CLOSURE PLAN. CCR (b) GERS Landfill Area. Pirkey Power Plant Hallsville, Texas. October, 2016

Similar documents
CLOSURE PLAN. CCR (b) GERS Little Broad Run Landfill. Mountaineer Plant New Haven, West Virginia. October, 2016

CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (b) Fly Ash Reservoir II. Cardinal Plant Brilliant, Ohio. August, 2016

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

2018 Annual Landfill Inspection Report

2018 Annual Landfill Inspection Report

Consulting Engineers and Scientists. Closure Plan. Submitted by: GEI Consultants, Inc Voyager Drive Green Bay, Wisconsin

Chesapeake Energy Center. Submitted To: Chesapeake Energy Center 2701 Vepco Street Chesapeake, VA 23323

Table of Contents. Attachments Attachment A Photos Attachment B Site Map. Pages 3 of 9

Selecting the Right Closure Cap Option for Your Surface Impoundment or CCR Landfill

NOTICE OF INTENT. Submitted To: Bremo Power Station 1038 Bremo Bluff Road Bremo Bluff, VA 23022

2016 Annual Inspection Report

Vegetated Filter Strips and Buffers

Vegetated Filter Strips and Buffers

Exposed Geomembrane Cover Systems for Coal Ash Facilities

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE

VIA Re: Liner Design Criteria for Existing CCR Surface Impoundments Interstate Power and Light Company (IPL) Prairie Creek Generating Station

HIGH PERFORMANCE COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUAL (CCR) SOLUTIONS

Slope Stability in Harris County

WQ-07 INFILTRATION TRENCH

CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360) (360) (FAX)

New Development Stormwater Guidelines

Cost Estimating for Landfill Design

2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens

Alternative Cover Systems

4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading

SWANA/A&WMA s. Third Annual Landfill Operator s Training Geosynthetics in Landfills. February 13, 2013

Geomembranes and Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs)

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS


RAIN GARDEN ILLINOIS URBAN MANUAL PRACTICE STANDARD. (feet) CODE 897 DEFINITION

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Key elements : Filter Strips must be designed within parameters required by the Fort Wayne s Development Standards/Criteria Manual.

Chapter 14. Stormwater Quality Introduction

Landfill Closure, Intermediate Cover & Post-Closure Care. Municipal League Meeting

Protocol for Sustainable Roadsides

Development of LID Design Guide in Edmonton

Bioretention cell schematic key

Rainwater Harvesting: Soil Storage and Infiltration Systems

Huntington Stormwater Utility

Infiltration. Keep Water Where it Falls. Frank Franciosi Novozymes

Eric Konzelmann, CPESC, CPSWQ Assistant District Manager. Montgomery County Conservation District

Post Construction BMPs

CHAPTER 4. SPECIAL CONDITION EROSION CONTROL MEASURES

Non-Metallic Mining Reclamation Checklist

Experiences with Placement of Alternative Final Covers Presented by

Bioretention. Matt Scharver Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. #ProjectCleanLake

A. Regional Detention Requirements

2008 SWMM, 2010 Revision City of Tacoma

Design Considerations for Open Channel and Detention Pond Design. Howard Redfearn, City of Mansfield

Chapter 2 Roof Downspout Controls

Structural Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs)

PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST

GEOWEB slope & shoreline protection OVERVIEW

Gloucester County PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST

CHAPTER 9 STORM DRAINAGE. Minimum Requirements for New Development and Redevelopment

Geosynthetics. Work platforms built with geotextile tubes at the Lach Huyen Bridge. GMA TECHLINE Exposed GM? Deformations?

BRISBANE BAYLANDS INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FEBRUARY 2011 APPENDIX O DRAFT

Maintaining Your Neighborhood Stormwater Facilities How to identify stormwater facilities and keep them working

Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet Vegetated Swales

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGNS RAIN GARDEN

GSI Handbook Details Pervious Pavement

Appendix C. Soil Amendments. Appendix C. C.1 General Description. C.2 Physical Feasibility & Design Applications

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 WILSON MINE LECROY AREA SEMIPERMANENT DEWATERING SYSTEM

Vegetation Management

Severn River Sub-Watershed: BMP 09-Retrofit

Project: Mooney Lake Preserve Received: Location: 300 Sixth Ave. N., Orono Complete: Noticed:

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

Final Report: Appendix G. LID Driveway Retrofit and Teaching Tool at Bristol County Agricultural High School, Dighton - Supporting Information

Volume 6 - Low Impact Development. Table of Contents

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

WET PONDS INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST

Site Formation Excavation - 6' depth square yard $8.00 $0.00 Grading square yard $1.50 $0.00 Hauling off-site - 6' depth square yard $10.00 $0.

Attachment 2: Permeable Pavement Design Guidelines

Public Works Department 104 W. Magnolia Street, Suite 109 Bellingham, WA (360)

HEALTH SCIENCES BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection

BIORETENTION FACILITY

APPLICATIONS IN FILTRATION AND DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL

Why Control and Prevent Erosion?

Tree Pits Construction Guide

Rain Gardens. A Welcome Addition to Your Landscape

A Drainage Geocomposite for Coal Combustion Residual Landfills and Surface Impoundments

City of Stoughton Erosion Control Permit Application (effective 2/6/2018)

SECTION 2.5. Construction Quality Assurance Plan

We Don t Have No Stinkin Dirt! Coal Ash Pond Closures (Traditional and an Alternative Method)

Development and Design of Cost-Effective, Real-Time Implementable Sediment and Contaminant Release Controls

6.1 Bioretention Areas

A. Install all temporary erosion control measures (in accordance with MNDOT General Conditions 2573) prior to site disturbance.

Project Name: Project Address or Location: Principal Designer Name and Company: Principal Designer Phone Number:

WATER QUALITY GUIDANCE MANUAL. Planning and Implementing Stormwater Quality Practices June 2018

OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE MANUAL STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURE DRY DETENTION POND

WAKE COUNTY STORMWATER MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST

EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Monica Smith, PE President Robinson Engineering Company

5.0 Storm Water Landscape Guidance Introduction

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

Green Infrastructure Recommendations For Parks and Public Spaces

Guidance on Preparation of Construction and Maintenance Costs

Washtenaw County Conservation District 7203 Jackson Rd Ann Arbor MI Phone: (734) x 5 Fax: (734) Web:

Transcription:

CLOSURE PLAN CCR 257.102(b) Landfill Area Pirkey Power Plant Hallsville, Texas October, 2016 Prepared for : Southwest Electric Power Company - Pirkey Plant Hallsville, Texas Prepared by: American Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus, OH 43215 GERS 16 096

Table of CONTENTS 1.0 OBJECTIVE... 4 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE CCR UNIT... 4 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF CLOSURE PLAN 257.102(b)(1)(i)... 4 4.0 CLOSURE IN PLACE 257.102 (b)(1)(iii)... 4 4.1 CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 257.102 (d)(1)... 5 4.2 DRAINING AND STABILIZING OF THE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 257.102(d)(2)... 5 4.3 FINAL COVER SYSTEM 257.102 (d)(3)... 6 5.0 ESTIMATE OF MAXIMUM CCR VOLUME 257.102 (b)(1)(iv)... 6 6.0 ESTIMATE OF LARGEST AREA OF CCR REQUIRING COVER 257.102 (b)(1)(v)... 6 7.0 CLOSURE SCHEDULE 257.102(b)(1)(vi)... 6 Page 3 of 6

1.0 OBJECTIVE This report was prepared by AEP- Geotechnical Engineering Services (GES) section to fulfill requirements of CCR 257.102(b) for Closure Plans of Existing CCR Units. 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE CCR UNIT The Henry W. Pirkey Power Station is located at 2400 FM 3251 and south of Hallsville, Texas. It is owned and operated by Southwest Electric Power Company (SWEPCO). The facility operates a landfill for the disposal of CCR materials. The Pirkey Landfill is a Class 2, Industrial Solid Waste Facility per the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Industrial Solid Waste Management Technical Guideline No. 3. 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF CLOSURE PLAN 257.102(b)(1)(i) [A narrative description of how the CCR unit will be closed in accordance with this section] The Pirkey Landfill will be closed by closure in place. The closure will consist of re-grading the existing onsite materials and the installation of an impermeable cap with vegetative cover. The existing surface will be graded to achieve a gently sloping surface to promote surface water runoff. The re-graded surface will be covered with a flexible geomembrane system and 2-feet of soil cover consisting of an 18 soil infiltration layer and 6 of earthen material that is capable of sustaining native plant growth. In addition to the minimum requirements for the closure plan set by the CCR rule 257.102(b), the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) guidelines state that the closure plan will include two (2) feet of compacted clay cap with a hydraulic conductivity no greater than 1x10-7 cm/sec be placed below the geomembrane layer. The surface soil will be seeded and mulched to promote the growth of a vegetative cover. 4.0 CLOSURE IN PLACE 257.102 (b)(1)(iii) [If closure of the CCR unit will be accomplished by leaving the CCR in place, a description of the final cover system, designed in accordance with paragraph(d) of this section, and the methods and procedures to be used to install the final cover. The closure plan must also discuss how the final cover system will achieve the performance standards specified in paragraph (d) of this section.] The final cover system will consist of a flexible geomembrane that will have a permeability that is less than or equal to the permeability of the natural subsoils and is no greater than 1 x 10-5 cm/sec. In addition to the minimum requirements for the closure plan set by the CCR rule 257.102(b), the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) guidelines state that the closure plan will include two (2) feet of compacted clay cap with a hydraulic conductivity no greater than 1x10-7 cm/sec be placed below the geomembrane layer. Over the geomembrane will be installed an infiltration layer consisting of 18 of earthen material and an erosion layer consisting of 6 of earthen material that is capable of sustaining native plant growth. The final cover will be seeded and mulched to promote growth of a vegetative cover. The final cover slope will be a minimum of 2% and will convey water to a TPDES permitted outfall. Prior to installation of the final cover system the impoundment will be drained of the free water within the ash and soil material will be placed to provide a stable subgrade. Page 4 of 6

4.1 CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 257.102 (d)(1) 4.1.1 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(i) [Control, minimize or eliminate, the maximum extent feasible, post-closure infiltration of liquids into the waste and releases of CCR, leachate, or contaminated run-off to the ground or surface waters or to the atmosphere.] The final cover system will cover the CCR material and will have a permeability that is less than or equal to the permeability of the natural subsoils and is no greater than 1 x 10-5 cm/sec. 4.1.2 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(ii) [Preclude the probability of future impoundment of water, sediment, or slurry.] The final surface areas will be graded to a minimum slope of 2% to prevent the ponding of surface water runoff. Drainage features will be designed to have positive drainage. 4.1.3 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(iii) [Include measures that provide for major slope stability to prevent the sloughing or movement of the final cover system during the closure and post-closure care period.] The final cover system will be gently graded with a minimum of 2% slope. The final configuration of the impoundment will meet the stability requirements to prevent the sloughing or movement of the final cover system during the closure and post-closure care period. 4.1.4 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(iv) [Minimize the need for further maintenance of the CCR unit.] The landfill facility will be vegetated to prevent erosion. Maintenance of the final cover system will include mowing. 4.1.5 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(v) [Be completed in the shortest amount of time consistent with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.] The CCR unit will be closed in a timeframe consistent with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. As the fill reaches the approved final grades, periodic closure activities may occur. 4.2 DRAINING AND STABILIZING OF THE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 257.102(d)(2) This section is not applicable to a landfill. Page 5 of 6

4.3 FINAL COVER SYSTEM 257.102 (d)(3) [If a CCR unit is closed by leaving CCR in place, the owner or operator must install a final cover system that is designed to minimize infiltration and erosion, and at a minimum, meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section, or the requirements of the alternative final cover system specified in paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this section. The final cover system must be designed and constructed to meet the criteria in paragraphs (d)(3)(i)(a) through (D) of this section. The design of the final cover system must be included in the written closure plan.] The final cover system will consist of a flexible geomembrane that will have a permeability that is less than or equal to the permeability of the natural subsoils and is no greater than 1 x 10-5 cm/sec. In addition to the minimum requirements for the closure plan set by the CCR rule 257.102(b), the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) guidelines state that the closure plan will include two (2) feet of compacted clay cap with a hydraulic conductivity no greater than 1x10-7 cm/sec be placed below the geomembrane layer. Over the geomembrane will be installed an infiltration layer consisting of 18 of earthen material and an erosion layer consisting of 6 of earthen material that is capable of sustaining native plant growth. The final cover will be seeded and mulched to promote growth of a vegetative cover. The final cover slope will be a minimum of 2% and will convey water to a TPDES permitted outfall. The final cover slope will be a minimum of 2% to accommodate settling and subsidence. 5.0 ESTIMATE OF MAXIMUM CCR VOLUME 257.102 (b)(1)(iv) [An estimate of the maximum inventory of CCR ever on-site over the active life of the CCR unit.] The estimated maximum CCR volume on-site is 10,850 Acre-Ft. or 17,500,000 Cubic Yards for the FGD Stack Out Area. 6.0 ESTIMATE OF LARGEST AREA OF CCR REQUIRING COVER 257.102 (b)(1)(v) [An estimate of the largest area of CCR unit ever requiring a final cover The largest area of the CCR unit requiring a final cover is 72 acres for the Landfill Area. 7.0 CLOSURE SCHEDULE 257.102(b)(1)(vi) [A schedule for completing all activities necessary to satisfy the closure criteria in the section, including an estimate of the year in which all closure activities for the CCR unit will be completed. The schedule should provide sufficient information to describe the sequential steps that will be taken to close the CCR unit, including identification of major milestones such as coordinating with and obtaining necessary approvals and permits from other agencies, the dewatering and stabilization phases of the CCR surface impoundment closure, or installation of the final cover system, and the estimated timeframes to complete each step or phase of the CCR unit closure. At this time, the facility will close once it reaches final grades. Based on the design capacity and expected current disposal volumes it is estimated that the landfill will be closed after Year 2022. Page 6 of 6