The Italian Plum Rootstock Trial: Results for Sicilian Environmental Conditions

Similar documents
Effect of Rootstocks on Growth and Yield of Carmen Sweet Cherry

Evaluation of new low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in coastal southern California

UC Agriculture & Natural Resources California Agriculture

Research Article IJAER (2017);

FUTURE ORCHARDS Crop Loading. Prepared by: John Wilton and Ross Wilson AGFIRST Nov 2007

Unit D: Fruit and Vegetable Crop Production. Lesson 4: Growing and Maintaining Tree Fruits

EVALUATION RESULTS OF FINNISH APPLE ROOTSTOCKS IN LATVIA

Grafting and Rootstock Effects on Fruit Yield and Composition in Organic, Field-grown Tomato

Field Performance of Grafted Fruit-Tree Rootstocks Was Not Affected by Micropropagation

EFFECT OF INDOLEBUTYRIC ACID (IBA) AND PLANTING TIMES ON THE GROWTH AND ROOTING OF PEACH CUTTINGS

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

The influence of different cherry rootstocks on sweet cherry properties

Intensive plum orchard with summer training and pruning

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Evaluation of Pyrus and Quince Rootstocks for High Density Pear Orchards

Performance of Different Tomato Genotypes in the Arid Tropics of Sudan during the Summer Season. II. Generative Development

Peach Rootstock Trials Jim Schupp PSU-FREC

In the case of intensive production systems, the objective is to use a rootstock that restricts tree vigour, induces early cropping is precocious and

The introduction of dwarfing cherry rootstocks, such as

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

A study of the plants produced by different methods of vegetative propagation in mango (cvs. Amrapali and Gopalbhog)

EVALUATION OF SIZE CONTROLLING ROOTSTOCKS FOR CALIFORNIA PEACH, PLUM AND NECTARINE PRODUCTION

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

Effects of Planting Date and Density on Tuber Production in Sandersonia aurantiaca

Tree growth over multiple years

Effect of Fruit Crop Load on Peach Root Growth

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums1

IV International Symposium Agrosym 2013

East Malling Rootstock Club Policy Group meeting 15th September 2017

Effect of Nitrogen and Potassium on Growth and Development of Curcuma alismatifolia Gagnep.

Home Orchard Care for Master Gardeners. Jeff Schalau Associate Agent, ANR University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

ARRESTING PLANT MATURATION TO MAINTAIN HIGH PROPAGATION SUCCESS WITH AMERICAN SYCAMORE CUTTINGS. S. B. Land, Jr.:

FIRST YEAR RECOVERY FOLLOWING A SIMULATED DROUGHT IN WALNUT. D. A. Goldhamer, R. Beede, S. Sibbett, D. Ramos, D. Katayama, S. Fusi, and R.

EXPERIMENTS WITH ETTINGER CULTIVAR GRAFTED ON CLONAL AVOCADO ROOTSTOCKS, IN ISRAEL

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS OF INDOLE BUTYRIC ACID (IBA) AND AGE OF SHOOT ON AIR LAYERING OF MANGO (Mangifera indica Linn.)

2009 NC-140 Peach Rootstock Trial in Massachusetts

Unit E: Fruit and Nut Production. Lesson 3: Growing Apples

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this

Rootstock-scion interactions of selected Annona species

Results of a high density avocado planting

Ion Duţu, Crăişor Mazilu, Ancu Sergiu. Abstract

Establishing new trees possible impacts of rootstock propagation method on young tree growth Ute Albrecht

ANNUAL REPORT TO NC DWARF APPLE ROOTSTOCK TRIAL SUMMARY FOR THE 2010 SEASON

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF AMELANCHIER SP. AND QUINCE ELINE AS ROOTSTOCKS ON 1- TO 2-YEAR-OLD EUROPEAN PEAR TREES

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Rootstocks. Rootstocks for intensive pear production. Pear (Pyrus) rootstocks. OHF series

One Shields Avenue Madera CA Davis CA USA

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Effect of Different Scion Varieties of Mango on Growth and Biomass Production per Formance of Stone Grafts (Mangifera indica L.)

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

STONE FRUIT ROOTSTOCKS

New Cherry Training Systems Show Promise Lynn E. Long, Extension Horticulturist Oregon State University Extension Service/Wasco County

Evaluation and Demonstration of New Stone Fruit Systems

UPDATE ON CHERRY ROOTSTOCKS

Apple I. Tuesday afternoon 2:00 pm

The primary reasons for pruning apple trees are to control

Transplant Growth and Stand Establishment of Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Plants as Affected by Compost-Amended Substrate

Butac Madalina, Botu Mihai, Militaru Madalina, Mazilu Craisor, Dutu Ion, Nicolae Silvia

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service Washington, D.C

Proceedings of The World Avocado Congress III, AVOCADO BREEDING IN ISRAEL

Grafting Morphology and Physiology Text Pages:

Inbred Planting Technique for Nakhon Sawan 3 Hybrid Maize Seed Production

Title: Evaluation of the effects of photo-selective shading nets on vegetative growth, and fruit growth and quality in southern highbush blueberry

Selection of Clonal Avocado Rootstocks in Israel for High Productivity under Different Soil Conditions

Tim Smith; Dana Faubion and Dr. William Proebsting,

EFFECTS OF SALINITY ON GROWTH AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF 'HASS' AVOCADO ON THREE ROOTSTOCKS.

EVALUATION OF CHANDLER CLONE WALNUT TREES ON VARIOUS ROOTSTOCKS INCLUDING ITS OWN ROOTS

WTFRC Project # AH A Penn State Project: WTFRC Soil Moisture 39E8

VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION OF MATURE SYCAMORE. Samuel B. Land, Jr, 1

Pruning and Training Fruit Trees

Cling Peach ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO BACTERIAL CANKER AND ORCHARD REPLANT CONDITIONS.

Alternate Irrigation of Avocados: Effects on Growth, Cropping, and Control of Rosellinia Necatrix

SEASONAL VARIATION IN SUCCESS OF VENEER GRAFTING OF MANGO UNDER ANDHRA PRADESH (INDIA) CONDITIONS

AVOCADO ROOTSTOCK-SCION RELATIONSHIPS: A LONG-TERM, LARGE-SCALE FIELD RESEARCH PROJECT. II. DATA COLLECTED FROM FRUIT-BEARING ORCHARDS 1

Welcome to Balsgård. Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)

Effect of Several Rootstocks on Fruit Quality of Sunburst Sweet Cherry

Effect of planting time on growth and flowering of Gladiolus

Rootstock and Grafting Effects on Tomato Fruit Yield and Quality in an organic, multiharvest

ROOT GROWTH DYNAMICS AND CONSTRAINTS ON ABOVE GROUND GROWTH AND YIELD IN WALNUTS

Screening and Evaluation of New Rootstocks with Resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi

Growth and Quality of Oriental Lilies at Different Fertilization Levels

Effect of Pruning on Growth, Flowering and Yield in High Density Planting of Guava

Raspberry flower initiation. pattern. Davide Neri

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

Development of Early Blight and Late Blight Resistant Tomatoes. Report of a research supported by:

EVALUATION OF NEW USDA ADVANCED FIRE BLIGHT-RESISTANT PEAR SELECTIONS

Pruning Stone Fruit. Open Vase and Modified Open Vase Pruning

Off-season Production of Southern Highbush Blueberries in the North of Spain

Developing and Optimizing Sweet Cherry Training Systems for Efficiency and High Quality Fruit Part 1. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

Unit D: Fruit and Vegetable Crop Production. Lesson 3. Growing and Maintaining Small Fruits

Effect of almond x peach hybrid rootstocks on fruit quality parameters and yield characteristics of peach cultivars

Peach Genetics and Breeding for the Future.

CHALLENGES FOR THE UK STONE FRUIT PRODUCTION

Effect of paraffin treatment on walnut grafts under bench grafting

Pruning is one of the oldest

Tree Fruit for the Home Gardener

Influence of Different Protected Conditions on Growth and Yield of Parthenocarpic Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) Hybrids

Transcription:

The Italian Plum Rootstock Trial: Results for Sicilian Environmental Conditions M. Monte, F.M. Impallari, G. Sala and F. Sottile Dipartimento di Colture Arboree Università di Palermo Viale delle Scienze, 11 90128 Italy A. De Michele Dipartimento di Scienze Entomologiche, Fitopatologiche, Microbiologiche e Zootecniche Università di Palermo Viale delle Scienze, 11-90128 Italy Keywords: development, tree, yield, fruit, Prunus domestica, Prunus salicina Abstract An increase of plum industry has been evident in Italy since the 1990s. This growth was in both area planted and production and it has been especially evident in the South of Italy, where the environmental conditions favor the development of plum orchards, particularly those adopting Japanese cultivars. The Myrobalan seedling was the main rootstock historically used in the south of the country for plum orchards, on account of its strong vigor, hardiness, longevity and adaptability to a wide range of soil types. The introduction of new scion cultivars and new rootstocks has stimulated new studies on the main technical aspects related to plum cultivation, to evaluate the wide number of rootstock genotypes which are today available for the plum species. The Italian Ministry of Agriculture has sponsored a National project which aims to evaluate the most recent rootstocks licensed and available for European and Japanese plum cultivars. A series of experimental orchards have been established in different regions representative of the main Italian plum growing areas. This paper reports on the vegetative and qualitative traits observed both for European and Japanese plum cultivars, respectively, Stanley and Shiro, grafted onto five rootstocks. INTRODUCTION For at least the last 30 years the plum industry in Italy has been based on the cultivation of indigenous germplasm cultivars/varieties. In fact, there is a wide range of plum germplasm concentrated particularly in the south of the country; this scion germplasm is characterized by some interesting fruit traits aroma, taste, flavor which although partially linked to the cultivation areas, are thought to present considerable qualitative and productive potential. For this reason, considering the importance of this germplasm, interest has been expressed in these local cultivars, prompting some research studies. Since the 1990s new cultivars have been introduced, and this has lead to the development of a plum industry mainly based on the cultivation of Japanese cultivars (Sansavini et al., 1996). During the same period, new rootstocks were introduced; these should be less variable in terms of vegetative growth and production than the diffused plum seedling and seedling-raised Myrobalan used as traditional rootstocks. In just a few years clonal Myrobalan 29C has been rapidly adopted becoming the chosen rootstock in almost the 80% of the new plum plantings. The increase of interest on this facet of plum cultivation inspired the Italian Ministry of Agriculture to sponsor a National rootstock evaluation project (Mezzetti and Sottile, 2007). This aims to evaluate the most recent rootstocks, which are licensed and available for use with European and Japanese plum cultivars, by adopting a national network of experimental orchards. Actually, the recent advances in rootstock breeding and licensing appear very limited and few new genotypes have been licensed specifically for plum (Nicotra and Moser, 1997). Proc. 9 th IS on Plum & Prune Genetics, Breeding & Pomology Ed.: F. Sottile Acta Hort. 874, ISHS 2010 269

MATERIALS AND METHODS The orchard was planted in 2001 at Collesano (PA) in a fertile and well-drained soil by using one-year-old grafted plants of Shiro Japanese plum cultivar and Stanley European plum cultivar. To warranty the pollen availability for the self-incompatible Japanese Shiro, in the orchard some trees of Sorriso di Primavera were also opportunely displaced as a pollinator. The cultivars Stanley and Shiro, although very old, were chosen because they are very representative and widely distributed in the production areas in Italy. Stanley is grown for its dual function as a plum for both for fresh market and for canning. The experimental location in Sicily is characterized as a rather dry area (annual rainfall average 500 mm), with very hot and dry summers and warm winters. The average maximum temperature is 24 C and the minimum is 14 C. Rootstocks adopted for the experimental design were the following: Myrobalan 29C (Prunus cerasifera), MrS2/5 (Prunus cerasifera), GF677 (Prunus amygdalus Prunus persica), Penta (Prunus domestica) and Tetra (Prunus domestica). The trees were planted on the square, 4.5 m within and between the rows and trained to a regular vase habit with 4 5 branches. The orchard is periodically cultivated, irrigated by a micro-sprinkler system from the end of May to the first of September. The experimental design is a complete randomized system with 15 trees for each grafting combination. The parameters evaluated within this National project focus on both the vegetative and the fruit quantitative/qualitative traits. To record the vegetative traits and the cropping efficiency tree height was measured; the summer and winter pruning wood weight was recorded; the trunk circumference was measured 10 cm above the graft union every year starting at the planting time and used to calculate the trunk cross-sectional area TCSA (cm 2 ). As a result, the cropping efficiency was calculated by the ratio of the production (yield in kg) and the trunk cross-sectional area (cm 2 ). The canopy size was measured by recording the height and the N-S and W-E width; the canopy projection area on the soil, and therefore, the tree total yield/plant. Furthermore, considering the real occupancy of the tree on the soil by the canopy projection, the cropping efficiency was also calculated as the ratio of yield (kg) to the area effectively occupied by the plant (m 2 ). For the measurements of fruit qualitative traits, at harvest a sample of 30 fruits randomly picked was used to record fruit weight, firmness, soluble solids and titratable acidity. An Analysis of Variance was performed and the differences were compared by using the Tukey test at P 0.05. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Vegetative Traits 1. European Plum (P. domestica). The vegetative traits measurements showed that on average that trees of Stanley grafted onto GF 677 were significantly the most vigorous (Table 1). The values for weight of pruning wood, trunk cross-sectional area TCSA (cm 2 ) and canopy projection, give estimates of the relative vigour of trees on GF 677. In contrast trees on Penta exhibited low vigour; while the results obtained with MrS 2/5 and Tetra were intermediate with respect to the others. The data concerning cropping efficiency are for the year 2006 both for Japanese and European plum. The cropping efficiency is only reported for 2006 because in 2007 the growing season was not favourable to production and all the data were not considered appropriate. Also in this case, the highest cropping efficiency was shown by trees grafted onto GF 677 while the lowest was shown by trees on Penta, the intermediary performance was recorded by Tetra and MrS 2/5. The same efficiency parameter obtained using canopy projection, confirmed the highest value for trees on GF 677 and the lowest for trees on Penta (Table 2). 2. Japanese Plum. As with the European plums the data on Japanese plum confirmed the higher vigour of GF 677 in terms of tree development, wood pruning, trunk cross- 270

sectional area (cm 2 ) and canopy projection (Table 3). Comparing the five rootstocks, Penta showed the lowest vigour, MrS 2/5 and Tetra were intermediate. In terms of cropping efficiency, GF 677 and Myrobalan 29C induced more efficient production and once and again Penta showed the lowest (Table 4). Comparing the two types of plums, the Japanese and the European, the canopy projections shown in Figures 1 and 2 indicate that trees on the former were more vigorous than those on the latter type. Qualitative Traits The European cultivar Stanley grafted onto GF677 produced fruits with the highest values of firmness but the lowest in terms of soluble solids content; it is possible that this effect is attributable to the slightly later ripening time induced, although higher crop loads may also lower individual fruit soluble solids. With Myrobalan 29C the fruit quality showed high soluble solids values, while with the low vigour rootstocks, the fruit size and soluble solids contents were also good (Table 5). For the Japanese plum cultivar Shiro, the trees grafted onto MrS 2/5 appeared to have fruits exhibiting the lowest firmness (effect not, however, statistically significant). It is probable that this is associated with the earliest ripening time induced by this lowvigour rootstock. Myrobalan 29C induced fruits of large size (Table 6). CONCLUSIONS All the data obtained showed the high vigour potential of trees on GF 677 confirming previous observations. It will be necessary to delay any final judgments on these rootstocks until the trees are somewhat older. However the results concerning canopy projection show that the spacing s adopted within the National evaluation project and assigned to the trees, seems excessive and that trees could be planted closer together in these environmental conditions. The qualitative traits confirm the known good performance in Sicily of both types of plum grafted onto Myrobalan 29 C and trees on GF 677 also showed early promise. The lower vigour rootstocks affected ripening times and soluble solids contents, gave higher values of firmness and soluble solids content than the more vigorous rootstocks GF 677 and Myrobalan 29C. This may be partly attributable to lower crop loading on the trees and differences in ripening times. This needs further investigation. Literature Cited Nicotra, A. and Moser, L. 1997. Two new plum rootstocks for peach and nectarines: Penta and Tetra. Acta Hort. 451:267 271. Mezzetti, B. and Sottile, F. 2004. MiPAF Targeted Project for Evaluation of European and Cino-Japanese Plum Rootstocks in Italy: Results of Six Years of Observations. Acta Hort. 734:149 156. Sansavini, S., Lugli, S., Martelli, S. and Grandi, M. 1996. Nuove varietà e portinnesti di susino: si allarga il ventaglio delle scelte Riv. di Frutticoltura 9:23 32. Sottile, F., Nencetti, V., Monte, M. and Bellini, E. 2002. Liste varietali: susino (cinogiapponese ed europeo). Supplemento a Inf. Agr. 23:76 82. 271

Tables Table 1. Vegetative traits in European plum tree cultivar Stanley grafted onto five genetically different rootstocks. Tree height (cm) Pruning wood weight (kg) TCSA (cm 2 ) Canopy projection (m 2 ) Myrobalan 29 C 275 n.s. 2,3 n.s. 38,9 b 5,3 b GF 677 310 7,4 73,4 a 8,1 a MrS 2/5 306 1,6 39,4 b 3,6 c Penta 304 0,9 27,4 c 2,9 c Tetra 352 1,3 39,6 b 5,2 b Table 2. Cropping of European plum tree cultivar Stanley grafted onto five genetically different rootstocks. Cropping by TCSA Cropping by canopy projection (kg/m 2 ) Myrobalan 29 C 0,2 n.s. 1,5 n.s GF 677 0,2 1,6 MrS 2/5 0,1 1,5 Penta 0,1 1,1 Tetra 0,1 0,9 Table 3. Vegetative traits in Japanese plum tree cultivar Shiro grafted onto five genetically different rootstocks Tree height (cm) Pruning wood weight (kg) TCSA (cm 2 ) Canopy projection (m 2 ) Myrobalan 29 C 274 n.s. 3,9 n.s. 97,7 ab 7,6 n.s GF 677 328 11,4 127,4 a 11,1 MrS 2/5 232 1,2 54,7 b 5,7 Penta 197 0,3 23,0 c 3,6 Tetra 238 1,1 36,3 bc 5,7 272

Table 4. Cropping of Japanese plum tree cultivar Shiro grafted onto five genetically different rootstocks. Cropping by TCSA Cropping by canopy projection (kg/m 2 ) Myrobalan 29 C 0,15 ab 2,0 n.s GF 677 0,19 a 2,2 MrS 2/5 0,12 ab 1,1 Penta 0,09 b 0,6 Tetra 0,12 ab 0,8 Table 5. Qualitative traits in European plum tree cultivar Stanley grafted onto five genetically different rootstocks. Fruit weight (g) Firmness Titratable acidity (mg/l) Soluble solids ( Brix) SSC/TA Myrobalan 29 C 36,6 b 2,4 n.s. 0,5 n.s. 16,1 a 30,5 a GF 677 42,2 a 2,5 0,5 12,7 b 23,9 b MrS 2/5 34,3 c 2,5 0,5 15,9 b 29,8 b Penta 37,9 b 2,4 0,6 15,2 bc 27,2 ab Tetra 40,2 a 2,3 0,5 14,4 c 28,2 b Table 6. Qualitative traits in Japanese plum tree cultivar Shiro grafted onto five genetically different rootstocks. Fruit weight (g) Firmness Titratable acidity (mg/l) Soluble solids ( Brix) SSC/TA Myrobalan 29 C 36,5 a 1,4 n.s. 1,2 n.s. 15,0 n.s. 12,1 a GF 677 48,4 b 1,5 1,7 14,9 8,7 b MrS 2/5 31,0 b 1,2 1,0 15,7 15,7 ab Penta 28,7 b 1,4 1,0 15,4 14,8 ab Tetra 30,5 b 1,3 1,1 15,4 14,3 b 273

Figures Space assigned: 20.25m 2 Fig. 1. Canopy projection on the soil of European plum tree cultivar Stanley grafted onto five genetically different rootstocks. Space assigned: 20.25m 2 Fig. 2. Canopy projection on the soil of Japanese plum tree cultivar Shiro grafted onto five genetically different rootstocks. 274