Downtown Davis Specific Plan

Similar documents
Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

Blueprint Denver A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INCLUSIVE CITY. Executive Summary

RE-Imagining the Downtown Colorado Springs Master Plan

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Page 1 of 19 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK FOR BOLTON STREET WATERFORD

Chapter 1: Introduction

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

East Central Area Plan

Silverdale Regional Center

Mr. Craig Young, Managing Principal Tidewater Capital 25 Taylor Street San Francisco, CA October 27, 2014

2. Approval of Agenda a. The agenda is approved by consensus. 3. Approval of Minutes a. No meeting minutes were available at this meeting.

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

Draft Bergamot Area Plan

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

Nick Podell, Principal Nick Podell Company 22 Battery Street, Suite 404 San Francisco, CA June 4, 2015

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

LAND USE OVERVIEW WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER

THE CIVIC DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

MONTGOMERY COUNTY METRO STATION AREA DESIGN CHARRETTE

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN. UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011

DALY CITY VISIONING PROCESS COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 3 MAY 8, 2008

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element

DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN. June 9, 2009

TEAM INPUT SUMMARY. Postcard Image?

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

What We Heard. Downtown Georgetown Planning Study. April 4, 2018

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

SUMMERSIDE / MT. CARMEL REINVESTMENT CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

What. - Civic anchors including a park and an updated library branch

1 ESRI User Conference Eastside Greenway

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

2.0 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE VISION

COLLABORATION BETWEEN CITY, COUNTY, UNIVERSITY AND PROPERTY OWNERS

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TODAY

International Blvd. TOD Plan Public Workshop #1

Equitable Growth Through TOD Planning

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

Coast Highway Oceanside, California

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN

Unique. Livable. Connected. Sustainable. Anticipate and Manage Change. Variety of Housing Choices. Enhanced Arterial Corridors

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

East Central Area Plan

KANATA CENTRUM 255 KANATA AVENUE OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

THE GREEN VISION WORKSHOP Friday, November 6, 2009

City of Lake Mary, Florida. Evolution of a Historic Downtown with Transit Oriented Development Strategies

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

Anatomy of A Vibrant Downtown. Anatomy of a Vibrant Downtown

Welcome & Introductions

THE 355/270 CORRIDOR:

W O R K S H O P S U M M A R Y

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

Urban Planning and Land Use

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

DOWNTOWN GEORGETOWN PLANNING STUDY

7Page 91 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 7 COMMUNITY CHARACTER

DOWNTOWN GEORGETOWN PLANNING STUDY

Economic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

Copake Hamlet Plan: Visioning Workshop

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

A P P E N D I X B - O P P O R T U N I T Y S I T E S

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #16 February 22, 2018

Pop-up Workshop #1 Summary of Community Feedback

Broadway District Specific Plan. Community Workshop #2 February 23,2016

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

PLAN ON A PAGE SUMMARY

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

Sustainability, Health, Safety, Recreation & Open Space Working Group August 3, 2017

Economy Vision Statements: Social Wellbeing Vision Statements: Natural Environment Vision Statements:

Planning Charlotte s Future. Transportation & Planning Committee March 14, 2016

CITY OF UNION CITY MINUTES GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

6. DOWNTOWN. The Downtown Element focuses on supporting and expanding the vitality and enhancement of Downtown Chico as the City s central core.

Streets, Connectivity & Built Environment Working Group August 2, 2017

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Working Group Meeting #11 September 2, 2014

Overview of the Plan. The Building Blocks of Centers, Neighborhoods and Network INTERNAL DRAFT

Transit Oriented Development. Overview

arts, culture & Entertainment district

8implementation. strategies

Tonight s Agenda. 7:45 p.m. Next Steps 8:00 p.m. Close

CLOUGHJORDAN SETTLEMENT PLAN

LUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY

The Lincoln Neighborhood Corridor Plan. The LiNC

Broadway/Lawrence Streetscape Design Charrette March 7, 2014

Civic Center District

Draft Memorandum #1: Goals and Vision for Revitalization

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

Transcription:

Downtown Davis Specific Plan Dana Point, CA Existing Conditions Presentation Daniel Parolek Principal, Opticos Design, Inc. Mitali Ganguly Associate, Opticos Design, Inc. January 25, 2018 1

All Places Evolve: Need a Framework to Guide Evolution

The 1961 Core Area Plan

Two Thirds of Your Downtown was Demolished to Implement the 1961 Plan E Street 2 nd Street

1 Project Area 5

Existing Core Area

Project Website for Frequent Updates www.cityofdavis.org/downtownplan

DPAC Homework 2 Assignment Findings: Strengths, Challenges and Aspirations for Downtown Davis AIM Consulting Gladys Cornell

Downtown Davis Strengths Local Business Outdoor Common Spaces Local Art Mixed-Use Buildings Entertainment and Events Local Food

Downtown Davis Challenges Vacant Community Space Homeless Challenges Vacant Retail Space Deteriorating Buildings Parking Minimums

Downtown Davis Aspirations Economic Development & Sustainability Create a diverse and economically resilient downtown Encourage local entrepreneurship Encourage independent, local business Environmental Sustainability Landscape with trees Integrate rooftop gardens and urban farming locations Enforce no waste regulations for restaurants Create solar parking Integrate bike-share Grocery Store Independent shops Bike share Rooftop Garden

Downtown Davis Aspirations Social Sustainability Encourage walkability Create more outdoor seating, eating, and drinking places Celebrate local food, art, music, ecology, energy, history Housing Offer denser, more diverse housing in varied price ranges Keep historically important buildings Bring more permanent residents to the Downtown area Walking malls Outdoor courtyard Mixed-use housing Permanent Resident Options

Downtown Davis Aspirations Transportation & Parking Shift car parking further out and/or incorporate it into new structures. Create a place that is accessible to pedestrians, bikes, buses and is adaptable to changing transportation modes Create more pedestrian and bicycle only streets Community Design Create a social, cultural and entertainment center of the city Create a place of varied architectural styles, old and new Create pedestrian connections through activated alleyways Shifted car parking Walking/biking-only street Varied architectural styles Social, cultural and entertainment center

3 Community Profile Source: State of the City Report (2017) 14

Who lives in Downtown Davis? Total Population: 1,100 in Downtown Age* 16% Under 18* 10% Over 65* Average Age 24* Employment 343 Workers live in Downtown 14 work and live in Downtown 2 work at UC Davis Median Income: $58,000* Household size: 2.7* 51% Family* 49% Non-Family* *City wide Statistic

3 Jobs Inflow/Outflow

Jobs Inflow/ Outflow: Davis (2015) Source: US Census, OnTheMap

Jobs Inflow/ Outflow: Downtown Davis Core (2015) There are 323 workers residing in the core area Here s where some commute: 14 2,450 309 Davis Core Sacramento Davis (outside core) San Francisco Palo Alto 14 people 52 people 46 people 4 people 3 people UC Davis 2 people

4 Urban Form Opticos Design Dan Parolek Mitali Ganguly 19

3 Assets and Opportunities

Small Walkable Block Framework Train Station

Tree Lined Streets/Tree Canopy

Eclectic and Unique Character

Streetscape and Intersection Pedestrian Improvements

Historic Buildings

Opportunity to Evolve 1-story [56%] 2-story [33%] 3-story [6%] 4-story [<1%]

3 Challenges/Issues

The Culprit: The Core Area Plan 1961

Fragmented Frontage Conditions Constraint/Gap Opportunity Asset

Lack of Hierarchy

Irregular Pattern of Lots 5-39ft [9%] 40-49ft [15%] 50-59ft [29%] 60-79ft [17%] 80-99ft [10%] 100ft [20%]

Lack of Civic Presence Current City Hall Train Station Farmer s Market Historic City Hall

Lack of Public Spaces

Planning and Regulatory 5 Framework Opticos Design Dan Parolek Mitali Ganguly 34

Zoning is from the 1961 Plan! Projected development for 1985 Strip mall approach to Parking Pedestrian only Parades on E, C One way streets

Complex Layers of Regulation: Attempting to Fix Ineffective Zoning Problem: Standards within guidelines. Advisory or regulatory status? Sometimes conflicting. Problem: Didn t Eliminate Ineffective Foundation. Zones are silent about intended physical character.

Issues Identified by City Staff 1. Cumbersome 2. Policies, Standards and Guidelines 3. Uncertainty. 1. historic preservation. 2. potential building heights. 3. residential densities floor area ratios. 4. parking in-lieu fees. 4. Inconsistency with densification policies 5. Unclear expectations for public engagement. 6. Specific conflicts or errors

6 Transportation Fehr & Peers Bob Grandy Greg Behrens

Downtown Travel Patterns Distribution of total trips Into Downtown Davis

Downtown Gateways Vehicle Transit Bicycle & Pedestrian

Pedestrian Facilities

Bicycle Facilities

Transit Service & Facilities

Parking & 7 TDM Strategies Nelson/Nygaard Patrick Siegman

Comprehensive Parking Assessment/Documentation Parking is the single largest land use in Downtown

Before 10 AM City-operated parking has ample vacancies Friday 9 to 10 a.m., Spring 2016 Study Area Occupancy (City Operated Parking Only)

Peak hour (lunchtime): City-operated parking is near capacity Friday 12 to 1 p.m., Spring 2016 Study Area Occupancy (City Operated Parking Only)

3-4 PM: Curb parking full on many blocks, City lots have room to spare Friday 3 to 4 p.m., Spring 2016 Study Area Occupancy (City Operated Parking Only)

City policies support Transportation Demand Management, but TDM Programs are Limited Policies: Implement solutions for managing parking demand before building more parking Alternatives to consider: Improve transit access & other TDM strategies Implement parking pricing (in progress) Improve parking enforcement Room for improvement: existing TDM programs are limited. Sacramento TMA

New Transportation Technologies will Reduce Parking Demand

8 Historical Resources Preservation Architecture Mark Hulbert

How many historical resources exist in the Davis downtown and surrounding neighborhoods? Designated historical resources: Landmarks = 11 Merit Resources = 21 Historic Districts = Ø Conservation overlay district: Contributors = 180

Assessing and Refining Historical Resources and Tools Landmark Merit Resource Historic District Conservation Districts Contributor Better Zoning: Form-Based Codes Ensuring Protection for targeted resources, but not providing barriers for the right development to implement the plan

Step 1: Identifying historic patterns and contexts in Davis Historic Contexts/Eras Are: 1848-1904 Pioneer/railroad era 1905-1939 Early 20th century and depression era 1940-1958 World War II and post-war era 1959-1971 Explosive growth era 1973-present Recent properties/resources (less than 45 years of age). The Historic Eras/Context Maps B ST. D ST. FIRST ST. THIRD ST. F ST. FIFTH ST. Identification of H

Step 1: Identifying historic patterns and contexts in Davis Photo Documentation Completed. Categorized by Type Few yet relevant public buildings: 520 Fifth Street (Central Fire Station, 1964) A group of branch bank buildings: 340 F Street (Wells Fargo Bank, 1964) The lack of architecturally substantial commercial buildings: 208-212 F Street (1957) Numerous and relatively large-scale apartment buildings and complexes: 411 First Street (1966)

Economic & 9 Market Analysis Urban 3 Cate Ryba

In Progress: to be presented at a later date Market Analysis of Retail, Office, Housing (existing & 3 trends; local & regional) Sales Tax Analysis

3 Value per Acre Analysis

How do you compare cars?

How do you compare cars?

How do you compare cars?

How do you compare cars?

Value Per Acre: Davis Why This Approach?

Land Cover Analysis: Downtown Davis (Core Area)

Prop 13 Effect

Prop 13 Effect Davis, CA Santa Rosa, CA

10 Sustainability Farr & Associates Doug Farr

DAVIS: A SUSTAINABILITY LEADER The Downtown Plan is an opportunity to consolidate and make visible previous sustainability efforts.

DEMONSTRATING DOWNTOWN There is a possibility for Downtown to become demonstration area for emerging best practices in sustainability.

11 Next Steps

Important Milestones February 15th: DPAC Meeting to Review Charrette Process and What to Expect from the Process March 8 th : DPAC Meeting to Follow up on Various Topics March 20 th -24 th : Charrette 1-Developing and Testing Alternatives April 19 th : Tentative DPAC Meeting (As Necessary) May 8 th -12 th : Charrette 2: Refining a Preferred Alternative, Looking at Transition Areas More Closely

More Information www.cityofdavis.org/downtownplan