PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017
City of Richardson, Texas Parks, Recreation & Open Space Master Plan Update 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction Page 2 II. III. IV. Goals & Objectives Park Standards & Inventory Accomplishments Page 3 Page 5 Page 15 V. Citizen Input Page 24 VI. VII. Needs & Priorities Implementation Schedule Page 28 Page 34 VIII. Summary Page 36 Appendix Appendix I National Service Research Park & Recreation Needs Assessment Study (November 29, 2016)
I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of updating the 2010 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan is to ensure the goals, objectives and proposed developments outlined in the 2010 plan still coincide with the parks and open space needs of the community. The 2017 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update includes summaries of the following: - 2017 demographics & projections - goals and objectives - park standards - park inventory - parks and open space accomplishments since 2010 - new citizen input - updated needs and priorities - implementation schedule for future developments Northrich Park Dedication Ceremony COMMUNITY The City of Richardson is located in north central Texas in Dallas and Collin County and is compromised of approximately 28.6 square miles. 2020 Population Projection - 110,430 (Population projection based on a 1.0% growth rate per year) DEMOGRAPHICS Population 106,123 (2010 Census) - 72 % - White - 16 % - Asian - 09 % - Black - 03% - Other - 18 % - Hispanic - 82 % - Non-Hispanic Page - 2
II. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goals and Objectives are provided to give direction for future community decisions regarding parks, recreation and open spaces specifically in the City of Richardson. The following goals and objectives were established in the 2010 master plan based on input from the City of Richardson residents. These goals and objectives were reaffirmed in the 2016 public input process and remain valid. PARK AND RECREATION GOAL: To ensure the provision of a balanced park system that meets the recreational needs of the citizens of Richardson and helps to create a unique community character. PARK AND RECREATION OBJECTIVES: - To forge partnerships with public and private organizations for the development, operation and maintenance of the existing and future recreational facilities. - To acquire and develop public parks throughout the city that are in close proximity to all neighborhoods. - To upgrade, renovate and rehabilitate existing parks in Richardson. - To provide new and different recreational opportunities for all ages and abilities throughout the community. - To provide a trail system that connects parks, residential areas, commercial areas and schools. Heights Park Page - 3
OPEN SPACE GOAL: To identify, protect and preserve quality natural open spaces for unstructured recreational activities, inherent aesthetic value and protection of valuable resources. OPEN SPACE OBJECTIVES: - To limit the development within natural open spaces and encourage environmentally responsible private development in order to minimize adverse effects on valuable ecosystems. - To be proactive in the acquisition and protection of unique natural open spaces throughout Richardson. - To increase availability and access to valuable lands to the general public - To continually research the viability of developing trail systems along creeks, flood ways and utility easements that will link public and private recreational facilities, neighborhoods and school campuses. - To address natural open space needs when developing active recreational facilities to provide citizens with well-balanced recreational experiences that include both active and passive opportunities. Spring Creek Nature Area Page - 4
III. PARK STANDARDS AND INVENTORY PARK STANDARDS The Richardson Parks network is made up of eight different park types and an indoor recreation center each having a role in satisfying the recreational needs of the community. It is important to note that the development costs of parkland have significantly increased over the past five years due to increased costs of materials and construction. The following chart defines the characteristics of each park type within the City. CLASSIFICATION SERVICE AREA SIZE (ACRES) POPULATION SERVED TYPICAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT COSTS Pocket/ Ornamental ¼ Mile 5,000 sq.ft. to 2 acres 500-2,500 Landscaping, drinking fountains, sidewalks, & benches $75,000 - $125,000 per acre Mini-Neighborhood ¼ Mile 1 acre to 4 acres 500-2,500 Paved area, playground apparatus, landscaping, $100,000 - $350,000 sidewalks, drinking fountains, lawn area, & per acre benches Neighborhood ½ Mile 5 acres to 29 acres 2,000-10,000 Playground apparatus, picnic area(s), pavilion, play courts, play fields, restroom, natural open space, landscaping, & parking $85,000 - $125,000 per acre Community 2 Miles 30 acres to 150 acres 10,000-50,000 Tennis courts, sports fields, playground apparatus, picnic area(s), pavilions, walking/jogging trails, swimming pools, open space, landscaping, recreation centers, restrooms, & parking $70,000 - $200,000 per acre Special Use Varies Determined by primary use Concentration of one or two of the following: Baseball/softball complex, soccer fields, Varies - Dependent tennis centers, sports on primary use stadiums, golf courses, performing arts parks, amphitheaters, & ornamental gardens Varies - Dependent on primary use Page - 5
CLASSIFICATION SERVICE AREA SIZE (ACRES) POPULATION SERVED TYPICAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT COSTS Regional Park 10 Miles 50 acres minimum Entire urban area Sports fields, tennis courts, lakes, swimming complexes, campgrounds, hike/bike trails, golf courses, nature areas, play structures, restrooms, & ample parking $2,000,000 & up Greenbelts Varies Varies 5,000 to entire community Landscaping, multipurpose trails, benches, information kiosks, telephones, exercise courses, & drinking fountains $225,000 - $750,000 per mile Natural Areas Varies Determined by resource Entire community Nature trails, multipurpose trails, benches, picnic areas, wildlife viewing stations, educational components, information kiosks, interpretive signs, exercise courses, & drinking fountains Varies Indoor Recreation Center Varies 10,000 sq. ft. minimum 20,000-30,000 Walking track, fitness rooms, gymnasium, weight room, racquetball/squash courts, indoor swimming pool, meeting/convention facilities, arts and crafts rooms, & day care facilities $4,000,000 - $7,500,000 Page - 6
RICHARDSON PARK INVENTORY The existing parks in Richardson are classified in the Existing Parks and Open Space Inventory shown in the following table. In order to illustrate the geographic distribution and areas of the city currently served by the park system, the service area of each existing park has been shown on the Existing Parks and Open Space Map and the Existing Community Park Map. Ideally, all developed residential areas of the city of Richardson should fall within the service area of a neighborhood park and a community park. NAME TYPE OF PARK DEVELOPED ACRES TOTAL ACRES FACILITIES 1 Berkner Neighborhood 10 10 Playground Baseball field Two soccer fields Multi-purpose trail Picnic areas Pavilion Restroom facility 2 Breckinridge Regional 200 417.13 Twelve soccer fields Two softball fields Multi-purpose trail Two Playgrounds Gazebo Two pavilions Picnic areas Three ponds Natural open space Restroom facility 3 Buckingham Pocket.25.25 Two pavilions 4 Bush Central Barkway Special Use 8.0 8.0 Open Lawn Area Shaded Areas Bench/Rest Areas Restroom Drinking Fountain 5 Campbell Ridge Greenbelt 5.4 5.4 Multi-purpose trail 6 Canyon Creek Neighborhood 8.98 8.98 Swimming pool with baby pool Lighted baseball field Two tennis courts Playground Picnic areas Page - 7
NAME TYPE OF PARK DEVELOPED ACRES TOTAL ACRES FACILITIES Multi-purpose trails 7 CityLine Mini- Neighborhood 5.75 5.75 Benches/Rest Areas Water fountain Native landscaping Playground Multi-purpose trail 8 Collins Mini- Neighborhood.87.87 Drinking fountain Picnic tables Pavilion 9 Cottonwood Community 25.31 25.31 10 Creek Hollow Neighborhood 7.7 8.7 Swimming pool with baby pool Two lighted tennis courts Sand volleyball court Multi-purpose trails Playground Two pavilions Two lakes Picnic areas Restroom facility One softball field One athletic field Playground Pavilion Picnic areas Multi-use court Horseshoe pits One acre preserved natural open space 11 Crowley Community 10 10 Two baseball/softball fields Multi-purpose trail Large athletic field Two Playgrounds Natural Area 15 48.53 Pavilion Pond with dock Naturalistic areas Restroom facility Page - 8
NAME TYPE OF PARK DEVELOPED ACRES TOTAL ACRES FACILITIES 12 Custer Neighborhood 7.02 7.02 13 Duck Creek Linear Greenbelt 26.26 26.26 14 Durham Pocket.8.8 15 Fox Creek Park 11 11 16 Foxboro Neighborhood 5 8.9 17 Galatyn Woodland Preserve Mini - Neighborhood 3 3 Greenbelt 5 5 Baseball/softball field Athletic field Two lighted tennis courts Playground Picnic areas Pavilion Restroom facility Multi-use trail(links with Owens Trail) Plaza with playground Picnic areas Playground Pavilion Multi-purpose trails Open lawn area Playground Pavilion Multi-purpose trail Benches Picnic Areas Pedestrian bridge Nature areas Naturalistic areas Playground Multi-purpose trail (links to Spring Creek Nature Area and to Owens Trail) Pavilion Restroom facility Boardwalk for birdwatching Wetland ponds Animal sculpture playground Picnic areas Three horseshoe pits Multi-purpose trails - trail links Spring Creek Nature Area to the north and Galatyn Plaza to the south 18 Glenville Park Neighborhood 7.5 7.5 Swimming Pool Sprayground Baseball/softball field Two athletic fields Playground Pavilion Picnic Areas Page - 9
NAME TYPE OF PARK DEVELOPED ACRES TOTAL ACRES FACILITIES 19 Heights Community 33 33 20 Huffhines Community 45 54.54 Recreation center Swimming pool Sprayground Two lighted baseball/softball fields Two athletic fields Two lighted tennis courts Playground Multi-purpose trail Two pavilions Picnic areas Recreation center Five lighted softball fields Five athletic fields Tennis center- ten lighted courts Two lakes Multi-purpose trail Playground Pavilion Picnic areas Concession complex Restroom facility 21 Lookout Neighborhood 20 20 Greenbelt 5 5 Three athletic fields Playground Pavilion Restroom facility Multi-purpose trails - trail links with Owens Trail 22 Mark Twain Neighborhood 8.95 8.95 Lighted baseball field Athletic field Two lighted tennis courts Playground Pavilion Picnic areas 23 McKamy Spring Pocket 1.94 1.94 Playground Trails 24 Memorial Pocket.84.84 25 Mimosa Neighborhood 9.41 9.41 Armed Forces personnel memorial Lighted baseball/softball field Athletic field Two lighted tennis courts Playground Pavilion Picnic areas Restroom facility Page - 10
NAME TYPE OF PARK DEVELOPED ACRES TOTAL ACRES FACILITIES 26 Northrich Pocket 1.0 1.0 Multi-purpose trails Pavilion Picnic areas Playground Outdoor classroom Drinking Fountain 27 Point North Neighborhood 5.49 5.49 Baseball/softball field Athletic field Playground Pavilion Picnic areas Restroom facility 28 Prairie Creek Natural Area 10 37.25 Natural areas Multi-purpose trail Picnic areas 29 Richland Neighborhood 7.37 7.37 Baseball/softball field Athletic field Sand volleyball court Two tennis courts Multi-purpose trail Playground Pavilion Picnic areas Restroom facility 30 Ruth Young Pocket.3.3 Botanical/Flower garden 31 Ruth Back Toler Natural Area 3 21.87 Natural Areas Trails Page - 11
NAME TYPE OF PARK DEVELOPED ACRES TOTAL ACRES FACILITIES 32 Sherrill Park Municipal Golf Course Special Use 296 296 Golf course - 36 holes Club house 33 Spring Creek Nature Area Natural Area 15 111 Multi-purpose trail - trail links with Galatyn Woodland Preserve/Central Trail Natural areas Hardwood forest Picnic areas Restroom facility 34 Terrace Neighborhood 10.24 10.24 Swimming pool with baby pool Two lighted baseball/softball fields Two athletic fields Two lighted tennis courts Playground Multi-purpose trail Picnic areas Pavilion Restroom facility 35 Woods Mini - Neighborhood Greenbelt 3.99 3 3 Natural areas Multi-purpose trail along Beck Branch Creek Playground Picnic areas 3.99 Pavilion 36 Woodhaven Grove Mini - Neighborhood 3.32 3.32 Playground Multi-purpose trail Pavilion Picnic areas 37 Woodland Mini- Neighborhood 5.92 5.92 Picnic Area Playground Shelter Restrooms Lighted baseball field Athletic field Lighted tennis courts Small backstops Page - 12
NAME TYPE OF PARK DEVELOPED ACRES TOTAL ACRES FACILITIES 38 Wyndsor Neighborhood 10 10 Baseball/softball field Multi-use courts Open sports field Playground Multi-purpose trail Picnic areas Pavilion Restroom facility 39 Yale Neighborhood 7.5 7.5 Baseball/softball field Athletic field Two tennis courts Playground Multi-purpose trail Picnic areas Pavilion Restroom facility 40 Plano Rd. and Apollo Rd. Land Special-Use 0 25 Vacant Land Total Park Acres 1,297.43 Total Developed Acres 869.11 Page - 13
IV. ACCOMPLISHMENTS One of the main objectives of this master plan update is to address the accomplishments within the existing park system made since the 2010 plan. The City of Richardson has made significant progress in updating and developing the existing park system. It is important to address the City s accomplishments in order to focus on what the city needs to accomplish in the upcoming years. RECONSTRUCTION OF HEIGHTS AQUATIC CENTER (FORMERLY ARAPAHO POOL) Heights Aquatic Center The reconstruction of Arapaho Pool, now known as The Heights Family Aquatic Center, was a high priority in the 2010 master plan. The aquatic center opened in the summer of 2013 and has been one of the most successful projects in the city. In addition, the city was awarded the Texas Recreation and Parks Society Facility Design Excellence Award for the aquatic center. Page - 16
RECONSTRUCTION OF THE HEIGHTS INDOOR RECREATION CENTER The Heights Indoor Recreation Center was a priority in the 2010 master plan and was reconstructed in 2012. The Heights Recreation Center offers a variety of amenities such as: a full regulation-sized basketball court, a dedicated game room, fitness and cardio areas with new equipment, updated locker rooms, larger classroom space, a preschool room, an aerobics studio and WiFi Internet access. Page - 17
CONSTRUCTION OF THE RICHARDSON GYMNASTICS CENTER The Richardson Gymnastic Center opened in January of 2013. The Gymnastic Center is a 16,000 square foot stand alone facility and became Silver Leed Certified in December 2013. Page - 18
ACQUISITION OF LAND AND DEVELOPMENT OF NORTHRICH PARK Northrich Park, developed in 2015, is a one acre park located at 527 Malden Drive. The park consists of multi-purpose trails, a pavilion, picnic tables, a playground, an outdoor classroom and drinking fountain. ACQUISITION OF LAND AND DEVELOPMENT OF DURHAM PARK Durham park is.8 acres located at 400 Weathered Drive. The new park was acquired and developed in 2012 and consists of a pavilion, drinking fountain, playground, butterfly garden, open lawn area and walking trails. Page - 19
ACQUISITION OF LAND AND DEVELOPMENT OF COLLINS PARK Collins Park was acquired and developed in accordance with Transit Oriented Development objectives in 2016. The.87 acre pocket park has a pavilion, benches, drinking fountain, rest area, multi-purpose trail and enhanced landscaping. ACQUISITION OF LAND AND DEVELOPMENT OF CITYLINE PARK CityLine Park is approximately 5.75 acres located at the northwest corner of Renner Road and Routh Creek Parkway. The Central Trail provides a connection to the Dallas Area Rapid Trasnit (DART) station at the CityLine Development. The park consists of a pavilion, playground, drinking fountain, trails, benches and native landscaping. Page - 20
CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUSH CENTRAL BARKWAY DOG PARK Dog parks ranked as the fourth highest priority in the City of Richardson in the 2010 master plan. The new Bush Central Barkway Dog Park consists of areas for large and small dogs as well as shaded areas, restrooms and seating areas. The park was opened to the public in August of 2015. Page - 21
CONSTRUCTION OF NEW MULTI-PURPOSE TRAILS & SOFT SURFACED TRAILS Spring Creek Nature Area Multi-purpose trails ranked as the number one priority in the 2010 parks and open space master plan. The City of Richardson has successfully constructed several miles of trails in the past year including connections to the City of Plano, Murphy and the Six Cities Trail. In addition, the city has completed the Ruth Back Toler Trail, and the Glenville Trail, which connects four parks and three Richardson ISD schools. CityLine Park CityLine Park Page - 22
RENOVATIONS AND UPGRADES OF EXISTING PARKS Lookout Park Playground The City of Richardson has not only grown and developed the existing park system over the past five years, the city has successfully updated, renovated and enhanced multiple parks throughout the entire park system that needed some attention. Tennis Center The City remodeled pavilions at five different parks, replaced dilapidated playgrounds at Custer Park, Glenville Park, Lookout Park, Mimosa Park and Yale Park and resurfaced and lighted 22 tennis courts. The City continually repaired both major and minor maintenance issues throughout the entire park system. In addition, the city completed various improvements throughout the entire park system to reach full compliance with the State Accessibilities Requirements. Glenville Park Playground The City acquired an addition 60 acres at the Spring Creek Nature Area to increase the total acreage to 111 acres. Fox Creek Park is currently under construction and is proposed to open in Autumn 2017. Page - 23
V. CITIZEN INPUT In order to develop a park system that will be highly supported and used by the residents of Richardson, the City has committed to using a citizen-driven needs based approach to park planning. In order to better understand the needs of the community, National Service Research mailed 7,000 surveys and provided an online survey to the residents of Richardson in the Fall of 2016. A total of 1,351 residents responded with valuable data regarding the existing and future needs of the park system. The response rate of surveys sent was 19%, which is a very high rate of participation! The mailed survey was similar to the survey used in 2010 in order to compare the changes over the past five years. In addition to the survey, National Service Research conducted a public meeting and two focus group meetings in September of 2016. Public Meeting The following pages are a summary of the key responses regarding the City of Richardson s park system. The complete survey results and public input data can be found in Appendix I. FOCUS GROUP INPUT - HIGHLIGHTS OF THE CURRENT PARK SYSTEM - Natural areas - Multi-purpose trails - Rich variety of programs - Gymnastics center - Aquatics Facilities & Programs - Mature trees, natural open space and creek corridors - High quality of maintenance Overall, it is apparent that the City of Richardson has a successful park system and is continually progressing. Many of the respondents feel that the City needs to continue moving in the same direction as identified in the 2010 master plan. Richardson Gymnastics Center Page - 24
FOCUS GROUP INPUT - NEEDS & VISIONS OF THE EXISTING PARK SYSTEM - Links to the regional trail system - Natural open spaces - Signature park the nucleus of Richardson - Educational elements in parks - Indoor aquatic facility - Programming (Very successful! Citizens just want more!) - Tournament quality sports fields - Bike lanes - Natural gathering areas - Art in the parks - Increased connectivity of park components SURVEY DATA According to the survey results, the frequency of park visitation and trail use has increased over the past five years in the City of Richardson. PARKS WEEKLY USE MONTHLY USE 2016 45% 24% 2009 40% 22% TRAILS WEEKLY USE MONTHLY USE 2016 28% 18% 2009 25% 16% Program participation increased by 15% among all age groups since 2009 and the interest in participation in programs increased from the 2010 survey. Page - 25
According to the citizen survey respondents, it is apparent the City of Richardson provides a high quality park system with an emphasis on a high quality of maintenance. Majority of the citizens who participated in the survey rated the facilities in Richardson as excellent or good. A total of 97% of the respondents stated that the excellent nt or good! A total of 91% of the respondents stated that the excellent or good! he Gymnastic Center is he Recreation Centers are A total of 86% of the respondents stated that the Parks are good! A total of 85% of the respondents stated that the re excellent nt or good! are e excellent or he Trails and Greenbelts Although the Senior Center, City Pools and the Tennis Center all ranked more positively than negatively; these three facilities are ranked as needing the most improvements. Page - 26
2016 CITIZEN SURVEY RECREATIONAL PRIORITIES RANK FACILITY FUTURE FUNDING? The number one priority for funding according to the survey respondents is Trail Connections. HOW TO FUND TRAILS? The number one supported funding option according to the survey respondents is Bonds. 1 Multi-Purpose Trails 2 Nature Trails & Greenbelt Corridors 3 Indoor Aquatic Center 4 Natural Open Spaces 5 Botanical Gardens 6 Spraygrounds 7 Seating Areas & Benches 8 Dog Parks 9 Playgrounds 10 Pavilions & Picnic Shelters 2016 ACTIVITY PRIORITIES RANK ACTIVITY 1 Festivals & Events 2 Walking & Hiking 3 Fitness Classes 4 Arts & Crafts 5 Health/Wellness Classes 6 Aquatic Programs 7 Biking INTERESTING FACT: The demand for every organized sport dropped in the 2016 survey compared to the 2009 survey, however, the decreasing demand for organized athletics is a national trend. 8 Senior Programs 9 Music/Dance/Drama Programs 10 Nature & Interpretive Programs Page - 27
VI. NEEDS AND PRIORITIES The needs and priorities of the City of Richardson are based on the citizens of Richardson s input, city staff recommendations and professional opinion. The following needs and priorities have been identified as important areas of focus for the next five years in the City of Richardson. NEW PARK NEEDS The City of Richardson has been successful in the past five years by acquiring and developing additional new parks within the city. As build-out continues and land is becoming less available, it is imperative the city focus on acquiring vacant land for additional parks to serve areas of the community that are not currently served, such as the southwestern and central portions of the city. After several public meetings with community leaders, key staff members and the general public, it is apparent that the City of Richardson needs a community parkin the central portion of town that can serve as the central hub of recreation for the entire community. This centrally located community park could serve the entire community and consist of: trails, pavilions, lawn areas, multi-purpose trails, a sprayground and public art, just to name a few. Cottonwood Park Page - 28
EXISTING PARK NEEDS As the City of Richardson continues to grow, it is essential that the city maintains, updates and renovates existing parks. The city has primarily focused on acquiring and developing land over the past five years and should continue to do so as the city becomes closer to build-out. With that being said, the city must continually focus on existing parks and open spaces over the next five years. The 2010 master plan recommended to focus on defining the true needs of ten cookie cutter neighborhood parks throughout the park system. Some of the parks received minor updates over the years but it is necessary to address the existing park system in the upcoming years. Yale Park Playground ATHLETIC FACILITY NEEDS Every community has different athletic needs based on population, demographics and geographic location. The City of Richardson has always put an emphasis on athletic facilities within the community. The city has had an active community base over the past five years and the trend is growing. The demand for organized athletics nationwide has steadily dropped for every sport over the past five years and the City of Richardson is beginning to see that trend according to the citizen survey. It is important to note that there is a demand for tournament quality fields and additional lighted facilities within the community. This data suggests that much of the demand is satisfied except for the top of the line tournament facilities and the ability to play or practice after dark. The city needs to focus on high quality, top of the line athletic facilities and field lighting. Page - 29
AQUATIC NEEDS TRAIL NEEDS The City of Richardson has focused heavily over the past five years on the development of additional trails to create more connectivity throughout the community. Hiking / Biking / Jogging Trails ranked number one on the citizen survey and Nature Trails/Greenbelt Corridors ranked number two. It is apparent that additional trails are needed within the city. It is imperative to construct trails that connect parks, schools, residential areas, employment centers, commercial areas and mass transit hubs. In addition to the functionality of the trail itself, it is important to focus on the aesthetics of the trail for the trail users. Kiosks, signage, rest areas, shade, landscaping and similar amenities can have a major impact on the trail users experience. The concept of swimming pools and aquatics in general have always been a priority in the City of Richardson. The city reconstructed the Heights Family Aquatic Center (formerly Arapaho Pool) in 2012 and it has been a huge success for the entire community. In addition to this newly reconstructed aquatic center, the City owns and operates an additional four swimming pools. Canyon Creek, Cottonwood, Glenville and Terrace pools are all over 40 years old. The city has been very successful in keeping the pools open, operational and well maintained, however, the average life span of a pool is approximately 30-40 years. Even with the newly renovated Heights Family Aquatic Center and four additional swimming pools, the citizen survey, focus groups and general public all suggested a need for aquatic facilities specifically an indoor aquatic facility. CityLine Park Page - 30
NATURAL OPEN SPACE NEEDS As the City of Richardson and surrounding communities continue to grow and build out, the amount of natural open space begins to diminish. The need for acquisition and preservation of natural open space was evident in the focus group meetings. Many of the citizens expressed the need for open spaces, creek corridors and preservation of mature trees. In addition, open spaces and nature trails ranked as the number four priority on the citizen survey. It is imperative, especially as the city continues to grow, to focus on preserving the most valuable environmental assets, such as wooded lots, natural open spaces, creek corridors and riparian areas. URBAN BEAUTIFICATION INDOOR RECREATION NEEDS The concept of urban beautification is a growing trend both in the City of Richardson and throughout the State. Botanical Gardens ranked as the number five priority in the citizen survey and suggests that citizens desire a higher level of landscaping and beautification throughout the park system. Enhanced landscaping at parks and aesthetic treatments along trail corridors are needed throughout the entire city. In 2013, the City of Richardson completed the renovation of the Heights Recreation Center. In addition, the city completed the construction of an Indoor Gymnastics Center in 2012. It is obvious, based on the citizen input that these developments satisfied a large need in the community, however, there is still a need to construct an indoor recreation center at Breckinridge Park. Page - 31
PRIORITIES The following Parks and Recreational Facility Priorities are based on results from the focus group meetings, public meetings, citizen survey, city staff, the needs analysis and professional opinion. The following list is depicted in order or priority, has been adopted and should be pursued as recreational priorities within the city. RANK FACILITY 1 Multi-Use Trails/Nature Trails/Greenbelt Corridors 2 Indoor Aquatic Center 3 Natural Open Spaces 4 Spraygrounds 5 Seating Areas / Benches 6 Enhanced Urban Beautification (Botanical Gardens) 7 Playgrounds 8 Pavilions / Picnic Shelters 9 Indoor Recreation Center 10 Dog Parks 11 Outdoor Aquatic Center 12 Senior Center 13 Amphitheater 14 Disc Golf Course 15 Tournament Quality Sports Complex (lighted) 16 Skate Park 17 Multi-Purpose Lighted Sports Practice Area 18 Basketball Courts 19 Tennis Courts 20 BMX Track Page - 32
RECOMMENDATIONS New Parks: - Develop property around the City core as a community park and recreational hub. - Develop +/- 25 acres as multi-purpose field sports complex (lighted). Existing Park Upgrades: - Continue to renovate existing neighborhood parks such as: Custer, Mark Twain, Mimosa and Terrace Parks. - Continue recreational developments within Breckinridge and Prairie Creek Parks in accordance with the adopted site master plans. Athletics: - Develop a fully lighted, multi-purpose field sports complex. Aquatics: - Continue to monitor and assess of Cottonwood, Canyon Creek, Glenville, and Terrace Pools and Heights Aquatic Center. - Construct indoor aquatics center. - Construct spraygrounds in existing and future parks Trails: - Continue to construct trails throughout the community to connect parks, schools, residential areas, commercial areas, mass public transit areas and employment centers. It is critical to construct trail segments that result in meaningful connectivity. Natural Open Space: - Acquire, preserve and develop key remaining natural areas for passive recreational opportunities as well as for natural habitats and trail corridors. Urban Beautification: - Enhance existing rights-of-way with identification treatments and landscaping to improve the aesthetic appeal of Richardson and enhance key entry portals and gateways. - Increase and enhance the level of landscaping within the park system. Indoor Recreation Center: - Construct an indoor recreation center at Breckinridge Park in accordance to the master plan. Page - 33
VII. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The following table depicts the updated project list for the City of Richardson for the next five years and beyond. It is important to note that the following schedule is intended to be a flexible guide for the development of parks, recreational facilities and open spaces over the next five to ten years. The city should evaluate and take advantage of any unforeseen opportunities that may arise that are not identified in this implementation schedule as long it meets the goals and objectives of this plan. The city should continually and actively pursue partnerships and non-traditional funding sources to expedite implementation where possible to alleviate some of the burden of implementation expenses on residents. PROJECT Develop a centrally located community park to include: open lawn areas, multi-use trails, pavilions, seating areas, sprayground, enhanced landscaping, etc Continue the development of multi-use trails and soft surfaced trails throughout the city Construct an indoor aquatic facility Continue to master plan, renovate, rehabilitate and upgrade existing parks Develop Breckinridge and Prairie Creek Parks in accordance to their master plans Construct an outdoor aquatics facility and sprayground in the northeastern quadrant of Richardson Capital improvement projects for parks and open space should contain a public art element equivalent to two percent of the project budget Continue to work closely with Transit Oriented Development, and Public, Private Partnerships in order to acquire and develop parkland The following list is NOT in priority order POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES TPWD Outdoor Grant General Fund General Obligation Bond TPWD Recreational Trails Grant TxDOT Enhancement Grant General Fund General Obligation Bond TPWD Indoor Grant General Fund General Obligation Bond TPWD Outdoor Grant General Fund General Obligation Bond TPWD Outdoor Grant General Fund General Obligation Bond TPWD Outdoor Grant General Fund General Obligation Bond General Fund General Obligation Bond TPWD Grants General Fund General Obligation Bond Page - 34
VIII. SUMMARY Based on all the received data, it is apparent that the citizens of Richardson are very satisfied, and not only invested in the existing park system, but looking towards the future. The City of Richardson has made incredible progress in the parks system with additions of the Heights Family Aquatic Center, Richardson Gymnastics Center, acquisition of additional park land, development of new parks, renovations of existing parks and the continual development of the overall trail system. In addition, the city has continually maintained the existing park system at a high level of service. It is imperative to continue this high level of maintenance as the city acquires and develops additional park land. A successful management program of the city s park system, especially the natural areas, will ensure that the city will stay ahead of the curve as the park system continues to develop and grow. The main objectives of this updated plan are to continue to acquire and develop land as it becomes available, primarily with a focus on the preservation of natural open spaces. In addition, continue to renovate and upgrade the aging parks within the system in regards to the high priority facilities as the population and demographics change in the community. It is also apparent that a centrally located community park and an indoor aquatic facility are needed. The demand for multi-use and nature trails continues to grow and the city needs to pursue the construction of trail segments that create a larger trail network to connect residential areas with commercial areas, parks and schools. This master plan update is to be utilized as a guideline which should be reviewed annually and updated every five years to reflect the unique recreational needs of the changing population and demographics of the city. The city should take advantage of any unforeseen opportunities not identified in the plan that may arise, such as donations of land and/or facilities as long as the actions meet the intent of thegoals, objectives and recommendations of this plan The proposed improvements contained in this plan will enhance the quality of life throughout the entire community. The resulting benefits include tourism potential, economic value, increasing property values, civic pride and most importantly, an increased quality of life for the residents of the City of Richardson. Page - 36
APPENDIX I National Service Research Park & Recreation Needs Assessment Study November 29, 2016
City of Richardson Park & Recreation Needs Assessment Study Prepared by: National Service Research November 29, 2016 REVISED March 7, 2017
Page Introduction & Methodology 3 Summary of Focus Groups/Public Meeting 4 Citizen Survey Summary Key Findings 6 Frequency of Facility Use 7 Frequency of Facility Use 2016 compared to 2009 8 Maintenance Rating of Facilities in Richardson 9 Maintenance Rating of Facilities in Richardson 2016 compared to 2009 10 Recreation Program Participation and Interest by Age Past Year 11 Recreation Programs of Most Interest 12 Preferred Communication Methods 13 Most Needed Recreation Facilities in Richardson 14 Future Funding Priorities 16 Future Funding Options 17 Respondent Demographics 18 National Service Research Background/Contact Information 20 2
National Service Research (NSR) completed a comprehensive research study for the City of Richardson, Texas as part of the Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan update. An important aspect of the Master Plan was to conduct a demand and needs assessment which involved citizen input. The purpose of the needs assessment study was to provide a foundation for the Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan that will provide guidance based upon citizen needs and priorities. NSR worked closely with MHS Planning and Design and the City of Richardson staff throughout the research process. In order to complete this study effort, National Service Research and MHS Planning and Design conducted a public meeting on September 15, 2016 and two focus groups on September 20 to understand the needs of the citizens The results of these discussions assisted in the design of the survey document. NSR mailed 7,000 surveys proportionately to five sectors in Richardson. A total of 364 mail surveys were returned and computer processed. NSR also provided an online survey link to the City of Richardson which was posted on their web site. A total of 987 survey responses were received via the online survey for a total of 1,351 surveys. The margin of error of this sample size at a 95% confidence level is plus or minus 2.9%. Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 3
Respondents commented that Richardson values its park system and provided several comments they like about it; Open areas and natural areas Trails for walking/hiking Active and passive areas Good use of creek/flood areas Parks are in almost every neighborhood Mature trees in parks A rich variety or programs for all ages Special events Gymnastic center and aquatic center Good safety and maintenance Needs/Vision of the current park & open space system: Trails that connect to a regional system Natural areas/open areas (nature interpretation/marked wildlife habitat areas/nature walks) Indoor aquatic center Further development of Breckinridge Park (recreation center/natatorium) A signature project or central park that is the nucleus of Richardson Create educational elements in parks Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 4
Expand programming (outdoor learning environments) Tournament quality sports fields More mixed use lighted sports fields Bike lanes More art festivals, fresh food markets, music festivals Art in parks Natural gathering places Skate park Expand handicapped access to parks Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 5
Maintenance Respondents feel the trails and parks are well maintained with most respondents rating maintenance as excellent or good. The pools and the senior center need some improvements as noted by the respondents. Recreation Programs There is interest for recreation programs among youth (age 10 and under) and adults. The programs of most interest are; festivals/events, walking/hiking, fitness classes, arts and crafts, health/wellness classes and aquatic programs. Park Facility Priorities It is clear citizens want additional trail connections throughout the city with nature trails, greenway corridors and open spaces/natural areas also being a priority. Other top priorities were (in order of priority); a new indoor aquatic center, botanic gardens, spray grounds, additional benches/seating areas, dog park and additional playgrounds. Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 6
Parks and trails are used most frequently, followed by recreation centers and pools. Parks 46% 24% 13% 10% 7% Trails 29% 19% 14% 12% 26% Recreation Centers 10% 12% 15% 28% 35% Pools 9% 9% 8% 19% 55% Senior Center 5% 10% 78% Gymnastic Center 7% 85% Tennis Center 6% 89% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Weekly Monthly Quarterly Twice a year or less Never Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 7
Frequency of park and trail use have increased since 2009. Facility At least weekly At least monthly At least quarterly Twice a year or less Never 2016 - Parks 45% 24% 13% 10% 7% 2009 Parks 40% 22% 13% 12% 10% 2016 Trails 28% 18% 14% 12% 25% 2009 Trails 25% 16% 12% 9% 33% 2016 -Pools 9% 9% 8% 18% 53% 2009 - Pools 11% 7% 5% 14% 57% 2016 - Recreation Center 9% 11% 15% 26% 34% 2009 - Recreation Center 10% 11% 15% 27% 35% 2016 Senior Center 5% 4% 4% 10% 75% 2009 Senior Center 6% 5% 5% 11% 68% 2016 Tennis Center 1% 2% 2% 6% 84% 2009 Tennis Center 1% 2% 4% 7% 80% Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 8
* Most survey respondents rated facilities in Richardson as good or excellent. * Some improvement is needed in parks (12%), trails (13%) and tennis center (18%). * 9% felt the senior center and 7% reported the pools need much improvement. Gymnastics Center Improvement Needed Much Some Good 38% Excellent 59% Recreation Centers 8% 50% 41% Parks 12% 51% 35% Trails/Greenbelts 13% 52% 33% Senior Center 9% 17% 45% 30% Tennis Center 18% 53% 25% Pools 7% 22% 48% 23% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percentages exclude no answer responses Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 9
Improvements in maintenance ratings are seen mainly among trails, the recreation centers, pools and the tennis center. Facility Excellent Good Needs Some Improvement Needs Much Improvement 2016 - Parks 35% 50% 12% 2% 2009 Parks 35% 53% 11% 1% 2016 Trails 33% 52% 13% 2% 2009 Trails 27% 58% 14% 2% 2016 -Pools 23% 48% 22% 7% 2009 - Pools 20% 53% 21% 7% 2016 - Recreation Center 41% 49% 8% 1% 2009 - Recreation Center 10% 49% 29% 12% 2016 Senior Center 30% 45% 17% 9% 2009 Senior Center 34% 48% 13% 4% 2016 Tennis Center 25% 53% 19% 4% 2009 Tennis Center 13% 62% 22% 3% 10
There is more interest in programs in all age groups compared to the actual program participation within the past year. This indicates there will be demand for programs among all age groups. Program participation increased 15% among all age groups since 2009. 5 and under 6 to 10 11 to 17 18 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 65 Over 65 None 16.9% 14.0% 16.0% 12.3% 12.3% 8.4% 8.0% 5.8% 27.9% 15.6% 27.4% 16.1% 21.8% 17.0% 17.0% 42.8% 2017 Recreation Interest by Age 2016 Recreation Participation by Age Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 11
Top programs that were mentioned in 2009; exercise classes, aquatic programs, arts & crafts, volleyball, and senior programs, The top ten programs of interest among survey respondents is depicted in the chart. Other programs of interest: Family Programs 19.9% Races 18.3 Soccer 17.1 Summer youth programs 15.1 Preschool/toddler programs 13.8 Tennis 13.1 Archery range 13.0 Parent/child programs 12.7 Youth camps 11.1 Basketball 10.7 Disc golf 9.3 Softball 8.6 Baseball 8.4 Sand volleyball 8.0 Indoor volleyball 7.9 Fishing derby 6.9 Kickball 6.0 None/not interested 6.0 Flag football 5.9 Racquetball 5.5 Horseshoes 4.7 Lacrosse 1.9 Rugby 1.3 Cricket 1.3 Festivals/events Walking/hiking Fitness classes/events Arts & Crafts Health/wellness classes Aquatic programs Biking Senior programs Music/dance/drama Nature interpretive programs 2016 Top Ten Programs of Interest 52.5% 52.4% 44.3% 35.9% 31.8% 28.9% 27.4% 23.9% 23.2% 23.0% Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 12
The primary ways residents prefer to receive information related to Park and Recreation activities and programs is Richardson Today, e-mail and water bill inserts. Other mentions included; Nextdoor.com, Week in Review and City Newsletter. Richardson Today 59.4% E-mail 43.2% Water bill insert Flyers/direct mail City website Facebook 19.2% 15.2% 13.8% 12.6% Street banners 8.1% Word of mouth Other Don't know 1.0% 2.0% 1.3% 2016 Preferred Communication Method Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 13
Facility 2016 Priority Score 1. Additional hike/bike/jog trails with connections in the City 14.12 14.57 2. Additional nature trails/greenway corridors 10.80 9.42 3. New indoor aquatic center 10.45 9.60 4. Additional open space/nature trails 7.57 6.00 5. Botanical gardens 5.83 5.33 6. New spray ground 4.51 4.37 7. Additional benches/seating areas 4.47 4.17 8. Additional dog park 3.47 7.48 9. Additional playgrounds 2.93 1.75 2009 Respondents were asked Priority to rate in rank order the Score recreation facilities most needed in Richardson. NSR calculated a weighted score for each facility rated. A #1 or most important received a weight of 40% #2 most important a weight of 25% #3 most important 20%, #4 most important 10% #5 most important 5%. 10. Additional picnic shelters/pavilions 2.91 2.85 11. New outdoor aquatic center 2.91 3.64 12. Additional senior center 2.71 3.40 13. New amphitheater 2.54 2.44 14. Additional recreation center 2.42 2.22 15. New disc golf course 1.48 1.54 16. New skate park 1.40 1.68 17. Additional basketball courts 0.96 1.45 The table at left shows the priority of facilities in rank order that are most needed with comparisons to 2009. Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 14
Facility 2016 Priority Score 2009 Priority Score 18. Additional tennis courts 0.90 1.41 19. Additional baseball fields 0.70 1.72 20. Additional soccer fields 0.64 1.57 21. Additional football fields 0.41 0.55 22. New BMX track 0.33 0.80 23. Cricket fields 0.25 0.39 24. Additional softball fields 0.21 0.61 25. Lacrosse fields 0.14 0.37 26. Rugby fields 0.11 0.18 Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 15
The top three funding priorities among residents are trail connections, renovate existing parks and facilities and enhance park maintenance. This validates the number one ranking presented on page 12 for developing additional trail connections throughout the city. Develop trail connections throughout the city Mean Score: 2.94 Renovate existing parks and facilities Mean Score: 2.85 Enhance park maintenance Mean Score: 2.67 Build an aquatic center/natatorium Mean Score: 2.46 Build an additional recreation center Mean Score: 1.80 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 4-Top Priority 3-2- 1-Low Priority No Opinion Mean score calculations were made on the 1 to 4 scale excluding those who had no opinion Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 16
Residents support increased user fees and bonds to fund park and facility updates and/or expansions. Fewer residents supported increased property taxes as an option to pay for future park updates or additions. Increased user fees Mean Score: 3.60 Bonds Mean Score: 3.76 Increased property taxes Mean Score: 2.14 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 5-Strong support 4-Mild support 3-Neutral 2-Mildly oppose 1-Strongly oppose No opinion Mean score calculations were made on the 1 to 5 scale excluding those who had no opinion Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 17
The typical respondent has lived in Richardson 18 years, has a household size of 2.8 persons and is 53.3 years of age. 52% of households have children residing within their household. Age groups of children represented in the surveyed households: 0 to 5 years old 17.3% 6 to 10 years old 14.8 11 to 13 years old 9.1 14 to 18 years old 10.7 No children in house 48.1 Head of household age of respondents: Under 35 12.7% 35 to 44 21.5 45 to 54 18.9 55 to 64 20.8 65+ 28.1 The age data is representative of the population of Richardson 95% own their home and 5% rent. Less than 2 years 2 to 5 years 6 to 10 years 11 to 20 years Over 20 years 5.3% 13.9% 13.4% 22.3% 2016 Length Lived in Richardson 45.1% Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 18
The geographic distribution of the respondents is representative of the city s population. NW of Arapaho & Central 31.6% SW of Arapaho & Central 15.1% NE of Arapaho & Central 21.8% SE of Arapaho & Central 21.1% Breckinridge area 10.5% 2016 Area of Residence Source: National Service Research, Mail and Online survey of 1,351 Richardson Residents, October 2016 19
Contact: Andrea Thomas, Owner 2601 Ridgmar Plaza, Suite 2 Fort Worth, Texas 76116 817-731-3493 e-mail: andrea@nationalserviceresearch.com web site: www.nationalserviceresearch.com National Service Research (NSR), founded in 1989, is a full-service market research consulting firm and conducts market studies for the public and private sector. NSR conducts various types of consumer and business research including focus groups and surveys nationwide. NSR s owner and founder, Andrea Thomas, has twenty-two years of professional market research experience. 20