Pine Island Road Corridor Master Plan

Similar documents
Status Report: MD 355 Project

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Broadway District Specific Plan. Community Workshop #2 February 23,2016

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TODAY

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

The transportation system in a community is an

Route 347. New York State Department of Transportation Region 10, Long Island. THE GREENING of ROUTE 347

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE HURONTARIO-MAIN CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

Section4 Design Vision & Implementation Plan

Access Management: An Overview

DRAFT Civic Center Station Area Plan. Executive Summary

appendix and street interface guidelines

Corridor Transformation Strategy

Green Gables. April 24, 2013

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE GLEN ABBEY GOLF CLUB. STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY (excerpt from the Urban Design Brief) TOWN OF OAKVILLE.

CHAPTER 2: FUTURE LAND USE CONCEPTS

South Fulton Parkway Transit Feasibility Study

Overview of the Plan. The Building Blocks of Centers, Neighborhoods and Network INTERNAL DRAFT

DOWNTOWN GEORGETOWN PLANNING STUDY

Westwind Developments Ltd. PIONEER LANDS AREA STRUCTURE PLAN - PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements

Commercial Node Plan Devine Street/Jackson Blvd. COLUMBIA, SC

Definitions. Average Daily Traffic Demand (ADT): The actual number or projected number of cars that pass a point in a 24-hour period.

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

Small Area Plan. South Gateway

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

GOLDEN MILE SECONDARY PLAN. Community Consultation Meeting #3 June 26, 2018

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

GATEWAY AREA STRUCTURE PLAN

3. Urban Design in the Central Area

RZC Public View Corridors and Gateways

Neighborhood Districts

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

7Page 91 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 7 COMMUNITY CHARACTER

APOLLO BEACH COMMUNITY PLAN Comprehensive Plan Amendment

RESOLUTION NO R

PROPOSED URBAN STRUCTURE

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

THE GARDEN CITY PLAN. City of St. Catharines Official Plan. City of St. Catharines

Behnke Ranch Property, Pasco County: Master Plan Development Approach

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

One of the components of the sustainable, traditional neighborhood is the neighborhood center.

BRANAN FIELD MASTER PLAN

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Chapter 6--Urban Design

BRANAN FIELD MASTER PLAN

9 th Street Sub Area Plan

Wadsworth Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

MORRISVILLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN TOWN COUNCIL PRESENTATION AUGUST 22, 2017

Subarea 4 Indian Creek. Vision The combination of park networks and transportation amenities make Subarea 4 the greenest hub in the Corridor.

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

124 Subarea Visions. Vision Plan. A. Nelessen Associates, INC I Visioning I Planning I Urban Design

Mix of Uses Guide for Transit-Oriented Development MIX OF USES

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

Transportation Land Use Integration & Regional Planning. Don Kostelec, AICP Senior Planner, Louis Berger Group February 1, 2010

Transportation. Strategies for Action

V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

Chapter 6: Community Character

Public Meeting Final Recommendations August 8, 2013

CHAPTER 4: LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

3. Project Description

Complete Streets Guidelines & Implementation Strategy. Public Open House #2 June 12, :30-8:00 pm

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

ATTACHMENT A. Definition of Activity Centers

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

1.0 VISION STATEMENT. December 6, PRINCIPLES

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Issues, Challenges & Opportunities

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

SCTPO Project Summary September 2014

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

Franklin/Myrtle School Small Area Plan Adopted February 18, 2003

Urban Design Brief. Watson Parkway North & Watson Road North Guelph, Ontario. Prepared by Coletara Development

THE 355/270 CORRIDOR:

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

1 Adapted from the Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study by CalTrans, 2006

Transcription:

RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN Figure 9: Del Prado Village District Conceptual Framework The Conceptual Framework (Figure 8) for development of the Pine Island Corridor is to encourage mixed-use development nodes at key intersections with major north-south streets along the Pine Island Road. Pine Island Road is designed to have a modified rural section with curb and gutter and swales for stormwater drainage. The use of curb along the roadway will allow trees and other landscaping material to be planted closer to the travel lanes to create a green boulevard. Major and Minor nodal development is place along the length of the roadway. The access roads parallel to Pine Island are an integral part of the Conceptual Framework and will provide alternative access and alleviate congestion on Pine Island Road. Both Pine Island Road and the access roads will have landscape treatment to denote the character of each. Urban Design Framework The Urban Design Framework (Figures 9 14) illustrates the over-all development vision for the corridor. It is comprised of Mixed Use Villages and Mixed Use Corridor Districts. Mixed Use Village District- Intent The Village District is intended to (contain high traffic generators and) serve as compact urban centers, promoting convenient walking between residential areas and shopping, entertainment and employment opportunities. This District should be organized into park-once districts, to maximize pedestrian environment and minimize traffic between destinations. Pedestrian and bicycle use should be considered as transportation modes, and provide for the convenient utilization of public transit. This District shall provide regulations, which ensure a consistent design theme and complementary palate of materials. Figure 8: Conceptual Framework Retail Village: Philips Place Charlotte, North Carolina 18

Figure 10: Santa Barbara Village District Example of Village Mixed Use Celebration, Florida 19

Figure 11:Surfside Village District Downtown Winter Park, Florida Phillips Place Charlotte, North Carolina Redmond Town Center Redmond, Washington Redmond Town Center Redmond, Washington Winter Park Village Winter Park, Florida 20

The district should provide for a mix of commercial, office, multi-family residential, and civic uses. Public civic space should be provided and function as an organizing element within the Village District. The subdivision of land and the planning of the transportation system of roadways or configuration of blocks within the Village District should respect the desire to maximize roadway connections. Residential uses are encouraged with densities ranging from a minimum of 12 du/ac to 30 du/ac. The Major Village Districts are located close to, but not immediately adjacent to, the following intersections. Del Prado Boulevard (Figure 9) Santa Barbara Boulevard (Figure 10) Surfside Extension (Figure 11) Their access should be from a signalized intersection along Pine Island Road, spaced at approximately a quarter mile (1320 feet) from the major intersection. There should also be access from the major north-south street at the parallel access roads intersections, again approximately a quarter mile from the intersection. Minor Village Districts are planned at: Cultural Park Boulevard (Figure 12) Nicholas Parkway (Figure 13) Burnt Store Road (Figure 14) They will be accessed from signalized intersections with Pine Island Road. The Design Guidelines encourage buildings at the Village Districts entry points (Figure 15) to be built to the sidewalk line along the frontages of north-south entry streets. The main streets within the Village Districts should also be planned with build-to lines, to encourage buildings to line the street frontage. This design strategy will produce a distinctive, traditional village character for the Districts. The special frontages for the Village District along Pine Island Road and other main streets will give these locations high visibility, and reduce the need to provide individual businesses with aggressively noticeable buildings. It is the District that should be the destination, which will benefit all the businesses within it. Again, to help create visibility for individual businesses located in the Districts, Village Gateway signs are recommended at these entry portals. Mixed Use Corridor District-Intent The land between the villages is the Corridor District, which includes uses that are not as high traffic generators including, office, office/warehouse, light manufacturing, institutional (schools, colleges), residential (single family and multi-family), golf courses, larger scale commercial retail (big box over 50,000 square feet) and government uses such as parks and recreation facilities. These areas are accessed at signalized intersections along Pine Island Road, and are connected to the Village Districts by the access road system. Figure 12: Cultural Park Boulevard Village District Figure 14: Burnt Store Village District (iii) Figure 13: Nicholas Parkway Village District (ii) Figure 15: Village Entry Sign Concept 21

Access Road Framework A major contributor to the success of the Land Use Framework and the Mixed Use Village and Corridor Districts is the development of secondary access road system. This system provides alternative parallel (Figure 16a and 16b) access along SR78 which: Provides connection to parcels of land from the limited access points provided by the FDOT access management criteria Provides new opportunity for commercial and mixed use development along a new collector/arterial system Enables traffic circulation between villages without impacting SR 78 Helps maintain the LOS standard requirements on SR78 This access road system is intended to parallel SR78 (Pine Island Road) utilizing a variety of means. These include: The use of existing roads where feasible New four lane divided roads principally along the north side of Pine Island where deep, extensive parcels exist Interconnected parking lots and/or two lane access drives along the south side of Pine Island where parcels are not deep It is recommended that access to the road system from Pine Island Road be limited to the more restrictive criteria of Class II for its entire length including the area east of Cultural Park Boulevard except for parcels that may have developed under the least restrictive criteria. However, certain changes to the strict FDOT criteria are indicated in the plan. Access Control: Signalization Access Control: Directional Left Turn Lane 22

Figure 16a: Transportation Framework (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) 23