AASHTO NTPEP Rolled E rosion Control Product (R ECP) Test Report

Similar documents
AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report

AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report

AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report

East Coast Erosion Blankets

A DIVISION OF L & M SUPPLY EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS, WATTLES AND LOGS

to hard armor

Biotechnical streambank stabilization

A Revolutionary Green Alternative to Hard Armor

Guidelines for Installing Rolled Erosion Control Products in Slope, Channel and Shoreline Applications Laurie Honnigford

EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient [1] Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent

Albert R. Jarrett. Annual and Individual-Storm Green Roof Stormwater Response Models

Bioengineering Shoreline Protection

What Is Water Erosion?

EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Erosion Control Blankets

Alternative Names: Erosion Control Matting, Erosion Control Netting, Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECP)

CHAPTER 2. VEGETATION AND SOIL STABILIZATION CONTROL MEASURES

Biodegradabale Soil Blankets Installation Technique

Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECPs) General Usage and Installation Guidelines for Slope

Part IV(a): BMPs for Erosion, Sediment, Velocity Control

COCO PEAT & COIR APPLICATIONS FROM NATURAL WORLD, ALLEPPEY, INDIA. Erosion Control Products

Bowling Green, Kentucky Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Erosion Prevention Practices (EPPs) Activity: Nets and Mats (N and M)

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

LiteEarth Advanced Synthetic Grass Geomembrane Liner INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY PERFORMANCE TESTING REPORT. U.S. Patent No.

PERMANENT SEEDING. Overview of Sedimentation and Erosion Control Practices. Practice no. 6.11

Structural Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs)

GEOMEMBRANE FIELD INSTALLATION

Coir Fibers Help Strengthen Environmentally-Friendly Golf Course Stream Restoration Project

4.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT PROCESS. 4.1 Mechanics of Erosion

Erosion Control Performance Studies on Ornamental Vegetation, Compost, and Jute Netting CASQA 2008

Bioretention. Matt Scharver Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. #ProjectCleanLake

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

Module 5 Erosion & Sediment Control. Introduction To Geosynthetics In Transportation. Prepared by. For the Local Technical Assistance Program

Applications of Coir Fibre Products in Environmental Erosion & Sediment Control and Restoration

Hydrologic Assessment of using Low Impact Development to Mitigate the Impacts of Climate Change. Chris Jensen, AScT Master of Science Thesis

CHAPTER 8 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS

EFFECT OF RELICT JOINTS IN RAIN INDUCED SLOPE FAILURES IN RESIDUAL SOIL

EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Development of LID Design Guide in Edmonton

GEPETO Project. Rémy BOURNIQUE INSA Lyon Jean-Luc BERTRAND-KRAJEWSKI INSA Lyon Jean-Christophe GRIMARD VEGETAL id

AASHTO M Subsurface Drainage

EAT 212 SOIL MECHANICS

Fire Effects on Soil. Factsheet 2 of 6 in the Fire Effects on Rangeland Factsheet Series PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

ACTIVITY: Geotextiles ES 12

THE ROLE OF GREEN ROOFS IN URBAN DRAINAGE A REVIEW OF THE CASE FROM AUGUSTENBORG ECO-CITY

Basic Geosynthetics: A Guide to Best Practices in Forest Engineering

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT GREEN ROOF DESIGNS CHENGDU, CHINA

H841:02 Deep and severe erosion of roadside ditch to form gullies. H837:02 Deep erosion of roadside ditch

Drop-In Specifications INTEGRATED DRAINAGE SYSTEM GEOMEMBRANE

FOR 426. Mineral and organic matter on the Earth s surface. Chad Hoffman and Penny Morgan

Section Specification for Geotextile Used in Permanent Erosion Control Application

Chapter 11 Site Rehabilitation and Stabilization

I N D U S T R I A L Y A R D S

PVC aquaculture liners stand the test of time

Wisconsin Contractors Institute Continuing Education

AN ASSESSMENT OF STRENGHT PROPERTIES OF. Diti Hengchaovanich and Nimal S. Nilaweera 1

A new test procedure to measure the soil-water characteristic curves using a small-scale centrifuge

Compaction. Compaction purposes and processes. Compaction as a construction process

DESIGN MATRICES FOR EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS FOR MISSOURI HYDROLOGY AND GEOLOGY

Technical Supplement 14D. Geosynthetics in Stream Restoration. (210 VI NEH, August 2007)

APPLICATIONS IN FILTRATION AND DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL

ITEM 164 SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET

Development and Design of Cost-Effective, Real-Time Implementable Sediment and Contaminant Release Controls

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VELUX America, Inc. PRODUCT: SUN TUNNEL Acrylic Dome

Applications of Volumetric Erosion Control Geocomposites

Outline. Overview of Soil Methods. Ecosystem Services in the Soil. Why care about soils? What are biological soil crusts?

Reinforcement for Slope

SKAPS GEOTEXTILE SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE

OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Effects of Soil Strength, Texture, Slope Steepness and Rainfall Intensity on Interrill Erosion of Some Soils in Taiwan

Subject Name: RESERVOIR AND FARM POND DESIGN (2+1) CONTENTS

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PROJECT NAME JOB # ISSUED: 03/29/2017

Adaptive Management of Erosion and Sediment Control Best Management Practices (BMPs) Presenter: Denis Rushton, P. Eng. Date: May 18, 2016

FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2010 REVISION 1 ITEM 709 TRIANGULAR FILTER FABRIC FENCE

Coir (Coconut Fiber) An Abundant Natural Fiber Resource to Save the Earth, its Waters and Wetlands. RoLanka International, Inc.

All materials in this presentation are taken from materials produced by:

EFFECT OF COMPACTION ON THE UNSATURATED SHEAR STRENGTH OF A COMPACTED TILL

Green Roof Benefits. Green Roof Media Selection for the Minimization of Pollutant Loadings in Roof Runoff

Geosynthetics for Erosion Control and Reinforcement

Innovative Green Technology for Eroded Stream Bank Restoration

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

Banking on Natural Fibers Products made from coir and jute play a key role in stabilizing a restored stream for a commercial stream mitigation bank.

CI/SfB (11.1) (11.3) Common Arrangement R12. Uniclass D1372/L141. Landlok. Bio-degradable Erosion Control. Geosynthetics

V. EROSION CONTROL. -Drainage swales separation -Under rip-rap protected -Under rip-rap unprotected

EFFECT OF INCLUSION OF BIORAISER POWDER IN GROWING MEDIA ON GRASS GROWTH AND WATER RETENTION OF THE GROWING MEDIA

Stream Restoration: Working with Nature?

Stream Restoration: Working with Nature? Greg Jennings, PhD, PE

July saturated and give way underneath the wattle or there would be a waterfall flowing over the wattle. None of that happened.

Evaluation of Installation Damage of Geotextiles. A Correlation to Index Tests

Identification of key parameters on Soil Water Characteristic Curve

FINAL COVER VENEER STABILITY ANALYSES FOR SCA DESIGN

A REVOLUTIONARY GREEN ALTERNATIVE TO HARD ARMOR

Salinity Management in Alfalfa Fields

Rapid Drawdown with Multi-Stage

Comprehensive Material Characterizations for a Pavement Embankment Installed with Wicking Fabric

Chapters 6 and 8 revised May 2013

Transcription:

AASHTO NTPEP Rolled E rosion Product (R ECP) Test Report Manufacturer: Winters Excelsior Company, INC Plant Name: Winters Excelsior Company, INC Corporate Address: City/State/Zip: PO Box 39, Hwy 21 Plant Address: PO Box 39, Hwy 21 McWilliams, AL 36753 City/State/Zip: McWilliams, AL 36753 Corporate Contact: Philip Winters Plant Contact: Philip Winters Phone: 251-746-2173 Phone: 251-746-2173 Fax: 251-746-2579 Fax: 251-746-2579 E-mail: philip@wintersexcelsior.com E-mail: philip@wintersexcelsior.com NTPEP / Log Number: RECP (05-04) - 17 Product Identification: WinterStraw HV Bio Description: Double net straw temporary erosion control blanket Netting: Synthetic top and bottom nets (both with 0.5 inch square openings) Matrix/Fill: Stitching: 100% straw 100% Synthetic @ 1.5 in. transverse stitch spacing Test Results Test Method - Description Parameters ASTM D 6475 - Mass per Unit Area Index Test ASTM D 6818 Ultimate Tensile Strength / Strain - MD - TD Index Test ASTM D 6525 Thickness Index Test ASTM D 6567 - Ground Cover / Light Penetration Index Test ASTM D 1117 & ECTC-TASC 00197 - Water Absorption Index Test ECTC Method 2 - Determination of Unvegetated RECP 50 mm (2 in.) / hr for min. Ability to Protect Soil From Rain Splash and Associated 100 mm (4 in.) / hr for min. Under Bench-Scale Conditions ECTC Method 3 - Determination of Unvegetated RECP Ability to Protect Soil from Hydraulically-Induced Shear Stresses Under Bench-Scale Conditions Test Result 5.05 oz/sq.yd. 9.3 lb/in @ % 25.3 7.1 lb/in @ % 27.3 324 mils 76.9 % / % 23.1 344 % Soil Loss Ratio* = 4.64 Soil Loss Ratio* = 6.10 Soil Loss Ratio* = 8.01 150 mm (6 in.) / hr for min. Shear: 0.46 psf for min. Soil Loss = 55.0 g Shear: 1.03 psf for min. Soil Loss = 128.3 g Shear: 1.60 psf for min. Soil Loss = 551.7 g Soil loss curve intercept = 1.55 psf @ ½-in soil loss Top soil; Fescue (Kentucky 31); % Improvement 21 day incubation; 27±2 & = 280% approximately 45±5% RH (increased biomass) ECTC Draft Method 4 - Determination of Temporary Degradable RECP Performance in Encouraging Seed Germination and Plant Growth * Soil Loss Ratio = Soil Loss Bare Soil / Soil Loss with RECP = 1 / C-Factor (Note: soil loss is based on regression analysis)

Erosion Product Testing Summary ECTC Test Method #2: STANDARD INDEX TEST METHOD FOR the DETERMINATION of UNVEGETATED ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT (RECP) ABILITY TO PROTECT SOIL FROM RAIN SPLASH AND ASSOCIATED RUNOFF UNDER BENCH-SCALE CONDITIONS Soil Loss Ratio* Based on Calculated Soil Loss Based Soil Loss Ratio* Based on 3:1 Slope Raw Soil Loss Data (g) Raw Data Regression Curve on Regression (g) Regression Surface Rain Intensity, mm/hr Rain Intensity, mm/hr Fitting Rain Intensity, mm/hr Rain Intensity, mm/hr Condition 50 100 150 50 100 150 50 100 150 50 100 150 CONTROL 48.0 125.6 272.5 20.766 0.0174 49.5 118.0 281.2 Winter Straw HV Bio 9.4 25.1.9 5.11 5.01 8.83 5.8818 0.0119 10.7 19.4 35.1 4.64 6.10 8.01 C-Factor 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.216 0.164 0.125 * soil loss ratio = soil loss of unprotected surface (I.e. control) divided by soil loss with protected surface = 1 / C-Factor RECP Erosion Product - Soil Loss vs. Intensity CONTROL AEC Premier Straw DN Expon. Power (CONTROL ) Expon. Power (AEC Premier Straw DN) Soil Loss (g) 0.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 y = 20.766e 0.1037x 0.0174x 1.5606 R 2 = 0.9961 0.9924 y = 5.8818e 0.1239x 0.0119x 1.1201 R 2 = 0.8766 0.957 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr)

RECP Slope Simulation Test Client: NTPEP Mass/Area (osy) Mfr: Winters Excelsior, INC 5.05 TRI Log # E2231-05-04 Sample ID: WinterStraw HV Bio Slope = 3 TO 1 2 in/hr rainfall Buckets weighed and volume measured every 5 min Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3 Test duration: min Mass Mass Mass 40 50 40 Soil only 5 10 15 20 25 Total Volume (ml) Volume (ml) 1 719 8.02 689 5.66 631 4.63 661 3.99 661 3.35 656 3.22 4017 2 912 16.51 909 11.19 867 8.78 859 6.62 967 6.5 925 6.26 5439 5061 3 1000 16.73 994 11.95 953 9.53 906 6.68 937 7.94 938 6.34 5728 Average 13.8 9.6 7.6 5.8 5.9 5.3 RECP Protected Total Volume (ml) Volume (ml) Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average 4498 Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) 3531 46 Cumulative 1 8.02 13.68 18.31 22.3 25.65 28.87 4889 soil loss 2 16.51 13.8 27.7 23.4 36.48 31.0 43.1 36.8 49.6 42.7 55.86 48.0 3 16.73 28.68 38.21 44.89 52.83 59.17 RECP over Soil Avg Mass/Area (osy): 5.05 Individual Individual Individual 5 10 15 20 25 Specimen Specimen Specimen Mass (g) Area (in2) Mass/Area (osy) 1 492 2.32 783 2.76 816 2.18 819 1.84 826 1.73 762 1.98 40 360 5.07 2 379 0.18 637 1.16 646 1.08 598 0.58 642 0.63 629 0.74 50 360 6.34 3 497 1.73 868 2.18 903 1.62 904 1.3 915 1.25 802 1.64 40 360 5.07 Average 1.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.5 Normalized Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Cumulative 1 2.32 5.08 7.26 9.1 10.83 12.81 12.88 soil loss 2 0.18 1.4 1.34 3.4 2.42 5.1 3 6.3 3.63 7.5 4.37 9.0 5.49 9.38 3 1.73 3.91 5.53 6.83 8.08 9.72 9.77

RECP Slope Simulation Test Client: NTPEP Mass/Area (osy) Mfr: Winters Excelsior, INC 5.05 TRI Log # E2231-05-04 Sample ID: WinterStraw HV Bio Slope = 3 TO 1 4 in/hr rainfall Buckets weighed and volume measured every 5 min Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3 Test duration: min Mass Mass Mass 45 50 40 Soil only 5 10 15 20 25 Total Volume Volume (ml) (ml) 1 831 20.15 1339 18.23 1323 18.52 1355 15.66 1359 13.58 1369 18.84 7576 2 1677 31.9 1925 29.59 1845 21.77 1827 18.26 1829 19.97 1831 22.55 10934 9448 3 1537 28.15 1344 23.28 1747 22.96 1726 16.19 1728 25.26 1751 12.04 9833 Average 26.7 23.7 21.1 16.7 19.6 17.8 RECP Protected Total Volume Volume (ml) (ml) Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average 8185 Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) 8060 8452 Cumulative 1 20.15 38.38 56.9 72.56 86.14 104.98 9111 soil loss 2 31.9 26.7 61.49 50.4 83.26 71.5 101.52 88.2 121.49 107.8 144.04 125.6 3 28.15 51.43 74.39 90.58 115.84 127.88 RECP over Soil Avg Mass/Area (osy): 5.05 Individual Individual Individual 5 10 15 20 25 Specimen Specimen Specimen Mass/Area Mass (g) Area (in2) (osy) 1 1104 5.65 1378 5.6 1372 4 1416 3.65 1481 3.08 1434 2.52 45 360 5.71 2 1068 5.69 1422 5.37 1414 2.89 1397 3.62 1456 3.72 13 2.62 50 360 6.34 3 1229 4.27 1550 4.33 1547 2.71 1568 2.52 1628 1.71 1589 1.79 40 360 5.07 Average 5.2 5.1 3.2 3.3 2.8 2.3 Normalized Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Cumulative 1 5.65 11.25 15.25 18.9 21.98 24.5 27.70 soil loss 2 5.69 5.2 11.06 10.3 13.95 13.5 17.57 16.8 21.29 19.6 23.91 21.9.04 25.05 3 4.27 8.6 11.31 13.83 15.54 17.33 17.42

RECP Slope Simulation Test Client: NTPEP Mass/Area (osy) Mfr: Winters Excelsior, INC 5.05 TRI Log # E2231-05-04 Sample ID: WinterStraw HV Bio Slope = 3 TO 1 6 in/hr rainfall Buckets weighed and volume measured every 5 min Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3 Test duration: min Mass Mass Mass 37.25 45.73 43.85 Soil only 5 10 15 20 25 Total Volume (ml) Volume (ml) 1 2033 45.07 2141 34.07 2134.05 2802 55.61 2154 31.25 2156 22.48 13420 2 2592 80.41 2766 68.85 2736 63.45 2139 29.92 2901 37.21 2729 47.65 15863 15046 3 2565 72.63 2699 55.12 2678 40.86 2665 42.78 2614 33.84 2633 26.33 15854 Average 66.0 52.7 44.8 42.8 34.1 32.2 RECP Protected Total Volume (ml) Volume (ml) Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average 9386 Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) 11924 11377 Cumulative 1 45.07 79.14 109.19 164.8 196.05 218.53 12822 soil loss 2 80.41 66.0 149.26 118.7 212.71 163.5 242.63 206.3 279.84 240.4 327.49 272.5 3 72.63 127.75 168.61 211.39 245.23 271.56 RECP over Soil Avg Mass/Area (osy): 5.05 Individual Individual Individual 5 10 15 20 25 Specimen Specimen Specimen Mass (g) Area (in2) Mass/Area (osy) 1 15 5.59 1628 4.27 1645 2.82 1555 2.41 1624 1.94 1629 2.02 37.25 360 4.73 2 1742 8.11 2068 4.53 1982 3.57 2029 2.83 2085 2.22 2018 2.47 45.73 360 5.80 3 1914 13.66 2228 8.44 2139 5 2151 5.3 2224 5.64 2166 5.06 43.85 360 5.56 Average 9.1 5.7 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.2 Normalized Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Cumulative 1 5.59 9.86 12.68 15.09 17.03 19.05 17.83 soil loss 2 8.11 9.1 12.64 14.9 16.21 18.7 19.04 22.2 21.26 25.4 23.73 28.6 27.27.86 3 13.66 22.1 27.1 32.4 38.04 43.1 47.49

Shear Stress vs Soil Loss WinterStraw HV Bio ECTC Test Method #3: STANDARD INDEX TEST METHOD FOR the DETERMINATION of UNVEGETATED ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT (RECP) ABILITY TO PROTECT SOIL FROM HYDRAULICALLY-INDUCED SHEAR STRESSES UNDER BENCH-SCALE CONDITIONS 900.0 Sand only y = 8687.8x 1.4551 R 2 = 0.9872 y = 0.2712e 1.3519x R 2 = 0.9533 675.0 Soil Loss (g) 450.0 450 g = 1/2-in soil loss 225.0 Note: Shear stress ratio = 1.55 / 0.1 = 15.5 0.0 0 1 2 3 Shear Stress (psf)

RECP Channel Simulation Test soil only rpm soil loss(g) shear stress(psf) CLIENT: Winters Excelsior, INC 16 728 0.188 TRI Log # E2231-05-04 20 1292 0.256 Sample ID: WinterStraw HV Bio 27 2387 0.42 RECP over soil soil only Test duration: min RADIUS = 11 RPM: 13 SQ FT = 0.4295 slope 7063.41 Shear Stress (psf): 0.46 intercept -565.26 R squared 1.00 Average Shear = 0-565.26 Mass(g) prior to test Mass(g) post test Soil loss(g) Soil loss(g) Shear = 0.50 2966.44 1 3790 3725 65 450 0.14 = 1/2-inch intercept 2 3935 3860 75 55.0 3 3905 3880 25 recp rpm soil loss(g) shear stress(psf) 13 55.0 0.46 RECP over soil 18 128.3 1.03 23 551.7 1.6 Test duration: min 7.56 19.59 RPM: 18 450.33 1.55 Shear Stress (psf): 1.03 Average Mass(g) prior to test Mass(g) post test Soil loss(g) Soil loss(g) 1 3895 3775 120 2 3925 3760 165 128.3 3 3740 3640 100 RECP over soil Test duration: min RPM: 23 Shear Stress (psf): 1.6 Average Mass(g) prior to test Mass(g) post test Soil loss(g) Soil loss(g) 1 4010 3615 395 2 39 31 800 551.7 3 3935 3475 460 Comments: Buckets weighed under water

Property Units Day Plant Mass per Area Germination / Vegetation Growth Summary ECTC Test Method #4: STANDARD INDEX TEST METHOD FOR the DETERMINATION of TEMPORARY DEGRADABLE RECP PERFORMANCE IN ENCOURAGING SEED GERMINATION AND PLANT GROWTH Seeds Germinated per Area Average Plant Height # per 4 sq.in. inch Winter Straw HV Bio 0 0.00 0.00 7 0.00 0.00 14 1.67 0.33 21 5.89 9.00 0 0.00 0.00 7 0.00 0.00 14 1.72 1.57 21 2.20 1.64 mg per 4 sq.in. 21 6.73 18.86 Property Units Day Seeds Germinated per Area Average Plant Height % Improvement vs. % Improvement vs. Winter Straw HV BIo 7 - - 14 1 20% 21 1 153% 7 - - 14 1 91% 21 1 74% Plant Mass per Area % Improvement vs. 21 1 280%

RECP Germination Date Client TRI Log # Sample ID 6/2/05 Winters Excelsior, INC E2231-05-04 WinterStraw HV Bio Top Thin layer of top soil 175 seeds 4" layer top soil Bottom RECP PROTECTED Day 7 Day 14 Day 21 Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3 Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3 Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Number of Germinated Seeds Number of Germinated Seeds Number of Germinated Seeds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 6 13 11 6 20 10 4 Average per square Average per square Average per square 0.0 0.3 9.0 Height of Germinated Plants Height of Germinated Plants Height of Germinated Plants 0.7 1.7 2.4 2.2 1.5 1 1.1 2.5 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.6 2 1.7 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.1 1.3 3.2 1.8 1.8 2.1 2 1.3 2.5 1.6 0.7 1.8 1.3 1.2 2 1.4 1.6 1.2 0.6 1.5 0.9 1.3 2.5 1 1.7 2.2 1.7 1.2 2.1 1.6 2.5 1.5 1.2 1.8 2.2 1.5 1.4 0.7 1.3 2.3 1.9 1.9 2 1 2.4 2.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 2.2 2.5 1.9 1.9 6.1 1.4 1.8 2 2.8 3.1 2 2.1 2.4 3.1 2 1.3 1.2 1.2 Average height of plants in each 2" square Average height of plants in each 2" square Average height of plants in each 2" square 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.9 1.4 0.9 Average height of plants in each bucket Average height of plants in each bucket Average height of plants in each bucket 1.6 1.6 1.9 1.4 Average height of plants of Sample Average height of plants of Sample Average height of plants of Sample 0.0 1.6 1.6 Mass(mg) of plants in each 2" square 0.5 10 3.1.3 26.8 20.6 33.7 25 19.7 Average per square 18.9 Total mass(mg) of plants in each bucket 13.6 77.7 78.4 Total mass(mg) of plants for sample 169.7 Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Temp (27 +/- 2 C) 26.9 26.6 26.3 27 25.5 26.8 26.6 26.7 26.4 26.3 26.4 27.1 27.4 26.8 26.7 Humidity (45 +/- 5 % RH) 42 38 37 36 41 38 40 43 37 40 37 42 38 41 43 Light Intensity (900 +/- 100 ft-cd) 798 815 837 820 832 840 827 848 852 841 852 857 842 839 839 Water Added (ml) 500 400 400

RECP Germination Date Client TRI Log # Sample ID 5/24/05 Winters Excelsior, INC E2231-05-04 Top Bottom Thin layer of top soil 175 seeds 4" layer top soil Day 7 Day 14 Day 21 Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3 Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3 Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Number of Germinated Seeds Number of Germinated Seeds Number of Germinated Seeds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 11 15 9 3 11 1 0 0 Average per square Average per square Average per square 0.0 1.7 5.9 Height of Germinated Plants Height of Germinated Plants Height of Germinated Plants 1.5 2 2.4 1.9 1.5 2.4 1.6 1.7 2.3 1.4 2.4 2.8 0.7 2 1 2.2 1.6 1.8 1.6 3.4 1.1 1.8 1.9 2.3 1.1 2.3 1 1.6 1.1 1.2 1.6 2.3 2 2.1 1.2 1.7 1.5 2.3 3.3 2.6 1.9 2 3 2.6 1.4 2.4 3.2 3.3 1.9 2.3 1.3 3.5 0.7 2.5 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.6 1 3 2.2 0.7 1.8 2.6 2.1 2.1 2.5 1.2 Average height of plants in each 2" square Average height of plants in each 2" square Average height of plants in each 2" square 1.3 1.8 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.9 1.9 2.2 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.8 Average height of plants in each bucket Average height of plants in each bucket Average height of plants in each bucket 1.7 1.7 2.0 1.8 2.8 Average height of plants of Sample Average height of plants of Sample Average height of plants of Sample 0.0 1.7 2.2 Mass(mg) of plants in each 2" square 3.3 8.4 11.9 7.9 9.4 15.1 4.6 0 0 Average per square 6.7 Total mass(mg) of plants in each bucket 23.6 32.4 4.6 Total mass(mg) of plants for sample 60.6 Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Temp (27 +/- 2 C) 26.2 26.4 26.2 27.2 27 26.9 27.8 27.5 26.5 26.3 26.7 26.9 27.3 26.1 28.4 27.2 Humidity (45 +/- 5 % RH) 38 39 40 40 40 39 41 41 39 40 40 40 43 41 34 38 Light Intensity (900 +/- 100 ft-cd) 768 813 820 835 850 840 835 850 840 835 850 860 870 835 840 850 Water Added (ml) 500 400 400