9/20/2016 2:27 PM Second Revision No. 5006-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.56 ] 3.3.56 Delayed Action Closer. Self-closing device that incorporates a delay prior to the initiation of closing. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing. (SAF-MEA) Submitter Full Name: SAF-MEA Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 11:39:31 EDT 2016 NOTE: This Public Comment appreared as CC Note No. 1 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballots of Pappas and Tierney to revise the definition by combining the two sentences to read as follows: Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing. (SAF-MEA) This action will be considered as a public comment. Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 3.3.56]
9/20/2016 2:27 PM Second Revision No. 5001-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.1.5.10.7 ] 7.2.1.5.10.7 Two releasing operations shall be permitted for educational occupancy classroom doors secured against unwanted entry in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 15. Submitter Full Name: SAF-MEA Submittal Date: Mon Jun 20 10:04:56 EDT 2016 It is the position of the TC on Means of Egress that increasing the number of latch/lock releasing operations is dangerous and could create a hazard to occupants. Technology exists that will meet the current code requirement for not more than one latch/lock releasing operation. The need for multiple operations is contrary to decades of experience resulting in fatalities in schools and other buildings. Single-action egress is an important aspect of life safety for all emergencies. Public Comment No. 42-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 7.2.1.5.3]
9/20/2016 2:27 PM Second Revision No. 5003-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.1.6.1 ] 7.2.1.6.1 Delayed-Egress Electrically Electrical Locking Systems. 7.2.1.6.1.1 Approved, delayed-egress electrically electrical locking systems shall be permitted to be installed on door assemblies serving lowand ordinary-hazard contents in buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordance with Section 9.6 or an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7, and where permitted in Chapters 11 through 43, provided that all of the following criteria are met: (1) The delay of the delayed-egress electrically electrical locking system shall deactivate allowing unobstructed egress upon actuation of one of the following: (a) Approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7 (b) Not more than one heat detector of an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordance with Section 9.6 (c) Not more than two smoke detectors of an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordance with Section 9.6 (2) The delay of the delayed-egress electrically electrical locking system shall deactivate allowing unobstructed egress upon loss of power controlling the lock or locking mechanism. (3)* An irreversible process shall release the electrical lock in the direction of egress within 15 seconds, or 30 seconds where approved by the authority having jurisdiction, upon application of a force to the release device required in 7.2.1.5.10 under all of the following conditions: (a) The force shall not be required to exceed 15 lbf (67 N). (b) The force shall not be required to be continuously applied for more than 3 seconds. (c) The initiation of the release process shall activate an audible signal in the vicinity of the door opening. (d) Once the electrical lock has been released by the application of force to the releasing device, rearming the delay electronics shall be by manual means only. (4)* A readily visible, durable sign that conforms to the visual characters requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1, Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities, shall be located on the door leaf adjacent to the release device in the direction of egress, and shall read as follows: (a) (b) PUSH UNTIL ALARM SOUNDS, DOOR CAN BE OPENED IN 15 SECONDS, for doors that swing in the direction of egress travel PULL UNTIL ALARM SOUNDS, DOOR CAN BE OPENED IN 15 SECONDS, for doors that swing against the direction of egress travel (5) The egress side of doors equipped with delayed-egress electrically electrical locking system shall be provided with emergency lighting in accordance with Section 7.9. (6) Hardware for new installations shall be listed in accordance with ANSI/UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units. 7.2.1.6.1.2 The provisions of 7.2.1.6.2 for sensor-release of electrical locking systems shall not apply to door assemblies with delayed-egress electrically electrical locking systems. Submitter Full Name: SAF-MEA Submittal Date: Mon Jun 20 11:11:25 EDT 2016 NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 7 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Tierney to revise the term delayed egress electrically locking systems to delayed egress electrical locking systems and make consistent use of the term. This action will be considered as a public comment.
9/20/2016 2:27 PM Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 7.2.1.6.1]
9/20/2016 2:27 PM Second Revision No. 5009-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.1.6.3 ] 7.2.1.6.3 Elevator Lobby Exit Access Door Assemblies Locking. Where permitted in Chapters 11 through 43, door assemblies separating the elevator lobby from the exit access required by 7.4.1.6.1 shall be permitted to be electrically locked, provided that all the following criteria are met: (1) The electrical locking hardware is listed in accordance with ANSI/UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units. (2) The building is protected throughout by a fire alarm system in accordance with Section 9.6. (3) The building is protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. (4) Waterflow in the sprinkler system required by 7.2.1.6.3(3) is arranged to initiate the building fire alarm system. (5) The elevator lobby is protected by an approved, supervised smoke detection system in accordance with Section 9.6. (6) Detection of smoke by the detection system required by 7.2.1.6.3(5) is arranged to initiate the building fire alarm system and notify building occupants. (7) Initiation of the building fire alarm system by other than manual fire alarm boxes unlocks the electrical locks on the elevator lobby door assembly. (8) Loss of power to the elevator lobby electrical lock system unlocks the electrical locks on the elevator lobby door assemblies. (9) Once unlocked, the elevator lobby door assemblies remain electrically unlocked until the building fire alarm system has been manually reset. (10) Where the elevator lobby door assemblies remain mechanically latched after being electrically unlocked, latch-releasing hardware in accordance with 7.2.1.5.10 is affixed to the door leaves. (11) A two-way communication system is provided for communication between the elevator lobby and a central control point that is constantly staffed. (12) The central control point staff required by 7.2.1.6.3 is capable, trained, and authorized to provide emergency assistance. (13) The provisions of 7.2.1.6.1 for delayed-egress electrically electrical locking systems are not applied to the elevator lobby door assemblies. (14) * The provisions of 7.2.1.6.2 for sensor-release of electrical locking systems are not applied to the elevator lobby door assemblies. Submitter Full Name: SAF-MEA Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 15:36:35 EDT 2016 : The revision responds to CC Note 7.
0 9/20/2016 2:27 PM Second Revision No. 5004-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.1.15.6 ] 7.2.1.15.6 As a minimum, the following items shall be verified: (1) Floor space on both sides of the openings is clear of obstructions, and door leaves open fully and close freely. (2) Forces required to set door leaves in motion and move to the fully open position do not exceed the requirements in 7.2.1.4.5. (3) Latching and locking devices comply with 7.2.1.5. (4) Releasing hardware devices are installed in accordance with 7.2.1.5.10.1. (5) Door leaves of paired openings are installed in accordance with 7.2.1.5.11. (6) Door closers are adjusted properly to control the closing speed of door leaves in accordance with accessibility requirements. (7) Projection of door leaves into the path of egress does not exceed the encroachment permitted by 7.2.1.4.3. (8) Powered door openings operate in accordance with 7.2.1.9. (9) Signage required by 7.2.1.4.1(3), 7.2.1.5.5, 7.2.1.6, and 7.2.1.9 is intact and legible. (10) Door openings with special locking arrangements function in accordance with 7.2.1.6. (11) Security devices that impede egress are not installed on openings, as required by 7.2.1.5.12. (12) Where required by 7.2.2.5.5.7, door hardware marking is present and intact. (13) Emergency lighting on sensor-release of electrical locking systems and doors equipped with delayed-egress electrically electrical locking systems is present and functioning in accordance with Section 7.9. Submitter Full Name: SAF-MEA Submittal Date: Mon Jun 20 11:23:14 EDT 2016 The committee believes that verifying the presence of emergency lighting is appropriate, but functional testing of emergency lighting is covered in Section 7.9 and therefore does not need to be part of the door inspection procedures. The requirement for verifying the presence of emergency lighting is consistent with the other provisions in 7.2.1.15.6. The revision also responds to CC Note 7, which replaces 'electrically' with 'electrical'. Public Comment No. 61-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 7.2.1.15.6]
3 9/20/2016 2:27 PM Second Revision No. 5010-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. A.7.2.1.6 ] A.7.2.1.6 None of the special locking arrangements addressed in 7.2.1.6 are intended to allow credentialed egress, request to exit, or similar provisions, where an occupant cannot leave the building without swiping a card through a reader. Where such an arrangement is desired to keep track of occupants, the swiping of cards needs to be procedural but not necessary for releasing the door lock or latch. Free egress needs to be available at all times. Another option to free egress is the use of a delayed-egress electrically electrical locking system. Submitter Full Name: SAF-MEA Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 15:40:13 EDT 2016 : The revision responds to CC Note 7.
9/20/2016 2:53 PM Second Revision No. 2011-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 14.2.2.2.4 ] 14.2.2.2.4* Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry. Classroom doors shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that the locking means is approved and all of the following conditions are met: The locking means is approved. (1) The locking means can shall be capable of being engaged without opening the door. (2) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door can be accomplished without the use of a key or tool, tool, or special knowledge or effort. (3) The unlocking and unlatching requires releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than one releasing operation. (4) The releasing mechanism for unlocking and unlatching means are mounted shall be located at a height not less than 34 in. (865 mm) and not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor. (5) Locks, if remotely engaged, can shall be unlocked unlockable from the classroom side of the door without the use of a key, tool, or special knowledge or effort. (6) The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room by staff with the necessary key or other credential. (7) The locking means does shall not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware. (8) Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80. (9) The emergency action plan, required by 14.7.1, addresses shall address the use of the locking and unlocking means from within and outside the room. (10) Staff is drilled in the engagement and release of the locking means, from within and outside the room, as part of the emergency egress drills required by 14.7.2. Supplemental Information File Name A.14.2.2.2.4.docx Description Submitter Full Name: SAF-END Submittal Date: Tue Jul 26 13:56:33 EDT 2016 The supports the First Draft text with minor modifications as directed by the Correlating. During the First Draft, the section was inadvertantly added with no charging statement. A statement has been added to the front of the Section to clarify that classroom doors are permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry only if the locking means is approved and all of the criteria in the list are met. The committee used some of the changes as proposed in Public Comment No.183 as the basis for edits to the section. Numbered items were updated with the word "shall" for editorial correction. Text was added to clarify that the unlocking and unlatching operation in the classroom cannot require the use of key, tool, special knowledge or effort which is consistent with other locking and latching provisions in Chapter 7. A minimum height for the location of the releasing mechanism, consistent with Chapter 7, was added to ensure that the mechanism was not located on the floor or low on the door and the text was updated to clarify that it is the releasing mechanism that must be located within the 34-48" range. Item 7 has been updated to delete 'by staff' from the First Revision as it was too specific. It may not just be staff opening the door, it could be first responders for example. The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors against unwanted entry and accepted the need that a second locking means may be needed for existing buildings. The multiple provisions proposed as part of 14.2.2.2.4 / 15.2.2.2.4 address the concerns for accomplishing door locking in a safe manner. The detailed criteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar with traditional egress needs. Annex: While the Section is written to apply only to classroom doors, newly proposed Annex language explains to AHJs and
9/20/2016 2:53 PM facilities how the section may be useful in other areas of educational occupancies that may also need to be secured. Public Comment No. 183-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 14.2.2.2.4] Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 14.2.2.2.3]
A.14.2.2.2.4 While Section 14.2.2.2.4 establishes locking criteria for classroom doors only, there may be situations where a school s emergency action plan identifies other areas that may need to be secured. The provisions of this Section may be considered when evaluating those areas as well. Examples of those areas are administrative offices, gymnasiums, teacher lounges, libraries, auditoriums, and cafeterias.
9/20/2016 2:53 PM Second Revision No. 2005-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 15.2.2.2.4 ] 15.2.2.2.4* Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry. Classroom doors shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that the locking means is approved and all of the following conditions are met: The locking means is approved. (1) The locking means can shall be capable of being engaged without opening the door. (2) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door can be accomplished without the use of a key or tool, tool, or special knowledge or effort. (3) The unlocking and unlatching requires releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than two releasing operations. (4) The releasing mechanism for unlocking and unlatching means are mounted shall be located at a height not less than 34 in. (865 mm) and not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor. (5) Locks, if remotely engaged, can shall be unlocked unlockable from the classroom side of the door without the use of a key, tool, or special knowledge or effort. (6) The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room by staff with the necessary key or other credential. (7) The locking means does not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware. (8) Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80. (9) The emergency action plan, required by 15.7.1 14.7.1, addresses shall address the use of the locking and unlocking means from within and outside the room. (10) Staff is drilled in the engagement and release of the locking means, from within and outside the room, as part of the emergency egress drills required by 15.7.2 14.7.2. Supplemental Information File Name A.15.2.2.2.4.docx 15.2.2.2.4_Terra_attachment.docx Description For staff use Submitter Full Name: SAF-END Submittal Date: Fri Jul 29 10:16:44 EDT 2016 The supports the First Draft text with minor modifications as directed by the Correlating. During the First Draft, the section was entertainingly added with no charging statement. A statement has been added to the front of the Section to clarify that classroom doors are permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry only if the locking means is approved and all of the criteria in the list are met. The committee used some of the changes as proposed in Public Comment No.185 as the basis for edits to the section. Numbered items were updated with the word "shall" for editorial correction. Text was added to clarify that the unlocking and unlatching operation in the classroom cannot require the use of key, tool, special knowledge or effort which is consistent with other locking and latching provisions in Chapter 7. A minimum height for the location of the releasing mechanism, consistent with Chapter 7, was added to ensure that the mechanism was not located on the floor or low on the door and the text was updated to clarify that it is the releasing mechanism that must be located within the 34-48" range. Item 7 has been updated to delete 'by staff' from the First Revision as it was too specific. It may not just be staff opening the door, it could be first responders for example. The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors against unwanted entry and accepted the need that a second locking means may be needed for existing buildings. The multiple provisions proposed as part of 14.2.2.2.4 / 15.2.2.2.4 address the concerns for accomplishing door locking in a safe manner. The detailed criteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar with traditional egress needs.
9/20/2016 2:53 PM The proposed language supports a safe installation and necessary guidance for situations that are already occurring in existing buildings. The language is written so that it is done to protect occupants but also to ensure the door is operable for safe and quick egress during emergencies. There are currently close to 100,000 existing public school buildings across the country. Without this guidance, non-compliant, and dangerous, installations will continue to occur. Other protection measures are required and relied upon by the Code as part of a total life safety approach. The intent of Chapter 15 is to provide those other measures necessary to ensure that total protection approach. For example, it is critical to ensure the door can be unlocked and opened from outside the room so as to not impede the ability for authorized responders to enter the classroom. The language permits not more than two releasing operations, two releasing operations are not mandatory. It is ultimately up to the local AHJ to approve the locking arrangement. Approval of locking devices may depend on individual scenarios such as classroom use, occupant load, and staffing. The committee supports this as a package of requirements that, together, provide the necessary guidance needed for classroom door locking in existing educational occupancies. The recognizes that hardware does exists, and could be used, that allows two locking mechanisms/devices with one releasing action, such as residential hotel locks. The proposed language addresses the inevitable existing conditions that cannot utilize the "hotel locks." Annex: While the Section is written to apply only to classroom doors, newly proposed Annex language explains to AHJs and facilities how the section may be useful in other areas of educational occupancies that may also need to be secured. Public Comment No. 185-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 15.2.2.2.4] Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 15.2.2.2.3] Public Comment No. 121-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 15.2.2.2.4]
A.15.2.2.2.4 While Section 15.2.2.2.4 establishes locking criteria for classroom doors only, there may be situations where a school s emergency action plan identifies other areas that may need to be secured. The provisions of this Section may be considered when evaluating those areas as well. Examples of those areas are administrative offices, gymnasiums, teacher lounges, libraries, auditoriums, and cafeterias.
9/20/2016 2:53 PM Second Revision No. 2007-NFPA 101-2016 [ New Section after 16.2.2.2.5 ] 16.2.2.2.6 Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry. Classroom doors shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that the locking means is approved and all of the following conditions are met: (1) The locking means shall be capable of being engaged without opening the door. (2) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door can be accomplished without the use of a key, tool, or special knowledge or effort. (3) The releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than one releasing operation. (4) The releasing mechanism for unlocking and unlatching shall be located at a height not less than 34 in. (865 mm) and not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor. (5) Locks, if remotely engaged, shall be unlockable from the classroom side of the door without the use of a key, tool, or special knowledge or effort. (6) The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room with the necessary key or other credential. (7) The locking means shall not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware. (8) Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80. (9) The emergency action plan, required by 16.7.1, shall address the use of the locking and unlocking means from within and outside the room. (10) Staff is drilled in the engagement and release of the locking means, from within and outside the room, as part of the emergency egress drills required by 16.7.2. Submitter Full Name: SAF-END Submittal Date: Fri Jul 29 12:01:57 EDT 2016 The Workship on School Safety, Codes and Security - Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors against unwanted entry. The multiple provisions provisions proposed are based on the provisions for locking classroom doors in educational occupancies. In addition to the reasons documented for allowing door locking in educational occupancies, the protection features are predicated on equal if not greater staffing found in day care occupancies.
1 9/20/2016 2:53 PM Second Revision No. 2008-NFPA 101-2016 [ New Section after 17.2.2.2.5 ] 17.2.2.2.6 Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry. Classroom doors shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that the locking means is approved and all of the following conditions are met: (1) The locking means shall be capable of being engaged without opening the door. (2) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door can be accomplished without the use of a key, tool, or special knowledge or effort. (3) The releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than two releasing operations. (4) The releasing mechanism for unlocking and unlatching shall be located at a height not less than 34 in. (865 mm) and not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor. (5) Locks, if remotely engaged, shall be unlockable from the classroom side of the door without the use of a key, tool, or special knowledge or effort. (6) The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room with the necessary key or other credential. (7) The locking means shall not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware. (8) Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80. (9) The emergency action plan, required by 17.7.1, shall address the use of the locking and unlocking means from within and outside the room. (10) Staff is drilled in the engagement and release of the locking means, from within and outside the room, as part of the emergency egress drills required by 17.7.2. Submitter Full Name: SAF-END Submittal Date: Fri Jul 29 12:30:40 EDT 2016 The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security - Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors against unwanted entry. The multiple provisions provisions proposed are based on the provisions for locking classroom doors in educational occupancies. In addition to the reasons documented for allowing door locking in educational occupancies, the protection features are predicated on equal if not greater staffing found in day-care occupancies. The multiple provisions proposed as part of 16.2.2.2.4 / 17.2.2.2.4 address the concerns for accomplishing door locking in a safe manner. The detailed criteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar with traditional egress needs. The proposed language supports a safe installation and necessary guidance for situations that are already occurring in existing buildings. The language is written so that it is done to protect occupants but also to ensure the door is operable for safe and quick egress during emergencies. Without this guidance, non-compliant, and dangerous, installations will continue to occur. Other protection measures are required and relied upon by the Code as part of a total life safety approach. The intent of Chapter 17 is to provide those other measures necessary to ensure that total protection approach. For example, it is critical to ensure the door can be unlocked and opened from outside the room so as to not impede the ability for authorized responders to enter the day-care classroom. The language permits not more than two releasing operations, two releasing operations are not mandatory. It is ultimately up to the local AHJ to approve the locking arrangement. Approval of locking devices may depend on individual scenarios such as classroom use, occupant load, and staffing. The committee supports this as a package of requirements that, together, provide the necessary guidance needed for classroom door locking in existing day-care occupancies. The recognizes that hardware does exists, and could be used, that allows two locking mechanisms/devices with one releasing action, such as residential hotel locks. The proposed language addresses the inevitable existing conditions that cannot utilize the "hotel locks."
2 of 28 9/20/2016 4:01 PM Second Revision No. 5507-NFPA 101-2016 [ New Section after 38.2.2.2.1 ] 38.2.2.2.2* Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry. Where approved, doors, other than those complying with 38.2.11.2, shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that all of the following conditions are met: (1) The locking means shall be capable of being engaged without opening the door. (2) The unlocking and unlatching operation from the egress side of the door shall be accomplished without the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort. (3) The releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than one releasing operation. (4) The releasing mechanism for unlocking and unlatching shall be located at a height not less than 34 in. (865 mm) and not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor. (5) Locks, if remotely engaged, shall be unlockable from the egress side of the door without the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort. (6) The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room with the necessary key or other credential. (7) The locking means does not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware. (8) Modifications to required fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80. Supplemental Information File Name A.38.2.2.2.2.docx Description Submitter Full Name: SAF-MER Submittal Date: Mon Aug 01 11:34:45 EDT 2016 The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors against unwanted entry. The multiple provisions proposed as part of 38/39.2.2.2.2 cover the concerns for accomplishing door locking in business occupancies, such as those buildings on college and university campuses, in a safe manner. The detailed criteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar with traditional egress needs. While the provisions are written to apply to doors in business occupancies, the annex text clarifies the intent of this section is to apply only to doors where specialized security measures are needed to prevent unwanted entry. Examples of doors that may use these provisions include college and university classroom doors, areas of office spaces open to the public, laboratories, instructional rooms or spaces. There have been recent events where security has been an issue in both office buildings and well as educational settings where both uses could benefit from the security offered from this proposed text. Public Comment No. 190-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 38.2.2.2.1]
A.38.2.2.2.2 The intent of this section is to apply only where specialized security measures are needed to prevent unwanted entry. Examples of doors that may use these provisions include college and university classroom doors, areas of office spaces open to the public, laboratories, instructional rooms or spaces.
5 of 28 9/20/2016 4:01 PM Second Revision No. 5508-NFPA 101-2016 [ New Section after 39.2.2.2.1 ] 39.2.2.2.2* Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry. Where approved, doors, other than those complying with 39.2.11.2, shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that all of the following conditions are met: (1) The locking means shall be capable of being engaged without opening the door. (2) The unlocking and unlatching operation from the egress side of the door shall be accomplished without the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort. (3) The releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than one releasing operation. (4) For existing doors, the releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than two releasing operations. (5) The releasing mechanism for unlocking and unlatching shall be located at a height not less than 34 in. (865 mm) and not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor. (6) Locks, if remotely engaged, shall be unlockable from the egress side of the door without the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort. (7) The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room with the necessary key or other credential. (8) The locking means does not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware. (9) Modifications to required fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80. Supplemental Information File Name A.39.2.2.2.2.docx Description Submitter Full Name: SAF-MER Submittal Date: Mon Aug 01 11:37:55 EDT 2016 The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors against unwanted entry. The multiple provisions proposed as part of 38/39.2.2.2.2 cover the concerns for accomplishing door locking in business occupancies, such as those buildings on college and university campuses, in a safe manner. The detailed criteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar with traditional egress needs. While the provisions are written to apply to doors in business occupancies, the annex text clarifies the intent of this section is to apply only to doors where specialized security measures are needed to prevent unwanted entry. Examples of doors that may use these provisions include college and university classroom doors, areas of office spaces open to the public, laboratories, instructional rooms or spaces. There have been recent events where security has been an issue in both office buildings and well as educational settings where both uses could benefit from the security offered from this proposed text. For existing doors, it is permitted that the releasing mechanism can open the door with not more than two releasing operations. The proposed language supports a safe installation and necessary guidance for situations that are already occurring in existing buildings. The language is written so that it is done to protect occupants but also to ensure door is operable for safe and quick egress during emergencies. The recognizes that hardware does exists, and could be used, that allows two locking mechanisms/devices with one releasing action, such as residential hotel locks. The proposed language addresses the inevitable existing conditions that cannot utilize the "hotel locks." Public Comment No. 192-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 39.2.2.2.1]
A.39.2.2.2 The intent of this section is to apply only where specialized security measures are needed to prevent unwanted entry. Examples of doors that may use these provisions include college and university classroom doors, areas of office spaces open to the public, laboratories, instructional rooms or spaces.