Potential for Seedling Mortality

1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded reasons High Fluvaquents, frequently flooded 45% Wayland 10% Naples Creek 5% 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Geneseo 90% 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Hemlock 90% 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Naples Creek 90% Wayland 5% 5A Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded High Wayland 60% Wayland, very poorly drained 30% Wakeville 10% 12D Rockrift channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Rockrift 85% Mongaup, very stony 10% Willdin 5% 13F Rock outcrop-arnot complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes Not rated Rock outcrop 55% 14D Cadosia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Cadosia 85% Lordstown, very stony 10% Mardin 5% 15A 15B Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 0 to 3 percent slopes Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Guyanoga, fan 90% Chenango, fan 5% Hemlock 5% Low Guyanoga, fan 90% Chenango, fan 5% Hemlock 5% 16A Almond channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Almond 80% Ontusia 10% Norchip 5% Gretor 5% 16B Almond channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Almond 80% Ontusia 10% Norchip 5% Gretor 5% 16C Almond channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Almond 80% Ontusia 10% Gretor 5% Norchip 5% Page 1 of 16

reasons 18A Homer fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Homer 90% Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Argiaquolls 5% 19A 20A Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 percent slopes Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Argiaquolls 80% Homer 8% Atherton 7% Palms, undrained 5% High Atherton 40% Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Argiaquolls 40% Homer 8% Canandaigua 7% 24A Howard gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Howard 80% Palmyra 10% Phelps 5% 24B Howard gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Howard 80% Palmyra 10% Phelps 5% 24C Howard gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Howard 80% Palmyra 10% Phelps 5% 24D Howard soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Howard 65% Palmyra 20% Arkport 13% Phelps 2% 25A Chenango gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Chenango 90% Castile 8% Valois 2% 25B Chenango gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Chenango 90% Castile 5% Valois 5% 25C Chenango gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Chenango 90% Castile 5% Valois 5% 25D Chenango gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Chenango 90% Castile 8% Valois 2% 25E Chenango gravelly loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes Low Chenango 90% Valois 10% 26B Chenango channery loam, fan, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Chenango, fan 85% Guyanoga, fan 5% Hemlock 5% Castile 5% Page 2 of 16

27B Castile gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Castile 85% Chenango 5% Phelps 5% 31A Collamer silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Collamer 85% Schoharie 5% 31B Collamer silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Collamer 85% Schoharie 5% 31C Collamer silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Collamer 85% Schoharie 5% 31D Collamer silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Collamer 90% Schoharie 5% 32A Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 90% Arkport 4% Schoharie 3% 32B Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 90% Arkport 4% Schoharie 3% 33A Dunkirk silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 90% Arkport 4% Schoharie 3% 33B Dunkirk silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 90% Arkport 4% Schoharie 3% 33C Dunkirk silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 90% Arkport 4% Schoharie 3% 33D Dunkirk silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 90% Schoharie 5% 33E Dunkirk silt loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 90% Schoharie 5% 34A Lakemont silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Lakemont 85% Odessa 5% Fonda 4% Canandaigua 4% Barre 2% 35A Odessa silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Odessa 85% Lakemont 5% Churchville 3% Rhinebeck 2% 35B Odessa silty clay loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Odessa 85% Lakemont 4% Churchville 3% Rhinebeck 2% reasons Page 3 of 16

reasons 36A Schoharie silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Schoharie 90% Dunkirk 5% 36B Schoharie silty clay loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Schoharie 90% Dunkirk 5% 36C Schoharie silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Schoharie 90% Dunkirk 5% 36D Schoharie silty clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Schoharie 90% Dunkirk 5% 36E Schoharie silty clay loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Low Schoharie 90% Dunkirk 5% 37A Schoharie silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Schoharie 90% Dunkirk 5% 37B Schoharie silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Schoharie 90% Dunkirk 5% 38A Niagara silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Niagara 85% Canandaigua 5% Rhinebeck 5% 38B Niagara silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Niagara 85% Canandaigua 5% Rhinebeck 5% 39A Rhinebeck silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Rhinebeck 90% Niagara 5% Lakemont 5% 41A Aeric Epiaquepts, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Aeric Epiaquepts 50% Aeric Epiaquepts 45% 43A Canandaigua silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Canandaigua 90% Canandaigua 4% Niagara 3% Lakemont 3% 44A Canandaigua mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Canandaigua 90% Canandaigua 5% Lakemont 3% Palms, undrained 2% Page 4 of 16

reasons 45A Fonda mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Fonda 95% Canandaigua 3% Palms, undrained 2% 46A Galen fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Galen 90% 46B Galen fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Galen 90% 48A Arkport fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Arkport 95% Dunkirk 3% Galen 2% 48B Arkport fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Arkport 95% Dunkirk 3% Galen 2% 48C Arkport fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Arkport 95% Dunkirk 3% Galen 2% 48D Arkport fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Arkport 90% Dunkirk 8% Palmyra 2% 49B Arkport loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Arkport 95% Dunkirk 3% Galen 2% 49D Arkport loamy fine sand, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Arkport 95% Dunkirk 3% Palmyra 2% 49E Arkport loamy fine sand, 25 to 35 percent slopes Low Arkport 90% Dunkirk 8% Palmyra 2% 49F Arkport loamy fine sand, 35 to 55 percent slopes Low Arkport 90% Dunkirk 8% Palmyra 2% 50B Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 50% Arkport 45% Collamer 5% 50C Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 60% Arkport 35% Collamer 5% 50D Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Dunkirk 60% Arkport 35% Collamer 5% 53A Lamson fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Lamson 90% Lamson 5% Canandaigua 3% 54A Lamson mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Lamson 90% Canandaigua 5% Lamson 5% 56A Elnora loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Elnora 90% 58B Colonie loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Colonie 95% Elnora 5% Page 5 of 16

58C Colonie loamy fine sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Colonie 95% Elnora 5% 62B Mardin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Mardin 85% Volusia 5% 62C Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Mardin 88% Volusia 5% 62D Mardin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes High Mardin 85% Volusia 5% 62E Mardin channery silt loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes High Mardin 80% Volusia 5% 63B Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Langford 90% 63C Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 pecent slopes Low Langford 90% 63D Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Langford 90% reasons 64B Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 percent Low Langford 55% slopes 66A Lyons soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Lyons 75% Lyons, frequently ponded 15% Appleton 3% Canandaigua 3% Kendaia 2% Ilion 1% Palms 1% 68A Volusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Volusia 90% Mardin 5% Chippewa 5% 68B Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Volusia 90% Chippewa 5% Mardin 5% 68C Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Volusia 90% Mardin 6% Chippewa 4% Page 6 of 16

reasons 68D Volusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes High Volusia 90% Mardin 7% Chippewa 3% 69A Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Erie 95% Chippewa 5% 69B Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Erie 95% Chippewa 5% 69C Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Erie 95% Chippewa 5% 71A Darien silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Darien 95% Ilion 4% Angola 1% 71B Darien silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Darien 95% Ilion 4% Angola 1% 71C Darien silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Darien 95% Ilion 4% Angola 1% 72A Darien-Ilion silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Darien 68% Ilion 27% Angola 5% 72B Darien-Ilion silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Darien 68% Ilion 27% Angola 5% 73B Gretor silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Gretor 95% Gretor, poorly drained 5% 73C Gretor silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Gretor 95% Gretor, poorly drained 5% Page 7 of 16

Map reasons 73D Gretor channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes High Gretor 90% Gretor, poorly drained 2% 76B Orpark silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Orpark 95% Orpark, poorly drained 5% 76C Orpark silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Orpark 95% Orpark, poorly drained 5% 76D Orpark channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes High Orpark 90% Orpark, poorly drained 5% 77A Chippewa silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Chippewa 85% Chippewa, very poorly drained 10% Volusia 5% 77B Chippewa silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Chippewa 85% Volusia 10% Chippewa, very poorly drained 5% 82B Manlius channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Manlius 95% 82C Manlius channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Manlius 95% 82D Manlius channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Manlius 95% Arnot 4% 91A Palms muck, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Palms, undrained 55% Palms, drained 40% Canandaigua 5% 92A Carlisle muck, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Carlisle, undrained 45% Carlisle, drained 40% Palms, undrained 10% Canandaigua 5% 93A Edwards muck, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Edwards, undrained 50% Edwards, drained 35% Martisco, undrained 10% Carbonate content Canandaigua 5% Page 8 of 16

reasons 94A Martisco muck, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Martisco, undrained 55% Carbonate content Martisco, drained 35% Carbonate content Canandaigua 5% Palms, drained 5% 95A Saprists, 0 to 3 percent slopes, inundated High Saprists, inundated 85% Carlisle, undrained 5% Fluvaquents, frequently flooded 5% Palms, undrained 5% 101A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Honeoye 85% Lansing 4% Wassaic 2% 101B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Honeoye 85% Lansing 4% Wassaic 2% 101C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Honeoye 85% Lansing 4% Wassaic 2% 101D Honeoye loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Moderate Honeoye 85% Lansing 4% 101E Honeoye loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes Moderate Honeoye 85% Lansing 4% 104A 104B 104C Honeoye loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, lower clay surface Honeoye loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, lower clay surface Honeoye loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, lower clay surface Low Honeoye, lower clay surface 85% Lansing 4% Wassaic 2% Low Honeoye, lower clay surface 85% Lansing 4% Wassaic 2% Low Honeoye, lower clay surface 85% Lansing 4% Wassaic 2% 106B Danley-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Danley 50% Lansing 45% Conesus 2% Palatine 1% 107B Conesus-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Conesus 50% Lansing 45% Danley 1% Palatine 1% Page 9 of 16

108C Lansing loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Lansing 85% Conesus 8% Danley 1% Wassaic 1% 108D Lansing loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Moderate Lansing 85% Conesus 9% 108E Lansing loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes Moderate Lansing 85% 112B Ontario fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Ontario 90% Lima 10% 112C Ontario fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Ontario 95% Palmyra 5% 112D Ontario fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Ontario 95% Palmyra 5% 112E Ontario fine sandy loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes Low Ontario 93% Palmyra 5% Manlius 2% 114B Ontario gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Ontario 98% Lima 2% 114C Ontario gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Ontario 95% Palmyra 5% 114D Ontario gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Ontario 95% Palmyra 5% 116B Ontario loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Ontario 90% 116C Ontario loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Ontario 95% 116D Ontario loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Ontario 95% 118F Ontario, Honeoye, and Lansing soils, 35 to 55 percent slopes Moderate Honeoye 35% Lansing 20% reasons 120E Palmyra and Howard soils, 25 to 45 percent slopes Low Palmyra 55% Howard 40% Colonie 5% 122A Palmyra cobbly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Palmyra 95% Honeoye, lower clay surface 5% 122B Palmyra cobbly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Palmyra 95% Honeoye, lower clay surface 5% 124A Palmyra fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Palmyra 90% Howard 10% 124B Palmyra fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Palmyra 90% Howard 10% 126A Palmyra gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Palmyra 95% 126B Palmyra gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Palmyra 95% 126C Palmyra gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Palmyra 90% Arkport 10% 126D Palmyra gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Palmyra 90% Arkport 10% 128A Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Palmyra 90% Arkport 10% Page 10 of 16

Map reasons 128B Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Palmyra 90% Arkport 10% 128C Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Palmyra 90% Arkport 10% 130A Farmington loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Farmington 90% Galoo 5% 130B Farmington loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Farmington 90% Galoo 5% 132A Galoo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rocky Low Galoo 95% 132B Galoo loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rocky Low Galoo 95% 134A Camillus silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Camillus 95% 134B Camillus silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Camillus 95% 151C Willdin-Norchip complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes High Willdin 60% Norchip 38% Palms, undrained 2% 152B Valois gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Valois 85% Cadosia 5% Mardin 5% 152C Valois gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Valois 85% Cadosia 5% Mardin 5% 152D Valois gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Valois 85% Cadosia 6% Mardin 6% 152E Valois gravelly loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes Low Valois 85% Cadosia 6% Mardin 6% Towerville, extremely stony 3% 153B Valois gravelly loam, cool, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Valois, cool 85% Rockrift 5% Willdin 5% 153C Valois gravelly loam, cool, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Valois, cool 85% Rockrift 5% Willdin 5% 153D Valois gravelly loam, cool, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Valois, cool 85% Willdin 6% Rockrift 6% 153E Valois gravelly loam, cool, 25 to 35 percent slopes Low Valois, cool 85% Willdin 6% Rockrift 6% Ischua 3% 162B Willdin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Willdin 85% Ontusia 5% Middlebrook 5% 162C Willdin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Willdin 85% Ontusia 6% Middlebrook 3% Page 11 of 16

162D Willdin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes High Willdin 80% Ontusia 5% 168A Ontusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Ontusia 88% Norchip 5% Willdin 5% Gretor 2% 168B Ontusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Ontusia 90% Norchip 5% Willdin 5% 168C Ontusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Ontusia 90% Norchip 5% Willdin 5% 168D Ontusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes High Ontusia 90% Willdin 7% Norchip 3% 171C Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 171D Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stony 171E Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stony 171F Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony reasons Low Lordstown 40% Manlius 20% Towerville 20% Cadosia 10% Mardin 5% Arnot 5% Low Lordstown, very stony 40% Manlius, very stony 20% Towerville, very stony 20% Cadosia 10% Arnot 5% Mardin 5% Low Lordstown, extremely stony 40% Towerville, extremely stony 20% Manlius, extremely stony 20% Cadosia 10% Mardin 5% Arnot 5% Low Lordstown, extremely stony 40% Manlius, extremely stony 20% Towerville, extremely stony 20% Arnot, extremely stony 10% Cadosia, extremely stony 10% 177A Norchip silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Norchip 85% Norchip, very poorly drained 10% Ontusia 5% Page 12 of 16

reasons 177B Norchip silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Norchip 85% Norchip, very poorly drained 10% Ontusia 5% 181B Mongaup-Ischua complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Mongaup 45% Ischua 40% Rockrift 10% Willdin 3% 181C Mongaup-Ischua complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Mongaup 45% Ischua 40% Rockrift 10% Willdin 3% 181D 181E Mongaup-Ischua complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stony Mongaup-Ischua complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stony Low Mongaup, very stony 45% Ischua, very stony 40% Rockrift 10% Willdin 3% Low Mongaup, extremely stony 45% Ischua, extremely stony 40% Rockrift 10% Willdin 3% 182B Mongaup channery loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Mongaup 75% Rockrift 10% Willdin 8% Ischua 5% 182C Mongaup channery loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Mongaup 75% Rockrift 10% Willdin 8% Ischua 5% 201A Lima loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Lima 85% Honeoye 5% Cazenovia 2% 201B Lima loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Lima 85% Honeoye 6% Cazenovia 2% 201C Lima loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Lima 85% Honeoye 7% Cazenovia 2% 204A Lima loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, lower clay surface Low Lima 85% Honeoye 5% Cazenovia 2% 204B Lima loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, lower clay surface Low Lima 85% Honeoye 6% Cazenovia 2% 210A Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Phelps 85% Galen 10% 210B Phelps gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Phelps 85% Galen 10% 212A Nuhi silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Nuhi 85% Nuhi, poorly drained 5% 240B Aurora-Angola silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Aurora 60% Danley 5% 240C Aurora-Angola silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Aurora 60% Danley 5% Page 13 of 16

240D Aurora-Angola silt loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Aurora 60% Danley 5% 241B Aurora silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Aurora 85% Danley 5% 241C Aurora silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Aurora 85% Danley 7% 241D Aurora silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Aurora 85% Danley 10% 255B Cazenovia silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Cazenovia 85% Cayuga 5% 255C Cazenovia silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Cazenovia 85% Cayuga 8% 255D Cazenovia silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Cazenovia 85% Cayuga 10% 260B Cayuga silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Low Cayuga 85% Schoharie 10% 260C Cayuga silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Low Cayuga 85% Schoharie 10% 260D Cayuga silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Low Cayuga 85% Lansing 10% Schoharie 5% 304A Kendaia loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Kendaia 85% Lyons 5% Churchville 2% Ovid 2% 304B Kendaia loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Kendaia 85% Lyons 4% Churchville 2% Ovid 2% 342A Angola silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Angola 90% Ilion 5% Darien 5% 356A Ovid silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes High Ovid 85% Odessa 10% Lakemont 5% 356B Ovid silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Ovid 85% Odessa 10% Lakemont 5% reasons Page 14 of 16

reasons 357B Ovid silty clay loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes High Ovid 85% Odessa 10% Lakemont 5% 357C Ovid silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes High Ovid 85% Odessa 10% Lakemont 5% 400A Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 3 percent slopes Low Udorthents, Loamy 80% Ontario 5% Palmyra 5% Howard 5% 401D Udorthents, refuse substratum. 0 to 25 percent Not rated Udorthents, refuse substratum 90% slopes PG Pits, gravel and sand Not rated Pits, gravel and sand 75% PQ Pits, quarry Not rated Pits, quarry 80% W Water Not rated Water 100% Page 15 of 16

Options Attribute Name: The ratings in this interpretation indicate the likelihood of death of naturally or artificially propagated tree seedlings, as influenced by soil characteristics, physiographic features, and climatic conditions. Considered in the ratings are flooding, ponding, depth to a water table, content of lime, reaction, available water capacity, soil moisture regime, soil temperature regime, aspect, and slope. The ratings are both verbal and numerical. The soils are described as having a "low," "moderate," or "high" potential for seedling mortality. "Low" indicates that seedling mortality is unlikely. Good performance can be expected, and little or no maintenance is needed. "Moderate" indicates that seedling mortality can occur because one or more soil properties are less than desirable. Fair performance can be expected, and some maintenance is needed. "High" indicates that seedling mortality can occur because of one or more soil properties and that overcoming the unfavorable properties requires special design, extra maintenance, and costly alteration. Numerical ratings indicate gradations between the point at which the potential for seedling mortality is highest (1.00) and the point at which the potential is lowest (0.00). The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen. An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating, can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value to represent the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. The components in the map unit name represent the major soils within a map unit delineation. Minor components make up the balance of the map unit. Great differences in soil properties can occur between map unit components and within short distances. Minor components may be very different from the major components. Such differences could significantly affect use and management of the map unit. Minor components may or may not be documented in the database. The results of aggregation do not reflect the presence or absence of limitations of the components which are not listed in the database. An on-site investigation is required to identify the location of individual map unit components. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding percent composition is recorded. A percent composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be generated. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. The aggregation method "Dominant Condition" first groups like attribute values for the components in a map unit. For each group, percent composition is set to the sum of the percent composition of all components participating in that group. These groups now represent "conditions" rather than components. The attribute value associated with the group with the highest cumulative percent composition is returned. If more than one group shares the highest cumulative percent composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher group value should be returned in the case of a percent composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method represents the dominant condition throughout the map unit only when no tie has occurred. The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a percent composition tie. Page 16 of 16