane Anytown, USA. February 21, 2018

Transcription:

From a Census of 680,000 Street Trees to Smart Stormwater Management: A Study of Efficacy and Economics of Street Tree Guards in New York City Elliott, R. M.i., Shetty N. H.i, Culligan P. J.i Green infrastructure and enhancing existing vegetation Green Infrastructure (GI) is a strategy of incorporating a distributed network of eco-technical systems that retain and detain stormwater to improve the hydrology of developed landscapes. GI is particularly needed in urban environments where roads, buildings, parking areas, and paved public spaces create a hardscape that results in rainfall rapidly running off and subsequently polluting natural waterways [1]. However, the same dense, built-up environment that necessitates GI also creates a barrier to installing the amount of GI needed to meaningfully alter urban hydrologic behavior. Although a wide array of systems have been developed to fit in different urban niches, as exemplified by sedum green roofs, bioswales, rain gardens, rainwater harvesting, and permeable paving [2], many can be costly and difficult to integrate at scale. Thus, measuring and optimizing the performance of existing urban vegetation represents an important area of focus for stormwater management and offers potential for more economical use of resources allocated for GI. Street trees and the role of a protective fence Street trees were initially planted for their aesthetic benefits and research spanning thirty years has shown their value to also include many social, economic, and other benefits, as reviewed by Mullaney et al (2015). Primarily for these reasons, street trees may be the most ubiquitous type of urban vegetation (for example in New York City their canopies in cover 6% of the land area) [3] but also explains their shortcomings regarding stormwater management. In terms of hydrologic function, street trees divert urban stormwater in four ways; leaves and branches directly hold rainwater (interception), the tree structure channels water to the base of the trunk (stemflow), rainfall from the adjacent sidewalk enters the pit (surface runoff), and water enters the ground via the tree pit itself (infiltration). Thus, the soil s infiltration capacity can be conceptualized as a valve controlling the rate that stormwater can recharge the soils under the urban hardscape. Figure 1: Instances in the Washington Heights (A) and Morningside Heights (B and C) neighborhoods of NYC, where the infiltration rate of water into a tree pit limited a tree s stormwater benefits i Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, 500 W. 120th St., 610 Mudd, New York, NY 10027, USA

Small protective fences around the opening in the sidewalk (tree guards) have been shown to have significantly faster water infiltration rates then their unguarded counterparts. [4,5] Furthermore, a recent experiment has proven the ability of installing tree guards on compacted tree pits to improve the infiltration rate (Figure 2). Despite a clear relationship between tree guards and permeability, 86% of NYC s 684,000 street trees have no guards [6]. Control Bare Mulch 2014 (May) 2015 (October) 2016 (October) Clover 2x Mulch Liriope Figure 2: Response in infiltration rate comparing a control (a) to installing a tree guard alone (b) and in addition to mulch (b & d) and clover (c) and Liriope (e) plantings Modeling street tree stormwater capture through infiltration 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Infiltration Rate (in/min) Introduced at equation 1, water-balance model of a street tree infiltration performance calculates runoff (RO) from a tree pit as the difference between inflows, partitioned as the product of rainfall with the tributary sidewalk surface area (SA) with a 0.95-runoff coefficient and the product of rainfall with the remaining canopy area (CA) 20% interception [7], and the outflow of infiltration rate (IR) acting over the tree pit bed area (PA). RO = RF * SA * 0.95 + RF * CA * 0.20 IR * PA [eq 1] The modeling exercise here assumes an infiltration rate of 0.03 in/hr for unguarded tree pits and 0.25 in/hr for guarded tree pits [4], a standard 5ft X 10ft pit area, and a 655 ft 2 canopy crown ii. Figure 3: Hydrologic model of street tree infiltration and representative areas with various sidewalk widths ii The median tree diameter at breast height (DBH) within NYC s street tree census dataset is 10cm, and canopy area was calculated by averaging four canopy/dbh relationships for four common street tree species [8]

Cost effectiveness and tributary area The inflow into a tree pit is largely a function of the surface runoff. For street trees this tributary area is modulated by the sidewalk width that can vary from 5ft (DOT minimum) in residential areas to more than 25ft in busy neighborhoods. Here, we examine the cost effectiveness of installations on 10, 15, 20, and 25 sidewalk widths for new street tree pits (10 x 5 ). The additional annual stormwater capture resulting from the installation of tree guards was calculated as the difference between the guarded and unguarded model when applied to 40 years of hourly rainfall data (USGC Central Park weather station (40 46'44", -73 58'9"). The results, presented in Table 1, demonstrate the increase in cost effectiveness with sidewalk width. As a point of comparison we have also included bioswales, which, like street trees are vegetated sidewalk openings but further benefit from quickly draining engineered substrates and curb inlets that allow them to act as catch basins for much larger tributary areas (streets). A bioswale captures an estimated 141,886 gal/yr, based on a 10,608 ft 2 effective tributary area and 43% median retention data from one well-performing bioswale in the Bronx measured during seven storms iii. However, they are much more costly ($55,503 installation and $300/yr maintenance iv ) compared to a tree guard ($1,100 installation and $7.67/yr repairs v ). Table 1 below provides a comparison of the stormwater capture, costs, and cost effectiveness of installing tree guards on various sidewalk widths and a bioswale. Table 1: Stormwater capture Intervention Additional Stormwater Capture (gal/year) Initial Cost ($) Annual Cost ($/year) 1-Year Cost Effectiveness ($/gal/year) 10-Year Cost Effectiveness ($/gal/year) Tree Guard (10 ft sidewalk) 334 1100 7.67 3.32 1.67 Tree Guard (15 ft sidewalk) 522 1100 7.67 2.12 1.07 Tree Guard (20 ft sidewalk) 790 1100 7.67 1.40 0.71 Tree Guard (25 ft sidewalk) 1,132 1100 7.67 0.98 0.49 New Bioswale 141,886 55,503 300 0.39 0.20 Cost effectiveness and storm intensity The cost-effectiveness of installing tree guards also varies greatly depending on the storm intensity, because existing street trees without guards will already not overflow during small storms. As illustrated in figure 4, the incremental stormwater benefit of installing guards is only realized with inflows generated by storms 0.2 in/hr or higher, and remains less cost effective then bioswales until storm intensity is 0.35-0.8 in/hr or higher. The combination of this behavior, with NYC s storm intensities rarely exceeding 0.3 in/hr (histogram in figure 4) results in bioswales greater cost effectiveness on an annualized basis. However, in extreme events or in climates that experience larger more intense storms, tree guards would provide greater benefits. iii A bioswale (ROWB 9B in HP-009) was monitored during seven rain events during 2016. The effective tributary area and the percent retention were found to average 10,600 ft 2 and 43% respectively (not yet published). 50 precipitation per year was found by averaging 40 yrs precipitation data from Central Park. iv Cost based on 5 x20 ROWB, contract no. XG-32250-313MA from communications with NYC Parks Dept. v Tree Guard Damage: repair cost average is $295 but only 2.6% tree guards require repair annually. Therefore annual cost for tree guard damage is $7.67 per guard per year from communications with NYC Parks Dept. Installation costs are from 2016 Tree planting contracts.

Figure 4: Cost effectiveness of a bioswale and guard installation on 5 x10 street tree beds on 10, 15, 20, and 25 sidewalks for rainfall intensities up to 1.5 in/hr. Additionally, the frequency of various storm intensities from 40 years of Central Park data is provided. Retrofit case study The Harlem River watershed in the Bronx has been a focus of recent green infrastructure planning and contains nearly 20,000 street trees, only 6% of which have guards. Using the typical percentage of helpful guards across the city [6]., we assume guards could be applied to 71% of the currently unguarded pits. Sidewalk Width (ft) Number Of Trees With Guards Street Trees Guards Opportunities 10 1774 82 1692 15 10611 687 9924 20 6220 395 5825 25 1254 87 Figure 5: Sidewalk widths and tree counts in the Harlem River watershed Bronx 1167 In all, this modeled full build out of tree guards in the Harlem River Watershed is estimated to capture an additional 8.3 million gallons of stormwater per year at an installation cost of $14.6 million dollars and maintenance costs of $101 thousand dollars per year. Conclusion Street tree guards are a cost effective stormwater management tool. Furthermore, the large scale of opportunity provides the potential to significantly improve stormwater capture volume in areas where other interventions are not feasible.

Works Cited: [1] Mullaney, J., Lucke, T., & Trueman, S. J. (2015). A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 157 166. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.013 [2] Luoni, S., & Matlock, M. (2010). Low Impact Development: A Design Manual for Urban Areas. [3] City of New York Parks & Recreation. (2006). Calculating Tree Benefits for New York City. New York, NY: City of New York Parks & Recreation. Retrieved from https://www.nycgovparks.org/sub_your_park/trees_greenstreets/images/treecount_report.pd f [4] Alizadehtazi, B., DiGiovanni, K., Foti, R., Morin, T., Shetty, N. H., Montalto, F. A., & Gurian, P. L. (2016). Comparison of Observed Infiltration Rates of Different Permeable Urban Surfaces Using a Cornell Sprinkle Infiltrometer. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. doi:10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001374 [5] Elliott, R. M. (2015). Vegetated Infrastructure for Urban Stormwater Management: Advances in Understanding, Modeling and Design. Columbia University. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/d8nv9hks [6] NYC Department of Parks and Recreation. NYC 2015 Street Tree Census Data. Accessed at https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/public-data/nyc-tree-census [7] Schooling, J. T., & Carlyle-Moses, D. E. (2015). The influence of rainfall depth class and deciduous tree traits on stemflow production in an urban park. Urban Ecosystems, 18(4), 1261 1284. doi:10.1007/s11252-015-0441-0 [8] Peper, P.J., McPherson, E.G., Mori, S.M., 2001b. Equations for predicting diameter, height, crown width, and leaf area of San Joaquin Valley street trees. Journal of Arboriculture 27 (6), 306 317