Australian National University

Similar documents
Australian National University

REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS HUDSON LIBRARY FIT OUT FOR MERIDEN SCHOOL, STRATHFIELD NSW

Applying the Heritage Overlay

Commercial Building Cuba Street. Images: Charles Collins, Summary of heritage significance

Register of Significant Twentieth Century Architecture

5 HERITAGE VALUES. 5.1 Method and Basis of Assessment

GREATER SHEPPARTON CULTURAL HERITAGE AWARDS GUIDELINES

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

Historic Resources Inventory Evaluation Form

L 4-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Kodors House. 35 Rosedale Avenue West

Lindsay & his legacy

CENTENNIAL PARKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN: VOLUME

Summary of Heritage Input

4.0 ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF COMPONENTS Kadlitpinna/Park 13/Rundle Park Assessment

7.5 Identified sites of significance_residential buildings within Turffontein (Semi-detached, freestanding)

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

4.3 Dudley Area Plan. Introduction. History and Existing Character. Desired Future Character for Dudley

CENTENNIAL PARKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN: VOLUME

5.0 WAITE CAMPUS. 5.1 Description of Campus

22.05 HERITAGE POLICYLACES OUTSIDE THE CAPITAL CITY ZONE

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

~~-~ ASSESSMENT OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OBSERVATORY HILL SYDNEY I I I I I. February For Edaw. Prepared by Wendy Thorp

Maryhill Burgh Halls. Submitted by Ian Alexander / Henry McKeown Output No. 1

IMPORTANT NOTICE. Architectural Inventory Form COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY I. IDENTIFICATION th Street 5WL.5601

Binghamton University Construction SUMMER 2012 HIGHLIGHTS

Heritage Property 70 Liberty Street (Central Prison Chapel)

Heritage Management Plan TOAD HALL. Australian Capital Territory. September 2010

REVIEW OF HERITAGE OVERLAY LISTINGS IN THE CBD

Allston Brighton Boston College Task Force Meeting. Brighton Marine Health Center March 27, 2013

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

SUE ROSEN ASSOCIATES. Re: DA DA/485/2016. Thank you etc

4.0 ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF COMPONENTS Kuntingga/Park 7 + Barnguttilla/Park 8 Assessment

8.1. Fire and Heritage. The maintenance series. Information sheet. Guidelines on Fire Safety in Heritage Buildings

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

Duplex Design Guidelines

37 th annual conference of the South African Association of Botanists (SAAB) Plants in a changing world. Second Announcement

58: 1285 Sedgewick Crescent, Rotary Gardens

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25

Information restricted under the old heritage places register or old heritage objects register is restricted under the Heritage Act 2004.

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

expectations for new development W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

7.0 NATIONAL WINE CENTRE

PDA SUBMISSION: Queen s Wharf, Brisbane (DEV2017/846)

5. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Kelowna Heritage Register Evaluation Criteria

Program Summary: A ,000 SF Program Statement: $46.41 $11,000,000 August 2013

Higher Kinnerton, Chester, Flintshire CH4 9AJ

Project Design and Access Statement: Rev B - Proposed replacement of the Clubhouse and Golf Shop at Hawkstone Park.

PART ONE: IDENTIFICATION

Blackford House, Macclesfield Road, Alderley Edge

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW ORDINANCE DESIGN GUIDELINES DECEMBER 2000 PREPARED FOR THE MEREDITH PLANNING BOARD BY CHRISTOPHER P. WILLIAMS, ARCHITECTS

DESIGN GUIDELINES & STANDARDS. August UNIVERSITY of DELAWARE

ICOMOS NEW ZEALAND CHARTER FOR THE CONSERVATION OF PLACES OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE

Warren Farm, Ampthill

Eastern Golf Course, Doncaster Road, Doncaster

DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT NEW TALYBONT HALLS, CARDIFF UNIVERSITY JULY 2018

Wiltshire College. Introduction. Have your say. Public Exhibition. Welcome. About Wiltshire College. Turley Consultation Team

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

LANDSCAPE RESOURCE SURVEY

AIA Albuquerque 2016 Design Awards

Cambridge. West Cambridge site. What is a Shared Facilities Hub? Welcome

2012 Exhibition of School Planning and Architecture. Crockett Elementary School. Houston Renovation Lee J Brockway Award

HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE PHOTOGRAPH: M.VAIR-PIOVA, 10/12/2014

Authority: North York Community Council Item 31.7, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No.

Addendum to Environmental Impact Report

Hastings CBD Heritage Inventory Project

Washington Irving Elementary School

INNOVATION AND TRANSFORMATION IN ADAPTIVE RE-USE OF UNIVERSITY FACILITIES

Prescription of qualifications. ARB Criteria at Part 2

College of William and Mary Campus Heritage Preservation Project

Notting Hill Housing & The Development Team

CELEBRATING DESIGN EXCELLENCE

HERITAGE STATEMENT AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT HILLBARK FARMHOUSE FRANKBY

4.0 ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF COMPONENTS

Bethlehem University 2008 Projects Summary

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

ICOMOS New Zealand Charter For The Conservation of Places Of Cultural Heritage Value

PANEL HEARING MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C258 HERITAGE POLICIES REVIEW AND WEST MELBOURNE HERITAGE REVIEW

FRAMEWORK OF DESIGN REVIEW:

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 OCTOBER 24, 2017

Knight Library Axis (v)

HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR PLANNERS NOTES

Building Technology III New York City College of Technology. Course Day 21 Revit Day 12 (Project Day 10)

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

UNIVERSITY TOWN NEIGHBOURHOODS 5.2 ECO-CORRIDOR MELBOURNE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN 2014

BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

B4. Te tiaki taonga tuku iho - Natural heritage

Goal 1 To establish and follow land use patterns for the long-range development of the campus.

Prepared by: LCT Design Group, LLC 401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S Chicago, Illinois 60610

National Character Area 70 Melbourne Parklands

4 REED CLOSE, TRUMPINGTON 900,000 (GUIDE PRICE)

Campus Identity & Design Guidelines

RADIATION CONTROL GUIDE

Historic Resources Inventory Evaluation Form

Kew WHS and the challenges of the regeneration of Brentford

Transcription:

Study Item/ Area Acton Campus Precinct Building Nos. & Names Department of Earth & Marine Sciences (DEMS), Wes Whitten Building BANKS Precinct 47 (DA Brown Building, DEMS), 133 (Wes Whitten Building) Figure 1: Location of study area within the ANU Acton Campus site. Heritage Ranking Heritage Listing Condition Date Relevant Documentation DA Brown Moderate Meets the criteria for Commonwealth Heritage List Wes Whitten Building Neutral Meets the criteria for Commonwealth Heritage List The Department of Earth & Marine Sciences (DEMS) and Wes Whitten Buildings are not individually listed on the Commonwealth Heritage List (CHL). The condition noted here is at March 2012. Department of Earth & Marine Sciences (DEMS) and Wes Whitten Buildings continue to be well maintained for student education and research and are in good condition. There is currently no relevant documentation for Department of Earth & Marine Sciences (DEMS) and the Wes Whitten Buildings. 1

Context of the Buildings Figure 2: The Department of Earth & Marine Sciences (DEMS) and Wes Whitten Building in the context of the Banks and Dickson Precincts. Figure 3: The Department of Earth & Marine Sciences (DEMS)and Wes Whitten Building in relation to Burton & Garran Halls. Brief Historical Overview The Department of Earth and Marine Sciences (DEMS), also known as the DA Brown Building, originally housed the Department of Botany in the early years of the University. The building, designed by Roy Grounds and built by LV O Hara, was completed in June 1966. During this period the Botany Department was led by the Founding Professor Lindsay Pryor (1958-1976). Professor Pryor s contributions to the development of both the city of Canberra and the ANU are considerable, with his continuation to Charles Weston s work in the directorship of the Parks and Gardens body in 1944-1958 for the development of the Capital. This coincided with his support and supervision of the development of the National Botanic Gardens from 1945 1958. During the 1980s works were done to enhance the building s basement and in 1989 there was a change of tenants from the Department of Botany to the Departments of Geology and Forestry and the newly established School for Resource and Environmental Management (SREM). With this change the building required refurbishment in order to better accommodate the studies and research of the Geology Department. These were completed in 1991. In 2004 the department was renamed to be more inclusive with the title Department of Earth and Marine Sciences. The Wes Whitten Building was constructed in 2009 by Hindmarsh Construction Company and designed by May and Russell Architects. It was constructed as an animal breeding establishment to supply research into biology and chemistry as well as teaching in these fields. Wes Whitten was the University s first Veterinary Officer and served from 1949 to 1961. In 2010 the building won the 2010 AIB New South Wales Professional Excellence in Building Award, won by Hindmarsh for their construction of the building. 2

Figure 4: Site Location Plan for the Wes Whitten Building. Drawn by May & Russell Architects for Hindmarsh Construction Australia. Plan approved on October 16 2008. Description of the Department of Earth & Marine Sciences (DEMS), Wes Whitten Building Buildings The DA Brown Building is a face brick, hollow square building with a metal parapet and recessed windows. The building is a single level at the west and north facades and drops to form a basement. Retaining walls allow for south and east lower level external access. The upper level is organised with rooms either side of a central corridor. The internal courtyard provides light to the inner rooms. The basement was extended in 1988 for the occupation of the Department of Geology. The northern internal verandah has been in-filled with aluminium framed windows. The northern entrance is a recent addition in clear anodised aluminium window and door suites with pre coated metal cladding below and to the parapet. The upper level foyer has seven different granite slab paving units and painted brickwork walls. It is constructed of brown and black face brickwork with vinyl tiles and suspended ceilings. Lower level walls are all black brickwork. Externally the building is constructed of brown face brickwork with copper parapet and window sills. Windows are clear anodised aluminium. The Wes Whitten Building is a metal framed partial two storey building. It has a combination brick and metal cladding exterior with painted metal plumbing. The interior includes suspended ceilings, painted plasterboard walls and patterned grey carpet tiles in the administrative sections of the building. The laboratory sections of the building have similar suspended ceilings and waterproof plasterboard walls with vinyl flooring, custom doors and stainless steel appliances. 3

Landscape The landscape of the area contains predominantly grassy lawns with heavily manicured shrubs in beds. There are also mature eucalypts along the Daley Road aspect of the building. Summary Significance Assessment against the Commonwealth Heritage criteria Statement of Significance Criteria (a) Historic place s importance in the course, or pattern, of Australia s natural or cultural history. (b) Rarity values because of the place s possession of uncommon, rare or endangered aspects of Australia s natural or cultural history. (c) Scientific place s potential to yield information that will contribute to an understanding of Australia s natural or cultural history. Brief Assessment The DA Brown Building originally housed the Department of Botany in the early years of the University and currently houses the Department of Earth and Marine Sciences (DEMS). The building was designed by Roy Grounds (of Boyd, Romberg and Grounds Architects) in 1966. During its time as the Botany Department, the building department was led by the Founding Professor Lindsay Pryor (1958-1976). Professor Pryor s contributions to the development of both the city of Canberra and the ANU are considerable, with his continuation to Charles Weston s work in the directorship of the Parks and Gardens body in 1944-1958 for the development of the Capital. The DA Brown Building meets CHL criterion (a) for historic values. Attributes The building and its association with Lindsay Pryor. The DA Brown Building does not meet criterion (b) for rarity values. The DA Brown Building does not meet criterion (c) for scientific values. 4

Summary Significance Assessment against the Commonwealth Heritage criteria (d) Representative place s importance in demonstrating the principal characteristics of: A class of Australia s natural or cultural places; or A class of Australia s natural or cultural environments. (e) Aesthetic place s importance in exhibiting particular aesthetic characteristics valued by a community or cultural group. (f) Creative/Technical place s importance in demonstrating a high degree of creative or technical achievement at a particular period. (g) Social place s strong or special association with a particular community or cultural group for social, cultural or spiritual reasons. The DA Brown Building does not meet criterion (d) for representative values. The DA Brown Building does not meet criterion (e) for aesthetic values. The DA Brown Building does not meet criterion (f) for creative/technical values. The DA Brown Building does not meet criterion (g) for social values. 5

Summary Significance Assessment against the Commonwealth Heritage criteria (h) Associative place s special association with the life or works of a person, or group of persons, of importance in Australia s natural and cultural history. (i) Indigenous place s importance as part of Indigenous tradition. The DA Brown Building is strongly associated with several key figures in the history of the University including its namesake David Alexander Brown, the foundation Professor of geology at the ANU. The building is also notably associated with Professor Lindsay Pryor, the founding professor of the Department of Botany at the ANU and major contributor to the development of the natural environment of the capital and the foundation of the National Botanical Gardens. During this period the Botany Department was led by the Founding Professor Lindsay Pryor (1958-1976). Professor Pryor s contributions to the development of both the city of Canberra and the ANU are considerable, with his continuation to Charles Weston s work in the directorship of the Parks and Gardens body in 1944-1958 for the development of the Capital. Attributes Associations with DA Brown and Professor Lindsay Pryor. The DA Brown Building does not meet criterion (i) for Indigenous values. Photographs Figure 5: View of the north entrance to the DA Brown Building. (Source: ANU Heritage Office 2012) Figure 6: View of the interior of the DA Brown Building showing enclosure of verandahs to the internal courtyard. (Source: ANU Heritage Office 2010) 6

Photographs Figure 9: View of the inlaid granite slabs forming a feature in the foyer of the DA Brown Building. (Source: ANU Heritage Office 2010) Figure 8: View of the Wes Whitten Building set into the landscape. (Source:http://www.mayrussell.com.au/projects/institutional/theaustralian-national-university-wes-whitten-building/) Figure 7: Main entrance of the Wes Whitten Building. (Source: http://www.mayrussell.com.au/projects/institutional/the-australiannational-university-wes-whitten-building/) Figure 10: View of the interior laboratory space of the Wes Whitten Building including purpose built and installed equipment. (Source: http://www.mayrussell.com.au/projects/institutional/the-australiannational-university-wes-whitten-building/) 7

Management Issues Constraints and Opportunities Constraints arise from the identified heritage values of the DA Brown Building and the requirement under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) (EPBC Act) to conserve them. The significant fabric of the DA Brown Building, as indicated in the attributes above, should be conserved wherever possible. The DA Brown Building is of moderate heritage values and meets CHL Criteria (a) historic and (h) associative. Elements that are of moderate heritage value and make a contribution to the overall heritage significance of ANU Acton campus and should be retained and conserved. They require care in their management and can generally tolerate a low degree of change or some change and adaptive reuse. Loss or unsympathetic alteration could diminish the Commonwealth Heritage or local heritage values of the ANU Acton campus. The Tolerance for Change heritage management tool, outlined in Section 7.6 of the ANU Action Campus Heritage Study 2012, will assist in conserving heritage values through a process of change. The DA Brown is able to tolerate some level of change through development whereby the attributes and characteristics are conserved and interpreted. The Wes Whitten building can tolerate a substantial amount of change. Opportunities arise from any future identifiable heritage values of the DA Brown Building. A greater degree of change may be tolerated if interpretation is of a very high quality and considered in any future development, which presents the identified heritage values for the future. Recommendations If development resulting in loss of significant fabric is proposed, interpretation and a heritage impact assessment would be a prerequisite according to EPBC Act requirements. Photographic recording for the ANU archives should be undertaken prior to any potential loss of significant fabric, buildings or landscaping in any future development. A formal assessment of the aesthetic and social values of the DA Brown Building should be carried out. 8