SHORELINE, FLOOD AND COASTAL DEFENCE MANAGEMENT PLANS

Similar documents
The Moors at Arne Project, Managing Coastal Change

Severn Estuary Shoreline Management Plan What does it mean for planning in North Somerset?

Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016

Policy DM19: Development and Nature Conservation

Saltmarsh Conference. 8 October in the Suffolk Coast & Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

PPS5: Planning for the Historic Environment

Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Report. Dublin Port Masterplan Review 2017

Stock-Taking on Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in the Black Sea IMPLEMENTATION AUDIT QUESTIONNAIRE 2010

Policy for management and protection of the coast

CORRECTIONS WITHIN DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROADS AND BRIDGES AUGUST 2009

Response to Review Panel Stage 2 Consultation on Designated Landscapes in Wales. UK Environmental Law Association s Wales Working Party

FAQ S about Restoration Planning FROM THE Department of Ecology WEBSITE:

Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability and Flexible Adaptation Planning: the Cockburn Sound Coastal Alliance Experience

INTRODUCTION NORTH HEYBRIDGE GARDEN SUBURB

PART 5 - NATURAL AND PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT

Scottish Natural Heritage. Better places for people and nature

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

Appendix A. Planning Processes. Introduction

Wise use of floodplains - a demonstration of techniques to evaluate and plan floodplain restoration LIFE99 ENV/UK/000203

Parish of Repton NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Wildlife and Planning Guidance: Neighbourhood Plans

Tāhuhu whakaruruhau ā-taone The sheltering ridge pole

building with nature - a new benchmark for green infrastructure

TOPIC PAPER 2: Links to other sustainability tools

Scotland s 2020 Biodiversity Challenge: Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Authority Delivery Agreement

Wildlife and Planning Guidance: Local Plans

Development in the setting of the Cotswolds AONB

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS): Design and Implementation

Assessing the impact of smallscale wind energy proposals on the natural heritage

Implementing sustainable water strategy through development industry engagement

Call for Proposals. Heritage, natural capital and ecosystem services: case studies. Project No: Date of Issue: Tuesday 14 th November 2017

Site Assessment Technical Document Appendix A: Glossary

South West Nature Map - A Planners Guide

Elected Members School Exeter 2009 A planning refresher for elected members

HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND S BIODIVERSITY DELIVERY STATEMENT WITH THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT

ROCHFORD LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK: Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment. Rochford Core Strategy Preferred Options Document

Managing the coast North Norfolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Non-technical summary of final plan Old Hunstanton to Kelling Hard

CREATING GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FOR IRELAND

River Basin Management Plans & Spatial Planning in N.Ireland. A land use planner s perspective

Circular L8/08 2 September Water Services Investment and Rural Water Programmes Protection of Natural Heritage and National Monuments

Coastal management. Coastal management. The four options

Rhode Island Shoreline Change Special Area Management Plan

volume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 7 ha 218/08

1. There are several important factors when discussing climate change, which the RCEP needs to understand for this study:

AECOM Wolverhampton City Centre Metro Extension Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report 64

Settlement Boundaries Methodology North Northumberland Coast Neighbourhood Plan (August 2016)

Development of green infrastructure in EU regions Nature-based solutions delivering multiple benefits

volume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 2 ha 202/08 environmental impact assessment

Guide. Guide to Regional Planning Policies. Background

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 8 June Pre-Application Report by Development Quality Manager

Highland Council Allotment Policy

HS2 Hybrid Bill Petitioning. Summary of SMBC Asks 23/09/13. Background

Water Vole (Arvicola terrestris)

HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND

Plan Modification to Chapter B2 of the Auckland Unitary Plan(AUP) Operative in part (15 November 2016)

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

Landscape and Heritage

Marinas, Mooring and Boating Facilities 23

WATERWAYS & DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Rochford District Council Allocations Development Plan Document: Discussion and Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal

10.0 Open Space and Public Realm

LANDSCAPES FOR EVERYONE: CREATING A BETTER FUTURE. A shared vision of why we must treasure our landscapes and how Government can help

CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY

Our approach to the design and routeing of new electricity transmission lines

Seascapes and Marine Planning in Wales

PLANNING COMMITTEE DATE: 07/09/2015 REPORT OF THE SENIOR MANAGER PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT SERVICE CAERNARFON. Number: 4

Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH. 18 January 2008

Scottish Natural Heritage Sharing Good Practice Programme

Master Plan for Preservation and Scenic Conservation (1995)

Proposal to designate the Queen of Sweden Historic Marine Protected Area - Partial Business Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA)

WGF18 Workshop Spatial Planning Questionnaires

Sunshine Coast Council Coastal Management Overview. January 2016 edition

Landscape and Heritage A Park landscape that embraces the physical, cultural and social heritage of the area

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES and TEN-T PROJECTS Key elements for a sustainable network development

Sustainability Statement. Whitby Business Park Area Action Plan

Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Regional Drainage Policies - Volume 3 Environmental Management INSERT FIGURE 36

6. THE COAST POLICY INDEX

Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB Boundary Variation Project

Western Sydney Parklands Australia s Largest Urban Park

Guidelines for Planning Authorities and Part V of the Planning and Development Act 2000: December 2000

CITY VIEW OBJECTIVES

Group Executive Liveability and Natural Assets

STATEMENT OF OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF LAND AT CHURCH CLIFF DRIVE FILEY

HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND

Queensland Coastal Plan. Presented by John Lane Director Environment Planning

Resolution XII NOTING also that with the increasingly rapid urbanization, wetlands are being threatened in two principle ways:

The role of Universities: Civic Design and planning futures

Preparing New Hampshire for Projected Storm Surge, Sea-Level Rise, and Extreme Precipitation

Policy Unit 5A05 Ella Nore Lane to Fishbourne

VCA Guidance Note. Contents

Published in March 2005 by the. Ministry for the Environment. PO Box , Wellington, New Zealand ISBN: X.

Priority Delivery Areas for Landscape Scale Conservation in the South West ( )

Great Easton Neighbourhood Plan Statement of Basic Conditions

Consolidated Workshop Proceedings Report

Draft Resolution XII.10

City of Rockingham. Local Management Practices, Costs and Strategic Coastal Planning

4. What are the goals of the Kawarthas, Naturally Connected project? 7. What are watersheds and why are they being used as the project boundaries?

Guidance for Public Authorities on Implementing the Biodiversity Duty

Overview Report. Proposed Development

WWT Steart Marshes: a coastal wetland that works for people and wildlife

Transcription:

These plans may provide opportunities as well as concern for recreational boating. They are currently being revised and consulted on. This document explains how we can engage in the process. Shoreline, flood and coastal defence management plans provide a framework for coastal defence and flood management outlining in broad terms how the coastline should be managed in future. They are non statutory documents that suggest an approach to managing the risks to people and the developed, historic and natural environment from coastal erosion and flooding. We are all aware that the coast is a dynamic environment evolving naturally through coastal erosion, accretion and flooding processes. The coast is also an economic and social asset for businesses, housing, tourism and recreational activities. Development on the coast has led to the necessity to protect some coastal developments through engineering solutions. It is estimated that 10 % of the population currently live in areas potentially at risk 1. Continued pressure on space at the coast for new developments, coupled with the potential effects of climate change and sea level rise will all increase these risks in the future. Together these plans aim to present a long term strategic approach to manage erosion and flood risk and outline an approach for the future management of the coastline. Who is responsible for managing coastal flooding? Coastal protection and coastal flood defence are devolved issues, governed primarily through the Coast Protection Act 1949, but also the Water Resources 1 Local Authority Coastal Risk Management: information pack. (2004) Act 1991 and Land Drainage Act 1991 and Water Act 2003 in England and Wales and Flood Defence (Scotland) Act 1961 and Flood Prevention and Land Drainage (Scotland) Act 1997 in Scotland. Defra has overall responsibility in England and funds most of the Environment Agency s flood management activities and provides grant aid on a project basis to the operating authorities to support their investment in flood and coastal protection. The Welsh Assembly Government provides a similar role in Wales, with responsibility for policy on flood and coastal defence. Central guidance on flood policy and good practice is limited in Scotland compared to England and Wales reflecting the lower level of coastal flooding in Scotland. This lower level is mainly due to the different topography of Scotland compared to many parts of England and Wales. However the Scottish Executive does grant aid coastal protection schemes proposed by Local Authorities. In addition the Scottish Executive, SNH and SEPA fund research to improve flood management. Government Strategy Making Space for Water 2 was the Government s consultation seeking views on a range of flood and coastal erosion risk management issues for England. In the Government s response to the consultation published in March 2005 3, Defra outlined a revised vision for the 2 Defra (2004) Making space for water: developing a new Government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England: a consultation exercise. Available at www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/waterspace /consultation.pdf 3 Defra (2005) Making space for water: taking forward a new Government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England. Available at http://www.defra. gov.uk/environ/fcd/policy/strategy/1stres.pdf PAGE 1

strategy. Of importance to RYA, the vision outlines: greater focus on stakeholder involvement and participation greater emphasis on solutions that work with natural processes for example, the appropriate use of multi functional wetlands that provide wildlife and recreational resource and reduce coastal squeeze on habitats like saltmarsh. The report also recognises that sites of designated environmental importance will usually also have other benefits, for example recreational and/or property interests, which will be considered in deciding on the management action. Operating authorities will need to increase their awareness of these recreational assets and this is one area where local participation is vital. Developing Shoreline Management Plans The Government has encouraged the formulation of voluntary Regional Coastal Groups made up primarily of the operating authorities ; maritime district councils, Environment Agency and internal drainage boards to develop SMPs. In Scotland, primary responsibility for coastal defence lies with the landowner, subject to approval from the relevant Local Authority. A Regional Coastal Group is defined by its geographical boundary based on sediment movement rather than administrative. At present there are 17 coastal groups covering England and Wales. The establishment of Regional Coastal Groups has allowed a more coordinated approach to coastal defence at both a regional and local level and enables strategic management within the sediment cells or sub-cells. How are SMPs implemented? SMPs outline the policy and preferred option for each coastal cell and have the following objectives: Objectives To define the risks to people and the developed, historical and natural environment Identify preferred policies for managing those risks over the next 100 years Identify consequences of implementing policies Set out procedures for monitoring Inform stakeholders of risk Ensure that future land use and development takes account of the risks and preferred policies Box 1: SMP Objectives Coastal cells are divided further into management units. Each management unit has its own distinct character and is assessed on which of the 4 basic policy options (defined by Defra) is preferred, taking into account and balancing the needs of the local community and the environment. This process requires an understanding of economic and social objectives, as well as environmental issues affecting where future development can be planned. Policy options 1. Hold the line - maintain or upgrade the level of protection provided by coastal defences 2. Advance the line build new defences seaward of the existing defence line 3. Managed realignment - allow retreat of the shoreline inland and identify a new line of coastal defences and where appropriate construct new defences landward of the original defences 4. No active intervention a decision not to invest in providing or maintaining any defences. Box 2: Policy Options Once the SMP has been approved, following a period of stakeholder consultation, strategy plans are developed to implement the detail and PAGE 2

identify the most appropriate coastal engineering schemes in line with the policy in accordance with Defra guidance. SMP2 Review The original SMPs were developed over a period between 1996 and 1999. Defra produced Shoreline Management Plans, A guide for coastal defence authorities in June 2001. The document provides the requirements of the stage 2 SMPs (known as SMP2s) including a review of the first SMPs, their strengths and weaknesses and highlights various issues that need to be addressed in the next SMP review. Regional Coastal Groups are beginning the preparation of SMP2s to give a guide for the management of the coast for the next 100 yrs. 3 pilot areas have already undergone a period of review and consultation for: Dover Harbour to Beachy Head, Beachy Head to Selsey Bill and North Kelling to Lowestoft. The remaining plans will be reviewed in 2005 and 2006. The pilot SMP2s recognised that existing management practices may not be appropriate in the long term. Consequently, the SMP2s will need to provide a timeline for objectives, policy and management changes, which will provide a route map for decision makers to move from the present situation towards the future. Objectives, policy setting and management requirements will be considered for three main epochs: 0-20 years, 20-50 years and 50-100 years. The review of SMP2s will account for: Latest coastal studies and monitoring information Issues identified since original plan Changes in legislation Changes in National policy Whilst SMP2s take account of other planning initiatives and legislative requirements and is intended to inform the wider strategic planning for the coast, it does not set anything other than coastal defence policies. Estuary Strategies and uneconomic sea defences There is no legal right to flood and coastal defence in England and Wales. In 2004 Defra clarified their policy towards the maintenance of uneconomic sea defences 4. The policy includes guidance for considering investment decisions taking account of social and environmental benefits as well as economic benefits and how sea defences will be categorised (Box 3). The EA is piloting a series of Essex and Suffolk Estuary strategies due for completion by 2007. The aim is to provide a better understanding of how future flood risk can be reduced in the face of such pressures such as sea level rise. Sea defence categories 1. Defences where there is a clear economic case to continue maintenance 2. Defences that are required to protect internationally designated environmental features from the damaging effect of tidal flooding 3. Defences which do not fit into 1 or 2 but where work is justified because withdrawal of maintenance would cause an uncertain and unacceptable risk 4. Defences that do not fit 1,2 or 3. Box 3: Sea defence categories Flood Management Plans The Environment Agency is currently undertaking a programme to produce Catchment Flood Management Plans (CFMPs) for the major river catchments. 4 Maintenance of uneconomic sea defences: a way forward: Available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/environ/ fcd/policy/unecseadef.htm PAGE 3

A CFMP is a high-level strategic planning tool through which the EA will seek to work with other key decisionmakers within a river catchment to identify and agree policies for sustainable flood risk management. CFMPs will identify broad policies for the long term (up to 100 years) and assist future flood risk management planning. They will improve understanding of what factors influence floods and flood risk at the catchment scale. These policies will form the basis for development of Strategy Plans, which will identify in more detail appropriate flood defence measures. Other Plans & Legislation Planning Guidance (England) Planning Policy Guidance Note (PPG) 25 in principle provides an effective mechanism for ensuring flood risk is taken into account in the planning process, allied to effective flood resilience and mitigation measures where development goes ahead in flood risk areas. Under the new planning system, a new Planning Policy Statement (PPS) will be consulted on to replace PPG 25. Regional Spatial Plans and Local Development Frameworks will have to take account of this advice. Planning Guidance (Wales) In Wales, the planning framework is provided through the Wales Spatial Plan, Planning Guidance Wales and Technical Guidance Note (TAN) 15, Development and Flood Risk. River Basin Management Plans The main mechanism by which the Water Framework Directive will achieve its goals is by developing River Basin Management Plans. Article 4(6) of the Directive acknowledges that extreme flood and drought events can adversely affect the status (both quality and quantity) of water bodies. In order to minimise these risks and help water bodies achieve the requirements of the Directive, certain conditions need to be met including taking all practical steps to alleviate flooding and prevent further deterioration in status. Part of the requirements of the WFD is stakeholder consultation and involvement. SAC and SPA Management Plans 5 Single schemes of management are being developed for all European Marine Sites designated under the Habitats Regulations 6. Any plans or projects affecting these sites must go through an assessment process to ensure there is no net loss to the site. English Nature is represented on the SMP Regional Coastal Groups and is required to ensure that SMP2s comply with the requirements of the regulations. In Wales, The Countryside Council for Wales (CCW) fulfils a similar role to English Nature. The RYA has the opportunity to represent their interests through local involvement on advisory groups for SACs and SPAs. 5 SAC is a Special Area of Conservation designated under the European Habitats Directive. SPA is a Special Protection Area designated under the European Birds Directive. 6 The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 Statutory Instrument 1994 No. 2716 PAGE 4

Estuary management plans In England, arising from an initiative by English Nature, Estuary Management Plans have been prepared by a project team which brings together all those with an interest in an estuary to reach a consensus of the sustainable use of that estuary. All the major estuaries in England have been covered, although some initiatives have been superseded by the SAC Management Schemes. All initiatives offer a valuable opportunity for recreational users to feed into the management strategy for the estuary. Responding to consultations Regional and local representation of recreational interests is going to be vital in the development of the management strategies for estuaries, coasts and inland waters. Whilst the RYA has produced guidance for Planning Authorities on requirements of the recreational boating sector 7, and will continue to provide a strategic framework for the development of various plans and inform members of progress, RYA Regional Associations and affiliated clubs will be key to providing a local response. Key Concerns Concerns have been raised that recreational boating interests may not be represented and considered within the development of coastal defence and flood management plans and consequently facilities lost. Managed retreat is one example where existing facilities and the access to water may be affected. Equally it may also provide an opportunity for new facilities or the relocation of facilities such as moorings, landing places and club houses. Through action at the regional level we can ensure facilities are not lost or degraded. Access to the water is vital for the range of recreational activities that take place and should be built into any new scheme where boating takes place. How to get involved For the Shoreline Management Plans, a stakeholder engagement strategy will be planned by the relevant coastal group before work starts. RYA will inform coastal groups initially and request we are given the opportunity to represent our interests and act as a central coordination point to facilitate input by the Regional Associations. Consultation will be via documents and also through local presentations and exhibitions advertised locally. Each Region should take stock of the facilities and level of activity within their region and the needs of recreational boaters including access to launch and landing sites from the water, sheltered waters for watersports and novices and direct access to the water and shore side facilities. The RYA Guidance and the response from Government to the Making Space for Water consultation support case for providing for recreational needs on the coast. Local and regional members can ensure that the operating authorities for these plans recognise that water recreation is an integral part of the local waterside environment and should ensure that boating is not compromised by flooding or flood/coast protection measures. 7 Planning Guide for Boating (2004) British Marine Federation and Royal Yachting Association. Available from RYA. PAGE 5