Part A. District Overview. Thornhill-Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 1

Similar documents
Thornhill Vaughan Heritage Conservation District Plan 2007

Village of Maple Heritage Conservation District Plan 2007 Volume 3

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Plan Heritage Workshop Public Open House September 10, 2013

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

L 4-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Kodors House. 35 Rosedale Avenue West

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

Existing Built Form By-Law (R1) Lot size 954 sq m, median 540 sq m, minimum Coverage 15%, median 35%, maximum Height 6.5m, maximum 9.

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

NEW EDINBURGH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

Historic Yonge Street HCD Plan Community Consultation October 14, 2015

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

Recommended Heritage Designation

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

KLEINBURG-NASHVILLE AREA HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY AND PLAN PURSUANT TO PART V OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

The Manager of Urban Design and Cultural Heritage recommends:

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF OAKVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER

Fredericksburg Historic Resources Survey

11.1 INTRODUCTION. The characteristics of these areas are briefly discussed below.

Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

Authority: North York Community Council Item 31.7, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No.

Planning Justification Brief

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

1.0 PLANNING MARKHAM S FUTURE CONTENTS

Courtice Main Street Study Community Vision Workshop PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

CITY OF VAUGHAN REPORT NO. 5 OF THE HERITAGE VAUGHAN COMMITTEE

Russell Avenue-Range Road

16. KING-SPADINA SECONDARY PLAN

KING-SPADINA COMMERCIAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION MEETING #1

6: 2417 Fourth Line, Sixteen Hollow, Lion Valley Park

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Cultural Heritage Landscapes Strategy

Heritage Markham Committee Meeting City of Markham

Planning Department. Director of Planning. Manager of Planning. Planning Technician/ Sustainability Coordinator. Planner II/ Heritage Coordinator

21: Sovereign Street, Streetscape

2136 & 2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Region of Halton

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: April 24, 2017

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Hendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines

1 Introduction. Chapter. In this chapter:

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

SAMPLE DOCUMENT USE STATEMENT & COPYRIGHT NOTICE

SCHEDULE 'A' TO BY-LAW as Amended by AMENDMENT NO. 90 TO THE WHITBY OFFICIAL PLAN

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

KING-SPADINA SECONDARY PLAN

PLANNING RATIONALE FOR 1127, 1128 MILL STREET AND 1125 CLAPP LANE CITY OF OTTAWA

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Committee of the Whole (Public Hearing) Report

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. SUBJECT: Draft Lakeview Local Area Plan (January 2014)

The protection of the agricultural resources of the Province;

YONGE STEELES CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN. Young + Wright / IBI Group Architects Dillon Consulting Ltd. GHK International (Canada) Ltd.

HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 62 Union Street. Prepared By:

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Glenbrooke North. New Westminster s Neighbourhoods Identifying Historical Contexts. Historical Neighbourhood Context Statements 2008

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

Rev John Withy, Sion House, 120 Melmount Road, Sion Mills

Planning Primer Legislative Background, Policy Documents and Development Review Processes. Presented by: Planning Services Date: April 6, 2017

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER

APPENDIX 9 HERITAGE CHARACTER

CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT TERMS OF REFERENCE

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Brooklyn and College Hill Heritage Conservation District Study

BENSON / HUNT TERTIARY PLAN

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08)

Policy Discussion Paper CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

NEW HOMES IN ANCASTER S MATURE NEIGHBOURHOODS WHAT WE HAVE HEARD

7.1 Area 1: Haslemere Conservation Area

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

Historic Yonge Street HCD Study Public Meeting #2

Sustainable Growth. Sustainable Growth

L 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. Cheyne Family Cemetery. Main Street South

Municipal Comprehensive and Open Space Plans

RE: Report CDS (Municipal Heritage Committee Minutes May 8, 2018) Randwood Estate

CITY CLERK. Parkland Acquisition Strategic Directions Report (All Wards)

6. Design and Architectural Guidance

Study Process / Planning Policy Issues

52: 2182 Lakeshore Road East, Horizons

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Heritage Markham Committee Meeting City of Markham Canada Room, Markham Civic Centre. February 12, Minutes

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

Transcription:

Part A District Overview Thornhill-Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 1

Thornhill-Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 2

1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Heritage Conservation District Concept A heritage conservation district is a collection of buildings, streets, and open spaces that collectively are of special historical and/or architectural significance to the community. The individual elements of a district must combine in such a way as to present a sense of cohesiveness. A heritage district is a place of special character or association with an integrity of its own that distinguishes it from other areas of the community. Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act provides for designation of heritage conservation districts. The parameters of this legislation enable municipalities, through study, to define the areas to be designated and to use development guidelines to assist in the regulation of various types of development within heritage conservation districts in order to ensure that the district s character and viability are maintained and/or enhanced. It is not the purpose of heritage conservation district designation to make the district a static place where change is prohibited. Rather, the purpose is to guide change so that it contributes to the district s architectural and historic character. 1.2 Unity of the Documents The Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan consists of three parts, published in separate volumes: This Plan document, The District Inventory, and The original 1986 Study document. These documents are complementary, and they are to be considered as a whole in interpreting the Plan. The view north from Yonge and Colborne Streets, circa 1905. Weaver #260 Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 3

1.0 Introduction 1.3 Background to the District Plan The Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District, adopted by Council in 1986, was the first District in the Town of Markham. The consultant for the Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan was Phillip H. Carter, who concurrently prepared the study and plan for the Thornhill-Vaughan Heritage Conservation District. process. As part of the review, a new inventory of every property in the District has been prepared. The Thornhill Heritage Conservation Districts were among the first in the province. When the studies were begun there were only 5 municipalities with districts in place, and the Ministry of Culture hadn t yet published any guidelines to assist municipalities. In the 20 years since the Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District was adopted, 60 or more districts have been created. The standards of practice for heritage districts have evolved with experience. In particular, a more holistic approach, including landscapes, has been developed, and user-friendly plan documents, pioneered by Markham s Unionville District Plan, have become the norm. The Ontario Heritage Act has been amended as well, most recently by Bill 60, which came into effect in May 2005. The Town of Markham Council determined that after almost 20 years it was time to review and renew the Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District. 1.4 Purpose of the District Plan Review The purpose of the Thornhill Heritage Conservation District Plan Review was to undertake a comprehensive review of the existing policies and guidelines and to update the District Plan to modern standards of practice, incorporating the experience of the local community through a community consultation 25 Colborne Street, circa 1925. Weaver #109 Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 4

1.0 Introduction 1.5 Phases of the District Plan Review The first phase of the District Plan review was the examination of the existing District Plan and other related and relevant materials affecting District, and to undertake a community consultation program to help identify issues of concern. A Thornhill District Plan Review Advisory Committee was formed to assist staff and the consultant by providing feedback on proposed policies and guidelines. The Advisory Committee was comprised of two elected members of Council, two members of Heritage Markham (Council s advisory committee on heritage matters), two local property owners, and one representative from each of the following organizations: the Society for the Preservation of Historic Thornhill and the Ward 1 (South) Thornhill Residents Inc. A community survey was mailed to residents to solicit views on suggested improvements to the District, the District Plan, and processes and procedures. A community meeting was also held at the Thornhill Community Centre in March 2005 to further obtain feedback and comments from local residents. An Issue Identification Report was prepared which summarized the results from the community consultation and organized the issues into areas for action with recommendations. This document was presented to both the public and Council in June 2005. Phase 2 of the District Plan Review involved the preparation of new policies and guidelines to address the issues. The new Heritage District Plan also reflects modern standards of practice and introduces specific elements that are now required to be included in all heritage conservation district plans as per the Ontario Heritage Act. 104 John Street, 1908. Weaver # 38. Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 5

1.0 Introduction 1.6 District Boundaries The boundary of the original Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District was established by By-law No. 269-86, and was approved by the Ontario Municipal Board on November 23, 1986. It is shown with the dash-dot line on the map to the right, and it remains unchanged. Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 6

2.0 Heritage Character and Heritage Statements 2.1 Examination An examination of the Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District shows that it has retained the character described in the 1986 District Plan. Indeed, the heritage character of the District has been enhanced in many cases, by virtue of heritage-friendly additions and alterations to nonheritage buildings. Many new houses, based on local heritage precedents have also been erected. The goal and objectives of the 1986 Plan have been largely sustained, and the District has been successful in preserving its heritage resources and heritage character. Credit is due to the community, local groups, and the staff and Council of the Town of Markham. 2.1.1 Heritage Character Thornhill is one of Ontario s earliest settlements, dating from the original construction of Yonge Street. As with many early villages, it was the intersection of the road with a river, giving the opportunity to develop water-powered mills that gave rise to a concentrated settlement within the general agricultural context. The first mill in what became Thornhill was built in 1801. The British Corn Laws created a ready market for Ontario s grain and Thornhill prospered and grew for 45 years. The repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846 ended the boom. The village entered a long stable period with little economic growth, but new houses continued to be built, though at a slower rate. The stability preserved the village and its buildings for another century and more. In 1986, the active effort of preservation, under the Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District, was undertaken. 30 Colborne Street, C. 1935. Weaver # 95.. A recent photograph of the same house Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 7

2.0 Heritage Character and Heritage Statements 2.2 Statement of Heritage Value The Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District is a distinct community in the Town of Markham, characterized by a wealth of heritage buildings, historic sites, and landscapes. Although none of Thornhill s mills or the earliest houses have survived, a wealth of buildings, both residential and commercial, dating from the 1840s, 50s, and 60s remain largely intact. The concentration of mid-19 th century Georgian and Neo-Classical buildings in the historic village core is remarkable, and constitutes the original basis of the village s heritage character. Other houses dating from the late 19 th century through the early 20 th century represent many of the styles developed during those prolific decades. Regency, Victorian vernacular, Victorian Gothic, Queen Anne, Edwardian, Foursquare, Arts and Crafts, and Craftsman Bungalow styles are all represented in the District. Many of the mid-20 th century houses, including the Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) housing, were built in the Cape Cod Cottage style, which shares the New England Georgian model with the old village houses of a century before, and many of the more recent houses have made an effort to reflect the heritage styles in the village. The ongoing development of Thornhill has maintained the scale and character of the older parts of the village, with a variety of lot sizes and siting, mostly modest-sized buildings, mature and rich planting and landscaping, a rural or modified-rural road profile, and a proliferation of white wooden picket fencing. This character is strongly maintained in most of the village. Although the mills and their ponds are long gone, the valleys are preserved in a mostly natural state as parkland and hazard land, with significant amounts of woodland. The preservation of the valleys respects and honours the mill-town origins of Thornhill. The quality of the heritage resources in the District is indicated by the number of properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, and the large number of buildings carrying A and B grades in the District Inventory. 1892 Weaver #37. 1908 Weaver #38 1976 Weaver #39 The evolution of style, 104 John Street. The Victorian tail doesn t appear in the 1892 photograph. It s still a straight-forward Georgian, although the veranda posts have Victorian gingerbread. The front of the house was transformed in the early 20 th century with the Arts and Crafts sunroom and veranda. Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 8

2.0 Heritage Character and Heritage Statements 2.2.1 Individual Designations within the District Within the District, there are eight properties that have been individually designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. These properties are included in the Part V District designation, and the general policies and guidelines of the Plan will apply to those individually designated properties located within the District. Address By-law Name of Building/Property Number 15 Church Lane Rectory 379-86 St. Volodymyr s Church and Rectory 10 Colborne Street 4-78 Thornhill Village Library 14 Colborne Street 80-90 The Red Cottage 37 Colborne Street 7-78 Thomas Hamill Cottage 39 Colborne Street 4-78 Thomas Hamill Cottage 111 John Street 116-91 Fisher House 148 John Street 298-78 David Chapman House 4 Leahill Drive 4-78 The Edey House At the time of individual designation, a detailed designation report identifying the reasons for designation was prepared for each of the above properties. These reports are on file at the Town and are a useful resource when exterior changes are proposed. Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 9

2.0 Heritage Character and Heritage Statements 2.2.2 Building/Property Classification All the buildings/properties within the District have been evaluated with each being assigned to one of three categories. These classifications are as follows: Class A Buildings/Properties of major importance to the District They possess cultural heritage value They are buildings and properties that maintain the heritage character of the District, primarily pre-1900 These buildings possess heritage attributes or character defining elements such as historic materials, features, characteristics, forms, locations, spatial configurations, uses or historical associations that contribute to the cultural heritage value of the District. For example, a building may represent a historic architectural style or may have historic claddings, windows architectural features, verandas or landscape elements. Includes properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and buildings identified as being of architectural and historical significance in the 1986 Heritage District Plan is associated with the life of a person or group who was of importance to the Thornhill or broader community) Class C Other Buildings/Properties in the District They are buildings/properties primarily post 1939 They include buildings/properties that are sympathetic to the District by virtue of their scale or design qualities They include buildings/properties not sympathetic to the historic character of the District. Once approved, the classification for each property will remain in place until formally changed by Council with opportunity for both owner and public input. The process by which a building/property classification could change is summarized in Appendix C. The classification of each property is shown on the maps that follow in Section 2.2.3 and identified by address in Appendix B. A detailed description of each property in the District can be found in the inventory, published separately. Class B Buildings/Properties of importance to the District They include buildings or properties of emerging cultural heritage value primarily from the early 20 th century They are good neighbours to Class A buildings/properties and contribute to the heritage character of the District by virtue of design, materials and/or scale. They support and help define the character of District. Includes buildings/properties that may possess specific historical or associative value (the building or property Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 10

2.0 Heritage Character and Heritage Statements 2.2.3 Building/Property Classification Maps Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 11

2.0 Heritage Character and Heritage Statements Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 12

2.0 Heritage Character and Heritage Statements 2.3 Statement of Heritage Attributes The heritage attributes of the Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District are embodied in its buildings and landscapes, which are shown and described in detail in Sections 4.1 through 4.4 of the original Study, and in the built form, architectural detail, and historical associations, which are depicted and described in detail in the District Plan Inventory. These attributes are worthy of preservation. 2.4 Statement of Objectives in Designating the District 2.4.1 Overall Objective To ensure the retention and conservation of the District s cultural heritage resources and heritage character, and to guide change so that it contributes to and does not detract from, the District s architectural, historical, and contextual character. 2.4.2 Objectives for Heritage Buildings To retain and conserve the heritage buildings identified as Class A in the District Plan. To conserve heritage attributes and distinguishing qualities of heritage buildings, and prevent the removal or alteration of any historic or distinctive architectural feature. To correct unsympathetic alterations to heritage buildings. To facilitate the restoration of heritage buildings based on a thorough examination of archival and pictorial evidence, physical evidence, and an understanding of the history of the local community. To promote retention and reuse of heritage buildings and take exceptional measures to prevent their demolition. 2.4.3 Objectives for Other Buildings To retain or enhance the complementary character of Class B buildings. To discourage the demolition of Class B buildings and encourage their retention, as they are supportive of the overall heritage character of the area. To encourage improvements to Class C buildings which will further enhance the District s heritage character. 2.4.4 Objectives for Landscape/Streetscape To facilitate the introduction of, as well as conservation of, historic landscape treatments in both the public and private realm. To preserve trees and mature vegetation, and encourage the planting of species characteristic of the District. To preserve historic fences and introduce new fences that respect historic patterns and styles while meeting contemporary needs. To preserve the existing street pattern and rural cross-sections and refrain from widening existing pavement and road allowances. To introduce landscape, streetscape, and infrastructure improvements that will enhance the heritage character of the District. Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 13

2.0 Heritage Character and Heritage Statements 2.4.5 Objectives for New Development To ensure compatible infill construction that will enhance the District s heritage character and complement the area s village-like, human scale of development. To guide the design of new development to be sympathetic and compatible with the heritage resources and character of the District while providing for contemporary needs. 2.4.6 Objectives for Community Support To foster community support, pride and appreciation of the heritage buildings, landscapes, and character of the District, and promote the need to conserve these resources for future generations. To facilitate public participation and involvement in the conservation of heritage resources and further development of the District. To offer assistance and incentives to individual heritage property owners to encourage the use of proper conservation approaches when undertaking improvement projects. 2.4.7 Objectives for Business/Tourism To work with owners on Yonge Street to maintain a progressive and competitive business environment while at the same time protecting the heritage attributes of the District that make the area a unique and distinctive shopping environment. To acknowledge that the Heritage District is an asset that the Town can leverage and celebrate in order to contribute to the greater commercial success of the Town. Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 14

3.0 Review and Interpretation 3.1 Review of Activities in the District 3.1.1 Activities subject to review In accordance with Section 42.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Goal and Objectives, Policies, and Design Guidelines in this document will be used to review the following types of activities in the District, other than those exempted below: The erection, demolition, or removal of any building or structure, or the alteration of any part of a property other than the interior of a building or structure, other than activities described in Section 3.1.2, below. (A Structure is anything built that is intended to be permanent, such as outbuildings, fences, signs, and infrastructure items such as utility boxes.) All matters relating to the Town of Markham Official Plan, and the regulation of zoning, site plan control, severances, variances, signage, demolitions, building relocation, and planning, urban design and other related studies. All municipal public works, such as street lighting, signs, landscaping, tree removal, utility locations, and street and infrastructure improvements. All activities of the municipal and regional governments. 3.1.2 Activities exempt from review In accordance with Section 41.1 (5)(e) of the Ontario Heritage Act, the following classes of alterations that are minor in nature, are not required to obtain a heritage permit, and are not subject to review under this Plan: any interior work, except that which affects external appearance; general repairs to eavestrough, roofs, chimneys, fences, exterior cladding, and weatherstripping; Repairs to broken window panes to original specifications; Roof re-shingling as per the District Plan policies and guidelines (replacing asphalt shingles with the same material); New or replacement rear yard fencing unless on a corner lot; Repainting in existing colour scheme if the colours are in conformity with the District Plan or in conformity with a previous Heritage Permit; Paving or re-paving a driveway in asphalt; and Backyard features that are not visible from the public realm, such as patios, pools, ponds, fountains, garden, and tool sheds, gazebos, doghouses/dog runs, and other small outbuildings. The review of activities in the District will primarily focus on work or projects visible from the public realm (i.e., front and visible side elevations of property.) Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 15

3.0 Review and Interpretation 3.2 Contexts for Interpretation Provisions of the District plan should be considered within the contexts of: The Ontario Planning Act, The Provincial Policy Statement, and Overall municipal objectives and goals. In accordance with Section 41.2 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Council may not pass a by-law for any purpose that is contrary to the objectives set out in the Plan. And, in the event of a conflict between the Plan and a municipal bylaw that affects the District, the Plan prevails to the extent of the conflict. Thornhill Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 16