Sustainable Community Index Defining smart growth in our communities RMLUI

Similar documents
Kelowna Sustainability Checklist

Using AutoCAD Civil 3D and ESRI ArcGIS to meet LEED-ND (Neighborhood Development) Requirements NDIA O Brien & Gere. All Rights Reserved.

Municipal Plan*Assessment

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

City of Langford Green Development Checklist

What s in a Name Sustainability, Smart Growth, New Urbanism

Smart Growth Development Checklist

Tennessee Stormwater Management Program. Stormwater Management Site Assessment and Inventory Checklist. Quick Check o Vicinity Map within Watershed

THE POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR WALKABLE COMMUNITIES. Community Technical Assistance Program Building Active Communities Institute March 2016

BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD GREEN DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES CHECKLIST November 15, 2013

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN. UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

Route 347. New York State Department of Transportation Region 10, Long Island. THE GREENING of ROUTE 347

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

D-O LRT Zoning Discussion. Chapel Hill Boards & Commissions October 16, 2017

BRISTOL PLACE MASTER PLAN. Prepared for the City of Champaign

O Dell Parkway PUD Association, Inc. PO Box 1335

2. Would the proposed project comply with the Land Use map? 3. Would the proposed project require a rezoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning district?

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD QUASI-JUDICIAL

Urban Design and Livability

City of Redmond. Urban Holding Area Master Planning Requirements and Approval Process

A larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF.

Municipal Development Plan Update Urban Service Area and Hamlets

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

LEED for Neighborhood Development. A Brief Overview

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Transit Oriented Development. Overview

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

Why and How to Evaluate the Feasibility of Infiltrating or Harvesting and Using Stormwater. Laura Prickett, EOA, Inc.

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

ICLEI Webinar Sustainability in the Master Plan and Zoning Code

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES DISTRICTS

F. The following uses in the HR District: attached single-family dwellings, condominiums, and institutional uses; and

Subarea 4 Indian Creek. Vision The combination of park networks and transportation amenities make Subarea 4 the greenest hub in the Corridor.

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

11 GUIDING PRINCIPLES:

3.9 Systems Interrelationships

for Master Planned Development Framework Design Standards & Guidelines

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

Urban Sustainability Strategies in the US: An Examination into the LEED - Neighborhood Development Program

March 21, 2018 ALCA Meeting. March 21, 2018

CHAPTER 2: PLANNING PRINCIPLES

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009

Whitemarsh Comprehensive Plan Update: Housing & Land Use. Public Workshop #3: September 20, 2018

Ten Mile Creek Planning Area

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

GUIDELINES. Transit Oriented Development. Approved by Edmonton City Council on February 15, 2012 in tandem with City Policy C565

City of St. Thomas New Official Plan

Official Plan Review

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

CHAPTER 6: Community Design and Appearance

OVERVIEW OF PLANS FOR THE JEFFERSON COUNTY COUNTRYSIDE FARM In the Context of Quality Place Characteristics

2. Would the proposed project comply with the Land Use map? 3. Would the proposed project require a rezoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning district?

Planning & Development. Background. Subject Lands

APPENDIX A - Block and Draft Plan

Land Use & Transportation Primer

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

NEWPORT NEWS/WILLIAMSBURG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DESIGN AND SUSTAINABILTY GUIDELINES

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

Improve Neighborhood Design and Reduce Non Point Source Water Pollution

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

CITY OF CLEVELAND GREEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015

Nanaimo OCP Community Consultation

3 Vision and Goals. Vision and Goals. Blueprint for Bloomsburg. Vision. Town of Bloomsburg Comprehensive Plan,

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC CONCERNS AND QUESTIONS

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

Urban Stormwater: Best Practice Environmental Management Guidelines. CSIRO This electronic edition published by CSIRO PUBLISHING, 2006.

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

2.7 ac park. TOTAL 5,403 DU 1,297,900 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac 5,563 DU 1,121,200 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac

THE 355/270 CORRIDOR:

Preliminary Recommendations Tk Takoma/Langley Crossroads Sector Plan

5. Would the proposed project require modifications to the existing regulations?

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

The Urban Design working group s vision for a sustainable Elgin includes the following:

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

Design for Health Comprehensive Plan Review Checklists. Design for Health,

Appendix 3-D LOCAL CODE AND ORDINANCE REVIEW AND EVALUATION

Transcription:

Sustainable Community Index Defining smart growth in our communities RMLUI

SCI not CSI

25-75 mph 300 mile range 12 x 7

5 mph Around 6 ft. in height ¼ mile walking distance standard

10-15 mph 7-mile national average bicycle commute

10-15 mph 7-mile national average bicycle commute

Goal: Promote positive new development within a larger social and environmental framework to meet many of the goals and policies regarding community sustainability outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Create working definition for many terms commonly used in public hearings. Be applicable and equitable to all projects Reduce uncertainty for developers Keep it simple

Commonly these two documents are not necessarily aligned Comprehensive Plan Land Use Regulations

Sustainable Community Index SCI is a required finding for PUDs, PUD amendments, major special use permits, final plats, and zone changes (would not apply to minor subdivisions (3 units or less), minor special use permits, amended final plats, variances, or FONSIs). Came from comp plan policies, LEED ND (ULI, NRDC, AIA, APA), RMLUI sustainable development code, 2007 Quality of Place survey: Establish open space buffer zones between towns and community centers: 82% said yes. Focus development by allowing higher density in towns and community centers to avoid sprawl: 70% said yes.

Sustainable Community Definition: A community which fosters economic opportunity and social capital while protecting and restoring the natural environment upon which people and economies depend.

sustainability

Green Creek PUD: 40 townhomes, environmental education school, fire department pts. SITE/LOCATION 2 2-5 5 5 4 2-4 0 5 LOCATION INFILL/REDEVELOPMENT: Infill (4), adjacent (2), and/or previously developed (1) TRANSIT: Over 50% of the development is within walking distance (1/4 mile) of transit stop (5). PROXIMITY TO EXISTING WATER/WASTEWATER: ties into existing (4); public extension (2) WILDLIFE/ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES: biological study with DOW compliance 0 1-3 RIPARIAN/WETLAND PRESERVATION: 100' setback and water quality testing 2 2 1 1-2 0 2-3 AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION: Doesn't remove historic/potential agricultural land EXISTING VEGETATION PRESERVATION: <10% existing tree/shrubs impacted (1) or no impact (2) BROWNFIELD/BLIGHT REDEVELOPMENT: Improves blighted lot (2), contamination cleanup (3) 2 2 STEEP SLOPES/RIDGELINES: on slopes less than 20% 0 1-3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: 100% of surface drainage through bioswale/vegetated system.

CONNECTIONS AND USES 2 2 OPEN COMMUNITY: no gates, amenities are open to the public 0 4 PUBLIC ACCESS: provides appropriate public access to public lands/rivers (with agency approval) 4 pts. 0 4 COMPACT DEVELOPMENT: 7 or more units/acre; commercial >.50 FAR 0 1-2 REDUCED FOOTPRINT: on previously disturbed area (1); all structures and parking <.50 lot (1) 2 2 CLUSTERING: efficient infrastructure, development concentrated in node(s), allowing for open areas. 0 3-18 OPEN SPACE: conservation easement meets components of open space criteria. See regulations. 2 2-7 REDUCED PARKING FOOTPRINT: less surface parking (2-3), carpool (1), covered bike storage (1-2) 0 2-4 PARKING LOCATION: surface parking to rear of structures only (4); to side and screened (2). 1 1-3 REDUCED PARKING: Does not exceed LURs: 1 pt. Study shows reduced on-site demand (2-3 pts.) 4 4 JOBS/HOUSING RATIO onsite housing for mixed-use non-residential (see regulations) 3 3 SCHOOL PROXIMITY: within a mile of a public school 4 1-20 DIVERSITY OF USES: 1 point each use category listed in regulations 2 1-8 DIVERSITY OF HOUSING TYPES 1 point each housing type listed in regulations above 2. 0 1-20 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 1 point each affordable housing unit provided above housing guidelines. 0 2-4 AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING: Onsite rental housing, see regulations.

TRANSPORTATION 12 1-28 WALKABLE STREETS: see commentary note: 16 pts. Not applicable 0 1-3 STREET NETWORK: grid small block pattern, 2 pts, pedestrian connection at cul de sacs (1) 0 2-3 TRANSIT FACILITIES: transit stop provided by development (2 pts.), covered bike storage (1 add'l pt.) 3 1-4 7 WALKABLE VICINITY: www.walkscore.com score 10-25=1pt, 26-50=2pts, 51-75=3pts, 76-100=4pts. 3 3 BICYCLE NETWORK: Connection to community center via bicycle paths/routes. 2 2 ACCESS TO PUBLIC SPACES: 90% of units within 1/4 mile of public green space 0 1-4 ACCESS TO ACTIVE SPACE: within 1/2 mile of ball field, 3-mile recreation trail, and/or dog park 0 1-3 LOCAL FOOD PRODUCTION: private garden areas (1); community garden(s) (2); local market (1)

1 1-2 1 1 0 2 0 5 3 3-30 0 1 REQUIRED REQUIRED 0 X RESOURCE EFFICIENCY LIMITED TURF/SPECIES: <25% landscaped areas turf (1). Turf uses 25% less water than KBG (1). DIVERSE NATIVE LANDSCAPE: Landscape plan utilizes 10 or more local native low-water species. XERISCAPE: Landscape plan incorporates seven xeric design principles (see regulations) SOLAR ORIENTATION: 75% of all buildings have solar orientation (see regulations) RENEWABLE ENERGY 3 points for every 5% total energy offset by onsite renewable system(s). INFRASTRUCTURE RECYCLED CONTENT: Concrete/asphalt 75% or more recycled content. RECYCLING: Design includes areas for recycling co-mingled, paper, and cardboard. LIGHT POLLUTION: Exterior lighting minimized, shielded, night sky compliant. INNOVATION IN DESIGN: 63 210 TOTAL 140+ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS 70-139 MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS 0-69 DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS

Staff recommendations DOW compliance for wildlife migration/habitat Increase stream setback/wetland impacts Improve drainage plan to incorporate natural drainage/bioswale design. Provide public trailhead access. Reduce overall footprint Open space through conservation easement Demonstrate specific clustering strategies Reduce Parking Footprint Provide variety of housing types and possibly commercial uses at frontage Provide onsite inclusionary affordable housing beyond guidelines Incorporate playground/court/area within development Design pedestrian trail connecting clustered nodes within the development with the town. Incorporate xeric landscape design Solar Orientation= <75% of buildings are oriented to maximize solar orientation. Renewable Energy=Estimated ~30KW solar system proposed, provide additional onsite renewable energy. Inclusion of above items would increase score to 136 points

East End Case Study

East End: Pro-rated adjustment: Project came in at 103. Staff recommendations: Better location/screening for parking (2-4 points) Renewable Energy system(s) integrated (3-30 points) Private or Community garden area(s) (1 to 3 points) Covered bicycle parking (2 points) Diverse native landscape/xeriscape (1 to 3 points) Inclusion of above items could increase SCI to 145.

Pro-rated adjustment: 5-unit PUD: 78 Not Applicable points 88+ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS 44-87 MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS 0-43 DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS

You cannot rate greatness on a graph! Rip it out! Pritchard Scale

Pritchard Scale You cannot rate greatness on a graph! Rip it out! Word

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." -Buckminster Fuller

www.eaglecounty.us adam.palmer@eaglecounty.us